Parliament monsoon session: Discussion on Dhankhar's resignation rejected; House dismisses over two dozen adjournment notices
Monsoon session of Parliament
witnessed sharp protests after Rajya Sabha deputy chairman Harivansh on Thursday rejected nearly 30 adjournment notices submitted by Opposition MPs, including those seeking a discussion on the sudden resignation of vice-president Jagdeep Dhankhar.
The rejection comes amid rising political tension and speculation over Dhankhar's exit, which several opposition leaders claim may have been influenced by internal pressure from the ruling dispensation. Dhankhar stepped down from his post on Monday citing health reasons. His resignation was officially communicated to the Upper House the next day.
The Rajya Sabha was adjourned just 15 minutes after proceedings began, as Opposition members protested, demanding the withdrawal of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision in Bihar.
The House is set to meet on Friday at 11 am.
Opposition seeks answers over VP's resignation
Indian Union Muslim League MP Abdul Wahab had submitted a notice under Rule 267 demanding a debate on what he described as the "unexpected resignation" of the Rajya Sabha Chairman. Multiple Congress MPs joined in, questioning the timing and reasons behind Dhankhar's departure.
On July 23, Congress chief and leader of the opposition in Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge said, "The government should answer why he resigned.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Many Filipinos don't know about this!
Sunlife.com.ph
Read More
Undo
I can see 'dal mein kuch kaala hai.' His health is fine. He used to defend RSS and BJP always. Who and what is behind his resignation should be known to the country."
Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee went a step further, alleging that Dhankhar was "forced" to resign by the Prime Minister and senior Cabinet members. "He was threatened that if he didn't resign before 9 pm on that day, an impeachment motion would be brought against him," Banerjee claimed.
Government maintains silence; PIB denies sealing rumours
Amidst the flurry of political allegations, rumours also swirled on social media that Dhankhar's official residence had been sealed and his social media team dismissed. These claims were firmly denied by the Press Information Bureau (PIB).
In a post on X, the PIB's fact-check unit clarified: "It is being widely claimed on social media that Vice President's official residence has been sealed and former VP has been asked to vacate his residence immediately.
These claims are Fake. Don't fall for misinformation. Always verify news from official sources before sharing it."
Congress leader Udit Raj welcomed the clarification and said, "Now, PIB has clarified the matter, and it is confirmed that his house has not been sealed, nor has the social media team been ousted. This clears up the confusion."
Revanth Reddy backs Bandaru Dattatraya for VP
Speculation over the next vice president has begun. Telangana chief minister Revanth Reddy suggested that Bandaru Dattatraya, the former Haryana governor, should be considered.
"If Modi ji writes to me, I would definitely go to him and say that he is from Telangana and he is a decent man. I will try my best to help him," Reddy said. He added that the final decision lies with the All India Congress Committee (AICC).
Reddy also claimed that Telugu-speaking leaders have historically been sidelined. "Vice President of India should be from Telangana. Last time, there were discussions that Venkaiah Naidu would be made the President, but there was injustice, and he was sent back from Delhi," he remarked.
BJP pushes for
Operation Sindoor debate
While the controversy over Dhankhar's resignation continues, the BJP is preparing to lead a major discussion in Parliament on "Operation Sindoor", a military operation that reportedly lasted 88 hours and targeted Pakistani airfields.
BJP MP Shashank Mani welcomed the discussion, saying, "This was a very critical project in which we demolished the ambitions of Pakistan. PM Modi's message against terrorism is echoing throughout the world.
We went to war for 88 hours, and a discussion is a must."
The Lok Sabha has allocated 16 hours for the debate, which will begin on July 28. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to take part after his return from foreign visits to the UK and Maldives. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh will reply to the debate.
In Rajya Sabha, the discussion is scheduled for July 29. Sources say that while the government accepted the Opposition's request for farewell speeches for seven retiring MPs, it refused to allow a similar speech from Dhankhar.
Rahul Gandhi questions PM
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi
also criticised PM Modi for not addressing earlier ceasefire claims made by former US President Donald Trump.
"How can the Prime Minister give a statement? Kya bolenge PM, ki Trump ne karwaya hai? He can't say it, but it is the truth. The entire world knows that Trump has announced a ceasefire. We can't hide from reality," he told reporters.
EC begins VP election preparations
Following Dhankhar's resignation, the Election Commission has initiated steps to elect a new Vice President.
The Electoral College comprises members from both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. As per protocol, if the position becomes vacant due to resignation or any other reason, elections must be held as soon as possible.
The EC is finalising the Returning Officer, Assistant Returning Officers, and background materials related to past vice-presidential elections.
Jagdeep Dhankhar, in his resignation letter, said he was stepping down "to prioritise health care and abide by medical advice". He thanked the President and Prime Minister for their support and cooperation during his tenure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ghislaine Maxwell has offered to testify before Congress, but only with immunity and conditions met
Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a prison sentence for helping Jeffrey Epstein abuse minors, has said she is willing to testify before the US Congress but only if she is granted immunity and other conditions are met. As per to a letter seen by CNN, her lawyers wrote to the House Oversight Committee saying she would cooperate 'if a fair and safe path forward can be established.' House Oversight Chair James Comer had earlier issued a subpoena for Maxwell to testify next month. Her lawyers said they had first planned to use her Fifth Amendment rights which protect against self-incrimination but later suggested she might speak to Congress under certain terms. One reason, they said, is that Maxwell is currently appealing her criminal conviction to the US Supreme Court. 'Any testimony she provides now could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool,' her lawyers wrote, as reported by CNN. They also said some lawmakers had already made public remarks about Maxwell that 'appear to have prejudged her credibility without even listening to what she has to say or evaluating the extensive documentation that corroborates it.' Maxwell's lawyers listed four main conditions for her testimony: If these conditions are not met, they said, Maxwell would invoke her right to remain silent. A spokesperson for the Oversight Committee told CNN that Maxwell's request for immunity would not be considered. 'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony,' the statement said. Chair James Comer also told CNN last week, 'I don't think there are many Republicans that want to give immunity to someone that may have been sex trafficking children.' Maxwell's legal team ended their letter by appealing to President Donald Trump for clemency. 'Of course, in the alternative, if Ms. Maxwell were to receive clemency, she would be willing and eager to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, DC,' the letter said. 'She welcomes the opportunity to share the truth and to dispel the many misconceptions and misstatements that have plagued this case from the beginning.'
NDTV
31 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Tried To Push Saffron Terror Narrative': PM Slams Congress In House Speech
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched a blistering attack on the Congress during his reply to the debate on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, accusing the party of decades-long inaction against terrorism due to its "appeasement politics" and vote-bank compulsions. In a scathing speech, PM Modi said that before 2014, the country was gripped by fear, with frequent terror alerts and citizens left to fend for their own safety. "Back then, the government didn't offer protection - it only issued warnings. People were told to be alert because bombs could go off anywhere. That was the reality of Congress rule," PM Modi said. He contrasted the current government's approach with that of the previous regimes led by Congress, claiming that under BJP rule, India has demonstrated both the will and capability to strike back decisively at terrorism. "The question the nation is asking today is: if we can take firm action against terror, why didn't Congress governments do it? What was stopping them?" PM Modi asked. The Prime Minister accused the Congress of being soft on terror to appease its vote banks. He cited multiple instances to make his case: Batla House encounter: "When terrorists were neutralised, a senior Congress leader was seen weeping. This wasn't compassion for the victims - it was appeasement in its most shameful form." Parliament attack (2001): "A Congress leader advocated giving terrorist Afzal Guru the benefit of doubt, even after such a brazen attack on India's democracy." 26/11 Mumbai Attacks "Despite overwhelming global evidence linking the attackers to Pakistan, Congress tried to push the narrative of 'saffron terror'. They were more interested in protecting their vote banks than defending the country." PM Modi also slammed the Congress for weakening anti-terror laws and blocking the full implementation of the Constitution in Jammu & Kashmir. "Why didn't Article 370 go earlier? Because the Congress didn't want to upset its appeasement strategy. Dr. Ambedkar's Constitution was kept out of Kashmir by Congress itself." He also referred to a reported incident where a Congress leader allegedly told a US diplomat that Hindu organisations were more dangerous than Lashkar-e-Taiba. "Imagine the mindset," PM Modi said, "comparing patriots to terrorists - just for political gain." The Prime Minister's speech, punctuated with pointed accusations and references to past terror attacks, underscored the BJP's aggressive posture on national security and its effort to corner the Opposition - particularly the Congress - on issues of internal safety and patriotism. As the Lok Sabha sat in tense silence punctuated by sharp protests from Opposition benches, PM Modi concluded with a pointed message: "The country has changed. The politics of fear and appeasement will no longer be accepted. The era of turning a blind eye to terror is over."
New Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Terrorism flourished under Congress rule, BJP brought it in check: PM Modi
PM Modi responded to scrutiny over Operation Sindoor by the Opposition leaders, especially LoP Rahul Gandhi, by claiming that his government brought terrorism under check, whereas it had flourished under the Congress rule, which ultimately led to the Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK).
