NPR, PBS face funding threat as House Republicans cite political bias
Listen to article
Republican lawmakers intensified their calls to dismantle and defund the United States' public broadcasting system, with leaders from NPR and PBS defending their editorial integrity and public service missions in a tense congressional hearing.
During testimony before the House's Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) subcommittee, Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene said, 'We believe that you all can hate us on your own dime,' arguing against federal support for what Republicans described as politically biased media.
The remarks come a day after President Donald Trump expressed support for eliminating funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes nearly $500 million in federal funding annually to public media outlets.
NPR and PBS leaders, including CEOs Katherine Maher and Paula Kerger, were pressed on past editorial decisions and content, particularly NPR's limited coverage of Hunter Biden's laptop in the run-up to the 2020 election.
Maher, who joined NPR in 2024, conceded the network had made a mistake in not covering the story more seriously.
'We made a mistake,' she said, also acknowledging regrets over past anti-Trump social media posts written before her tenure.
The hearing reflected longstanding Republican criticisms that public broadcasters skew left in their news programming. Rep. James Comer of Kentucky cited his past support for NPR but said he no longer recognises the content, describing it as 'disinformation.'
Greene criticised PBS for content she deemed inappropriate, including a 'drag queen' photo mistakenly uploaded to a local station's website and documentaries featuring transgender individuals. Kerger clarified that such content was part of adult programming and not targeted at children.
Democrats on the panel accused Republicans of using the hearing to distract from larger national security concerns. 'If shame was still a thing, this hearing would be shameful,' said Rep. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts.
Some lawmakers resorted to satire. Rep. Robert Garcia of California asked if Elmo, a character from Sesame Street, had ever been a member of the Communist Party. 'He's a puppet,' Kerger replied. 'But, no.'
Maher told the committee NPR's weekly listenership had dropped from 60 million in 2020 to 42 million in 2024, though it has risen slightly in the past year. She denied that the network is politically biased and highlighted efforts to diversify viewpoints in coverage.
Critics of public broadcasting have cited an essay by former NPR editor Uri Berliner, published Wednesday, in which he called for the network to stop accepting taxpayer funding and to acknowledge its progressive leanings.
Kerger warned that cuts to federal funding could devastate smaller PBS stations, particularly those in rural areas. 'This is an existential moment for them,' she said.
Following the hearing, the Committee to Protect Journalists defended NPR and PBS, calling them essential to public access to reliable information.
CEO Jodie Ginsberg said, 'Casting them as propaganda machines undeserving of taxpayer support is a dangerous mischaracterisation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
EU's strategic autonomy postponed, again
EDITORIAL: The EU may have averted a damaging trade war with the United States, but in doing so it has once again exposed the limits of its own strategic autonomy. The hurried agreement reached with President Donald Trump – a 15 percent tariff across EU exports in exchange for steep energy and investment pledges – has been spun as a diplomatic success in Brussels. Yet the broader picture suggests a reluctant capitulation dressed in the language of stability. At its core, this deal reflects a familiar European instinct: contain the immediate fallout, defer structural reform. Faced with the prospect of across-the-board 30 percent tariffs by August 1, the European Commission moved quickly to secure a 'framework accord' that trims the damage but doesn't eliminate it. On paper, key sectors like autos and pharmaceuticals have been spared harsher treatment. In practice, however, European exporters will still face a tariff regime significantly more punitive than the one in place before Trump returned to office. The accompanying commitments – USD 750 billion in energy imports and $600 billion in additional investment from EU firms – raise further questions. These are staggering figures, especially in light of the current fiscal constraints many member states are navigating. More importantly, the pledges appear more political than operational for now. What mechanisms will enforce them? What sectors will they affect? And what levers, if any, will Europe retain in future negotiations? Criticism from within the bloc has been immediate and sharp. France called the agreement a 'dark day', Hungary framed it as humiliation, and even industry groups in Germany – arguably the deal's most vocal backer – questioned the long-term cost of accepting new tariffs. That divergence highlights a deeper challenge: the EU's internal economic fragmentation continues to hamper its ability to present a coherent front when it matters most. What's notable here is less the outcome than the pattern. This is not the first time Brussels has opted to absorb pressure from Washington rather than confront it. The underlying logic – prioritising the transatlantic relationship to protect Europe's economic fabric – has remained intact for decades. But the assumptions that supported that logic are eroding fast. Trump's worldview, centred on bilateral leverage and zero-sum outcomes, runs counter to the EU's multilateral instincts. That tension isn't new, but it is now sharpened by a global environment where supply chains are more politicised, energy flows are more transactional, and technology competition is more strategic. In that context, the EU's position looks increasingly reactive. Indeed, much of the reaction from Brussels has framed the deal in binary terms: either this compromise or a full-blown trade war. That framing itself suggests a lack of leverage. The bloc remains economically powerful, but it still lacks the instruments – both institutional and political – to translate market size into bargaining strength. The concept of strategic autonomy has been central to European rhetoric since at least 2016. Yet each time the need to demonstrate it arises; the result is a recalibration rather than a redefinition. What this deal underscores is that the EU still lacks the confidence to negotiate with the United States on equal footing when the stakes are highest. The agreement may have shielded millions of European jobs in the short term, but it has also signalled to Washington, and the world, that Brussels remains unwilling to pay the upfront costs of independence. If the goal is to build a resilient and autonomous Europe, that reluctance will have to change. Sooner or later, avoiding escalation will no longer be an option. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Oil steadies on reports of US-Russia deal
HOUSTON: Oil held steady on Friday as markets awaited a meeting in coming days between Russian president Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump, but prices marked their steepest weekly losses since late June on a tariff-hit economic outlook. Brent crude futures settled 16 cents, or 0.2%, higher at $66.59 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude futures were unchanged at $63.88. Brent fell 4.4% over the week, while WTI finished 5.1% lower than last Friday's close. US crude fell over 1% earlier in the session after Bloomberg News reported that Washington and Moscow were aiming to reach a deal to halt the war in Ukraine that would lock in Russia's occupation of territory seized during its military invasion. US and Russian officials are working towards an agreement on territories for a planned summit meeting between Trump and Putin as early as next week, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter. The potential meeting raises expectations of a diplomatic end to the war in Ukraine, which could lead to eased sanctions on Russia, and comes as trade tensions have been on the rise between Trump and buyers of Russian oil. This week, Trump threatened to increase tariffs on India if it kept purchasing Russian oil. Trump also said China, the largest buyer of Russian crude, could be hit with tariffs similar to those levied against Indian imports. 'Various non-oil considerations are at play, including fears over the impact of tariffs and the headlines flying over the last few days regarding a Trump and Putin meeting in the near term,' said Neil Crosby, an energy market analyst at Sparta Commodities. 'Headline risk is particularly strong currently with flip-flopping regarding who will turn up to a meeting over Ukraine and under what circumstances.' Higher US tariffs on imports from a host of trade partners went into effect on Thursday, raising concern over economic activity and demand for crude oil, ANZ Bank analysts said in a note. OPEC+ agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September, the latest in a series of accelerated output hikes to regain market share, adding to supply. The US oil rig count, an indicator of future supply, rose by one to 411 this week. 'Bearish sentiment has returned this week as key OPEC+ members announced a second 'quadruple' output unwind for September (thus fully restoring their extra voluntary cuts of 2.2 mmb/d) and President Trump's sweeping import tariffs took effect against most countries,' analysts at FGE NexantECA said. Trump on Thursday also said he will nominate Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran to serve out the final few months of a newly vacant seat at the Federal Reserve, fuelling expectations of a more dovish policy ahead. Lower interest rates reduce consumer borrowing costs and can boost economic growth and demand for oil. The dollar firmed on Friday but headed for a weekly fall. A stronger dollar hurts demand for dollar-denominated crude from foreign buyers. Money managers cut their net long US crude futures and options positions in the week to August 5, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said.
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan welcomes signing of peace agreement
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan welcomed the signing of the peace agreement between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia. This historic moment reflects the wisdom and sagacity of Azerbaijan's leadership in bringing a prolonged conflict to a peaceful resolution, Foreign Office spokesperson stated this in a statement issued here on Saturday. Pakistan acknowledges and appreciates the efforts of President Trump in fostering conflict resolution and promoting peace across various regions of the world. As a steadfast advocate for peace and stability in the Caucasus and beyond, Pakistan hopes this agreement will mark the beginning of a new era of prosperity and enduring peace - not only for Azerbaijan and Armenia but for the entire region. Azerbaijan and Armenia have signed historic US-brokered peace deal on Friday in Washington in front of President Donald Trump. Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev and Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a peace deal at the White House. The deal, if it holds, would end almost years of tensions and conflict between the two arch rivals over control of Nogorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
