Acts of kindness can make you happier and healthier, Happiness researchers say: 3 simple ways to give and reap the benefits
They discovered that the rate of benevolent acts was 10% higher in 2024 than between 2017 and 2019 almost everywhere in the world. They also found that the rate of helping strangers, specifically, is 18% higher than between 2017 and 2019.
"People consistently and universally underestimate the kindness of others," says Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, editor of the report and director of the Wellbeing Research Centre at the University of Oxford. But the truth is, it happens more often than people realize.
"In the United States, only 30% of people think the wallet will be returned when lost," says De Neve. "The reality is about 60% of wallets get returned when lost." And these acts improve everyone's wellbeing.
Kindness is a "dynamic and a virtuous cycle," says De Neve, "in the sense that if you're being virtuous and helping others and being kind to others, that obviously helps the receiving party, but it also helps you."
Researchers now have proof that three different kinds of giving can have this effect:
"These things are very strongly correlated with improving one's own life satisfaction, one's own well-being," says De Neve. Even toddlers as young as two years old feel pleasure from giving to others, according to the report.
In fact, just seeing someone else's generosity has a positive impact on wellbeing, researchers found.
And if you're looking to implement these kind acts in your own life, there's virtually no limit to how frequently you should do so in terms of reaping the benefits. "The kinder you can be without hurting yourself, of course," says De Neve, the better.
For managers looking for feel-good teambuilding activities, "allow company employees and teams to volunteer together for their chosen charities on company days," suggests De Neve.
The wellbeing effects will be the same as those outside of the workplace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Researchers discover 2,500-year-old honey residue in ancient bronze jars
Researchers recently made a sticky discovery. They found 2,500-year-old honey, sealed in a vessel and buried underground for nearly three millennia. The residue was found in bronze jars at an underground shrine in Paestum, an ancient Greek settlement in modern-day Campania, Italy. The artifacts date back to the 6th century B.C. The jars were first found by archaeologists in 1954, but the residue in them has eluded experts – until now. In a study published by the American Chemical Society on July 30, experts concluded that the waxy residue was once honey. Luciana Carvalho, a research associate at the University of Oxford, told Fox News Digital the substance bears little resemblance to the golden honey in most modern-day cupboards. "Ancient honey was quite different from the clear, smooth honey we buy today," she noted. "There was no ultra‑filtration, no pasteurization and no synthetic pesticides in the landscape." The chemical results "strongly" suggested that the jars held raw honeycomb, rather than a blended product like most modern honey. "If honey had been mixed with milk, for example, we would expect to see extra fatty acids in the residue – and we don't," she said. But the raw honeycomb has dramatically changed over the millennia. Along with fellow researchers Elisabete Pires and James McCullagh, Carvalho found that the sugar gradually became dark and acidic. "After 2,500 years, almost all the original sugars have broken down [and been] eaten by microbes, so the residue isn't sweet anymore." "[The] sugars slowly reacted with proteins in a kind of slow-motion browning process, similar to what happens when bread bakes, turning it darker and more acidic," she said. Because of that, the remaining residue isn't exactly pleasant to eat, according to the expert. "What survives now is a waxy residue with a slight tang and virtually no sweetness," Carvalho noted. "After 2,500 years, almost all the original sugars have broken down [and been] eaten by microbes, so the residue isn't sweet anymore." As for the vessels, Carvalho said the bronze jars have cork discs that seal their necks, which points to "careful storage of something valuable." The copper-alloy jugs were found in a sealed, underground shrine, suggesting that they were left there as part of a ritual. "Inside, the residue clung to the bottoms and sides, exactly what you'd expect if raw honeycomb had been placed inside and slowly dried out over centuries," she said. "We hope our approach will be used to identify honey residues in other museum collections so we can learn more about ancient beekeeping and the role of honey in diet, medicine and ritual life." Researchers in the 1980s previously believed that the honey was a mixture of wax, fat and resin, with Carvalho noting that past research was limited by less precise tools. "Those methods were great for detecting fats and waxes but couldn't easily pick up sugars or proteins without extra chemical steps," she said. "In our study we used multiple modern techniques designed to detect different types of molecules, including sugars and proteins, even if these are present at trace levels, with instruments far more sensitive than anything available in the 1980s." She also noted that the discovery had strong collaboration from multiple groups, including museum curators, conservators and specialized scientists. "We hope our approach will now be used to identify honey residues in other museum collections so we can learn more about ancient beekeeping and the role of honey in diet, medicine and ritual life," Carvalho said. The latest research adds to a number of ancient food-related discoveries this year, which are extremely rare occurrences. In Guam, 3,500-year-old rice was recently found, making it the earliest known evidence of rice in Remote Oceania. Earlier in 2025, archaeologists uncovered a well-preserved loaf of ancient bread in Turkey, dating back to the Bronze Age.
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
Weight Loss May Improve Pregnancy Odds
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Weight loss interventions for people who are overweight and obese undertaken before turning to IVF could increase the chances of getting pregnant naturally. This is the conclusion of researchers from University of Oxford who reviewed 12 past studies involving nearly 2,000 patients from 1980 to May of this year. They compared a woman's weight to how likely they were to become pregnant either without IVF (unassisted pregnancy), with IVF (treatment-induced pregnancy) and overall (unassisted plus treatment-induced)—as well as whether they delivered a live baby. "All participants in the included studies were candidates for IVF. Before having IVF, they were offered weight loss support. The women who got pregnant naturally, ended up not needing to have IVF," study author and dietician Moscho Michalopoulou told Newsweek. Side view pregnant woman with advanced pregnant belly belly in hands. Side view pregnant woman with advanced pregnant belly belly in criteria included studies conducted on women who were at least 18 years old with a BMI of 27 kg/m² or greater who were seeking IVF with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment (ICSI) for infertility. "IVF and ICSI are assisted reproductive techniques where oocytes [cells involved in reproduction] are fertilized outside the body, before embryos are transferred back into the woman's womb. The key difference is how the fertilization is achieved," Michalopoulou explained. "Regular IVF egg and sperm are typically mixed in a Petri dish, with ICSI, the sperm is directly injected into the egg." The researchers found that participants were typically women in their early 30s with a median baseline BMI of 33.6 kg/m². The weight loss interventions studied included low-energy diets, an exercise program accompanied by healthy eating advice and pharmacotherapy accompanied by diet and physical activity advice. "Low-energy diets, also known as total diet replacements, typically use liquid formula products to replace real food and induce a much larger energy deficit with total energy intake of no more than 1000 kcal/day, followed by gradual reintroduction of foods for weight stabilization," Michalopoulou explained. She said these are safe for women when supervised and supported to follow such a program, with a lot of literature on the effectiveness of these diets. "In this one study, the main intervention being tested was high-intensity interval training (referenced as Kiel 2018 in the paper). At the same time, participants were advised to eat healthy as per national healthy eating recommendations," said Michalopoulou. In terms of the 'pharmacotherapy' intervention, she added, "Participants were instructed to take weight loss medication which was the main intervention being tested, but at the same time, they were given healthy eating advice or a hypocaloric diet [low in calories], plus advice on how to increase their physical activity, e.g. doing more steps, or doing exercise." Overall, weight loss interventions before IVF were associated with greater unassisted pregnancy rates, according to the researchers. "Regardless of weight loss method used, across all studies, women with obesity who participated in a supported weight loss program before IVF had 47 percent higher chances of getting pregnant naturally, compared to women in the comparator groups who typically received standard care," said Michalopoulou. "Therefore, more women in the intervention than in the comparator groups did not need to have IVF treatment to get pregnant, as they got pregnant naturally." However, evidence was inconclusive on the effect of weight loss interventions on treatment-induced pregnancies. Illustration representing IVF process with eggs fertilized with sperm. Illustration representing IVF process with eggs fertilized with sperm."It is unclear if weight loss interventions before IVF have an effect on the chances of getting pregnant through IVF. In some studies there were more IVF pregnancies in the intervention groups compared to standard care, in some others there were fewer IVF pregnancies compared to standard care—and in some others there was no difference in IVF pregnancy rates compared to standard care," Michalopoulou explained. "This large variability, combined with other methodological issues of the included studies, prevent us from having a clear conclusion on whether weight loss programs before IVF have an effect on IVF-induced pregnancy success or not." Evidence on the association between weight loss interventions before IVF and live births was uncertain—mainly because there were fewer studies that reported live birth outcomes—although there was moderate certainty of no association with pregnancy loss. "Obesity can lead to female infertility through hormone imbalance, insulin resistance, inflammation, and polycystic ovary syndrome. All of these can lead to ovulatory dysfunction," said Michalopoulou. "Obesity has also been associated with lower IVF success for women with infertility, such as requiring higher doses of treatment, reduced response to the medications, reduced chances of getting pregnant, and increased chances of miscarriage if a pregnancy is achieved." "Maintaining a healthier weight can help improve hormone balance, increase insulin sensitivity, reduce inflammation, and improve ovulation. For women seeking IVF, lowering their BMI to healthier levels may improve sensitivity and response to the treatment, improve egg quality and uterine function, and as a result, increase their chances of getting pregnant." However, everyone is different, the researcher noted. "Many larger women will have healthy pregnancies. But evidence shows that starting pregnancy carrying too much weight and gaining too much weight during pregnancy are both associated with greater risks of complications. This does not mean that every woman living with obesity will develop these complications—just that there will likely be more complications than in women who start pregnancy in the normal BMI range" The researchers hope their systematic review and analysis of randomized controlled trials will lead to more advanced trials. "We already know weight loss can help with fertility, but whether it improves IVF outcomes is far less certain. This review sheds some light, but most of the studies are small and at high risk of bias, so the results need cautious interpretation. IVF bypasses many obesity-related barriers, but what is still unclear is if delaying treatment for weight loss truly boosts success rates," said Ying Cheong—a professor of reproductive medicine of the University of Southampton who was not involved in the present study—in a statement. "Weight loss interventions before IVF appear to increase the chances of pregnancy, especially through natural conception, which may negate the need for IVF treatment, and does not seem to increase the risk of pregnancy loss. This offers hope to women with obesity and infertility," Michalopoulou said. "However, the evidence is limited and unclear on whether weight loss interventions before IVF have an effect on live birth rates, and more evidence from larger, high-quality trials is needed to test this." Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about pregnancy? Let us know via health@ Reference Michalopoulou, M., Jebb, S. A., Hobson, A., Khaw, S. C., Stevens, R., Melo, P., Haffner, S. J. P., Clay, K. S., Mounsey, S., Granne, I., Lim, L., Child, T., & Astbury, N. M. (2025). The effect of weight loss before in vitro fertilization on reproductive outcomes in women with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 178(9).
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists make incredible plant discovery that could help solve major issue in food system: 'It's the signal that initiates healing'
Scientists make incredible plant discovery that could help solve major issue in food system: 'It's the signal that initiates healing' Scientists at the University of Helsinki have found that plants use gas movement to heal their protective outer layers. When a plant's outer cork layer gets damaged, gases shift. Ethylene escapes while oxygen flows in through the wound. This simple gas exchange tells the plant to start repairs. The protective cork layer, called the periderm, normally blocks gases from moving in or out, which creates conditions where ethylene (a plant hormone) builds up inside while oxygen levels drop due to the plant's natural growth processes. When damage occurs, this balance gets disrupted. "Gas diffusion through a wound isn't just a consequence of injury — it's the signal that initiates healing," explained Dr. Hiroyuki Iida, the lead scientist on the project. The team first noticed ethylene's role in healing, then worked with University of Oxford Professor Francesco Licausi to confirm oxygen's importance, too. Once repairs finish and the barrier seals back up, gases again accumulate inside the plant, which signals that healing can stop and normal growth can resume. This elegant detection system works without complex sensors, using basic physics to monitor barrier integrity. This discovery holds promise for the future of food waste and crop resilience. Potatoes, carrots, fruits, and other produce with damaged outer layers tend to lose water and become more susceptible to disease, ultimately leading to spoilage. By studying and improving this natural repair system, farmers might grow plants that handle dry conditions better, while picked produce could stay fresh for longer in stores. With warming temperatures and growing populations putting pressure on global food systems, this finding creates promising paths for more sustainable farming. Improving how plants heal could help feed more people while cutting waste throughout the food supply chain. Researchers are now exploring practical uses that could reach farms and food storage facilities within the next few years. What is the biggest reason you don't grow food at home? Not enough time Not enough space It seems too hard I have a garden already Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
