logo
New federal student loan limits are a 'punch in the face' for aspiring doctors: American Medical Association president

New federal student loan limits are a 'punch in the face' for aspiring doctors: American Medical Association president

CNBC5 days ago
A measure in President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill" that caps federal student loans could make it harder for medical students to finance their education or force them to abandon their medical school plans, experts say.
Starting next year, the legislation caps the amount of federal loans students can borrow for graduate school at $100,000 over a lifetime — and sets a lifetime loan limit of $200,000 for professional programs, such as medical, dental or law school. Grad PLUS loans will also be eliminated entirely. Those changes go into effect for new borrowers on July 1, 2026.
Some experts say the new loan limits will provide a much-needed check on soaring tuition costs, which have jumped significantly in recent decades, outpacing inflation and other household expenses. Higher costs have made college and graduate school seem out of reach for some while saddling others with crippling student loan debt.
More from Personal Finance:These college majors have the best job prospectsFamilies feel confident about paying for college, until tuition bills arriveStudent loan borrowers — how will the end of the SAVE plan impact you? Tell us
Families, too, support having additional guardrails. Roughly two-thirds, or 67%, of parents said there should be limits on how much federal student loan debt students can take on, according to Sallie Mae's annual How America Pays for College report.
However, for aspiring doctors, the limits may mean drastic changes. The average cost of medical school already exceeds $200,000. At private institutions, the average cost is more than $300,000, according to 2024 data from the Association of American Medical Colleges.
"This is now a generation that has a big-time punch in the face," said Bobby Mukkamala, president of the American Medical Association.
"People view medical students as future rich people and that's not the case at all," said Kylie Ruprecht, a third-year student at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine.
"You go into crazy, crazy debt to go into medicine," said Ruprecht, 24, "and then repay those loans over decades."
Ruprecht relies on a combination of unsubsidized student loans and Grad PLUS loans to cover her costs. Once she graduates, she will begin a four-year residency to become an anesthesiologist. It will be years before she is on solid financial footing, she said.
Ruprecht declined to say how much she will owe, in total, when she graduates. Although Ruprecht is grandfathered into the old borrowing limits, her current debt load, with Grad Plus loans, would surpass the new loan caps, she said.
In fact, about 27.5% of medical school students and 60% of those in dentistry programs graduated with more debt in 2020 than is allowed under the new loan limits, according to calculations by higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.
"Medical school is the 'hair on fire' situation because the numbers are big, period, and the gaps between the federal loan limits and the program costs are sizeable," said Ken Ruggiero, co-founder and CEO of private education lender Ascent Funding.
Nearly every year, students and their families are borrowing more to make up the difference. Now, around 44 million Americans owe a combined $1.7 trillion for their education. Roughly 40% of that outstanding federal student loan debt is taken on for master's and PhD programs.
The new legislation "doesn't affect everyone equally," Mukkamala said — it's students from underserved communities who will be less likely to go into the medical field as the new loan limits fall short of the total cost of attendance, which is over $200,000. "If someone like that gets through college and looks at that number, they are going to say, 'no way,'" he said.
According to 2024 projections by the Association of American Medical Colleges, the U.S. was already on track to have a shortage of up to 86,000 physicians by 2036.
"The new annual and aggregate loan limits could create challenges for some medical students to finance their education, resulting in an additional financial barrier to attending medical school and ultimately worsening the current and projected physician shortage," said Kristen Earle, program leader for student financial aid services at the Association of American Medical Colleges.
"We are concerned that this added barrier could deter qualified candidates, particularly low-income students, from pursuing a medical career altogether," Earle said.
It's likely the new limits on federal student loans will spur borrowers to find other lenders to bridge the gap, Earle said. "The changing landscape does present an opportunity for private lenders."
Private student loans often come into play once students have reached the federal loan limits and still need additional education financing.
"The new loan limits for Parent PLUS loans and graduate/professional school loans will shift some borrowing from federal loans to private student loans," Kantrowitz also recently told CNBC. "This will particularly impact low-income students, who are less likely to qualify for private student loans."
Unlike federal loans, private loans are not guaranteed. Private student loan lenders rely on a borrower's credit score to determine eligibility and interest rate.
"We want to lend to people who can afford to pay us back, that's how the model works," said Ascent's Ruggiero.
Private loans also come with fewer safety nets and less flexible repayment options compared with federal loans.
"The idea behind [the loan limits] is great, but it's not putting the burden on the universities. It's putting the burden on students," said Ruprecht, the aspiring anesthesiologist. "It's students who will have to scramble."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

British historian Andrew Lownie tells The Daily Beast Podcast about the trio's relationship.
British historian Andrew Lownie tells The Daily Beast Podcast about the trio's relationship.

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

British historian Andrew Lownie tells The Daily Beast Podcast about the trio's relationship.

Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew were 'all part of the same little group,' British historian and author Andrew Lownie said on The Daily Beast Podcast. Lownie, the author of the forthcoming book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, told host Joanna Coles about what drew the trio together. 'Certainly Donald Trump and Andrew were close. They moved in very much the same circles. They had the same interests in golf, money, and sex,' Lownie said.

Gov. Newsom says he'll back down from redistricting threats if Texas throws out new maps
Gov. Newsom says he'll back down from redistricting threats if Texas throws out new maps

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Newsom says he'll back down from redistricting threats if Texas throws out new maps

WASHINGTON — California Gov. Gavin Newsom said he would drop threats to redraw California's congressional map if red states dropped efforts to alter the political landscape before next year's midterm elections. In a letter to President Donald Trump on Monday, Newsom warned against following through with plans to redraw congressional boundaries in red states in order to protect Republicans' slim majority in Congress, threatening to 'neutralize' any GOP gains with a new map in California. The letter comes as Texas state lawmakers plan to vote on a newly proposed map in the coming weeks that would secure up to five new Republican seats in the U.S. House next November. 'You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy,' Newsom wrote. 'The attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy. This is not what the Founders envisioned, and California cannot stand idly by as this power grab unfolds.' Newsom warned Trump that if he did not 'stand down,' the California governor would be 'forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps' in the Golden State in retaliation. But, he added, if red states agreed to stand down, 'we will happily do the same.' It's unlikely that Trump would agree to reverse his calls for Texas to pass its newly unveiled map that would create new districts in areas that he carried by more than 10 percentage points in the 2024 election. Most of the new districts are in heavily Hispanic areas, a crucial demographic shift that helped secure Trump's victory in November. The Texas Legislature was originally scheduled to vote on the map last week, but those efforts have so far been delayed after Democratic lawmakers fled to blue states such as New York, Illinois and Massachusetts to block any legislative action. Newsom was the first Democratic governor to threaten retaliation, suggesting last month he would look at altering California's districts. The Texas versus California battle has since expanded into a national political war as red and blue states alike have publicly suggested they would look at major changes. However, Newsom could face challenges to changing California's maps as the state has strict laws on redistricting that could make it difficult to adjust boundaries before next November. State law restricts mid-decade redistricting, meaning the state would likely need to pass a constitutional amendment to allow for any changes. Even then, state law requires California to utilize an independent redistricting commission to draw maps, which requires a lengthy vetting process and is designed to ensure little political leverage. Meanwhile, some lawmakers in Congress have openly called for an end to the redistricting efforts — including one Republican who introduced a bill to ban any changes before next November. Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Calif., filed the bill last week to block any new maps from being used in the 2026 midterm elections and nullify any changes that are adopted this year. Kiley introduced the ban in response to possible changes in California, which would likely put him at risk as one of just nine House Republicans from the Golden State. Rep. Blake Moore, R-Utah, said he opposes the push by Texas Republicans to redraw the state's congressional boundaries, making him the highest-ranking GOP lawmaker so far to contradict Trump's demands. 'If Texas does it, California is going to do it, Illinois is going to do it — and Illinois is going to do it worse, in favor of the Democrats, and all of a sudden it's just a free-for-all,' Moore told the Deseret News in an interview last week. 'Every two years, we're going to have redistricting going on constantly instead of the current norm of at least once every 10 years. It's not a perfect system. There's bias constantly involved in this. So yeah, I don't agree with mid-decade redistricting.' The Deseret News has contacted the White House for comment, but has yet to receive it.

South Korean President Lee will travel to Washington for Aug. 25 meeting with Trump
South Korean President Lee will travel to Washington for Aug. 25 meeting with Trump

Washington Post

time28 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

South Korean President Lee will travel to Washington for Aug. 25 meeting with Trump

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea's new President Lee Jae Myung will travel to Washington later this month to meet with U.S. President Donald Trump, Lee's office said Tuesday, for talks on trade and defense cooperation in the face of nuclear-armed North Korea and other threats. Their Aug. 25 summit will follow a July trade deal in which Washington agreed to cut its reciprocal tariff on South Korea to 15% from the initially proposed 25% and to apply the same reduced rate to South Korean cars, the country's top export to the United States.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store