
Is the $10bn Spotify gave artists last year enough to silence its critics?
Spotify paid out more money into the music industry last year than any other retailer in history.
ADVERTISEMENT
Swedish music streaming platform Spotify paid the music industry over $10 billion (€9.2 billion) over 2024.
Loud & Clear, Spotify's annual report on how much the platform gives back to the industry has been released. 2024's figures bring the total amount Spotify has paid back into the industry nearly $60 billion (€55 billion).
It makes Spotify the single biggest retailer contributing to the music industry in history, with its annual figures 10 times greater than the largest record store at the height of the CD era.
It's also a significant figure in comparison to the company's profits. Spotify paid out over 60% of the €15.7 billion it made in total revenue in 2024.
While Spotify's contribution back to musicians, labels, promoters and others in the industry is significantly higher than any single record store ever has been, they exist in an entirely different model.
Music streaming makes up around 89% of the revenue of the entire industry. Spotify leads the pack of the streamers, with 31.7% of the market share. It's a dominance over the space that far exceeds any single retailer during previous eras of music.
That rise in streaming culture is represented in the Loud & Clear report. In the decade since 2014, global revenues have recovered from a low point of $13 billion to $28 billion (€11.9-25.7 billion). At the same time, Spotify's annual payouts have increased tenfold from $1 billion (€0.9 billion).
Spotify uses the report to respond to one of its main sources of criticism: that it underpays artists. What critics miss is the enlarged number of artists attempting careers in music, Spotify argues.
Spotify CEO Daniel Ek
Kelly West/AP
'Looking back to the peak of the CD era, only a few thousand artists had their music on the shelves of record stores,' the report reads. 'Streaming has allowed millions to easily share their music globally – that's an amazing thing. But the sheer volume of uploaders means the fraction who find success appears smaller over time.'
The 100,000th-ranked artist based on royalties earn around 10 times what they earned a decade ago, from under $600 to $6,000 (€550-5,500). At the next echelon up, the 10,000th-ranked artist, increased in earnings by around four times, from $34,000 to $131,000 (€31,200-120,000).
It means that an artist who received in every million streams on Spotify generated over $10,000 (€9,200) on average. This year, they also included a tool within the report to work out where an artist is likely to fall within the platform's rankings, to be able to guess how much they might earn.
Hurray For The Riff Raff, who released Euronews Culture's Best Album of 2024, are in the top 24,000 artists on Spotify through their 508,400 monthly listeners. This means the New Orleans band will earn somewhere between the $6,000 for the 100,000th-ranked and $131,000 for the 10,000th-ranked artist.
Comparatively, second favourite album artist Charli XCX is in the top 1,000 streamed artists with her 32 million monthly listeners. Spotify has said that the nearly 1,500 artists generated over $1 million in royalties last year.
Spotify also sought to explain some of the misconceptions around earnings. 'Streaming services don't pay out based on a fixed per-stream rate' they write, explaining that instead it is calculated based on an artist's streamshare – the proportion they are being streamed in comparison to streams across the entire platform.
Last year, in response to the release of the previous Loud & Clear report, Spotify CEO Daniel Ek offered many of these arguments in response to the platform's critics. Ek also made note that while Spotify is consistent in how it pays artists, it cannot account for what share artists get of that money after labels and publishers touch it.
ADVERTISEMENT
'Spotify is probably the worst thing that has happened to musicians,' Icelandic musician Björk said earlier this year. She lamented how younger artists must rely on streaming to grow their fanbases, counting herself lucky to be established and able to tour – where the money really is.
Björk performing
AP2007
Even with Spotify's grand payout figures, it's still estimated that artists earn somewhere between $0.003 and $0.005 per stream. It pales in comparison to the amount artists would earn from physical media sales. While vinyl sales continue to increase though, Pandora's box of streaming music is unlikely ever to close. How useful comparisons between streaming and physical media sales are anymore is questionable.
Spotify has also come under new criticism in the past year. Investigative journalists have found that large swathes of the easy-listening playlists increasingly popular as background music are from seemingly non-existent artists. As Spotify's profits increase, questions have been raised as to whether a significant portion of the payouts are able to be rerouted internally through company-commissioned music.
'What I uncovered was an elaborate internal program. Spotify, I discovered, not only has partnerships with a web of production companies, which, as one former employee put it, provide Spotify with 'music we benefited from financially,' but also a team of employees working to seed these tracks on playlists across the platform,' Liz Pelly wrote in an expose piece.
ADVERTISEMENT
'In doing so, they are effectively working to grow the percentage of total streams of music that is cheaper for the platform.' Pelly's investigation is fully explicated in her 2025 book "Mood Machine: The Rise of Spotify and the Costs of the Perfect Playlist".
Spotify is unlikely to slough off its critics any time soon, but the Loud & Clear report proves once again how enmeshed the platform is within the music industry.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fashion Network
2 days ago
- Fashion Network
Swedish hair care brand Sachajuan launches in Indian market
Swedish hair care label Sachajuan has entered the Indian market with Kutub Ariwala, founder of BeautIndia. The brand aims to bring its minimalist, performance-driven products to a growing base of ingredient-aware consumers. 'I was tired of seeing clients overwhelmed by shelves of products, unsure of what actually worked,' said brand founder and hairstylist Sacha Mitic, Indian Retailer Bureau reported. 'Everything felt overly engineered. I wanted to go the other way- to create something intuitive, elegant, and honest.' Sachajuan's range includes leave-in treatments like In The Sun, After The Sun, Hair Repair, and Dark Volume Powder, the latter formulated specifically for dark hair tones. At the core of its products is 'Ocean Silk Technology,' combining marine algae to strengthen hair without weighing it down, according to its Facebook page. 'India's beauty and personal care industry is experiencing tremendous growth," said BeautIndia's founder Kutub Ariwala. "Today's consumer doesn't just read the label, they research every ingredient. They don't fall for fluff.' With an emphasis on scalp health, simplicity, and function, Sachajuan aims to engage shoppers in India's increasingly sophisticated premium haircare segment. 'There's such deep hair culture here,' said Mitic. 'What surprised me most was how people balance modern routines with traditional values.'


Fashion Network
3 days ago
- Fashion Network
H&M founding family moves closer to full control of retailer
Hennes Mauritz AB, the fast-fashion retailer that's been listed on the Swedish stock market since 1974, is steadily moving back toward private ownership. The founding family has stepped up purchases of H&M shares, spending more than 63 billion kronor ($6.6 billion) since 2016 and fueling speculation it could take the Stockholm-based company back into private hands — despite denials from family members. The Perssons, one of Sweden's wealthiest families, have amassed a growing stake through the holding company Ramsbury Invest, saying little about their intentions other than that they 'believe' in H&M, which was founded in 1947 by Erling Persson. The media-shy clan is now getting within striking distance of full control of the retailer, which in recent years has been losing ground among shoppers to its main rival, Zara, and ultra-fast fashion upstarts like Shein. 'This is something we've been talking about for years, and few would doubt that's the direction things are headed,' said Sverre Linton, chief legal officer and spokesperson for the Swedish Shareholders' Association, which represents small stock investors. He added that if the family doesn't plan to take H&M private, it should communicate that more clearly and stop buying shares. The family has ramped up insider buying by reinvesting dividends, boosting its H&M stake to almost 64% from 35.5% over the past nine years via Ramsbury, a vehicle named after billionaire Stefan Persson's sprawling estate. Including extended family holdings, the Perssons now control roughly 70% of the capital and about 85% of voting rights, according to H&M's website. In an interview last year with Bloomberg, H&M Chairman Karl-Johan Persson — grandson of the founder — dismissed talk that the family intended to take the company private. 'There are no plans,' he said. 'We just buy because we believe in the company.' Representatives at Ramsbury Invest and H&M declined to comment. Analysts, including Niklas Ekman at DNB Carnegie, say the family's regular share purchases could signal more than just confidence in the retailer. In a note to clients last month, Ekman estimated that if the family continues acquiring shares at the same pace, a buyout could come as early as two years from now. If its holdings reach 90%, the family could request a delisting of the shares. A take-private would be 'based on emotional rather than financial motives,' Ekman wrote, given that the family already has a controlling stake and has long managed the company with little regard for minority shareholders. He attributed the push to patriarch Stefan Persson, 77, who built H&M into one of the world's largest fast-fashion retailers during his 16 years as chief executive officer and over two decades as chairman. He remains deeply invested in the company's future. His son Karl-Johan, who took over as H&M chairman in 2020 after serving as CEO, also holds an active role at Ramsbury Invest. 'They've never, at least in modern times, expressed a strong desire to remain public,' said Daniel Schmidt, an analyst at Danske Bank. 'I would say that transparency has always been a part of it.' H&M's shares reached an all-time high about a decade ago and have since fallen by around 60%, valuing the group at 220 billion kronor. Zara owner Inditex SA, by contrast, has climbed about 60% over that period. For the Perssons, the sagging stock price is no doubt a frustration but also presents an opportunity by making full control more attainable. At the current price, it would cost the family at least 70 billion kronor to buy the remaining outstanding shares, according to Ekman. That would likely require them to take on debt. According to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Charles Allen, a delisting would also require a premium. 'If the bid were financed by debt, then it may reduce the company's operating flexibility,' Allen said. 'It wouldn't really matter if the debt was in the company or the family, as either way cash flow would have to be diverted from investment to pay interest and then repay.' Operationally, the fast-fashion retailer appears stuck in the slow lane, facing tepid demand for its apparel, fierce competition and now US tariffs. The first-quarter results were weaker than analysts had expected and showed that efforts to claw back customers through higher marketing spending hadn't brought a rebound. CEO Daniel Erver, an H&M veteran who took the top job last January, was involved in setting the current strategy and has yet to reverse market share losses in countries including Germany, France and the UK. Attempts to reconnect with younger audiences through collaborations, such as with pop artist Charli XCX, haven't significantly boosted growth. H&M has been criticized for a lack of transparency over sudden management changes and being the only company in Stockholm's benchmark index not to disclose the shareholdings of its top executive team. 'Obviously, being a listed company puts management under more scrutiny than if they were private, but it also presumably offers some incentives to management and other employees that would not be available if it were private,' BI's Allen said. Anders Oscarsson, head of equities at AMF, one of Sweden's biggest pension managers and the largest non-family shareholder, said he hasn't heard the family say anything about taking H&M private and that such a move would be a big loss for investors. 'It would be sad if the company disappears from the stock exchange,' he said. Yet if the family's purchases lead to a marked deterioration in the stock's liquidity, that wouldn't be a good outcome either. 'It might become a bit like Hotel California — where you can neither check in nor check out.'


Fashion Network
3 days ago
- Fashion Network
Swedish hair care brand Sachajuan launches in Indian market
Swedish hair care label Sachajuan has entered the Indian market with Kutub Ariwala, founder of BeautIndia. The brand aims to bring its minimalist, performance-driven products to a growing base of ingredient-aware consumers. 'I was tired of seeing clients overwhelmed by shelves of products, unsure of what actually worked,' said brand founder and hairstylist Sacha Mitic, Indian Retailer Bureau reported. 'Everything felt overly engineered. I wanted to go the other way- to create something intuitive, elegant, and honest.' Sachajuan's range includes leave-in treatments like In The Sun, After The Sun, Hair Repair, and Dark Volume Powder, the latter formulated specifically for dark hair tones. At the core of its products is 'Ocean Silk Technology,' combining marine algae to strengthen hair without weighing it down, according to its Facebook page. 'India's beauty and personal care industry is experiencing tremendous growth," said BeautIndia's founder Kutub Ariwala. "Today's consumer doesn't just read the label, they research every ingredient. They don't fall for fluff.' With an emphasis on scalp health, simplicity, and function, Sachajuan aims to engage shoppers in India's increasingly sophisticated premium haircare segment. 'There's such deep hair culture here,' said Mitic. 'What surprised me most was how people balance modern routines with traditional values.'