1 boy dead, 1 injured after shooting in West Philadelphia, police say
Police responded to a shooting at a grocery store on the 5400 block of Race Street around 2:15 p.m. They found two victims with gunshot wounds. One of the boys was pronounced dead at the scene, police said.
Medics took the other victim to Lankenau Medical Center, where he is listed in critical condition, police said.
Philadelphia police said officers found one gun at the scene and have taken one person into custody. The investigation is ongoing, according to police.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I sold $3K in gold via wire transfer, but then the buyer got their bank to reverse the payment. What can I do?
Buyer-beware scams are in the headlines every day, but a growing number of buyers are ripping off businesses by reversing charges on their purchases. This is a seller-beware scenario. Imagine you run a precious metals store and a customer wants to buy $3,000 worth of gold via wire transfer. You verify their identity, complete the sale and hand over the gold. All by the book, right? Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Not quite. A month later, the customer calls their bank to dispute the charge, claiming they were tricked into buying the gold by a third party. The bank is convinced by the customer's story, cancels the wire transfer and withdraws money from your merchant account, leaving you without payment — and your store down $3,000 worth of gold, which is hard to trace. The same thing can happen with customers who request the reversal of electronic fund transfers (EFTs) or credit card charges. Such transactions are called 'friendly fraud" or "chargeback fraud." The customer may indeed have been the victim of a scam, or be pulling off a scam themselves. Either way, your business is left with a loss. Unfortunately, it's not an uncommon occurrence, particularly for businesses dealing in precious gems and metals, which are frequently targeted in scams. Here's what happens and how to protect your business. Banks often side with customers in cases of alleged fraud Banks typically allow chargebacks or payment reversals only under certain conditions: Unauthorized transactions. The customer claims they didn't authorize the purchase. Billing errors. The charge was duplicated, incorrect, or charged in the wrong amount. Fraudulent activity. The purchase was made under false pretenses or through deception. Failure to receive goods or services. The item was never delivered, was defective, or didn't match the description. In many cases, banks default to protecting the consumer, especially when fraud is alleged. However, with wire transfers, often considered final and irreversible, the rules are more complicated and the reversal takes more time. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Some banks will allow customers to file a complaint and launch an investigation, especially if they claim they were defrauded or coerced into making a purchase. If the bank believes the customer acted in good faith, it may choose to reverse the charge, even if the merchant did nothing wrong. That's what makes this type of situation so frustrating for business owners. What to do if your business falls victim to this scam Once a bank reverses a wire transfer, it's tough to undo. So be proactive. If a bank contacts your business about potential fraud, respond promptly. Providing proof, such as receipts, can help your case before the funds are reversed. After funds are reversed, you still have a few options: Dispute the reversal. Provide documentation showing the customer authorized the purchase and received the goods. This could include signed receipts, invoices, tracking data, or even video footage. File a police report. If the customer's story involves criminal fraud, getting law enforcement involved may help clarify who's actually at fault. Seek legal action. If the bank won't reverse its decision, the business may consider small claims court or civil litigation to recover the funds. Consult with the bank. Each bank has its own internal process. Sometimes, escalating the issue to a higher level of review can change the outcome. To avoid issues in the future, consider implementing more advanced due diligence processes for high-dollar sales — especially for gems and precious metals, which are frequently targeted in scams. You can leverage technology in your business's fight against friendly fraud. A number of companies offer AI-based fraud prevention software, including Signifyd — designed to protect online retailers — and Arctic Intelligence. Arctic Intelligence advises training staff to identify questionable purchases. They should ask for proof of the source of funds for any big transaction, particularly with a new client, and report suspected money laundering to law enforcement. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police make fourth arrest after taxi smashed into home
POLICE have made a fourth arrest after a taxi was smashed into the side of a house. As already reported, a car was smashed into the side of a parked white Peugeot taxi in Woodgreen Avenue. It then caused the taxi to collide with the house it was parked outside of, leading to significant damage to the bricks. Nobody was injured in the crash, but the road was taped off for most of Monday, August 18 while officers investigated. Shortly after the crash happened at around 3.30am, police officers made two arrests. READ MORE: This included a 19-year-old man and a 28-year-old man, both from Banbury, arrested on suspicion of criminal damage. Later on Monday afternoon, officers also arrested a third man, 59 from Banbury, also on suspicion of criminal damage. Providing an update on Wednesday afternoon, Thames Valley police said that in addition to the three men arrested, officers have also now arrested a 58-year-old woman from Banbury on suspicion of assault and criminal damage. All four of those arrested have been released on conditional police bail pending further enquiries by investigating officers. Their bail dates are November 3 and 4. A spokesman from Thames Valley Police said: 'Anyone with information regarding this incident is asked to call 101 quoting reference 43250421142.' Officers throughout Monday had urged residents to avoid the area knowing the road would be closed for some time. No charges have been made.
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Phil sued by Christian broadcaster for ‘reprehensible conduct' in $500 million deal: ‘Years-long fraudulent scheme'
The fraught bankruptcy proceedings for Dr. Phil McGraw's 'anti-woke' Merit Street Media have taken another dramatic turn as his broadcasting partner is suing the company and McGraw for fraud and breach of contract. The lawsuit filed by the Trinity Broadcasting comes just a month after Merit Street filed for bankruptcy and sued the Christian television network, accusing TBN of 'sabotage' because it 'reneged on its obligations and abused its position as the controlling shareholder of Merit Street.' Meanwhile, the countersuit by TBN – which was filed in Texas court Tuesday – comes as Dr. Phil and his production company Peteski attempted to halt the Chapter 11 proceedings for the year-old Merit Street, claiming the legal costs of going bankrupt were too expensive. The effort to halt the bankruptcy follows the Professional Bull Riders accusing Dr. Phil of engaging in a 'bad faith' Chapter 11 filing as the bull-riding league tries to collect on the $181 million it claims is owed to them by Merit Street. 'The response to TBN legitimately and lawfully defending itself from Peteski and McGraw's bad-faith attacks is to cry foul because they do not like the true facts that they themselves now regretfully put at issue before this Court, revealing McGraw's true illicit intent and wrongful conduct which he self-described as a 'gangster move' and as '11th-hour poker,'' TBN and its attorneys state in the complaint. 'TBN now asserts its affirmative claims against Peteski and McGraw related to the years-long fraudulent scheme that they developed and executed to fleece TBN, a not-for-profit corporation, to enrich McGraw, his associates and affiliates,' the lawsuit alleges. 'TBN is confident that the truth will set it free, and result in Peteski and McGraw being held accountable for their reprehensible conduct.' Merit Street has accused TBN of failing to live up to the terms of their agreement, specifically citing the inability to secure national television distribution for the Dr. Phil-led channel. 'These failures by TBN were neither unintended nor inadvertent,' Merit Street alleges in its complaint. 'They were a conscious, intentional pattern of choices made with full awareness that the consequence of which was to sabotage and seal the fate of a new but already nationally acclaimed network.' However, TBN – which at one point owned 70 percent of Merit Street – counters that it was McGraw who created a 'false sense of urgency' when he approached the broadcaster about cutting ties with CBS and starting up his own network. All the while, TBN alleges, the MAGA-boosting TV psychologist lied about viewership numbers, advertising revenues, back catalogs and production costs in order to quickly secure a highly lucrative $500 million, 10-year deal from the network. 'Among other things, McGraw falsely represented to TBN that CBS would pay him $75 million per year to renew his contract and TBN must (1) immediately sign some form of binding agreement with Peteski and (2) immediately pay him $20 million as a gesture of good faith to show TBN's ability to pay and commitment to the deal,' the complaint states. 'Anything less, McGraw claimed, would be a 'deal killer.' TBN relied on McGraw's false assurances and proceeded with the requested urgency.' Dr. Phil, who had hosted a syndicated television show for roughly 20 years at that point, also told Trinity that he 'wanted to change networks because of what he perceived to be CBS's censorship,' explicitly saying: 'I don't want snot nose lawyers telling me what I can and can't say on TV.' McGraw also allegedly said that he was looking to move his show from California to Texas, where TBN is located, in order to lower production costs by avoiding California regulations and cutting payroll by ridding himself of union-based employees. At the same time, in order to further entice Trinity into a deal, Dr. Phil represented that he owned the entire 21-year media library for his syndicated show and that TBN would have access to it at no additional cost. However, according to the complaint, McGraw hired dozens of employees from his previous show despite the agreement to slash production costs. On top of that, TBN alleges, Peteski – which owned the other 30 percent of Merit – failed to make payments on its interest in the company. While the agreement called for Dr. Phil to produce 160 90-minute episodes of his new primetime show to be aired on Merit Street, TBN claims McGraw never made good on that promise, instead keeping the program in its current hour-long format. A spokesperson for McGraw, meanwhile, stated that the host recorded 214 new episodes of Dr. Phil Primetime, adding that 'to say otherwise is absolutely false.' Elsewhere in the complaint, Trinity claims that McGraw demanded more money – despite TBN already expending tens of millions of dollars establishing his show on the new network – after the broadcaster asked to use the library content to fill out airtime on Merit Street. 'This, among other things, prompted TBN to press McGraw to live up to his representation that he would contribute the Dr Phil Show library to Merit Street,' the lawsuit states. 'Despite his previous representations, McGraw and his attorneys at Manatt informed TBN for the first time that McGraw would not contribute any old episodes of the Dr. Phil Show to Merit Street for Peteski's 30% or otherwise,' the complaint continues. 'Instead, McGraw brazenly demanded that TBN pay him $100 million to obtain a 50% interest in the media library.' As for Merit Street's bankruptcy, which was filed last month, TBN says the Chapter 11 proceedings weren't approved by its board members while accusing McGraw of plotting to use the bankruptcy to start a new media venture and snag the license for his show. Meanwhile, the bankruptcy judge presiding over the case said on Tuesday that the Chapter 11 proceedings will continue for now, adding that the court will decide on September 2 whether to dismiss the filing or convert it to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. 'The judge has initially sided with Trinity Broadcasting Network and Professional Bull Riders, stating that Merit Street is at fault for delaying the case by resisting discovery and it is therefore not going to fund what Trinity and PBR call a 'giant litigation war chest' for the company's professionals,' Sarah Foss, Head of Legal at Debtwire, explained to The Independent. 'The discovery resistance may be tied to reputational concerns from Dr. Phil, and what might be revealed in text messages or emails that come out in the discovery process,' Foss continued, adding: 'Notably, the judge overseeing the bankruptcy denied a request from Merit Street's bankruptcy counsel, Sidley Austin, to withdraw from the case before that hearing, despite being owed $3.7m in unpaid legal fees and a lack of funds to pay the lawyers for their work representing the company at the hearing.'
