Russia Claims Quad Nations Trying To Force India Into Military Alliance: ‘Trying To Involve…'
Last Updated:
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov highlighted that Quad member countries were actively pushing for naval and military exercises outside the official Quad framework.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has claimed that India's joined the QUAD alliance, comprising the United States, Japan, and Australia, ostensibly for trade; however, the member nations were reportedly already coordinating naval and other military exercises.
'We spoke to our Indian friends back then and they told us that their interest in joining the Quad is exclusively of trade of economic nature and cooperation in other peaceful areas," he said at a security conference in Eurasia in the city of Perm, as quoted by media reports.
He highlighted that Quad member countries were actively pushing for naval and military exercises outside the official Quad framework.
Lavrov further warned that these actions were part of a broader strategy to militarise the alliance, adding, 'they try to involve all the four countries into these exercises. And I'm sure that our Indian friends, they can see this provocation clearly."
He also called for reviving the Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral format. He said the 'time has come" to restart RIC meetings, adding that, in his view, India and China have reached an understanding on easing border tensions.
'I would like to confirm our genuine interest in the earliest resumption of the work within the format of the troika — Russia, India, China — which was established many years ago on the initiative of (ex-Russian prime minister) Yevgeny Primakov, and which has organised meetings more than 20 times at the ministerial level since then, not only at the level of foreign policy chiefs, but also the heads of other economic, trade and financial agencies of the three countries," Lavrov was quoted as saying by TASS.
The RIC platform, originally launched in the late 1990s, has remained dormant since the deadly Galwan clashes between Indian and Chinese troops in June 2020. While Russia had hinted at trilateral engagement during the BRICS Summit in Kazan in 2024, Lavrov's latest pitch marks the most explicit call to formally revive the RIC mechanism since Galwan. Lavrov's renewed pitch signals much more than just a procedural revival — it reflects Moscow's shifting diplomatic calculus amid changing global alignments.
Earlier, Lavrov had alleged that the West is attempting to create a rift between India and China to foster antagonism between the neighbouring countries.
While speaking at a meeting of a diplomatic club, he had asserted that Western strategies in the Asia-Pacific region are designed to fuel tensions between the two Asian nations.
'Take note of the current developments in the Asia-Pacific region, which the West has started calling the Indo-Pacific region to give its policy a clear anti-China orientation — expecting thereby to additionally clash our great friends and neighbours India and China," Lavrov had said.
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
With stiffer tariffs on a neighbouring country, India now more competitive; could boost furniture exports: Swapneel Nagarkar, Business Head and Executive VP at Godrej Interio
In a conversation with The Indian Express, SWAPNEEL NAGARKAR, business head and executive vice president at Godrej Interio, discussed global trade dynamics, India's quality control order (QCO) on furniture products, and trends in domestic demand. Nagarkar, who also chairs the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) Task Force on Furniture, said India's furniture standards have been framed keeping consumer interest in mind. Edited excerpts: The US is India's largest furniture export market. Given recent tariff-related developments, where do you see things headed in the near future? We're confident the Indian government will resolve tariff issues with the US amicably, so business continuity shouldn't be affected. In fact, with stiffer tariffs on a neighbouring country and some others, India is now more competitive — creating an opportunity to increase exports. Most Indian exports are wooden furniture, especially carved pieces from Rajasthan, which see strong demand abroad. Meanwhile, India's domestic furniture market is vast — estimated at around Rs 2 lakh crore, including both organised and unorganised players. It's also highly fragmented, so as an industry, our current focus is on streamlining and better addressing domestic demand alongside growing exports. As India negotiates trade agreements with Europe and the US, there has been some pushback on certain quality control orders (QCOs), including the one on furniture products. How should we navigate this? When FTAs are discussed, it's important that both countries uphold quality standards. India hadn't effectively modernised furniture-related standards. But, in the last few years, the government has taken a positive step — this process has either been completed or is nearing completion in several categories. Once the QCO is in effect, BIS standards will become applicable. Then, furniture exported to India as well as domestically manufactured furniture will need to comply with these standards. Exporters from other countries can get BIS certification to ensure compliance. As per our information, inspecting authorities have been visiting major foreign suppliers to assess and certify them under BIS norms. When Indian suppliers are exporting to other countries, they have to adhere to foreign standards, because standards are governed by the way furniture is used in those countries. Similarly, today, India has created standards based on our country's requirements and it is for everybody to comply with them. Concerns have been raised in global forums that India's furniture standards may pose limitations on design… Godrej has played an active role in formulating these standards, along with 6-7 other domestic furniture players, including some MSMEs, and international players. I can say with confidence that the standards are not limiting in any way, except one — they require furniture to last at least 4-5 years — a fair and reasonable expectation for protecting the interest of customers. Based on that, tests for durability, load-bearing, and usage cycles have been defined, but there are no constraints on design or other creative aspects for any country. Do you think India's largely informal furniture sector, especially MSMEs, will struggle to become QCO-compliant? What kind of support can industry bodies or the government provide to help them comply? MSMEs shouldn't face major challenges in meeting the new standards. A key focus of the government and CII is ensuring easy, affordable access to testing facilities for all players. The industry, including MSMEs, is working collaboratively with authorities to address issues like lab availability and logistics. Recognising their scale and exposure, MSMEs have also been given a compliance timeline of additional six months. These steps aim to address their concerns so that they properly come onboard. Did the furniture industry witness a consumption slowdown last year? Let me break this into B2B (business-to-business) and B2C (business-to-consumer), as they behaved quite differently. Last year, B2B furniture saw strong tailwinds, driven by healthy space absorption — 7-8 million sq ft more than the previous year. In contrast, B2C faced a slowdown, particularly in the second half, which is the more critical half for business for everybody. This was largely due to challenges with disposable incomes among the middle class. As a result, the overall industry did not experience much growth in the second half. That said, the shift toward organised players continued, and Godrej managed to grow 12-14 per cent last year. Looking ahead, there's positive anticipation. With inflation under control, a stable macro environment, and a good monsoon forecast, demand in the B2C segment is expected to improve. The industry could see 4-5 per cent growth on a large base. What kind of furniture are Indians buying furniture these days? How are they doing it? The Indian furniture market is divided into premium and non-premium segments. The premium segment is fairly insulated from the variability of the economy. Premium buyers are increasingly seeking tech-integrated, lifestyle-supporting furniture — like beds with remote-controlled storage or sofas with charging ports. They also value personalisation, often working with professionals for home interiors. Godrej addresses this through component-based, modular solutions that can be reconfigured later, like its Upmods range. In the economy segment, customers typically buy single functional pieces. To serve them better, especially younger online shoppers, Godrej has strengthened its digital presence. From a historically offline model, it now delivers to 18,000 pin codes through online channels, ensuring wider access across India. Online now accounts for 10 per cent of our B2C sales — it's growing, but 90 per cent remains offline. Given India's diversity, offline will continue to matter, and the path ahead is clearly omnichannel. As a division, we're around Rs 3,800 crore in revenue. Of this, B2B products contribute roughly Rs 1,400 crore, B2C products about Rs 1,200 crore, and the balance comes from B2B projects, including interiors and audiovisual solutions. How are furniture manufacturers responding to growing calls for sustainability, especially around timber sourcing? Sustainability is only going to grow in importance, and we're seeing strong national-level efforts, with active support from CII. Godrej has long championed this cause — 60-65 per cent of our product portfolio is now green certified, and 45 per cent of our division's revenue last year came from such products. That said, awareness is stronger in the B2B segment, where buyers demand sustainability certifications for furniture and interiors. In B2C, awareness is still evolving. While some evolved consumers do look for green credentials, it's not yet widespread. We believe it's our responsibility to raise awareness and ensure that sustainability becomes central to the buying decision, especially as we remain accountable to future generations. Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Woman ‘pushed into Bangladesh' during Assam crackdown, brought back after officials found ‘mismatch'
A woman from Assam's Golaghat district was detained by the police, allegedly taken to the Bangladesh border by security forces, and told to cross — before authorities realised there had been an error in her case and brought her back. Rahima Begum (50) is among several people to have been detained in Assam in the past few weeks as part of an ongoing crackdown on people who have been declared foreigners by the state's Foreigners Tribunals (FTs). According to her lawyer, a Foreigners Tribunal ruled last month that Begum's family had entered India before March 25, 1971, the cut-off date for citizenship in Assam. On Friday, invoking a Supreme Court order, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma had confirmed that the state is pushing declared foreigners across the international border into Bangladesh. Begum, who returned home to her family in Golaghat's 2 Padumoni village on Friday evening, alleged she was 'pushed into Bangladesh' with a group of people on Tuesday night. 'On Sunday morning (May 25) at around 4 am, when we were still sleeping, police came to our home and told me to report to the police station to answer some questions. After spending the morning there, they took me to the Golaghat Superintendent of Police's office with some others. I took my documents, and they collected our fingerprints. We were there the whole day. At night, they took us somewhere else in a vehicle,' she said, adding that she didn't know where she was taken. 'Two of our daughters were there, and they saw their mother taken away at night. But nobody told us where she was all these days,' said her husband, Malek Ali. 'Late Tuesday night, they put us in a few cars and took us near the border,' she alleged. 'The security forces who were with us gave us some Bangladeshi currency, told us to cross and not return. It was all paddy fields with mud and water up to our knees. We didn't know what to do; we just walked between the paddy fields until we reached a village. But the people there chased us away and their border forces called us, beat us a lot and told us to go back to where we came from.' 'We spent the whole day standing in a paddy field and drinking the water from it because we could not go to either side,' she said. '(On Thursday evening), the forces on the Indian side called us back, took the Bangladesh currency, put us in vehicles and took us to Kokrajhar. I don't know about what happened to the rest of the people, but I was brought to Golaghat. I don't know why this happened to me; I have all my papers. I completed my FT case after fighting it for more than two years.' Her husband got a call on Friday afternoon to pick her up from Golaghat town. The BSF Guwahati Frontier and the Golaghat SP Rajen Singh did not respond to calls and messages seeking a comment. Advocate Lipika Deb, who handled Begum's case in the Jorhat FT, said the family called her on Sunday, saying that she had been taken away along with others suspected to be foreigners. According to Deb, the tribunal declared her as 'post-stream', which is used to refer to cases in which entry into India is said to be between January 1, 1966 and March 25, 1971, after which the person has been an ordinary resident of Assam, where in line with Section 6A(3) of the Citizenship Act, the person has to be registered within 30 days with the relevant Foreigners Registration Office (FRRO). According to the Act, such a person will have their name struck from electoral rolls for 10 years, but during that time they will have 'the same rights and obligations as a citizen of India.' At the end of the period, they 'shall be deemed to be a citizen of India for all purposes.' 'After checking with the police and the FRRO office in Jorhat, where we had registered her, we found that there was a mismatch in a digit in the registration number in her certificate. We approached the SP about the mismatch, and now she has returned. But it's unfortunate that the verification was not thorough. If there was a mismatch, the authorities should have called the registration office to cross-check,' she said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India lost jets but changed tactics to hit Pakistan hard: CDS
NEW DELHI: India did lose some fighter jets during the strikes on nine terror hubs in Pakistan and POK and the consequent retaliation on May 7, but then changed tactics to inflict major damage on airbases deep across the border before the ceasefire three days later, Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan said on Saturday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The CDS did not specify the exact number of jets India lost but asserted that Pakistan's claim of having shot down six IAF aircraft, including three French-origin Rafales, was "absolutely incorrect" in separate interviews to Reuters TV and Bloomberg TV on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. Gen Chauhan's admission of India's initial setbacks during is the most direct since director -general of air operations Air Marshal A K Bharti on May 11 said losses were part of any combat situation but "all our pilots are back home", implying that they had ejected safely after their jets were hit by enemy fire. "What I can say is on May 7, in the initial stages, there were losses," Gen Chauhan said. India-Pak conflict came nowhere close to N-faceoff: CDS Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan said the conflict with Pakistan from May 7 to May 10, which saw reciprocal air, missile, drone and artillery strikes, never came anywhere close to the point of nuclear conflagration, with both sides 'displaying a lot of rationality in their thoughts as well as actions'. In another interview on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue, the CDS further said, 'The good part is that we are able to understand the tactical mistake which we made, remedy it, rectify it, and then implement it again after two days and flew all our jets again, targeting at long range.' Gen Chauhan was also dismissive of the effectiveness of Pakistan's air defence systems of Chinese-origin like HQ-9 missile batteries and radars as well as the use of Turkish-origin Byker Yiha kamikaze drones and Asisguard Songar drones. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'They didn't work. We were able to do precision strikes on heavily air-defended airfields of Pakistan 300km deep inside, with the precision of a metre,' he said. Pakistan was obviously prepared for the initial Indian strikes on May 7, which saw the IAF and Army hit four terror hubs in Pakistan and five in PoK, with fighter-launched missiles and 'smart' bombs as well as Kamikaze drones and extended range artillery shells between 1.05 am and 1.30 am. India immediately made it clear that the aim was to hit only terror infrastructure, and no military bases were targeted. Pakistan, however, chose to escalate the situation, which included launching waves of drones and some missiles to target Indian airbases, military assets and civilian areas. The IAF then struck nine Pakistani airbases and at least three radar sites, a few of them close to nuclear facilities as well as command and control structures, with Sukhoi-30MKI, Rafale and Mirage-2000 fighters using BrahMos, Crystal Maze-2, Rampage and Scalp missiles, among other precision munitions, for the calibrated pinpoint strikes, as was reported by TOI. Gen Chauhan, on his part, declined to comment on President Donald Trump's claim that the US brokered the ceasefire to help avert a nuclear war but said it was 'far-fetched' to suggest either side was close to using nuclear weapons. Pakistan's chairman of joint chiefs of staff Gen Sahir Shamshad Mirza had made the same point a day ago, also on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue, but had stressed that a 'strategic miscalculation' cannot be ruled out in the future. Gen Chauhan, however, said 'people in uniform' were actually the 'most rational' since they understand the consequences. 'In every step that happened during Operation Sindoor, I found both sides displaying a lot of rationality in their thoughts as well as actions. So, why should we assume that in the nuclear domain, there will be irrationality on someone else's part,' he said. There is 'a lot of space' between the conduct of conventional operations and the nuclear threshold, the CDS said, adding that channels of communication with Pakistan 'were always open' to control the situation and there were 'more sub-ladders' on the escalation ladder that 'can be exploited to settle our issues'.
