
CFPB paralyzed as staff paid to wait, mission dismantled under Trump
The CFPB, established 15 years ago to police banks and financial service providers, has been instrumental in returning some US$21 billion to consumers harmed by predatory practices. Now, the agency's core mission is being dismantled under new leadership, with staff stuck in limbo—paid but prohibited from acting.
"It feels like we're just waiting," said one current employee, who spoke anonymously due to restrictions on speaking publicly. "We show up, check emails, and try not to talk too much. Even small conversations feel risky."
Ten current and former employees, along with industry professionals who once worked closely with the bureau, painted a similar picture: internal communication has all but stopped, and staff feel adrift. The press office no longer responds to inquiries.
While the CFPB dialed back its enforcement under President Donald Trump's first term, it still pursued some consumer protection cases. That shifted under President Joe Biden, when the bureau cracked down on excessive bank fees and probed the growing role of Big Tech in financial services, securing penalties from companies like Apple.
However, the recent return of Trump's influence has reversed course dramatically. The Department of Government Efficiency—now overseen by Elon Musk—called for the CFPB's shutdown, and acting chief Russell Vought ordered employees not to carry out any job-related tasks. The courts temporarily blocked an effort to lay off 1,500 employees, but insiders worry that further cuts are imminent.
Some enforcement actions have already been rolled back. Navy Federal Credit Union, for instance, was allowed to withdraw from an $80 million settlement over unlawful overdraft fees. Toyota also avoided penalties related to questionable loan practices.
The bureau's productivity has plummeted. According to a report by Senator Elizabeth Warren, the CFPB now processes just 2,200 consumer complaints per day, down from around 10,500 before the policy shift.
There have been rare exceptions. The bureau recently settled a case with FirstCash, a national pawn chain, over illegal high-interest loans to service members, resulting in a $9 million fine. However, with looming budget cuts that could slash funding in half, such enforcement actions may become even rarer.
Inside the bureau, morale has cratered. As one employee put it, each week brings "mini-funerals" as colleagues resign rather than endure the uncertainty. For those who remain, the days are quiet, the work is scarce, and the future is uncertain.
"I don't think I'll ever work in public service again," said one current employee, who has been looking for a new job for the past three months.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Star
14 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Rogers Announces Results and Upsize of its Cash Tender Offers for Eight Series of U.S. Dollar Debt Securities
TORONTO, July 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Rogers Communications Inc. ('Rogers' or the 'Company') (TSX: RCI.A and RCI.B; NYSE: RCI) announced (i) the release of the results of its previously announced eight separate offers (the 'Offers') to purchase for cash any and all of the outstanding notes of each series listed in the table below (collectively, the 'Notes'), and (ii) that Rogers is increasing the aggregate Total Consideration payable for all Notes it will accept for purchase in the Offers, excluding accrued but unpaid interest, from the previously announced amount of US$1,250,000,000 to US$1,400,000,000 (the 'Consideration Cap Amount'). The increased Consideration Cap Amount is sufficient to enable Rogers to accept for purchase all (1) 4.350% Senior Notes due 2049, (2) 3.700% Senior Notes due 2049, (3) 4.300% Senior Notes due 2048, (4) 4.500% Senior Notes due 2043 and (5) 5.000% Senior Notes due 2044, in each case, that were validly tendered prior to or at the Expiration Date and not validly withdrawn (as well as all of the Notes of such series that were tendered pursuant to the Guaranteed Delivery Procedures). The Offers were made upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase dated July 11, 2025 relating to the Notes (the 'Offer to Purchase') and the notice of guaranteed delivery attached as Appendix A thereto (the 'Notice of Guaranteed Delivery' and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the 'Tender Offer Documents'). Capitalized terms used but not defined in this news release have the meanings given to them in the Offer to Purchase.


National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Trump's inaugural fund received US$19m from fossil fuel industry, analysis shows
This story was originally published by The Guardian and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration The fossil fuel industry poured more than US$19m into Donald Trump's inaugural fund, accounting for nearly eight per cent of all donations it raised, a new analysis shows, raising concerns about White House's relationship with big oil. The president raised a stunning $239m for his inauguration – more than the previous three inaugural committees took in combined and more than double the previous record – according to data published by the US Federal Election Commission (FEC). The oil and gas sector made a significant contribution to that overall number, found the international environmental and human rights organization Global Witness. The group pulled itemized inaugural fund contribution data released by the FEC in April, and researched each contributor with the help of an in-house artificial intelligence tool. It located 47 contributions to the fund made by companies and individuals linked to the fossil fuel sector, to which Trump has voiced his fealty. On the campaign trail and in his inauguration speech, the president pledged to 'drill, baby, drill'. 'We will be a rich nation again, and it is that liquid gold under our feet that will help to do it,' Trump said in his inaugural address, just hours before he signed a spate of executive orders to 'unleash American energy' and roll back environmental protections. His administration has since worked to boost the oil industry, including by taking aim at city- and state-led fossil fuel accountability efforts, opening up swaths of land to extraction, and cracking down on renewable energy expansion. 'It's no surprise the oil and gas industry handed millions to Donald Trump for his inauguration, and they seem to have reaped a huge return on their investment, said Nicu Calcea, a senior data investigator at Global Witness. Nearly eight per cent of all of the donations raised by Donald Trump's inaugural fund came from the fossil fuel industry, raising concerns about the White House's relationship with Big Oil. Among the oil-linked donors identified, the energy giant Chevron made the largest contribution to Trump's inaugural fund at $2m, tying it for fourth-largest donor overall alongside other givers such as the crypto platform Coinbase and the financial services company Robinhood. Reached for comment, a Chevron spokesperson said: 'Chevron has a long tradition of celebrating democracy by supporting the inaugural committees of both parties. We are proud to have done so again.' ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and Occidental Petroleum each made $1m donations. None of the three companies responded to the Guardian's requests for comment. Altogether, Global Witness identified $19,151,933 in donations from fossil fuel-linked donors. That number is probably an underestimate, it says, because it does not include contributions from unverified energy-linked donors, or from diversified investors and businesses that do not work primarily in oil and gas. Trump's profile of inaugural fund donors starkly contrasts with Joe Biden's; the former president banned contributions to the fund from the oil and gas sector. 'So Trump's day one love-in with the oil and gas industry really tells us whose side he's on,' said Alice Harrison, head of fossil fuel campaigning at Global Witness. Set up as charitable organizations, presidential inaugural funds are used to cover the costs of parades, galas and receptions as a new president enters the White House. Unlike presidential election campaigns, there are no set limits on how much a corporation or US citizen can give to an inaugural committee. Fossil fuel interests poured an additional $96m into Trump's re-election campaign and affiliated political action committees, a January report found. Though that was less than the $1bn


Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Russia launches a major aerial attack on Kyiv hours before high-level talks on support for Ukraine
Russia unleashed one of its largest aerial assaults on Ukraine in recent months, only hours before the U.K. and Germany are to chair a meeting to discuss U.S. President Donald Trump's plans for NATO allies to provide Ukraine with weapons. The attack killed two people and wounded 15, including a 12-year-old, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said.