
Population Census-2027: Why this reopens debate on delimitation, timeline
The announcement Wednesday of the decision to conduct Population Census-2027 in two phases along with enumeration of castes has reopened the debate on delimitation, especially in the southern states, with Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin seeking an answer from the Centre and accusing it of delaying the headcount to reduce the state's parliamentary representation.
The many processes of the exercise and what will follow put a question mark on whether all this can be completed before the next Lok Sabha elections in 2029.
Stalin, in a post on X, demanded 'Fair Delimitation' and said, 'The Indian Constitution mandates that delimitation must follow the first Census after 2026. The BJP has now delayed the Census to 2027, making their plan clear to reduce Tamil Nadu's Parliamentary representation. I had warned about this. It is now unfolding… We need clear answers from the Union Government.'
Stalin had earlier asked the Centre to extend the 1971 Census-based delimitation framework for another 30 years beyond 2026. The 'status quo should continue for at least three decades', until 2056, he had said.
The Congress, on the other hand, treaded cautiously. 'There is really no reason to delay the Census that was due in 2021 for another twenty three months. The Modi Government is capable only of generating headlines, not meeting deadlines,' the party's communication head Jairam Ramesh said.
According to the announcement by the Ministry of Home Affairs, 'the reference date for Population Census-2027 will be 00:00 hours of the first day of March, 2027'.
Sources said the Census enumeration may take only 21 days and will be completed in February 2027 and the final report released in the next few months.
This will eventually open the doors for delimitation to take place. The government has also promised to implement 33% reservation for women in Parliament following the delimitation.
Delimitation has been a contentious subject with parties ruling the southern states fearing that they will lose representation in Parliament if delimitation is conducted based on population enumeration of the latest Census. It is because the southern states have been able to control their populations better compared to northern states over the years. Earlier this year, the ruling DMK in Tamil Nadu even passed a resolution opposing Census-based delimitation.
According to sources, while the government is yet to notify the exact schedule, which would be done through a gazette notification on June 16, it is likely that the house listing phase of the Census will start by March-April 2026. This will be completed by September 2026 and would be followed by Census enumeration that will take place over 21 days in February 2027. Sources said 25-30 lakh enumerators would be involved in conducting the Census.
Sources said after the enumeration is completed, provisional data of the population may become available within 10 days in the month of March. 'This time, enumeration is being done digitally. So things will be faster. There will still be some time lag between the provisional data and the final data. Removal of discrepancies through verification may take six months. It is also likely that there will be very little difference between the provisional data and final data since it is being done digitally,' an official of the MHA said.
Once the final data is out, which could be in late 2027 itself, it will open the doors to start the process of delimitation. Parliament will have to pass a Delimitation Act to pave the way for formation of a Delimitation Commission.
This Commission would then devise a formula (population per constituency), in consultation with various stakeholders including state governments, based on which the delimitation exercise would be conducted.
A Constitutional amendment Bill will have to be brought to increase the seats in Parliament which remain frozen at 543.
Delimitation is mandated under Articles 81 and 82 of the Constitution and is required to be carried out after every Census. This happened thrice, based on the Census of 1951, 1961 and 1971.
The 42nd Amendment to the Constitution, passed during the Emergency, froze the total number of Parliamentary and state Assembly seats until the 2001 Census.
The present delimitation of Parliamentary constituencies within states, has been done on the basis of the 2001 Census, under the provisions of Delimitation Act, 2002. However, only the boundaries of constituencies have been altered and not the number of seats which remain the same as based on the 1971 Census.
Again, the Constitution of India was specifically amended (84th amendment) in 2002, not to have interstate delimitation of constituencies until the 'first Census conducted after the year 2026'.
According to the Delimitation Act of 2002, the Delimitation Commission would be headed by a retired Supreme Court judge and would have a Chief Election Commissioner and State Election Commissioner as members. The Commission associates as members MPs and MLAs from states but none of these members have voting rights.
The Centre will have to get a Constitutional amendment passed to increase the total number of seats in Parliament and that will require a two-thirds majority. According to Article 81 of the Constitution, the total number of seats in Lok Sabha cannot exceed 550.
But resisting an increase in total number of seats could put southern states at further disadvantage since Census-based delimitation at 543 seats could reduce their existing number of seats in Parliament. Also, since women's reservation is tethered to the delimitation process, opposing it could open a political party to the charge of being anti-women.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
The Story Of Filmmaker Roshaan Khattak, Hunted By Pakistan, Let Down By Cambridge
On April 10, 2025, UK MP John McDonnell issued a stark warning to the University of Cambridge: 'It is absolutely essential that his research into the critical issue of the Balochistan genocide is not obstructed - regardless of pressure from the Pakistani state.' His message, sent to Cambridge Vice-Chancellor Deborah Prentice and Wolfson College President Ijeoma Uchegbu, called for urgent clarity on how the university was responding to security concerns surrounding a postgraduate researcher facing threats. 'I would therefore be most grateful,' McDonnell added, 'if you could clarify any current security concerns and let me know how I and other Members of Parliament familiar with the Balochistan situation might offer assistance.' Why Both China And Pak Are Interested McDonnell was advocating on behalf of Roshaan Khattak, an Oscar-nominated filmmaker and academic whose proposed doctorate at Cambridge investigates enforced disappearances and other genocidal crimes in Balochistan - a region of Pakistan intersected by China's multibillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Politically explosive, both Islamabad and Beijing have a deep interest in controlling the narrative. And so, what began as a scholarly project has morphed into a high-stakes test: will one of the world's most prestigious universities defend academic freedom, or capitulate to the pressures of transnational repression? Roshaan's ordeal began in December, when he started receiving explicit threats. One anonymous message warned: 'Don't forget even Cambridge and the UK is not safe. They can get anywhere…. Don't be stupid.' According to security analysts, the threats bear the hallmarks of Pakistan's intelligence services. Rather than receiving institutional support, Khattak says he encountered obstruction. Wolfson College abruptly revoked his accommodation, changed his door locks without notice, and permitted staff to access his room while he was abroad - compromising hard drives that stored sensitive data. He also reports that key emails mysteriously vanished from his university account. All of this, he says, occurred without a formal security review. Anonymous emails also warned that 'senior staff had mentioned that the Pakistani state via its embassy and networks… [is] not happy with your research' and cautioned that 'just like they were looking for excuses to cancel your room, they will now be looking to cancel your PhD'. 'Do It Yourself' The university's response? Roshaan was told Cambridge lacked the 'resources or expertise' to help, and was advised to rely on 'his own resources'. This is no isolated case. Transnational repression - the long arm of authoritarian regimes targeting exiles and dissidents abroad - is now a grim feature of global politics. In the UK alone, police thwarted an assassination attempt on Dutch-based Pakistani activist Waqas Goraya. Scotland Yard has issued warnings to Iranian journalists in London. And in November 2023, Pakistani exile Shahzad Akbar survived an acid attack in England, widely believed to be orchestrated by Pakistan's ISI. What's new, however, and deeply troubling, is the encroachment of these tactics into British universities. Dr Andrew Chubb, who serves on the UK Parliament's working group on the issue, has described Khattak's case as 'a clear instance of transnational repression'. He's right. The threats are credible. The patterns are familiar. And the institutional response has been shamefully inadequate. Cambridge, of all places, should know better. Between 2020 and 2024, the university accepted up to £19 million from Chinese sources. That alone should have triggered safeguards and scrutiny when a researcher's work touched Beijing's strategic interests. Instead, the university appears to have treated the problem not as a matter of principle, but of risk management - removing the vulnerable rather than confronting the powerful. This goes far beyond Cambridge. If one of Britain's most prestigious universities can't - or won't - protect a single postgraduate researcher, what hope is there for smaller institutions? What message does this send to young academics investigating authoritarianism, state violence, or contested territories? A Break-In, A Threat For Roshaan, the risks are not theoretical. 'Two years ago,' he recalls, 'I travelled to Stockholm to investigate the mysterious assassination of fellow journalist Sajid Hussain Baloch. Right at the start of my investigation, my hotel room was broken into. My cameras, laptop, passport, and hard drives containing invaluable research were stolen. A man carrying a dagger was reportedly seen on my floor that very night.' Khattak, who is part of the working group for UK Parliamentary inquiry into transnational repression, has since submitted detailed testimony to the Parliament and proposed a model draft for the Transnational Repression Bill, calling for visa bans, asset freezes, and criminal penalties targeting foreign officials who orchestrate threats or harassment abroad. These are not abstract proposals. They are urgently needed tools in an increasingly hostile global landscape. Universities Must Do Better The stakes could not be higher. The deaths of Sajid Hussain in Sweden and Karima Baloch in Canada at the hands of Pakistani intelligence are grim reminders of what happens when states silence dissenters. Without formal safeguards - whether through the Office for Students, the Department for Education, or another body - Khattak's case won't be the last. As authoritarian regimes grow more aggressive, academics researching politically sensitive topics will continue to face serious threats, often without any institutional backup. Universities must decide what they stand for. Academic freedom is not just a slogan for glossy brochures. It's a moral and academic duty. And it's tested not in moments of comfort, but under pressure. Cambridge failed that test. The rest of the world should take note. Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author

Business Standard
41 minutes ago
- Business Standard
RBI Guv flags crypto concerns, says it may hamper financial stability
RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra on Friday said the central bank is concerned about cryptocurrencies as it can hamper financial stability. Malhotra was replying to a question during a media interaction post the RBI monetary policy about the developments in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's observation on crypto currency last month. "There is no new development as far as crypto is concerned. A committee of the government is looking after this. Of course, as you are aware, we are concerned about crypto because that can hamper financial stability and monetary policy," Malhotra said. The Supreme Court has last month asked the Centre to formulate a "clear cut" policy on regulating cryptocurrency, while underlining its impact on the economy. A Supreme Court bench termed the Bitcoin trade as an illicit trade more or less like "hawala" business. India is currently working on a discussion paper for cryptocurrencies and an inter-ministerial group (IMG), comprising officials from RBI, Sebi and finance ministry, is looking into global norms. In absence of any regulation, cryptocurrency is not yet illegal in India. The discussion paper will give the stakeholders an opportunity to give their views before India decides on its policy stance on cryptocurrencies. In 2022, the government announced a flat 30 per cent tax on gains arising from cryptocurrencies. Taxing income from cryptocurrencies does not necessarily and explicitly legalise cryptocurrencies. Currently, crypto assets are unregulated in India. Here cryptocurrencies are regulated from the perspective of anti-money laundering law. Besides that, income tax and TDS is levied on earnings from trading in such virtual digital assets. Also, GST is levied on cryptocurrency exchanges. It may be noted that, on March 4, 2021, the Supreme Court had set aside an RBI circular of April 6, 2018, prohibiting banks and entities regulated by it from providing services in relation to virtual currencies.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
From 2014 to 2025: How Modi redefined India's political and economic landscape
From policies that further prosperity to driving the economy to reach the fourth spot in the world, PM Modi has worked to make a name for India on the global stage through his ideas and actions in the past 11 years read more Prime Minister Narendra Modi will complete 11 years in office on June 9. The National Democratic Alliance's decade-long governance under PM Modi's vision has been marked by development in both the political and economic landscape. From policies that further prosperity to driving the economy to reach the fourth spot in the world, PM Modi has worked to make a name for India on the global stage through his ideas and actions in the past 11 years. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Here's a look at how this change came to effect: New building for Parliament India has come a long way since the British left in 1947. However, their vestiges remain in the form of buildings and architecture across the country. For 73 years, lawmakers had to draft blueprints of India's development in a British-made structure, that is, the old Parliament. Prime Minister Narendra Modi carries the 'Sengol' in a procession before installing it in the Lok Sabha chamber at the inauguration of the new Parliament building, in New Delhi, Sunday, May 28, 2023. PTI Under PM Modi, the central government changed this. In 2023, the prime minister inaugurated the new Parliament House of India, which now serves as a pillar of the country's heritage. The inauguration ceremony included traditional rituals such as a havan and the installation of the Sengol, a sacred sceptre, behind the Speaker's chair in the Lok Sabha chamber. Rise of BJP at the Centre and in states PM Modi did not just help the Bharatiya Janata Party dominate the centre, but also paved the way for the party to expand its footprint across India. The BJP, along with its ally parties, are now ruling 19 states and two union territories. The latest victory came during the Delhi Assembly Elections in February when the party dethroned the Aam Aadmi Party's rule to make a comeback in the national capital. Party workers and supporters celebrating BJP's success in Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh state assembly elections outside the BJP headquarter, in New Delhi on Monday. PTI This expansion of NDA governance marks a historic milestone, with the alliance now overseeing a population of approximately 920 million people, solidifying its dominance in India's political landscape. End of the Congress-led political power In 2014, a new age of politics was heralded in India. PM Modi's BJP ended the Indian National Congress's 10 years of rule under former prime minister Manmohan Singh. The Grand Old Party has ever since been the largest Opposition in India. BJP has now emerged as India's dominant political force, securing consecutive majorities in the 2014, 2019 and 2024 general elections. This period marked a shift from a multi-party system to a more centralised political landscape, with the BJP consolidating support among various social groups, including rural voters, women, and marginalised communities. In fact, PM Modi is the first prime minister after Jawaharlal Nehru to have won three consecutive parliamentary elections. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD End of Article 370 In 2019, the central government took the bold step of abrogating Article 370 that gave Jammu and Kashmir its special status and split the region into two Union Territories – J&K and Ladakh. Supporters wave BJP's flags at Prime Minister Narendra Modi's helicopter, during a public meeting ahead of the Delhi Assembly elections, at Kartar Nagar in New Delhi. PTI The abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019 significantly transformed Jammu and Kashmir by integrating it fully into India's constitutional framework. This move enabled the application of central laws, such as the Right to Education and land acquisition compensation statutes, which were previously inapplicable. One nation, one tax PM Modi revolutionised India's taxation system by introducing 'One Nation, One Tax' that established the Goods and Services Tax (GST), which was implemented on July 1, 2017. This landmark reform unified the country's complex tax structure by subsuming various central and state taxes into a single tax, aiming to simplify the taxation process and promote economic integration. The GST was officially launched at midnight on June 30, 2017, with a special session held in the Central Hall of Parliament. Finance Bill of 2017 In 0217, the central government under the BJP unveiled the Finance Bill, which is seen as a significant legislative measure introduced in India to implement the financial proposals of the administration. It encompassed over 40 amendments across various laws, aiming to enhance transparency, curb black money, and streamline governance. Key provisions included making Aadhaar mandatory for filing income tax returns and obtaining a Permanent Account Number (PAN), imposing a cap of Rs 2 lakh on cash transactions to discourage unaccounted money, and removing caps on corporate donations to political parties while mandating anonymous contributions through electoral bonds. The bill also helped to restructure several tribunals, granting the central government greater control over their functioning.