Maryland Gov. Wes Moore says tariffs on Canada, Mexico are deeply problematic for Port of Baltimore
The Port of Baltimore, one of the nation's busiest port facilities, supports thousands of local jobs and brings in billions of dollars worth of goods, especially car parts and produce, according to Maryland economists.
Moore said Maryland businesses and consumers are bracing for higher costs on imported goods.
"It's going to have a huge impact. In fact, it already has," Moore said. "Canada is our largest partner, it's our largest domestic producer, for the state of Maryland, and we are going to throw blanket tariffs, on Canada?"
According to the state of Maryland, in 2024, the Port of Baltimore handled 45.9 million tons of international cargo valued at $62.2 billion. Nationally, Baltimore ranks 10th for tonnage of international cargo and 11th for total dollar value, the state reports.
Now, the Trump administration has imposed new 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, adding to an existing 10% on Chinese imports.
"This is deeply problematic what we are seeing with this unnecessary and self-imposed trade war," Moore said.
According to CBS News, experts say the new tax on imports could drive up the costs of consumer goods, including groceries and automobiles.
A typical American family could face higher annual costs of between $1,600 to $2,000 due to the new tariffs, according to CBS News, citing a new analysis from the Yale Budget Lab, a nonpartisan public policy research center.
Moore says the supplies coming in will directly impact Marylanders' wallets.
"I think this is having this deep and disastrous impact on, not just the business community, but on the price and cost of goods that everyday Marylanders are feeling, whether you are going to the grocery store or whether you are getting your prescription drugs."
Rising costs with tariffs
According to CBS News, products imported directly from Canada, Mexico and China could see price hikes as businesses pass along the tariff costs, either in full or in part, to consumers.
There are some products made in the United States that use imported materials, including vehicles, which could cause a price hike.
According to CBS News, citing GasBuddy energy analyst Patrick De Haan, consumers could see higher prices for some products fairly quickly, such as gasoline, with some regions expected to see gas prices jump as much as 40 cents per gallon within days.
De Haan says drivers in the Northeast are likely to see the biggest immediate impact, with gas prices jumping by between 20 to 40 cents per gallon by mid-March.
Experts tell CBS News that other goods, including cars, might not reflect higher prices for several months.
CBS News, citing the Anderson Economic Group (AEG), a Michigan-based economic consultancy, reports the sweeping tariffs could drive up car costs by as much as $12,200 for some models.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that in 2023, the U.S. imported more than $45 billion worth of agricultural products from Mexico, and nearly three-quarters of those imports consisted of vegetables, fruit, beer, tequila and other drinks.
Key Bridge collapse
The Port of Baltimore and the nation's supply chain were impacted when Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge collapsed on March 26, 2024, killing five construction workers who fell into the Patapsco River.
The main channel to the Port of Baltimore was blocked for weeks, which prohibited major cargo ships from docking at the port. The main passageway for commercial ships was fully reopened on June 11, 2024, after about 50,000 tons of bridge wreckage was removed from the Patapsco River.
Portworkers strike
In October 2024, portworkers along the East Coast, including at the Port of Baltimore, went on strike.
At least 25,000 port workers, with more than 2,000 in Baltimore, at 14 ports along the East Coast and the Gulf of Mexico, initiated a strike after a new labor agreement between the International Longshoremen's Association and the US Maritime Alliance wasn't reached.
Fortunately, the strike only lasted three days. The union stopped its strike after securing a pay raise of 61.5% over the next six years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Now we know just how useless Trump's Alaska summit really was ... to everyone but Vladimir Putin
Before President Trump's tête-à-tête with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, press secretary Karoline Leavitt was already downplaying the stakes. Wednesday morning, she described the summit as a 'listening exercise' — which is, frankly, a relief. After all, when you're a time-poor autocrat juggling a Monday invasion, a midweek labor camp opening, and a weekend of jailing political opponents, it's easy to feel unheard. Sure, Putin invaded Ukraine. And yes, countless people have suffered ... on both sides. But perhaps — and I think we can all agree this is the real tragedy here — no one has taken the time to validate his feelings. So it was heartening, then, to see Vlad and Donald touch down on Alaskan soil midday Friday and greet each other with warmth: a smattering of applause from Trump, a weirdly prolonged handshake, and then the two friends sliding into the same back seat — a notable break in protocol — for the drive to their meeting. Waiting for them on the tarmac was a stage emblazoned 'ALASKA 2025,' festival-style, primed for the photo-op. Meanwhile, at least seven civilians had just been killed in Ukraine by Russian missiles. When they emerged again for a post-meeting press conference, earlier than expected, it was clear a good time had been had by all. They had agreed on 'most points,' said Trump. He was going to 'call up NATO,' he added, saying, 'I will, of course, call up President Zelensky and tell him about today's meeting." Very good of him. They should meet, Putin added, but 'next time in Moscow.' Trump laughed at that point, calling his suggestion 'an interesting one.' 'I'll get a little heat on that one,' the American president added, 'but I could see it possibly happening.' The two men leaned in toward each other and smiled, like they were sharing an inside joke. The bottom line: a nebulous amount of 'progress' made, some 'headway,' stuff to talk about, but 'there's no deal until there's a deal.' Ah well. Maybe Vlad just needs more time. I'm pretty sure, however, that he already got what he came for — and that the joke is on America. Contrast the kid-gloves treatment of everybody's favorite dictator with the treatment of Volodymyr Zelensky a few months ago, when he visited the White House. Indeed, it is hard to recall another Oval Office meeting where an allied head of state was treated quite like the Ukrainian president was in February. Lest we forget, Zelensky had arrived to discuss a minerals deal that might have bolstered his country's three-year fight for survival. He left having been publicly chided, mid-meeting, for 'disrespect' and insufficient gratitude. Trump accused him of 'gambling with World War III', while JD Vance, in full Wormtail mode, jumped in to ask: 'Have you even said thank-you once?' It was both difficult and embarrassing to watch. This is the asymmetry at the heart of Trump-era foreign policy: allies get the tongue-lashing, rivals get the literal red carpet. Zelensky's reward for resisting an existential threat was a televised scolding. Putin's reward for creating it has been years of deference and flattery. Recall the Helsinki summit, where Trump sided with the Russian leader over his own intelligence agencies, or the warm praise for Putin's 'genius'. Too self-satisfied to realize he's been manipulated, The Donald simply keeps walking into the same trap, over and over again. Trump himself seems to have realized how poor his own negotiating skills are in the past few weeks. Putin's not a blowhard like his American counterpart; he just does what he feels like, and everyone else be damned. Indeed, it was Donald himself who put it best in a press conference earlier in July where he described his ongoing efforts to help broker an end to the war in Ukraine thus: 'I get home, I say to the First Lady, 'I had the most wonderful talk with Vladimir. I think we are finished,'' to which Melania will apparently respond in kind: 'That's funny, because they just bombed a nursing home.' Therein lies the entire issue. Trump is brittle and easily manipulated; Putin talks him round again and again. Trump leaves those conversations utterly convinced of both Putin's integrity and his own genius. Then Putin goes on dropping bombs and killing people. It's a familiar story that's played out not just in Russia, and that we can expect to play out anywhere where there's a strongman leader with a penchant for basic flattery. And really, where better to stage this utterly redundant spectacle than Alaska — the state Trump accidentally referred to as Russia earlier this week, and which, of course, once belonged to the Russian Empire. After all, isn't the whole point to start returning old territories to their former owners? Alaska, a place that is currently arranging citizen evacuations because of an uncontrolled glacier flood due to the effects of climate change, where water is thundering toward a dam called Suicide Basin. (Anchorage is on the other end of the state to where all that is happening in Juneau, meaning that Trump was able to fly right over Suicide Basin and shutter his Qatari-gifted Air Force One windows to the sight of climate catastrophe before he landed at a military base to meet with the man who started a war to talk about ending it.) Alaska, the perfect place to propose — as leaks have suggested — that Russia has a 'West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine,' since all available geopolitical sources suggest that solution has already played out so well for everyone involved. And so the dance goes on, and tangible progress is not made but cameras and microphones and spotlights are perpetually trained on two geriatric egomaniacs. This kind of time-wasting theater always works in Russia's favor. The war will rumble on in Ukraine. The deal will never be made. Trump will get a few nice words, Putin will get his headlines. And the rest of us are left with just the images of Donald and his little band of spray-tanned comrades marching about in the Alaskan summer, isolated together in a cold state in the middle of nowhere, with only a friendly dictator to keep them warm.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The veteran anchor was caught off guard—and on camera—during CNN's coverage of Trump's historic meeting with Putin.
President Donald Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin for historic talks on U.S. soil on Friday. However, in the pre-press conference coverage on CNN, veteran anchor Jake Tapper's mind seemed to be elsewhere. Speaking live from Anchorage, Alaska, where the meeting between the two world leaders took place, Tapper could be heard having a testy exchange with a producer just as fellow anchor Anderson Cooper ceded the spotlight to his colleague. 'I'm fine,' Tapper can be heard saying with what seems to be some exasperation. 'Just give me my show back.'
Los Angeles Times
22 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Putin and Trump conclude Alaska summit but provide no details
Three hours of negotiations with Vladimir Putin over Russia's war in Ukraine were 'extremely productive,' but only Kyiv can decide whether a deal toward a ceasefire is possible, President Trump said Friday, capping a historic summit with the Russian leader. At a news conference at a U.S. air base in Alaska, the two men alluded to agreements made, but offered no details and took no questions. 'We didn't get there,' Trump said.
