All you need to know about the Brazilian woman NASA fact-checked over viral mars and moon mission claims
NASA
astronaut Bill McArthur through private firm Titan Space.
The post garnered over 83,000 likes and positioned her as Brazil's first female astronaut, but NASA quickly discredited her claims. In a public statement, the agency clarified that Peixoto is 'not a NASA employee, principal investigator, or astronaut candidate,' and that her only involvement was a student workshop, not formal employment or training. 'It would be inappropriate to claim NASA affiliation,' the agency added.
Further questions arose around Peixoto's academic credentials. The Federal University of Minas Gerais confirmed she was dismissed in 2023, while Columbia University denied she had ever enrolled, contradicting her claim of pursuing a master's in quantum computing. Her since-deleted LinkedIn also listed unverifiable affiliations with NASA, MIT, and Germany's Max Planck Society.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
After 35 Years, Her Jewelry Is Nearly Gone
The Heritage Journal
Read More
Undo
Titan Space initially acknowledged her but later clarified she is not listed among the astronauts for its planned 2029 mission. The company, which lacks FAA approval for human spaceflight, offers commercial flights for a fee or by invitation. Their official press release did not include Peixoto's name, and no further details of her involvement have been made public.
Following the backlash, Peixoto's team released a statement insisting she never claimed NASA selected her, but evidence later showed her Instagram post had been edited. Her case serves as a cautionary tale about self-promotion in the age of social media, where inflated claims can quickly collide with institutional standards and public accountability.
Live Events
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Wharton professor calls out illusive ‘TikTok science': Says, ‘Beware of mistaking familiarity for fluency'
Synopsis Adam Grant cautions against relying on TikTok for science education, highlighting the risk of overconfidence from simplified content. He warns that brief soundbites create an illusion of understanding, potentially leading to flawed judgments. Grant emphasizes that true expertise requires in-depth study, not just familiarity with viral clips, urging a balance between accessibility and rigorous learning. iStock Adam Grant warns against overconfidence from TikTok science lessons. He says short videos cannot replace in-depth study. Simplified content makes people think they know more than they do. (Image: iStock) Scrolling through TikTok, Shorts or Instagram reels for quick science lessons may feel enlightening, but according to Wharton professor Adam Grant, it could be leaving people dangerously overconfident in their knowledge. Grant, a best-selling author and one of the world's most influential management thinkers, took to social media to warn against the rising trend of bite-sized science content. His message was clear: simplified soundbites cannot replace the depth of systematic study. 'TikTok science can leave you overconfident in your knowledge,' Grant wrote in his post. 'Simplifying complex ideas makes them more compelling, but also fosters an illusion of deep understanding. Beware of mistaking familiarity for fluency. Soundbites aren't substitutes for systematic study.'To back up his warning, Grant cited two academic papers: A new dimension of simplified science communication: the easiness effect of science popularization in animated video abstracts The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople's reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information Both studies explore how people are more likely to trust their own judgment when presented with simplified scientific explanations, even if their actual expertise is limited. — AdamMGrant (@AdamMGrant) According to the paper The Seduction of Easiness , when participants were given scientific arguments that appeared simple, they felt more confident in evaluating the claims themselves and were less likely to defer to expert opinions. The researchers noted that this false sense of understanding could lead to misguided conclusions, especially in areas requiring nuanced knowledge. The findings highlight what Grant calls the 'illusion of fluency'—where being familiar with a concept through simplified content creates a false impression of mastery. As a renowned organizational psychologist and Wharton's top-rated professor for seven consecutive years, Adam Grant's voice carries weight beyond academia. His concern about oversimplified science is not just about TikTok. It reflects a larger cultural shift where quick consumption of knowledge, driven by social media platforms, risks replacing in-depth learning. Grant's caution serves as a reminder that true understanding requires more than viral clips or catchy infographics. While platforms like TikTok make science accessible, they can also blur the line between awareness and warning struck a chord with many online users, who echoed Grant's concerns. One commenter noted that reels and shorts often 'sensationalize complex topics in 30 seconds, which is an injustice to knowledge.' Others agreed that while TikTok may spark curiosity, true mastery requires patience, depth, and critical thinking. Several pointed out that the culture of bite-sized content has its advantages in accessibility, but it should never be mistaken for a substitute for rigorous study and debate. As one user summed it up, 'There's no replacement for deep studying, diving into sources, and examining both pros and cons.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Wharton professor calls out illusive ‘TikTok science': Says, ‘Beware of mistaking familiarity for fluency'
Scrolling through TikTok, Shorts or Instagram reels for quick science lessons may feel enlightening, but according to Wharton professor Adam Grant, it could be leaving people dangerously overconfident in their knowledge. Grant, a best-selling author and one of the world's most influential management thinkers, took to social media to warn against the rising trend of bite-sized science content . His message was clear: simplified soundbites cannot replace the depth of systematic study . The Danger of 'Easy Science' 'TikTok science can leave you overconfident in your knowledge,' Grant wrote in his post. 'Simplifying complex ideas makes them more compelling, but also fosters an illusion of deep understanding. Beware of mistaking familiarity for fluency. Soundbites aren't substitutes for systematic study.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo To back up his warning, Grant cited two academic papers: A new dimension of simplified science communication : the easiness effect of science popularization in animated video abstracts The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople's reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information Both studies explore how people are more likely to trust their own judgment when presented with simplified scientific explanations, even if their actual expertise is limited. — AdamMGrant (@AdamMGrant) According to the paper The Seduction of Easiness , when participants were given scientific arguments that appeared simple, they felt more confident in evaluating the claims themselves and were less likely to defer to expert opinions. The researchers noted that this false sense of understanding could lead to misguided conclusions, especially in areas requiring nuanced knowledge. The findings highlight what Grant calls the 'illusion of fluency'—where being familiar with a concept through simplified content creates a false impression of mastery. Why Grant's Warning Matters As a renowned organizational psychologist and Wharton's top-rated professor for seven consecutive years, Adam Grant's voice carries weight beyond academia. His concern about oversimplified science is not just about TikTok. It reflects a larger cultural shift where quick consumption of knowledge, driven by social media platforms, risks replacing in-depth learning. Grant's caution serves as a reminder that true understanding requires more than viral clips or catchy infographics. While platforms like TikTok make science accessible, they can also blur the line between awareness and expertise. Netizens React The warning struck a chord with many online users, who echoed Grant's concerns. One commenter noted that reels and shorts often 'sensationalize complex topics in 30 seconds, which is an injustice to knowledge.' Others agreed that while TikTok may spark curiosity, true mastery requires patience, depth, and critical thinking. Several pointed out that the culture of bite-sized content has its advantages in accessibility, but it should never be mistaken for a substitute for rigorous study and debate. As one user summed it up, 'There's no replacement for deep studying, diving into sources, and examining both pros and cons.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Dark myth tied to horned ‘Frankenstein rabbits' spark fear across US state as public told to stay away
Sightings of rabbits with tentacles or horns coming from their heads and near their mouths in northern Colorado in the United States have caused widespread concern among local residents. Images of rabbits with this bizarre affliction have made waves across social media, with many likening their strange visage to that of Frankenstein's monster or an undead zombie. Rabbits with horn-like growths have taken the internet by storm in recent weeks, as some have compared them to a mythical creature known in popular Western folklore. Some have described the animals as "Frankenstein-", "zombie-" and "demon-rabbits". The rabbits are suffering from a relatively harmless disease called Shope Papilloma Virus , according to Colorado Parks and Wildlife. The disease is mainly found in America's Midwest, according to the University of Missouri, and is more noticeable in the summer, when the fleas and ticks that spread the virus are most active. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo ALSO READ: $1,390 stimulus check in your bank account soon? IRS' crucial update for millions of Americans Jackalope mythical creature tied to Zombie rabbits? The virus likely influenced the centuries-old jackalope myth in North America, which told of a rabbit with antlers or horns, among other animal variations. The disease in rabbits also contributed to scientists' knowledge about the connection between viruses and cancer, such as the human papillomavirus that causes cervical cancer. The virus in rabbits was named after Dr. Richard E Shope, a professor at The Rockefeller University who discovered the disease in cottontails in the 1930s. Live Events According to a report in The US Sun, many have pointed out that the sick animals look a lot like jackalopes. The combination was started by taxidermists in Douglas, Wyoming, during the 1930s. Douglas Herrick, alongside his brother, Ralph, came back from hunting one day and threw a jackrabbit body on the ground next to deer horns. The brothers put the two things together and there, a jackalope was born. ALSO READ: Why Target ousted CEO Brian Cornell after he turned the US retail giant into a $100 billion powerhouse Legends about the jackalope have taken many forms—some describe them as 'killer rabbits,' while others claim the creatures can flawlessly mimic a human voice, even echoing the cowboy songs once sung around campfires. According to the Douglas, Wyoming, tourism website, these mythical animals are also said to have a peculiar taste for whiskey. Douglas, the town where the jackalope legend was born, has fully embraced the creature, turning it into a symbol of local culture. Statues of jackalopes can be found throughout the town, a towering 13-foot cutout greets visitors on a nearby hillside, and the animal proudly appears on the city's official logo. ALSO READ: Top 10 highest paying jobs in US What is SPV virus? A viral disease causing wart-like tumors on rabbits, mainly on their heads, ears, and eyelids is linked to Shope Papilloma Virus. The illness causes wart-like tumors on the little animals, and is spread by biting insects. According to Van Hoose, the infected animals are most common in the summer months when insects (such as fleas and ticks) are more prevalent. Kara Van Hoose, a spokesperson for Colorado Parks and Wildlife, told The Associated Press that the agency has recently received an influx of calls about the infected rabbits. While people should stay away from the wild rabbits, the virus can only be transferred from rabbit to rabbit, not rabbit to human or other pets. Despite that, Van Hoose has warned people not to touch or go near the rabbits, or any other wild animal. 'That's what we tell everyone with wildlife,' she explained to Time. 'It's just practicing those really smart wildlife principles of keeping your distance, not feeding them, and not trying to step in and help, because there's nothing we can really do.'
