India welcomes return of ancient Buddhist relics after controversial Hong Kong auction axed
In May, Sotheby's pushed back the auction of the jewels after India demanded a halt to the sale.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday called the return of the relics a 'joyous day' in a post on X.
'It would make every Indian proud that the sacred Piprahwa relics of Bhagwan Buddha have come home after 127 long years,' he also said, using the Hindi term for Lord Buddha.
The Piprahwa relics, which consist of pearls, rubies, topaz, sapphires, and patterned gold sheets, date back to the Ashokan era of the Mauryan Empire, around 240-200 BC.
They were discovered by British estate manager William Claxton Peppé in 1898 in the present-day northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. The jewels were identified by an inscription as belonging to the Buddha, who died around two centuries prior.
The relics represent one of India's most important archaeological discoveries and hold great importance to Buddhists worldwide, according to a press release published by India's Ministry of Culture on Wednesday.
'These sacred relics highlight India's close association with Bhagwan Buddha and his noble teachings,' Modi added. 'It also illustrates our commitment to preserving and protecting different aspects of our glorious culture.'
'Enshrined by His followers around the 3rd century BCE, these relics have long held immense spiritual value for the global Buddhist community,' the ministry said.
'Historic outcome'
Sotheby's told HKFP on Wednesday that the return of the relics was a 'historic outcome,' after a two-month search for a suitable custodian for the gems.
'Today is the culmination of our close collaboration with the Peppé family, the Government of India and the newly-announced owners of the Gems – the Godrej Industries Group. Now concluded, this sale will see the permanent return of the Piprahwa Gems to India where they will be on public display for years to come,' said Sotheby's in a written statement.
The ministry said a ceremony to formally unveil the relics is in the works.
'The sacred Piprahwa relics will be formally unveiled during a special ceremony and placed on public display, allowing citizens and global visitors to pay homage and witness these rare artefacts,' the ministry added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
2 days ago
- HKFP
Gov't-supported youth climate scheme accepting funds from ExxonMobil, world's 5th largest historic polluter
A government-supported youth climate ambassadorship programme is accepting funding from a fossil fuel giant, a move one environmental scholar has called 'hypocritical.' Civic Exchange's annual Young Environment Ambassador (YEA) Programme – launched in 2021 to 'empower the next generation of environmental leaders' – counts ExxonMobil among its three funding organisations. The petrochemical company told HKFP that the funding spans the programme's entire duration. The other two funding organisations listed on the YEA webpage include Swire Properties and the Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation HK. Several government departments and the Martine Museum are listed as supporters. The US-headquartered oil and gas firm is rated the fifth top historic polluter by emissions, according to an Influence Map report based on 2023 data. It has been responsible for 2.76 per cent of all global carbon dioxide emissions, behind the former Soviet Union, China between 1945 and 2004, and fellow oil firms Saudi Aramco and Chevon. When approached by HKFP, Civic Exchange did not respond as to how much ExxonMobil contributed, what proportion of funds were involved or why they were accepted as a programme sponsor. However, Executive Director Lawrence Iu said on Tuesday that the think tank aimed to 'engage stakeholders' in the city's most pressing environmental challenges: 'We maintain full editorial and programme independence, and all funders—regardless of sector—play no role in shaping our priorities or directing our work.' Though the YEA website hails Swedish environmentalist Greta Thunberg, the activist has repeatedly criticised the involvement of oil giants at climate talks. 'Hypocritical in the extreme' On July 19, the YEA programme onboarded 30 Form 3 to Form 5 students at a ceremony attended by Under Secretary for Environment and Ecology Diane Wong. In response to HKFP on Tuesday, ExxonMobil Hong Kong said it invests in the communities where they operate, though it also dodged questions over the proportion and amount of funds involved in the YEA sponsorship. 'We engage with key stakeholders, including governments and NGOs, to identify the best way to support each community's unique development goals. We often participate in public-private partnerships to create long-term, positive economic and social development… We do not interfere in how the funding is utilized within the programme or the programme's operation,' ExxonMobil Hong Kong said. Paul G. Harris, professor of global and environmental studies at the Education University of Hong Kong, told HKFP on Thursday that – even if not intended – Civic Exchange may have helped the oil firm greenwash their practices. '[F]or any organisation that claims to care about the environment, and the climate crisis in particular, to accept funding from Exxon seems hypocritical in the extreme,' Harris said. 'It's hard to identify any corporation — or indeed any entity — anywhere in the world that has done more to both cause the climate crisis and, very importantly, to sow doubt about the need for urgent action to curtail the use of fossil fuels.' 'Civic Exchange should know better, at least if it wants to be trusted on any environmental credentials, than to join the list of organizations that have accepted funding from Exxon. Civic Exchange may enjoy a financial windfall from Exxon's support, but the result is moral bankruptcy. Alas, in a world — and a city — addicted to fossil fuels, this may not harm Civic Exchange's bottom line. Money talks,' he added. In response to HKFP on Wednesday, local environmentalist Paule De La Poype questioned whether it is 'better for ExxonMobil to be supporting this kind of youth program, or to continue funding climate change denying scientific reports, given its historic record in that regard.' She said securing funds can be difficult, though it would be preferable if oil firms were not involved. She added that it would be essential to ensure ExxonMobil does not interfere in the programme: 'Perhaps having an external observer supervising the preparation and delivery would be a way for Civic Exchange to reassure the public.' 5th top historic polluter, 15th in 2023 In 2023, ExxonMobil was 15th top polluting entity of that year, according to the Influence Map report. The company was also a driving force of climate change denialism until the mid-2000s. Though it has since acknowledged that burning fossil fuels adds to global warming, a 2023 Wall Street Journal report said that a culture of denialism continued internally for years afterwards. When HKFP cited the report – which was based on the company's own internal documents – ExxonMobil said that 'debating the past may generate interesting headlines but as we have said, time and time again, climate change is real, and we have an entire business dedicated to reducing emissions.' 'We are pursuing up to US$30 billion in lower emission investments between 2025 and 2030, which include carbon capture and storage (CCS), hydrogen, lithium, and lower emission fuels (LEF), among others,' the firm added, saying it was the first supplier of renewable diesel for public road use. On Tuesday, the Independent reported that the oil giant is one of several facing a lawsuit in Honolulu, Hawaii over their historic greenhouse gas emissions. Last year, 50 leading scientists warned that global warming has accelerated at an 'unprecedented' pace, saying the window to limit rising temperatures within internationally-set targets was closing.
HKFP
3 days ago
- HKFP
India welcomes return of ancient Buddhist relics after controversial Hong Kong auction axed
Ancient jewels linked to Buddha's remains have been returned to India following the postponement of a controversial auction in Hong Kong, India's prime minister has said. In May, Sotheby's pushed back the auction of the jewels after India demanded a halt to the sale. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday called the return of the relics a 'joyous day' in a post on X. 'It would make every Indian proud that the sacred Piprahwa relics of Bhagwan Buddha have come home after 127 long years,' he also said, using the Hindi term for Lord Buddha. The Piprahwa relics, which consist of pearls, rubies, topaz, sapphires, and patterned gold sheets, date back to the Ashokan era of the Mauryan Empire, around 240-200 BC. They were discovered by British estate manager William Claxton Peppé in 1898 in the present-day northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. The jewels were identified by an inscription as belonging to the Buddha, who died around two centuries prior. The relics represent one of India's most important archaeological discoveries and hold great importance to Buddhists worldwide, according to a press release published by India's Ministry of Culture on Wednesday. 'These sacred relics highlight India's close association with Bhagwan Buddha and his noble teachings,' Modi added. 'It also illustrates our commitment to preserving and protecting different aspects of our glorious culture.' 'Enshrined by His followers around the 3rd century BCE, these relics have long held immense spiritual value for the global Buddhist community,' the ministry said. 'Historic outcome' Sotheby's told HKFP on Wednesday that the return of the relics was a 'historic outcome,' after a two-month search for a suitable custodian for the gems. 'Today is the culmination of our close collaboration with the Peppé family, the Government of India and the newly-announced owners of the Gems – the Godrej Industries Group. Now concluded, this sale will see the permanent return of the Piprahwa Gems to India where they will be on public display for years to come,' said Sotheby's in a written statement. The ministry said a ceremony to formally unveil the relics is in the works. 'The sacred Piprahwa relics will be formally unveiled during a special ceremony and placed on public display, allowing citizens and global visitors to pay homage and witness these rare artefacts,' the ministry added.
AllAfrica
4 days ago
- AllAfrica
Trump's tariff threat shows US-India aren't really allies
For years, India has proudly touted its 'comprehensive global strategic partnership' with the United States as a cornerstone of its foreign policy. New Delhi's diplomats, defense chiefs, and prime ministers have invoked the US alliance as a sign of India's rise — a symbol that it has stepped out of the post-colonial shadow and into the ranks of major global powers. But if this week's events are any indication, those claims may be more illusion than reality. On Tuesday (July 29), US President Donald Trump — the presumptive GOP nominee and still a loud voice in global politics — threatened to impose tariffs of up to 25% on Indian imports if a long-pending trade deal remains unresolved. 'They are going to pay 25%,' Trump said bluntly, adding with characteristic paradox, 'They're my friends.' At the same time, Trump once again claimed that during the recent India-Pakistan military flare-up — Operation Sindoor and Operation Bunyan ul Marsoos — five aircraft were 'shot down.' Whether intentional or not, the comment lent weight to Pakistani assertions and left India scrambling to control the narrative of what was billed as a decisive show of strength. India's foreign policy establishment has long pitched Washington as its most critical strategic partner. Defense pacts, intelligence cooperation, and joint military exercises — particularly naval drills in the Indo-Pacific — were presented as evidence of deepening ties. But Trump's tariff threat now lays bare a fundamental truth: this relationship is still largely transactional, not transformational. It was under Trump's first term that India lost preferential trade benefits under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). Tariff disputes escalated. US tech firms battled India's data localization laws. Now, the threat of 25% duties shows that the US remains willing to punish India economically, regardless of strategic rhetoric. What kind of 'major defense partner,' as India is officially designated, faces the same hardball tactics reserved for adversaries? And then came Trump's battlefield commentary. During a campaign stop, Trump repeated a now-familiar claim: that he helped broker peace between India and Pakistan during their May 2025 conflict, and that five fighter jets were downed during the standoff. India has never publicly confirmed such losses. Pakistani officials, however, have claimed they downed multiple Indian Rafales. Trump's statement — true or not — undermines India's narrative of military supremacy. When the world's most recognizable political figure asserts that India lost five jets, and India cannot decisively refute it, it casts doubt on New Delhi's transparency, competence, and strategic control. This double blow — economic coercion and military humiliation — has serious consequences for India's legitimacy in the Indo-Pacific. India wants to be seen as a credible counterweight to China, a regional anchor for democratic values and security cooperation. But if its most important Western ally is treating it as a disposable trading partner and publicly amplifying its military setbacks, that legitimacy suffers. Smaller regional powers — from Vietnam to the Maldives — will begin to ask: Can India really lead? Or is it a middle power still vulnerable to both US pressure and Chinese encirclement? The answer is clear: Pakistan and China. China benefits from the growing discord between Washington and New Delhi, while Pakistan — once sidelined in Indo-Pacific strategies — now finds itself vindicated. Trump's 'five jets' statement lends legitimacy to Pakistan's military claims and reinforces the message that India is not the regional hegemon it claims to be. India may continue to declare that it is a reliable, indispensable US partner. But when economic threats come faster than trade deals — and when public narratives on military engagements are shaped by Trump, not Delhi — the gap between rhetoric and reality is impossible to ignore. Strategic partnerships are not built on joint statements and ceremonial summits. They are tested under pressure — in moments like this. And right now, the US-India partnership looks more fragile than firm. Rashid Siddiqui is a student of MPhil Economics at the University of the Punjab. He may be reached at rashidsidiqui84@
