Designated Terrorist Groups Samidoun – Based In U.S. And Canada, And Masar Badil – Active In Spain, Both Affiliated With The PFLP, Condemn American Strikes Against Houthis, Call On Anti-Israel Protest
On March 16, 2025, Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network, and its offshoot Masar Badil, issued statements in English condemning the recent U.S. strikes that targeted multiple leaders of the Iran-backed Yemeni jihadi Ansar Allah Movement, AKA the Houthis.
Samidoun, and Masar Badil were Designated as supporters of Foreign Terror Organization by the U.S. Treasury on October 15, 2024, in a statement that called Samidoun A "sham charity that serves as an international fundraiser for the PFLP [Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine]".[1] In a coordinated effort, Canada listed Samidoun as a terrorist entity on October 11. Khaled Barakat the Canadian leader of Masar Badil, and husband of Samidoun's International Coordinator Charlotte Kates, was also Designated by the Canada and the U.S. Treasury on October 15, 2024, for being among the leaders of PFLP, a Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist by the U.S. Department of State.
This is not the first time Samidoun and Masar Badil have issues statements of support for the Iran-backed Houthis. In June 2024, they led over 250 international jihadi and anti-Israel organizations in a statement of support for the Yemeni group's attack on U.S. and UK targets. In addition, as part of its efforts to platform the voices of "Resistance Axis" leaders, Masar Badil livestreamed in August 2024 an interview with Nasruddin Amer, chair of the board of the Yemeni Saba Media Agency and vice chair of the Media Authority of the Houthi movement. The interview prominently featured Samidoun International Coordinator Kates.[2]
The following is a review of the recent statements by Samidoun and Masar Badil.
Samidoun: "Zionist, American, Arab Alliance Against Yemen"
Samidoun's statement read: "Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network unequivocally condemns the latest US-Zionist assault on Yemen, which has taken the lives of dozens of martyrs and injured many more in the Yemeni capital, Sanaa, and Saada Governorate, and urges all supporters of Palestine to stand in defense of Yemen and all those in the region and around the world targeted for their resistance to genocide."
"The US' latest bombing of Yemen illustrates vividly once again that this is now and always has been a US-Zionist genocide in Gaza and throughout occupied Palestine, against the Arab nation and against the region as a whole."
It further accused Arab governments of conspiracy against Yemen.
"The complicity and involvement of the Arab reactionary regimes in the assault on Yemen further underlines the alliance of Zionism, imperialism and Arab reaction in the enemy camp confronting all those who stand for justice, unity, self-determination and national and international liberation."
Defending the Houthi attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea, the statement said:
"Yemen's blockade of Zionist shipping is a blockade to break the siege and end genocide, the decolonization of the Red Sea from imperialist and Zionist control and domination. Yemen is leading the world in the implementation of the Genocide Convention and international law, requiring the Zionist regime to abide by its ceasefire conditions, end the siege on Gaza and stop blocking the entry of humanitarian aid. Any attack on Yemen is carried out, clearly and explicitly, to advance the project of genocide and starvation against the Palestinian people, through a bloody assault on the people of Yemen. The aggression on Yemen comes after Sayyed Abdel-Malik Badr al-Din al-Houthi announced that the four-day window for the Zionist regime to abide by its ceasefire agreement had expired and that, therefore, anti-genocide naval operations against Zionist shipping in the Bab al-Mandab strait would resume."
The statement further conflated the American airstrikes against the Houthis with President Donald Trump's policy of deporting foreign students who were inciting antisemitism in American universities, describing it as a policy of "fascist state."
Arrests, Deportations Are Policies Of A "Fascist State"
"These attacks come simultaneously with intensified repression by the fascist state powers in the heart of the imperial core. Let us be clear: their arrests and deportations are meant to silence the movement, create fear and impose terror in the hearts of the population in order to give them free rein to bombard Yemen, to assault Gaza, to starve the Palestinian people, to attack Tulkarem, to advance genocide throughout Palestine, to threaten Iran."
"Only Way To Fight Repression Is To Escalate"
Calling on anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian supporters everywhere to show solidarity with Yemen, the statement instructed them to "escalate" their activities.
"It is critical that the Palestine movement stands fully with Yemen against this attack and refuses to be silenced by repression, to ensure that there is no business as usual for genocide. The only way we can effectively fight repression is to defend all those under attack and to escalate, in size, strength and numbers, our support for Palestine, for Yemen and for all of the forces of resistance. We cannot fight repression as a series of individual battles, but must do so as part of the anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist struggle, for the liberation of Palestine, the Arab nation and the region."
"To Stand With Yemen Is To Stand With Palestine"
In conclusion, the statement assured Palestinians that the Houthis would not be intimidated by the U.S. airstrikes, and would continue to support them. It encouraged pro-Palestinian supporters to take the streets to show support for Houthis.
"The Yemeni people are making quite clear that they will never stop their defense of Palestine, despite the bombings of civilian homes, power plants and infrastructure, by the US-Zionist imperialist monster. It is incumbent upon us all to take that same stand for Yemen, to begin to live up to the Yemeni example set every day with courage and steadfastness; to fill the streets and squares, to raise our voices, to make it impossible for the imperialist assaults to continue. To stand with Yemen is to stand with Palestine, is to stand with the global resistance in defense of humanity."
The statement included a list of "hundreds of organizations and thousands of individuals who signed a statement in June 2024 "in defense of the Yemeni people against US-British-Zionist aggression."
Masar Badil Calls For International Popular Movement For Yemen, Palestine
Similarly, Vancouver-based Khaled Barakat, who heads Masar Badil, a pro-Palestinian, pro-Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) organization affiliated with Samidoun, issued a statement in which he said that "these disgusting and desperate American attacks will not succeed in separating the Yemeni people from their central cause, Palestine."
Barakat called upon the organizations and supporters of the Masar Badil and the international movements in solidarity with Palestine to "declare their revolutionary and practical solidarity with the Yemeni people supporting the Palestinian resistance and supporting our people in the Gaza Strip in the face of siege, starvation and the Zionist genocidal aggression."
He also called for "real and active mobilization in all areas in order to expose the US and Zionist policies targeting the people of Yemen who stood tall in the face of criminal wars for two decades, and still declare their steadfast position, standing united behind their revolutionary leadership and armed forces that imposed by force and will a naval blockade on the ports of occupied Palestine, which caused billions of dollars in losses for the enemy, its companies and supporters."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
4 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq after the Global Coalition: Between sovereignty and strategic risk
Shafaq News The US-led Global Coalition's withdrawal from Iraq has officially begun, with troops departing from Ain al-Assad airbase in western al-Anbar. Ain al-Assad, Iraq's second-largest air installation, has long hosted both Iraqi and coalition forces under Iraq's al-Jazeera and al-Badiya Operations Command. Its evacuation marks the first visible step in a two-stage drawdown, which will continue through September 2026. The plan envisages phased departures from Baghdad, followed by the retention of fewer than 500 US personnel in Erbil before their redeployment to Kuwait. For Baghdad, the process represents a symbolic end to more than two decades of foreign troop deployments. Yet it also exposes the delicate balance between consolidating sovereignty and confronting security gaps that remain unresolved. A Political Achievement in the Government's Eyes Spokesman for the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Sabah al-Naaman, described the withdrawal as 'one of the government's most significant achievements.' He credited 'intensive political efforts and the Prime Minister's determination' alongside tangible improvements in Iraq's security apparatus — from modernizing its arsenal to enhancing intelligence capabilities. In his view, the departure reflects confidence that Iraqi forces can now independently secure the country and prevent the resurgence of terrorism. 'The growing capabilities of our security forces, along with the government's ongoing efforts to develop the military and security system with the latest weaponry and technical technologies, in addition to enhancing the efficiency of the intelligence services, are all factors that enable Iraq to fully take control of the security file and deter any threat to the country's security,' he told Shafaq News. Legal Framework and Political Reassurances Echoing the government's message, lawmaker Imran al-Karkoushi, of the Iran-backed State of Law Coalition, insisted the redeployment 'stems from bilateral security agreements and is not a result of external pressure or regional tensions.' He pointed to the 2008 US–Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA) as the 'legal basis guiding the move.' Unlike earlier troop-specific arrangements, the SFA lays out the broader partnership between Baghdad and Washington, covering security cooperation, economic development, cultural exchange, and respect for Iraqi sovereignty. By grounding the withdrawal in this framework, al-Karkoushi sought to counter arguments that the decision is linked to US–Iran tensions or regional escalations. Instead, 'it is a contractual step within Iraq's sovereign right to shape its foreign partnerships.' Parliamentary Skepticism: Airspace and Air Defenses Other lawmakers voiced sharper concerns. Independent MP Haitham al-Zarkani criticized the Global Coalition for its 'failure' to protect Iraq's skies, citing repeated airspace violations and cross-border strikes carried out from Iraqi territory without coalition intervention. 'Iraqi airspace has been used to carry out attacks on neighboring countries without any response from the Coalition, and the United States has deliberately refrained from providing Iraq with advanced air defense systems, which makes its withdrawal or continued presence have no real effect,' he explained to Shafaq News. Warns of Premature Timing Security expert Ali al-Maamari warned that the decision to withdraw from Ain al-Assad and the Victoria base near Baghdad airport was based on assessments of readiness that he considers premature. While Iraqi forces have accumulated significant combat experience on the ground, he argued that they still lack 'effective air defense systems and advanced radar technologies capable of intercepting missiles and hostile aircraft.' From Domestic to Regional Threats Security analyst Adnan al-Kinani stressed that Iraq's security challenges no longer stem primarily from ISIS. 'ISIS as an organization is largely dismantled, but external threats — such as potential Turkish incursions or engineered Iraq–Syria tensions — now pose the real danger,' he told Shafaq News. He also cautioned that Iraq risks becoming a theater for broader rivalries: 'The United States and Israel may attempt to use Iraqi territory as a platform for pressuring or attacking Iran, which poses a strategic risk to national sovereignty.' For al-Kinani, the coalition's departure does not eliminate risk but shifts it outward — to borders, neighbors, and the regional balance of power. Intelligence Gaps and Regional Competition Security expert Saif Raad emphasized another vulnerability: the coalition's departure leaves Iraq at risk of losing advanced intelligence support, including satellite imagery and aerial reconnaissance. 'This comes at a time of ongoing unrest in Syria and renewed ISIS activity in al-Hol camp,' he said, referring to the sprawling detention site in northeast Syria that continues to harbor thousands of ISIS-linked individuals. Raad also noted that Iran appears poised to fill part of the vacuum. A recent Baghdad–Tehran security agreement, signed as the US exit timetable was being finalized, signals Tehran's intent to expand its role in training and intelligence. For Iraq, this creates a dilemma: trading one external dependency for another risks limiting its freedom of maneuver in the long run. Between Sovereignty and Exposure The debate reflects two competing lenses. For the government and its allies, the withdrawal is a sign of sovereign maturity, anchored in international agreements and political determination. For skeptical lawmakers and experts, the risks lie in capability gaps and the shifting nature of threats — from insurgency to regional power competition. As the countdown to September 2026 accelerates, the central question remains: can Iraq protect its fragile security gains while resisting entanglement in wider regional conflicts?
Shafaq News
a day ago
- Shafaq News
US starts withdrawing from Iraq through Al-Anbar
Shafaq News – Al-Anbar The first phase of the US military withdrawal from Iraq has begun in western Al-Anbar province, a security source told Shafaq News on Monday. The source said a convoy departed Ain al-Asad Air Base carrying trucks loaded with military vehicles and is expected to move toward Syrian territory. Ain al-Asad, located about 10 kilometers from the town of al-Baghdadi, is Iraq's second-largest air base after Balad. It has served as a central hub for US forces and houses the command of the 7th Division. The withdrawal follows a 2022 Baghdad–Washington agreement that set September 2025 as the point to begin scaling down the US presence. Washington had returned troops to Iraq in 2014 at Baghdad's request to lead the Global Coalition against ISIS, a campaign that grew to 87 members. Initially focused on combat operations, the mission later shifted toward training, intelligence, and advisory support under Operation Inherent Resolve. Today, about 2,500 US troops remain in Iraq. The reduction comes amid renewed warnings from US officials of persistent ISIS activity, alongside growing Iraqi political demands for full sovereignty and continued pressure from pro-Iran armed factions within the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF).
Shafaq News
a day ago
- Shafaq News
EXPLAINER: From the fight against ISIS to US withdrawal talks
Shafaq News More than a decade after the US-led Global Coalition was formed to defeat ISIS, Iraq is entering a decisive phase. The 2022 Baghdad–Washington agreement set September 2025 as the point to begin US troop withdrawal. Today, as the deadline approaches, Iraq faces competing pressures: renewed warnings of ISIS activity, political demands for full sovereignty, and armed factions' threats against foreign troops. From Combat Operations to Training and Support -The Global Coalition against Daesh was launched in September 2014, led by the United States and joined by 87 members. -Its first task was to degrade and ultimately defeat ISIS while stabilizing liberated areas. -Coalition forces provided combat support to the Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) and the Kurdish Peshmerga, and later aided reconstruction. -Under Operation Inherent Resolve, the mission evolved into training, advisory, intelligence, and surveillance support, including countering ISIS financing. -Iraq itself is a key member of the Coalition, with its security forces now leading operations against ISIS remnants. Rising Demands for Foreign Troop Withdrawal After ISIS's territorial defeat in 2017, calls for Coalition withdrawal grew louder. -In January 2020, a US airstrike in Baghdad killed Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani and Iraqi PMF leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, prompting Iraqi leaders to accuse Washington of violating sovereignty. -Soon after, Iraq's parliament passed a non-binding resolution demanding the removal of foreign troops and the cancellation of Baghdad's formal request for Coalition support. -In January 2024, US–Iraq negotiations began on the future of foreign troops, focusing on Iraq's military readiness and the continuing ISIS threat. A joint commission was formed to establish a timeline. -ISIS propaganda quickly seized on the talks, framing them as proof that 'America only understands the language of force.' -Today, about 2,500 US troops remain in Iraq. Renewed ISIS Activity -In July 2024, US Central Command (CENTCOM) warned that ISIS attacks in Iraq and Syria were set to double compared to 2023. -The group claimed 153 attacks in the first half of 2024, surpassing the 121 attacks reported in all of 2023. -CENTCOM credited US and partner forces with 196 counter-ISIS missions during the same period, including: 137 operations, killing 30 militants, and detaining 74 in Iraq. 59 operations, killing 14 militants and detaining 92 in Syria. -US officials estimate about 1,000 ISIS fighters remain in Iraq, describing the threat as persistent but contained. -Critics in Iraq argue the warnings are overstated and used to justify prolonging the US military presence. PMF Pressure Campaign -Pro-Iran factions within the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF)—including Kataib Hezbollah, Harakat Ansarallah al-Nujabaa, and Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhadaa, all sanctioned by Washington—have been central to the campaign against US forces. -These groups targeted US bases in Iraq and Syria, especially after the Gaza war broke out in October 2023. -In January 2024, they declared a suspension of operations, and no attacks have been recorded since—even during Israel–Iran war. -Despite this pause, their leaders continue to call the US deployment 'illegal' and threaten renewed action if the withdrawal is delayed. Iraq's Internal Divide -The debate remains unresolved within Iraq's political and security circles: -Advocates of Withdrawal stress that Iraq's forces are now capable of defending the country, that foreign troops are unconstitutional, and that sovereignty requires ending external military missions. -Supporters of the Coalition argue that the US-led presence still plays a stabilizing role, pointing to ongoing ISIS activity and volatile regional conflicts involving Gaza, Lebanon, Israel, and Iran.
