logo
Tharoor-Congress feud sparks buzz in his Thiruvananthapuram constituency, unease in party unit

Tharoor-Congress feud sparks buzz in his Thiruvananthapuram constituency, unease in party unit

The Printa day ago

While Tharoor continues to make waves within the Congress Modi government's efforts at political diplomacy, voters in his Thiruvananthapuram Lok Sabha constituency—where he has won four consecutive terms—still appreciate his independent voice. But within the local Congress unit, there is caution, with some leaders uneasy about him speaking against the party line.
The Congress leader's remarks in Panama last week were slammed by Congress leader Udit Raj, who publicly accused Tharoor of disparaging the party's 'golden history' and provocatively suggested he should be the 'BJP's super spokesperson'.
Thiruvananthapuram: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor calling India's 2016 surgical strike across the Line of Control (LoC) a 'first' has drawn sharp criticism from within the Congress, since it contradicts the party's position that similar strikes occurred under UPA. Back in his constituency of Thiruvananthapuram, though, the comment has generated a different kind of buzz. Voters and local Congress leaders are watching Tharoor's moves closely—while some admire his individual appeal, others interpret the remark as a sign of his growing national ambitions and political recalibration.
A local Congress functionary, who wished to not be named, said Tharoor's 'continuous praise for Modi has put the party in a difficult position with the public'.
'He can't continue praising Modi. It's making it difficult for us here as people question us on why the leaders are praising the BJP.'
The functionary added that while the party has instructed its members not to speak against Tharoor, he should also be mindful and ideally raise internal disagreements within the party.
Tharoor's relationship with the Congress party has soured in the past weeks due to his public deviations from official party stances.
He has repeatedly praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi, most recently endorsing India's military response, 'Operation Sindoor', after the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people, saying it was 'well done'.
Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, though, swiftly clarified that Tharoor's statements did 'not reflect the party's stance'.
Ramesh later also accused the Centre of playing 'cheap political games' by selecting Tharoor to lead an all-party delegation to explain India's position on the conflict with Pakistan, especially since the Congress had provided four MP names for consideration, and the Centre still chose him even though he wasn't on the list.
Earlier, Tharoor had also drawn criticism from party leaders over his 2-day visit and meeting with US President Donald Trump, which he maintained was 'good for India', even as his colleagues were vocally attacking the Indian government over the repatriation of Indians from the US.
However, despite some local resentment over his long absences, the functionary quoted above noted that Tharoor continues to win because voters ultimately want the Congress to remain in power.
Also read: Shashi Tharoor's loyalty keeps colliding with Congress scepticism—while his global stature grows
Changing perceptions, declining margins
Tharoor has held the Thiruvananthapuram Lok Sabha constituency, which encompasses seven Assembly segments, since 2009, but recent electoral trends indicate a discernible weakening of his support base.
His victory margins, close to one lakh in both 2009 and 2019, dropped considerably in 2014 and, more recently, in 2024 to just 16,077 votes against BJP's Rajeev Chandrasekhar.
ThePrint visited three Assembly segments within the Thiruvananthapuram Lok Sabha constituency—Kovalam and Neyyattinkara, where Tharoor had leads of over 15,000 votes, and the Thiruvananthapuram Assembly segment, where he led by over 4,000 votes—to understand the sentiment among local Congress workers and voters.
Voters largely expressed admiration for Tharoor's 'non-partisan' views but also noted his frequent absences from the constituency and the prevalent factionalism within Congress.
Stanley, a 51-year-old resident of Vizhinjam in the traditional Congress stronghold of Kovalam, believes Tharoor'is speaking the truth'and that his knowledge and education drive his statements.
Stanley feels the party isn't recognising Tharoor enough, prompting him to voice his dissent. He views the current tussle as a minor part of larger infighting within the party.
Shubha V., 44, also a resident of Vizhinjam, similarly said Tharoor has a 'good name and reputation, which has created the perception that he might be right'.
A local fisherman in Vizhinjam, 50-year-old Abilis George, too, feels the ongoing disagreement is 'just a result of the Congress's internal fight'.
'The Congress is hugely divided. They don't have any consensus on a stand. We can't blame Tharoor for that,' he added.
However, Antony S., a 42-year-old Congress supporter from Kovalam who has campaigned for Tharoor in past elections, including in 2024, expressed regret at voting him in again.
'It was a mistake to re-elect him. He hasn't done anything here,' he said.
He added that he voted for him to secure a win for the Congress and Rahul Gandhi, and finds Tharoor's praise for the BJP disheartening. He emphasised that Tharoor's votes are largely 'party votes' and that he 'can't win without a party'.
Nandakumar, a 54-year-old grocery store owner in Neyyattinkara, appreciated Tharoor as 'a good person and a global citizen', but urged him to consider his voters.
'He is hoping to get more power and position in the BJP, it seems. But he should stay with the party's policies. Without the Congress, he will not win,' said Nandakumar.
He added that Tharoor's votes have significantly reduced due to his perceived poor performance as an MP.
Sudheer M., a 53-year-old auto driver in the same town, feels Tharoor is being unfairly targeted. 'It looks like the Congress is throwing him out. He is just saying what is true.'
Another resident of Neyyattinkara, 74-year-old Somasekharan Nair, said Tharoor has never praised the PM blindly, he is only 'admitting to the good deeds of other politicians'.
Nair added that it seemed like Tharoor wanted to join the BJP. 'It looks like he is not satisfied with his position in the Congress. But it's not right to show it openly,' he said.
Younger voters, like 39-year-old Shyamjith M. and 24-year-old Sudhin Gokul S., view Tharoor as a well-meaning intellectual who 'speaks beyond politics', while the Congress's reaction to him has been 'political'.
Gokul noted a shift in Tharoor's votes to Chandrasekhar in 2024, as people saw the latter as an 'equal alternative'.
In Thiruvananthapuram city, too, voters had mixed reactions.
Shaji H., a resident of Thiruvananthapuram's Balaramapuram, said that though Tharoor is a good MP, the backing of the Congress is important for his victory from the constituency. He, too, said that Tharoor's recent activities suggested he was interested in joining the BJP.
'His individual support is decreasing here. If he goes to the BJP. He will not win,' he said.
Congress functionaries feel 'betrayed'
While the public expressed a mixed reaction, local Congress functionaries largely agree that Tharoor's victory is primarily due to the party's influence rather than his charisma.
A party functionary in Vizhinjam and another in Neyyattinkara said that while Tharoor's international stature helped, 'the votes came for Rahul Gandhi and INC'.
In Kovalam, too, functionaries consistently believe Tharoor's success is party-driven.
One such functionary in Kovalam's Mokkola said Tharoor was able to win despite his absence from the constituency because of the coastal community's support for the Congress, and the perception that Tharoor's victory was due to his votes is wrong.
'First term, he performed well. But now there's a distance from Congress workers. People here vote for the party symbol, not him,' he said.
The leader said that Tharoor's continuous praise of the BJP is a 'bad mistake'.
'It's local Congress functionaries who worked for his victory. He is doing a one-man show to get claps beyond party lines. It looks like he wants to show he can do a lot even without the support of the party.' he said. 'But it's not true.'
(Edited by Sugita Katyal)
Also read: After Tharoor, Congress now has a Salman Khurshid problem as ex-minister lauds Article 370 abrogation

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mediation between two unequals not possible: Tharoor on Trump's claims
Mediation between two unequals not possible: Tharoor on Trump's claims

Business Standard

time28 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Mediation between two unequals not possible: Tharoor on Trump's claims

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has said that to suggest one can mediate between two unequals is not possible because there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims, amid repeated claims by US President Donald Trump that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. Tharoor, currently in the US leading a multi-party delegation on Operation Sindoor, made the comments in response to a question during a conversation at the Council on Foreign Relations here Thursday. "Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. I'll tell you why not. The fact is that this implies, even when you say things like broker or whatever, you're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist," Tharoor said. He said there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. "There is no equivalence between a country that provides safe haven to terrorism, and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business," he said. "There is no equivalence between a state that is a status quo power that just wants to be left alone by its neighbours, where the neighbours don't agree with us, and a revisionist power that wants to upset the geopolitical arrangements that have existed for the last three-quarters of a century. There is no equivalence possible in these cases, and in these circumstances, to suggest that you can mediate between two unequals is not possible, Tharoor added. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over a dozen times that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan. He has also claimed that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America would do a lot of trade with them if they stopped the conflict. On being asked how he would characterize the American role in the conflict, Tharoor said he is "guessing to some degree that the American role would have been first of all to keep themselves informed, conversations on both sides, and certainly my government received a number of calls at high levels from the US government, and we appreciated their concern and their interest. He said that at the same time, the US must have been making similar calls at the highest levels to the Pakistan side, and our assumption is that's where, because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process, that may well have been where their messages really had the greatest effect. But that's guesswork on my part. I don't know what they said to the Pakistanis. Trump repeated the claim as recently as Thursday when during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, the US President said that he is very proud" that he was able to stop the conflict between nuclear powers India and Pakistan. I spoke to some very talented people on both sides, very good people on both sides and said that Washington will not do any trade deals with either if you are going to go shooting each other and whipping out nuclear weapons that may be even affect us. Because you know that nuclear dust blows across oceans very quickly, it affects us," Trump said. You know what, I got that war am I going to get credit? I'm not going to get credit for anything. They don't give me credit for anything. But nobody else could have done it. I stopped it. I was very proud of that, Trump added. About two weeks after the horrific April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Modi accepts Canadian PM Carney's invitation to G-7, promises 'renewed vigour' in ties
Modi accepts Canadian PM Carney's invitation to G-7, promises 'renewed vigour' in ties

The Hindu

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Modi accepts Canadian PM Carney's invitation to G-7, promises 'renewed vigour' in ties

Prime Minister Narendra Modi will represent India at the upcoming G-7 summit in Canada next week, he confirmed on Friday (June 6, 2025), after he was invited by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney during a telephone call. The visit to Canada, Mr. Modi's first since 2015, could mark a reset in ties after years of tensions over Khalistani separatists targeting Indian diplomats and the killing of Canadian and Khalistani leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar, which the previous Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had blamed Indian government agents for. The invitation for India as a guest invitee for the G-7 summit to be held in Kananaskis, Alberta province of Canada could also herald the restoration of India and Canada's diplomatic presence in each other's capitals, where both sides expelled High Commissioners, stopped visas temporarily and cut staff strength drastically in 2023 and 2024. In October 2024, India and Canada also expelled each other's deputy High commissioners, over further charges in the Nijjar case, and spying respectively. This month also marks two anniversaries - 40 years since the bombing of the Air India 'Kanishka' flight on June 23, 1985 by Khalistani separatists in Canada, and two years since the killing of Nijjar on June 18, 2023 near Toronto, and both governments would have to work around each other's sensitivities during the visit. Glad to receive a call from Prime Minister @MarkJCarney of Canada. Congratulated him on his recent election victory and thanked him for the invitation to the G7 Summit in Kananaskis later this month. As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada… — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 6, 2025 Announcing the visit, Mr. Modi said his meeting with Mr. Carney would give ties 'renewed vigour'. 'As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the Summit,' said PM Modi in social media post, adding that he had thanked Mr. Carney for the invitation to the G-7 and congratulated him on his recent victory in Canadian elections. Mr. Modi's attendance at the G-7, that he has been to every year as a special invitee since 2019, will also give him the opportunity to meet other Western leaders from member countries such as the U.S., U.K., France, Italy, Japan and Germany, for the first time since Operation Sindoor. In particular, Mr. Modi will meet with U.S. President Donald Trump, after a strain in ties over Mr. Trump's repeated assertion that he mediated to end the four-day conflict between India and Pakistan, a claim the Ministry of External Affairs has denied consistently. Ahead of a possible meeting of Mr. Modi with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Canada, which would be their first since India and U.K. finalised a Free Trade Agreement, U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy is due in Delhi for a one-day visit on Saturday, and will meet External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal. Quad partner Australia as well as leaders of BRICS countries Brazil and South Africa are also expected to be special invitees at the summit. Mr. Modi is likely to travel to Brazil next month, where he will share the stage with leaders of Russia and China and other members at the BRICS summit in Rio. At the G-7, all eyes in India will be on the meeting with the Canadian PM, and whether ties can be restored after the bitterness, particularly of the last two year between them. In 2024, Mr. Trudeau's government had suggested restoring High Commissioners, and the Canada's Foreign Ministry, called 'Global Canada', had forwarded the name of Canadian diplomat Christopher Cooter for the post. However, New Delhi had given Ottawa no response. This year, the Ministry has named India's Ambassador to Spain Dinesh Patnaik for the High Commissioner's post in Ottawa, and it remains to be seen whether both sides will now agree to exchange diplomats at the High Commissioner and other levels. The invitation to Mr. Modi comes after some speculation that Canada would not invite the Indian PM given the relationship at present, and the very short notice, with just over a week to go for the Summit added to the surprise of the announcement. However, officials explained that Mr. Carney took over as PM only on April 29 this year after winning polls where he defeated the conservative party considered the frontrunner in elections. The Ministry declined to comment on whether the upcoming G-7 had been discussed during a call between the new Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand and Mr. Jaishankar on May 29. It is understood that while the governments had discussed the issue through interlocuters in recent weeks, a formal invitation for special invitees was only sent on Friday.

Firm on breaking 50% reservation cap in country: Rahul
Firm on breaking 50% reservation cap in country: Rahul

Time of India

time37 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Firm on breaking 50% reservation cap in country: Rahul

Patna: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday said wherever there is a Congress govt, 50% reservation barrier would be removed. Addressing the 'Samvidhan Suraksha Sammelan' at Rajgir in Nalanda district, Gandhi said he was firm on his commitment to break the 50% barrier on reservations. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "If the population of the marginalised communities is 90%, why is their reservation limited to only 50%?" he asked. He said, "the Telangana govt has already broken the barrier, and wherever a Congress govt is formed, this barrier will be removed there." Gandhi also said Bihar which once guided the world civilisations with its wisdom and philosophy has now turned into the "crime capital of the country". He said, "Bihar was once considered the land of truth, justice, and non-violence. It showed the path to the entire world; people from across the globe used to come to study at Nalanda University". But today, he said, the situation has completely changed. "People from Bihar are now forced to migrate to other states and even abroad because there are no employment opportunities here", he pointed out, while remarking, "Bihar has now become the crime capital of the country". Reaffirming his commitment to caste census and removing the 50% cap on reservation, he said, he will ensure both these are done. And once done, there will be a paradigm shift in the way development is carried out in the country. Gandhi disclosed that after joining politics, he learnt that "90% of the country's population has no real representation anywhere". The backward classes, dalits, adivasis, and extremely backward communities lack meaningful representation in key areas such as the corporate sector, judiciary, bureaucracy, and among the owners of private hospitals and other institutions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On the other hand, Gandhi added, these 90% of people can only be found among the MGNREGA and the gig workers. He said, while dalits, backward classes, adivasis, extremely backward communities, and the poor from the general category make up 90% of the population, they control less than 5% of the country's resources. "You have 90% shareholding in pain and suffering", he remarked about the 90% population. Gandhi also said while the BJP agreed under pressure to carry out the caste census, he was not sure whether they will do it the way it needs to be done. He referred to the Telangana model, where the questions were framed by about 3 lakh people, unlike the BJP model, where the questions are framed by a selective few officers behind closed doors with no representation from the "90% population". Referring to the Constitution, he said, it is not merely a 75-year-old book, but a collection of thoughts and philosophy of thousands of years. "The Constitution embodies an ancient philosophy — the thoughts of Lord Shiva, Buddha, Mahatma Gandhi, Dr Ambedkar, Periyar, Narayana Guru, and Basavanna", he said, while adding, "This ideological battle has been going on for thousands of years as on one side stands Mahatma Gandhi and on the other, Godse". Gandhi said, once the caste census is conducted properly, it will not just be an X-ray but an MRI, leading to a new paradigm of development. "The beginning will be made from Bihar; you have been doing it for thousands of years and you will do this also as this is in your DNA", he remarked amidst thundering applause.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store