logo
Taiwan downgrades Chiang Kai-shek's mausoleum to ‘camp area' as it grapples with legacy

Taiwan downgrades Chiang Kai-shek's mausoleum to ‘camp area' as it grapples with legacy

The Star12-05-2025

Chiang Kai-shek's mausoleum has officially been consigned to history, as Taiwan's military reclassified the site in the city of Taoyuan as a 'camp area' – the latest move by the island's independence-leaning authorities to erase the legacy of the former Kuomintang (KMT) leader.
The mausoleum of Chiang's son and successor, Chiang Ching-kuo, located just 2.2km (1.4 miles) from his father's tomb, was also reclassified, according to a notice issued by the island's defence ministry on April 22.
The two sites, which house the preserved remains of the two former leaders, will no longer be referred to as 'mausoleums' or 'spirit-worship facilities', according to the announcement.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
It said the elder Chiang's resting place, previously known as the Cihu Mausoleum, would be renamed the 'Cihu Camp Area', while his son's Daxi Mausoleum would be designated as the 'Daxi Camp Area'.
In the announcement, the military said the revised guidelines reflected updated administrative needs and the 2014 reclassification of Taoyuan as a metropolitan area.
But Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers argued that the move signalled a deeper shift in the island's memory – part of transitional justice reforms aimed at removing what they saw as symbols of dictatorship and authoritarian rule.
For decades, the military had referred to the sites using terms traditionally reserved for royalty, such as 'mausoleum' and 'paying respects to the exalted spirit'.
Pro-independence voices have long criticised this reverence towards the Chiangs, arguing it glorified a legacy of political repression and martial law. These criticisms intensified in 2000 when the DPP first gained power and have grown louder since 2016.
The move is likely to reinforce Beijing's perception that Taipei is trying to erase its common history with the mainland. Chiang, despite fighting the Communists in China's civil war and being seen as an enemy by Beijing his entire life, had sought to bring the mainland and Taiwan under the same rule – that of the Republic of China.
In recent years, the Chiang family has been viewed more favourably on the mainland as a historical link between Taiwan and mainland China.
Under the revised guidelines, the phrase 'coffin viewing area' is retained only for the specific rooms housing the Chiangs' remains, while the broader sites are classified simply as military camp areas.
'The term 'mausoleum' typically refers to imperial tombs,' said DPP lawmaker Chiu Chih-wei during an April 16 legislative session. 'The military's duty is to defend the country, not to guard the graves of dictators.'
Chiu has also demanded the military withdraw its ceremonial honour guards from the sites, arguing they were a misuse of public resources. He noted the current deployment had been based on a 2007 directive issued by then Taoyuan county chief Eric Chu Li-luan – now KMT chairman – as a tourism initiative.
'But how many tourists still go there today?' Chiu said. 'If we continue this, does it mean any local shrine or memorial can request military guards, too?'
In response, the defence ministry said it would convene a meeting later this month with the Presidential Office, cabinet, and Taoyuan city officials to evaluate whether continued military presence was warranted.
Taiwanese Defence Minister Wellington Koo Li-hsiung added that relocating the Chiangs' remains to the Wuzhishan Military Cemetery for permanent burial might offer a solution.
He noted that Chiang Fang-liang, widow of Chiang Ching-kuo, had written to the ministry in 2004 requesting such a move, and Chen Shui-bian – Taiwan's leader at the time – had endorsed the plan. However, the relocation has yet to take place.
Chiang Kai-shek died in 1975 and was placed at the Cihu site in Taoyuan, pending eventual burial in mainland China, from which he fled after losing the Chinese civil war in 1949.
His son, Chiang Ching-kuo, died in 1988 and was laid to rest in nearby Daxi. Their plan was to be buried in their ancestral hometown once reunification was achieved through the KMT's recapture of the mainland – a goal now seen as impossible.
Beijing, which sees Taiwan as part of China to be reunited by force if necessary, has ramped up military pressure on Taiwan since Tsai Ing-wen was elected the island's leader in 2016 and refused to accept the one-China principle.
Most countries, including the US, do not recognise Taiwan as an independent state, but Washington is opposed to any attempt to take the self-governed island by force and is committed to arming Taiwan.
Since passing a transitional justice law in 2017, the DPP government has accelerated efforts to remove symbols of Chiang Kai-shek's rule, revise historical narratives, and blame the late Chiang for past abuses.
Thousands of statues of the elder Chiang have been removed from parks, schools, and military facilities. The campaign aims to break the legacy of martial law and authoritarian rule led by Chiang, which defined much of the history of Taiwan in the 20th century.
One major milestone came in July 2024, when ceremonial honour guards inside the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall in Taipei ended their 44-year vigil. The military's rifle-twirling ritual, long a popular tourist attraction, was moved outside to the public plaza in front of the hall after public consultation.
This year marks the 50th anniversary of Chiang Kai-shek's death. In April, civil society groups launched a campaign urging the government to close the main hall in Taipei and get rid of authoritarian symbols – including place names, statues, and currency bearing Chiang's image.
'Taiwan truly doesn't need a dictator's memorial hall,' said Michelle Wang, chairwoman of the Koo Kwang-ming Foundation. 'We must face our history honestly and move forward.'
Not everyone agrees. Former Taiwanese leader Ma Ying-jeou has defended Chiang's legacy, saying it was 'a bit excessive' to label him a dictator.
'As a political leader, Chiang bore responsibility for certain wrongdoings,' Ma said. 'But his contributions to Taiwan outweigh his mistakes. Having a memorial hall for him is not unreasonable.'
Taipei Mayor Wayne Chiang Wan-an, a great-grandson of Chiang Kai-shek, pushed back on recent remarks by the island's current leader, William Lai Ching-te, who in February described Chiang as 'a dictator who committed heinous crimes to maintain his rule over Taiwan'. The Taipei mayor urged leaders to 'face history with caution and humility' and to 'adopt a broader, more inclusive vision'.
More from South China Morning Post:
For the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taiwan scholars mark 80th anniversary of victory in war against Japanese aggression
Taiwan scholars mark 80th anniversary of victory in war against Japanese aggression

The Star

time34 minutes ago

  • The Star

Taiwan scholars mark 80th anniversary of victory in war against Japanese aggression

Japanese Soldiers Entering Taipei City in 1895 after the Treaty of Shimonoseki between Qing and Japan. - Wikipedia TAIPEI: A symposium commemorating the 80th anniversary of both victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and Taiwan's recovery was held in Taipei on Saturday (June 7), calling for historical truth to be restored as the narrative of "Taiwan independence" is being pushed by Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities. Chi Chia-lin, president of Homeland Publishing and chief of a Taiwan history research association, emphasised that the war of 1895 against Japanese occupation and the subsequent waves of armed resistance were patriotic struggles launched by the people of Taiwan as part of the Chinese nation. He criticised the DPP authorities for deliberately distorting history over recent years, not only by glorifying Japan's colonial rule but also by attempting to misrepresent the battle of 1895 as a movement for "Taiwan independence." The 1895 battle was a six-month resistance struggle that broke out on the island after the Qing government ceded Taiwan to Japan under the unequal Treaty of Shimonoseki in April 1895, following its defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War. Chi explained that at that time, locals and soldiers from the Hunan, Anhui and Guangdong provinces who remained in Taiwan fought side by side to resist the Japanese. Due to overwhelming disparities in weaponry and equipment, more than 14,000 people were killed over the course of four-and-a-half months. Pien Feng-kwei, a professor with the Taiwan Ocean University, said that during the 50 years of Japanese colonial rule in Taiwan, the island's people continued their resistance unbroken and in various forms. However, he noted, "Taiwan independence" forces have deliberately ignored or even distorted Taiwan's history of anti-Japanese resistance and anti-colonial struggle. "Remembering history is meant to help us cherish peace. I hope the Taiwan authorities will face history squarely and draw lessons from it," he said. The strong national consciousness became the foundation of Taiwan's anti-Japanese resistance, and the sacrifices of heroes during the struggle are a lasting testament to the indomitable spirit of the Chinese nation, said professor Sun Juo-yi of Taiwan's Chung Hsing University. Chi also called for the development of an accurate historical narrative of Taiwan to awaken the society's true memory. - Xinhua

#SHOWBIZ: Jackie Chan recalls moment his father revealed spy past
#SHOWBIZ: Jackie Chan recalls moment his father revealed spy past

New Straits Times

time4 days ago

  • New Straits Times

#SHOWBIZ: Jackie Chan recalls moment his father revealed spy past

HONG KONG: Jackie Chan, 71, recently recounted the surprising discovery he made about his father, Charles. In an interview with People magazine, Chan revealed that his father had once confessed to being a spy for China's then-Kuomintang government in the 1940s. Chan recalled: "I was in my forties then, and my father stunned me into silence with this shocking revelation. He said, 'Son, I'm old. I might sleep and never wake up,' before telling me that he was a spy. At first, I was unable to accept this, but five hours later I was ready." This revelation prompted Chan to commission the 2003 documentary, Traces Of The Dragon: Jackie Chan And His Lost Family. The film explored his father's work as a government spy during the Chinese Civil War in the 1940s. It also uncovered his mother, Lee-Lee's, secret past as an opium smuggler and gambler. Charles passed away in 2008 at the age of 93, and Lee-Lee died in 2002 at the age of 86. "As a child, my father sent me to a martial arts school as I was very naughty," Chan explained. "But this move turned out to be the catalyst for a long and fruitful career." Chan is currently starring alongside Ralph Macchio in Karate Kid: Legends, part of the long-running Karate Kid film franchise.

No complex legal questions in Muhyiddin's sedition case, prosecution argues
No complex legal questions in Muhyiddin's sedition case, prosecution argues

The Star

time4 days ago

  • The Star

No complex legal questions in Muhyiddin's sedition case, prosecution argues

KUALA LUMPUR: The prosecution contends that the sedition case involving former prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin does not involve complex or extraordinary questions of law. In an affidavit responding to Muhyiddin's application to refer legal questions related to the Sedition Act 1948 to the Federal Court, the prosecution, as the respondent, stated that various legal issues concerning provisions of the Federal Constitution and the Act have already been decided by higher courts. DPP Datuk Razali Che Ani, in the affidavit, said the issue raised regarding a speech or discussion allegedly falling under Clause 43(2)(a) of the Constitution, read together with Sections 3(2) and 3(3) of the Sedition Act 1948, is a matter of defence. "This issue can be raised by Muhyiddin during the trial and should be decided by the presiding judge after all the respondent's witnesses (prosecution) have testified,' he said in the affidavit. ALSO READ: Muhyiddin's bid to refer questions on Sedition Act to be heard before another judge Razali further stated that the issue is academic as the trial has not yet started, and no evidence has been presented for the court's consideration. He said the prosecution and evidence process for offences under the Act are conducted in accordance with the country's criminal law principles and comply with the Constitution. "It is not in the interest of justice to refer this case to the Federal Court. Therefore, I request that the applicant's (Muhyiddin's) notice of motion be dismissed,' he said. During case management proceedings on Wednesday (June 4), High Court judge Justice Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin set Aug 28 for the hearing of Muhyiddin's application to refer legal questions related to the Sedition Act 1948 to the Federal Court. Muhyiddin's lawyer Joshua Tay and DPP Razali attended. On April 4, Muhyiddin, 77, filed an application to refer a question of law regarding the Sedition Act 1948 to the Federal Court to challenge the validity of certain provisions. He had previously pleaded not guilty to a charge of making seditious remarks while campaigning in conjunction with the Nenggiri state by-election at Dewan Semai Bakti Felda Perasu, between 10.30pm and 11.50pm on Aug 14 last year. The alleged seditious remarks concerned his claim that he was not invited by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be sworn in as prime minister following the 15th General Election, despite allegedly having the support of 115 out of 222 MPs at that time. He is charged under Section 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act 1948, punishable under Subsection 4(1) of the same Act with a maximum fine of RM5,000 or a maximum imprisonment of three years, or both, if convicted. – Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store