
ECOWAS gets a new leader at pivotal time for West Africa – DW – 06/24/2025
Nigerian President Bola Tinubu led the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) for just under two years as its rotating chairman. But, in that short period, the main political and economic body in the region witnessed some of the biggest challenges in its history.
With terror attacks and other security concerns ongoing, the ability of ECOWAS to respond to threats has been further reduced following the exit of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger from the bloc under the leadership of their respective military rulers. Tinubu acknowledged as much in his speech at the ECOWAS summit over the weekend in Nigeria's capital, Abuja.
The president expressed concern about the stalled process of rolling out an expanded ECOWAS Standby Force, which is made up of military, civilian and police components. The force was conceived in 2024 following the departures of the three Sahel nations.
"The ECOWAS Standby Force must move from concept to operational reality. I am a little bit worried about the slow pace of its activation, which is taking longer than desired," Tinubu said, highlighting the need for a ready force to combat terrorism as well as other forms of organized crime in West Africa.
While also having faith that Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger would eventually "return to the family," Tinubu also highlighted the fact that he had exhausted "all diplomatic means to engage and dialogue with our brothers" during his tenure. The three nations, however, have categorically ruled out any suggestions of rejoining the fold.
Beverly Ochieng, a senior associate at Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, says that in the wake of multiple coups in West Africa "you now have a completely fractured region."
"So you have three countries that have basically walked out of the bloc; you have one that's still under suspension until it holds its elections, and that is Guinea; and broadly speaking, you have an ECOWAS that sometimes feels as if it is struggling to be able to just maintain a sense of unity in order for them to be able to face some of those challenges as a united front," Ochieng told DW.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
To add insult to injury, the establishment of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) by the three renegade former ECOWAS members in 2023 openly defies the bloc's established authority in the region for the past 50 years, and has been used as an example to underscore accusations of Tinubu showing too much resolve against the junta-led Sahel states during his ECOWAS presidency.
"The rhetoric initially in response to the military coups may have been misplaced in the sense of ensuring open dialogue and cooperation," says Ocheing, referring to Tinubu's hardball approach.
Perhaps now as a gentle signal of rapprochement — or a final sign of defeat — ECOWAS also announced during its summit in Abuja last week that it had reached an agreement with the military juntas of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger to work together in their fight against terrorism throughout the region.
According to Ochieng, however, this move is mainly based on "a realization by ECOWAS that they will ultimately have to find a way to work with the Sahel because the issues that affect the Sahel will ultimately have an impact on ECOWAS."
The agreement further stipulates that the principle of freedom of movement of goods and persons between member states of both alliances will also be maintained.
Under these circumstances, ECOWAS' new chairman, Sierra Leone's President Julius Maada Bio, clearly has his work cut out for him and knows it, too, as the unity of the bloc and indeed much of the entire region is facing unprecedented threats to its integrity.
Bio himself stated in his opening remarks as ECOWAS president that "the democratic space is under strain in parts of our region. In some countries, the constitutional order has been disrupted," referring in no uncertain terms to the military takeovers of Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger and Guinea in recent years.
DW's Ben Shemang, who reported from the ECOWAS summit in Abuja last week, said that Bio had pledged to prioritize democracy, security cooperation, economic integration and the institutional credibility of ECOWAS during his tenure.
"Many are expecting a tenure that will not only strengthen security within the regional bloc but also to ensure unity," Shemang explained.
But at the same time, there are new issues piling up on the new leader's desk in addition to the widespread erosion of civilian rule and the proliferation of Islamist threats across West Africa:
Organized crime is on the rise in West Africa against the backdrop of both political and economic instability, and it often straddles multiple national borders where insurgents mixing with criminals has resulted in growing unrest.
Abductions for ransom, a spike in recreational drug abuse and a rise in illegal mining practices highlight the growing despair of people throughout a region with an overall population of 425 million people. If ECOWAS was a country with all its current, as well as former member states, it would be the third most-populous state in the world after Indiaand China.
"ECOWAS and some of its departments will talk about levels of crime, they'll talk about the issues affecting criminality. But when it comes to implementing measures to be able to counter to some of those vices, it's quite slow and bureaucratic," says Ochieng.
The bloc's coffers, meanwhile, just received a fresh cash injection from the European Union last week of €110 million ($126 million) — though this is still a far cry from the estimated cost of €2.26 billion needed for the activation of ECOWAS' Standby Force — outgoing ECOWAS President Tinubu's pet project.
The foundation of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), meanwhile, has also emboldened leaders as well as opposition groups in the region and beyond to seek new directions, with many interpreting the actions of these three countries as an overdue response to the lingering effects of colonialism and attempts at neo-colonialism.
A recent survey in Togo carried out by the independent, pan-African research network Afrobarometer found that 64% of Togolese respondents found the establishment of the AES "somewhat" or "very" justified and that that 54% of Togolese thought their country would benefit from leaving ECOWAS to join the Alliance of Sahel States.
Meanwhile, Guinea, which has also been under military rule for close to four years now but has not joined the AES, remains suspended from ECOWAS in a delicate balancing act which, if there's further discord, could also lead to the West African nation further distancing itself from the bloc.
Such trends can be interpreted as evidence of the waning influence of former colonial powers but also reflect the fact that bodies like ECOWAS appear to have little impact on people's daily lives, as instability and unrest continue to affect millions.
"Understandably, there is a feeling that [ECOWAS] is not fit for purpose in terms of being able to address current political pressures, and in doing so, being able to address the issues that then lead to economic and civil unrest," Ochieng told DW. She added that ideas like "joining the AES feel like a more reactionary solution. And even the AES itself is a very reactionary institution."
"Perhaps the AES could be moving in a direction that people feel is admirable, that is very purposeful, that is very driven, but it's also on a very fragile foundation. These are military leaderships. They have widespread unrest and instability that they are facing as they are trying to establish this institution," she added.
As growing numbers of people in the region nevertheless appear to be showing their support for strongmen tactics over democratic and consensus-led policies, Maada Bio is aware of this big task that lies ahead as he begins his tenure.
During his opening speech, the new leader of the bloc acknowledged that "ECOWAS must reform itself, and become more transparent, efficient and responsive to its people's needs."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Trump-Putin Alaska talks friendly but without Ukraine deal – DW – 08/16/2025
There was no breakthrough at the meeting between the American and Russian presidents. Now it is up to the embattled Ukrainians to decide. But what exactly? Having made no concessions, Putin can return home satisfied. Donald Trump loves to talk, especially about his supposed successes as a skilled negotiator and shrewd statesman. This time in Alaska, things were different. By his standards, the "deal-maker in chief" kept his appearance before the gathered press remarkably short, lasting only four minutes. After his three-hour meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin at a US military base near Anchorage, Trump said only that they had had an "extremely productive meeting." They had agreed on many things, he said, with only "one big thing" remaining. "We haven't done that yet. But there is a very good chance that we will get that done too," Trump said in an effort to sound friendly. The US president did not elaborate further. In fact, Trump made no mention of Ukraine by name. Only once did he refer to Russia's war of aggression. "We will end the deaths of five thousand people a week. President Putin wants that too," he said. Trump also failed to mention that Putin, a former KGB spy, could achieve this goal immediately if he stopped the attacks on Ukraine. The guest from Moscow remained extremely polite and calm. Without batting an eyelid, he suggested that the "situation" in Ukraine was about Russia's security. It may sound strange under the current circumstances, Putin said, but everything that is being done to the "brotherly people of Ukraine is a tragedy for us, a terrible wound. That is why our country is seriously interested in putting an end to it." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Putin gave the impression that Russia was under threat and had to respond to "provocations." This is a reversal of the facts, which he presumably also presented to Donald Trump during their talks in Alaska. Many observers who closely follow the mood swings and erratic pronouncements of the 79-year-old US president believe that Trump picks up on and repeats whatever he last heard. The question is, therefore, how far the Russian narrative will catch on. Last Wednesday, it still seemed as if the US president was on the side of Ukraine, which is under attack. According to Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Donald Trump had "largely" agreed with the West's demands on Russia. Merz had organized a virtual preparatory summit from Berlin and formulated five points for the negotiations in Alaska. These included the demand that Ukraine alone should decide on its territory and the conditions for a ceasefire. Trump did mention this demand in his brief statement. He said that in the end, "they" would have to decide, referring to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the leaders of the major NATO countries. Trump announced that he would call them immediately to inform them about the talks. It is unclear whether he will be able to announce any concrete agreements with Russia during these phone calls. On his way back to Washington, Trump told reporters that it was now up to Zelenskyy to reach an agreement with Moscow. After the meeting, Donald Trump told reporters he had a "fantastic relationship with President Putin, with Vladimir." Before the meeting, he had described the Russian leader as a "smart guy." A few weeks ago, however, he also said that Putin talks a lot of nonsense and does not keep his promises, but instead intensifies his attacks on Ukraine after each of their phone calls. However, during personal meetings with the Russian leader, Trump always seems to hold back. No criticism, not even subtle, was heard from Donald Trump's mouth. He is of course far less restrained with other state guests. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump followed Putin's eight minutes of remarks and excursions into Russian-American history at the joint press conference with a kind of frozen smile. He had already displayed the same expression in Helsinki in 2018. At that time, the two men came together for their first long summit meeting. Trump talked himself into a corner and went so far as to say that he trusted the man from the Kremlin more than his own intelligence services. Putin was not stingy with pleasantries in his remarks, praising the great prospects for cooperation between the US and Russia and politely thanking the Trump administration for its efforts to end the conflict in Ukraine. However, he immediately added that the "roots of the conflict" must be eliminated. By this he meant Ukraine's ties to the West, the membership of Eastern European countries in NATO, and NATO troops on its eastern flank. The bottom line is that few concrete results were made public. There was no mention whatsoever of a ceasefire or steps toward one. Donald Trump had announced that if the Alaska summit was successful, there would be a trilateral meeting between him, Putin and the Ukrainian president. But there was no mention of that following the talks. "We may see each other again soon," the US president said vaguely. The Russian leader then invited the perplexed Trump to Moscow in English. "That could possibly happen," Trump said, even if he would face some criticism for it. If Moscow were the next venue for talks it would make it almost impossible for Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attend. Before the summit, Trump had threatened Russia with "severe consequences" if Putin did not move toward a ceasefire. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Whether these consequences will now follow — meaning new, harsh economic sanctions against Russia's business partners, such as India and China — remains unclear. However, the US president hinted that "after what happened today, higher tariffs against China are unlikely." Unfortunately, he did not elaborate on what had actually happened. However, Trump is likely to be in a hurry to continue talks and efforts to bring peace to Ukraine. After all, the Nobel Committee will decide who will receive the Nobel Peace Prize at the beginning of October, in two months' time. Trump is desperate to win it. He made no secret of this in a recent telephone conversation with Norwegian Finance Minister and former NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, according to Norwegian media reports. The Nobel Peace Prize is traditionally awarded in early December in the Norwegian capital Oslo. Trump has already been nominated several times. Even his former rival in the presidential election campaign, Democrat Hillary Clinton, said she would support him. But only if he achieves a "just peace for Ukraine." After the summit in Alaska, Trump still has a long way to go to achieve that.


DW
6 hours ago
- DW
US: Trump administration to keep DC police chief in charge – DW – 08/16/2025
The decision reverses the US President Donald Trump administration's bid to take control of the police department in Washington, DC. The US President Donald Trump administration on Friday retracted its previous decision and agreed to let the Washington, DC, police chief remain in charge of the police force after a federal court's order. The decision to keep DC Police Chief Pamela Smith, who was appointed by the mayor, in command of the Metropolitan Police Department came after officials in the nation's capital sued to block President Donald Trump's takeover of the Washington police. On Friday, US District Judge Ana Reyes observed that the Trump administration cannot legally take over the city police, but the law probably gives the president more power than the city might like. "The way I read the statute, the president can ask, the mayor must provide, but the president can't control," Reyes said. Earlier this week, Trump had deployed hundreds of National Guard Troops in Washington, as a crime crackdown. He called it "Liberation Day" and claimed the city needed rescuing from "crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The night before the order, Trump had expanded the purview of his takeover of the law enforcement agencies of the city and brought the police department under the control of the federal government. The lawsuit, filed by DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb, had sought a court order blocking the takeover as illegal. The two sides sparred in the court for hours on Friday before Reyes insisted that they make a compromise. The move to take over the capital's police is Trump's latest attempt to test the extent of his legal authorities.


DW
18 hours ago
- DW
Washington legal chief sues Trump over police takeover – DW – 08/15/2025
The nation's capital has been challenging the president's move to seize control of its police force. City leaders have called it the gravest threat to autonomy from federal power in decades. Washington, DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb on Friday filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block US President Donald Trump's takeover of the city's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). The legal challenge came hours after US Attorney General Pam Bondi named Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole as the department's emergency commissioner. Schwalb said the lawsuit asks the court to rule that Trump's action is illegal. "The administration's unlawful actions are an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call DC home," he said. "This is the gravest threat to Home Rule that the District has ever faced, and we are fighting to stop it." Bondi's directive, issued Thursday night, gives Cole authority over the powers and duties of the police chief. She ordered that the MPD must receive Cole's approval before issuing any directives. Mayor Muriel Bowser wrote that "there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official." It remains unclear how the move affects Police Chief Pamela Smith, who works for the mayor. Neither Bondi's office nor the White House responded immediately to requests for comment. Bondi rescinded several MPD policies, including a recent directive from Smith allowing limited cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Justice Department said Bondi opposed the chief's order because it still allowed so-called "sanctuary policies" that restrict local law enforcement's ability to assist in immigration enforcement. Smith had instructed Metropolitan Police Department officers to share information with immigration agencies about people not in custody, such as those stopped at traffic checks. However, she said other MPD policies remain in place, restricting inquiries into immigration status and prohibiting arrests based solely on federal immigration warrants. Schwalb told Smith in a memo that "members of MPD must continue to follow your orders and not the orders of any official not appointed by the Mayor.' Trump said Monday he was deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the city's police department to address what he called a crime emergency. Federal law enforcement agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and Customs and Border Protection have been patrolling streets and making arrests. Residents have reported a heavy federal presence, with Humvee vehicles positioned at Union Station and National Guard troops at major landmarks.