The ugly truth behind baby boomers and Britain's housing crisis
Nearly 10 million homes in England had at least two unused bedrooms last year and were therefore considered under-occupied, according to the latest English Housing Survey.
Pensioners made up the largest share of these homeowners, with around 36pc of Britain's 16 million properties owned by retirees.
The issue is amplifying generational rifts. While pensioners enjoy ever more breathing space, the young are being squeezed into expensive rentals.
It comes as a separate analysis of Office for National Statistics (ONS) research by the Intergenerational Foundation found that the number of young people with no housing wealth is at record highs.
It has become harder for renters to find bigger properties, with the proportion of those with extra bedrooms on the private market falling from 16pc in 2022-2023 to 13pc last year.
The proportion of rental homes with less than 50 square meters of floor space has increased to 18.6pc from 15.3pc a decade ago. This is equivalent to the minimum gross internal floor and storage area by law for a new-build single-bedroom flat for two people – with the absolute minimum for one being 37 square metres.
However, owner-occupied homes are ballooning, with the share of those stretching over 110 square metres increasing from 34.7 to 38pc during this time.
Not only are renters having to live in smaller homes, but the route to becoming a homeowner is getting harder as prices continue to rise.
In 2008-2010, the proportion of 25- to 34-year-olds who have no housing wealth was 35pc. The latest data, which covers 2020-2022, found that 44pc now have no housing wealth.
The average age of a first-time buyer hit nearly 34 last year, according to major lender Barclays, two years higher than at the turn of the century.
The average price of a home in the UK was £289,707 in November 2024, according to the Land Registry – 10 times the average wage for those aged between 22 and 29.
Baby boomers were eyeing up property worth an average of £58,000 at a similar age back in 1990, roughly five times their £12,500 pay packets at the time, meaning their money went about twice as far.
Meanwhile, over-65s are the only group which has not seen an increase in the number of those without property wealth. The proportion of pensioners sitting on property wealth of more than £500,000 has jumped from 5pc in 2008-2010 to 18pc.
'The continued widening of the gulf of housing wealth between generations is deeply concerning,' Toby Whelton, from the Intergenerational Foundation, said.
'If these trends of low homeownership continue for younger generations, it will mean that when younger generations reach state pension age, the majority will not enjoy the same security of owning their own home and will be forced into renting into very old age.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
Netflix Stock (NFLX) Switches on as Penny Pinching Brits Sign-Up for Ads
Shares in streaming giant Netflix (NFLX) were brighter today after cost-conscious Brits helped its U.K. arm rake in record annual profits. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Ad Free Netflix said that pre-tax annual profits at Netflix Services U.K. came in at £63 million in 2024, up from the £60.6 million it achieved in 2023. Its revenues also leapt from £1.66 billion in 2023 to £1.84 billion. Netflix said the increase in its revenue was due to an 11% surge in the average number of paid memberships during the year. It said more than 55% of its new sign-ups had come through its advertising tier while membership on its advertising plan grew by almost 30% quarter over quarter. The number of subscribers has been boosted by the streaming service's crackdown on password sharing in the UK. But, the company is also seeing growth elsewhere in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. During the 12 months, the company also distributed an interim dividend of £50 million to its US parent. In August last year, it also loaned £375 million to Netflix Inc. U.K. Investment In a statement, Netflix said: 'Netflix is a significant contributor to the UK economy – investing $6bn over the last four years and working with over 50,000 cast and crew and 200+ producers to produce British content such as Adolescence, Baby Reindeer and Black Doves that is loved the world over. We're committed for the long term and invest more here than any other country except the US.' Netflix's results contradict previous studies on U.K. viewership. They have revealed how Brits are trying to enhance their viewing experience without the 'annoyance' of adverts during runs of their favourite shows. A recent report in the U.K. found that Brits are spending £5 billion a year just to avoid adverts on major streaming services. The Finder report found that over 31 million UK adults pay for premium, ad-free subscriptions across Netflix, Amazon (AMZN) Prime, Disney (DIS) + and Spotify (SPOT). Good news on the surface for streaming providers but perhaps storing up a problem over the long-term if advertisers begin to feel snubbed. Overall, however, Netflix feels optimistic about the future. In the group's Q2 earnings last month, it increased its full-year revenue guidance to $44.8 billion to $45.2 billion, up from the prior guide of $43.5 billion to $44.5 billion. This further bolstered the Netflix stock price – see above – which has soared over 30% this year. Is NFLX a Good Stock to Buy Now? On TipRanks, NFLX has a Moderate Buy consensus based on 25 Buy, 11 Hold and 1 Sell ratings. Its highest price target is $1,600. NFLX stock's consensus price target is $1,395.19, implying a 16.61% upside.


New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Digging for mineral independence, UK regime change is coming and other commentary
Defense beat: Digging for Mineral Independence For the first time in 70 years, 'the United States opened a rare earth mine,' reports RealClearInvestigation's James Varney. 'Ramaco's Brook Mine in Ranchester,' Wyo., is 'part of a critical effort to free the U.S. from China's stranglehold on the minerals.' 'China is the top producer of 30 of the 50 minerals the U.S. considers critical, and of 90% of the 17 that comprise rare earths.' Team Trump wants change, hence Energy Secretary Chris Wright's presence at the mine opening. But mineral independence won't be easy. 'It takes more than seven years to secure a permit for mining something other than coal or gravel on public land.' The prez is 'trying to remove some of the industry's obstacles,' yet 'the future pace and success of rare earth extraction in the U.S. remains decidedly uncertain.' Foreign desk: UK Regime Change Is Coming Advertisement 'Britain's regime forfeited its people's trust by bungling the economy, bringing in millions of immigrants, and failing to defend the borders,' argues Dominic Green at The Wall Street Journal. 'It now suppresses legitimate responses by trying to interdict private communications and isolate the British from their free-speaking American cousins. But any teenager with a virtual private network can get around the Great Firewall of London.' So Brits 'have turned against the regime,' and 'the regime is turning against the people' — but 'it can't silence them all.' Prime Minister Keir Starmer & Co. 'will go down with the ship. It's still unclear what kind of regime can refloat Britain and restore its traditional freedoms. Still, regime change is coming.' Liberal: Dems' Disastrous Denial on Disorder 'It's just a fact,' warns the Liberal Patriot's Ruy Teixeira, 'that most Americans think the social order is falling apart.' Polls show that 66% 'flat-out believe 'society is broken,'' which 'raises troubling questions about the current state of the Democratic Party.' Democrats 'don't recognize' that voters who observe the 'rolling crisis of the social order' also think 'Democrats are utterly useless at resolving it.' That Dems won't even acknowledge the problem leads many to suspect 'most Democrats are basically okay with their place in the broken social order.' Dems must admit that they, and 'not just Republicans,' bear 'grave responsibility' for a collapsing social order. Instead, 'things fall apart and Democrats are currently just poking around in the wreckage.' Advertisement Culture watch: Academia's Sydney Problem That Sydney Sweeney ad campaign 'didn't 'threaten academia because it was political. It threatened academia because it wasn't political at all,' claim Kevin Waldman & Forest Romm at The Hill. 'In showcasing her 'great jeans,' Sweeney doesn't posture. She doesn't apologize for her 'privilege' — whether attractiveness, 'whiteness', or able-bodiedness.' She 'simply exists.' The ensuing furor 'was incubated in elite institutions,' where 'today's curricula often encourage students to devalue and disavow any aspect of identity not classified as 'marginalized,' such as maleness or heterosexuality.' 'A figure like Sweeney — marked by ease, absence of political dog whistles, and comfort in a traditionally beautiful body — quietly opposes this climate' and so 'represents a loss of control for the prevailing ideological apparatus, which demands punishment.' Libertarian: An Unconstitutional Alcohol Ruling Advertisement Though the 'Supreme Court has struck down protectionist state wine and liquor laws,' this week 'a federal appellate court upheld an Indiana law that forbids out-of-state retailers from shipping wine directly to Indiana consumers,' fumes Reason's Damon Root. The Constitution's 'Dormant Commerce Clause' forbids states 'from erecting their own interstate economic barriers,' and the new ruling also 'would seem to be at odds with the principles of interstate free trade embraced by' the Supreme Court in two prior decisions. This 'may not sound like the most pressing legal dispute of the day,' but 'the Constitution does protect the right to earn a living free from arbitrary and unnecessary government interference.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stardust Solar Energy Inc. Announces Adoption of New By-Law No. 1 with Advance Notice Provisions
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - August 8, 2025) - Stardust Solar Energy Inc. (TSXV: SUN) (OTCQB: SUNXF) (FSE: 6330) ("Stardust Solar" or the "Corporation") today announces that its board of directors (the "Board") has repealed its current Canada Business Corporations Act By-Laws and By-Law Amendments and approved a new Canada Business Corporations Act by-law being a by-law relating generally to the conduct of the business and affairs of the Corporation ("By-Law No. 1") and including and introducing an advance notice requirement in connection with shareholders intending to nominate directors in certain circumstances (the "Advance Notice Provisions"). By-Law No. 1 sets a deadline by which such shareholders must notify the Corporation in writing of an intention to nominate directors prior to any meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected and set forth the information that the shareholder must include in the notice for it to be valid. The Board believes that its By-Law No. 1 provides a clear and transparent process for shareholders to follow if they intend to nominate directors and provides a reasonable time frame for shareholders to notify the Corporation of their intention to nominate directors. The Board will be able to evaluate the proposed nominees' qualifications and suitability as directors and respond as appropriate in the best interests of the Corporation. In the case of an annual meeting of shareholders, notice to the Corporation must be made not less than 30 and not more than 65 days prior to the date of the annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting is to be held on a date that is less than 40 days after the date on which the first public announcement of the date of the annual meeting was made, notice may be made not later than the close of business on the 10th day following such public announcement. In the case of a special meeting of shareholders (which is not also an annual meeting), notice to the Corporation must be made not later than the close of business on the 15th day following the day on which the first public announcement of the date of the special meeting was made. By-Law No. 1 is effective immediately and will be placed before shareholders for ratification at the annual and special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation on September18, 2025 (the "Meeting"). By-Law No. 1 is in effect until it is confirmed or rejected by shareholders at the Meeting and, if By-Law No. 1 is confirmed at the Meeting, it will continue in effect in the form in which it was so confirmed. About Stardust Solar Energy Inc. Stardust Solar is a North American franchisor of renewable energy installation services, specializing in solar panels (PV), energy storage systems, and electric vehicle supply equipment. The Company equips entrepreneurs with branded business management services, cutting-edge equipment, and comprehensive support, including marketing, sales, engineering, and project management. With franchises across Canada and the United States, Stardust Solar drives the adoption of clean energy solutions that boost economic development and create a more sustainable future. This press release was prepared on behalf of the Board of Directors, which accepts full responsibility for its content. STARDUST SOLAR ENERGY INC. Mark TadrosCEO, Chairman and Director Media and Investor Contacts: Steve RickabyCommunications and Investor RelationsPhone: 1-672-472-1345Email: steve@ DISCLAIMER The information in this news release includes certain information and statements about management's view of future events, expectations, plans, and prospects that constitute forward-looking statements, including statements relating to the adoption, effectiveness, and potential ratification of New By-Law No. 1, the timing and outcome of the upcoming shareholder meeting, and the anticipated impact of the Advance Notice Provisions on the Corporation's corporate governance. These statements are based upon assumptions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Because of these risks and uncertainties, and as a result of a variety of factors, actual results, expectations, achievements, or performance may differ materially from those anticipated and indicated by these forward-looking statements. Any number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements or from future results. Although the Corporation believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurances that the expectations of any such statements will prove to be correct. Except as required by law, the Corporation disclaims any intention and assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, or otherwise. Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. To view the source version of this press release, please visit Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data