logo
OpenAI tests in-chat payment checkout system

OpenAI tests in-chat payment checkout system

Finextra17-07-2025
OpenAI is planning to integrate a payment checkout system into ChatGPT in a bid to boost revenues, according to the Financial Times.
0
This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.
The feature is currently being tested with Shopify, among others, as a way to let OpenAI take a commission on sales made through the chatbot.
OpenAI and Shopify already work together on boosting product discovery, but ChatGPT links to external retailers for transactions.
Having pumped billions of dollars into their products, AI firms are working hard on monetising the services.
This week, Anthropic launched a tool to help finance professionals analyse markets, conduct research, and make investment decisions with its Claude models.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

STV warns over profits as advertising market slumps and TV projects delayed
STV warns over profits as advertising market slumps and TV projects delayed

The Independent

time5 minutes ago

  • The Independent

STV warns over profits as advertising market slumps and TV projects delayed

Scottish media firm STV Group has downgraded its sales and profit outlook as 'deteriorating' economic conditions squeeze advertising revenues and push back TV projects. Shares in the London-listed business plunged by about a quarter on Monday morning following the update. STV said it was now expecting full-year revenue and adjusted operating profit to be 'materially below' a consensus of analysts. Revenues are predicted to range between £165 million and £180 million for 2025. The company said it was now targeting £2.5 million worth of cost savings this year – higher than the £1.7 million outlined in March – having launched a significant savings programme last year, including across its broadcast operations. STV blamed worsening conditions in the commissioning and advertising markets in recent months for the profit and sales downgrade. Advertising revenues for the period between July and September is forecast to decline by 8%, lower than previously expected, driven by a sharp 20% drop in July, it told investors. The year-on-year decline is set to be impacted by particularly strong sales this time last year, due to the men's Euro football tournament being broadcast on TV. It follows a 10% fall in advertising revenues over the first half of 2025. A number of businesses, including WPP and S4 Capital, have flagged a worsening advertising market as more challenging economic conditions prompt clients to reign in marketing spending. Furthermore, STV warned the uncertainty was causing significant deterioration in the commissioning market. It said projects within its unscripted labels were being impacted with some in advanced development not getting the green light, and others being delayed into 2026. Nevertheless, it highlighted strong progress within its scripted labels with current projects including for Netflix, Apple, Sky and the BBC. Rufus Radcliffe, STV's chief executive, said: 'The deteriorating macroeconomic backdrop continues to lower business confidence impacting both markets in which we operate. 'STV Studios' delivery schedule for the remainder of 2025 has been impacted by the UK commissioning market, which has further weakened at the end of H1 (the first half of 2025) and into the second half of the year.' But he said production had finished on 'key titles with international appeal, including high-end drama Amadeus for Sky and a third series of Blue Lights for BBC One'. 'We are proactively responding to market conditions through a combination of investing in targeted future growth initiatives aligned with our long-term strategy and identifying efficiency and cost saving opportunities across the business,' Mr Radcliffe added.

Grok's behavior isn't surprising – but we needn't settle for Musk's vision of the future
Grok's behavior isn't surprising – but we needn't settle for Musk's vision of the future

The Guardian

time6 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Grok's behavior isn't surprising – but we needn't settle for Musk's vision of the future

Elon Musk's chatbot Grok went on a hateful tirade earlier this month. The AI-powered account praised Hitler and posted a series of antisemitic comments over X, the digital platform also owned by Musk. The company's CEO, Linda Yaccarino, resigned the next day – though it's unclear whether her exit was directly related to the bot's rant. Posting on X, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) said Grok's behavior was 'irresponsible, dangerous and antisemitic'. xAI and the Grok account on X apologized for the incident, but days later released two chatbot 'companions', including an NSFW anime avatar available to children and a red panda character built to issue crude insults. Musk, meanwhile, chalked Grok's behavior up to it being 'too eager to please' and to respond to user generated prompts. He said that the issue had been fixed. US politicians and platform advertisers said little, unlike past responses to similar incidents on X. Their silence and Musk's downplaying of the event speak louder than if we had heard significant public denouncements of the chatbot's actions from the powers that be. The relative quiet at the top is illustrative of two things. First, Grok's behavior is not surprising. At this point, it's predictable. Second, little about Grok, X, or xAI is likely to change in the short-term. Grok sharing hateful content is Grok working precisely as it was designed to. Before the inflammatory chatbot was 'born' and launched on X in late 2023, Musk spoke about the need for AI alternatives to ChatGPT, which he deemed too politically correct. He has consistently referred to his anti-woke AI as 'TruthGPT'. Grok was deliberately built to be provocative – and 'to tell it like it is'. Grok is a fitting representation of the current culture of X and, more broadly, of social media and those at its reins. In the years since Musk purchased the internet platform, originally named Twitter, many have pointed out that it has devolved into a space rife with 'racism, misogyny, and lies'. It's also full of spam and scams. Shortly after the platform changed names and hands, most of the people behind content moderation and platform trust and safety were unceremoniously fired. Extremists and conspiracy theorists who had been deplatformed from Twitter were reinstated on X. In late 2024, the social media organization's first transparency report in years revealed serious problems with this new laissez-faire approach, including unsettling new instances of child exploitation. According to Musk, Grok was built to seek and reveal truths beyond the supposedly sanitized content seen on competing generative AI systems or prior social media platforms. But Grok what actually does is tell the 'truth' of the current hands-off, malignant, version of X, and of other social media platforms and tech leadership. Since Musk's acquisition of X – and the deregulation of content that followed – other platforms have followed suit. These shifts follow an executive order and other moves from the Trump administration aimed at curtailing 'censorship' through digital content moderation and, seemingly, the collaborative study of social media propaganda. Meanwhile, social media and AI companies are getting more cozy with Washington: xAI just signed a $200m contract with the Pentagon to provide 'Grok for government'. In past research, I've found that billionaires' and global political leaders' claims about striking down digital media censorship and preserving free speech online are often suspect at best. At worst, and closer to what I've encountered in my analyses, such claims are self-serving for those in power. These figures not only own a significant stake in the digital information environment; they have also purposefully and steadily cultivated the online space to be favorable to their goals and ideas. They seek to artificially control what trends, or what people see as popular behavior, and to make such statements or actions acceptable. But an online world where hate, spam, and scams run rampant is only one version of what the internet and digital media technology can be. The opposite, as Musk and others in Silicon Valley and Washington have rightfully pointed out, is an overtly censored online space. China's internet and social media platforms, for instance, have been tightly controlled by the government since the outset. We do not have to accept either extreme. Empirical research and lessons from recent history show us that we can indeed have healthier, more connective, communication tools. We can have social media platforms that are sensibly and systematically moderated from both the top down and bottom up. But to have such spaces we must demand better, more thoughtful, content moderation and tool design from technologists and policy makers. We must also break big tech's stranglehold on innovation in the social media space. Too much power online is consolidated in the hands of too few companies and individuals. We need new digital platforms that genuinely center human rights, pluralism, and democratic discourse and better policies that allow for such an experience. Samuel Woolley is the author Manufacturing Consensus: Understanding Propaganda in the Era of Automation and Anonymity and co-author of Bots. He is a professor at the University of Pittsburgh

3 AI Concepts Everyone Misunderstands Simplified
3 AI Concepts Everyone Misunderstands Simplified

Geeky Gadgets

time34 minutes ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

3 AI Concepts Everyone Misunderstands Simplified

What if the secret to unlocking Artificial Intelligences AI's full potential wasn't about mastering complex algorithms, but simply understanding a few misunderstood ideas? Artificial intelligence is everywhere—from chatbots to content creation—but the jargon surrounding it often feels like a barrier rather than a bridge. Terms like 'tokenizable data' or 'jagged intelligence' might sound intimidating, but they hold the keys to making AI work smarter for you. Here's the truth: you don't need to be a data scientist to grasp these concepts. You just need a clear explanation of what they mean and how they impact your interactions with AI. In this overview, Nate Jones demystifies three of the most misunderstood concepts in AI, breaking them down into practical insights you can apply immediately. You'll learn why clean, structured data is the unsung hero of AI performance, how to navigate the uneven strengths of 'jagged intelligence,' and when to use detailed prompts versus casual chats for better results. These aren't just abstract ideas—they're tools to help you collaborate more effectively with AI and avoid common frustrations. By the end, you might just see AI not as a mysterious black box, but as a partner you can guide and optimize. After all, understanding is the first step to mastery. Mastering AI Fundamentals What is Tokenizable Data? Tokenization is a fundamental process in AI systems, where information is broken down into smaller, manageable units called tokens. These tokens allow AI to process and analyze data more efficiently, making tokenization a cornerstone of how AI understands and interacts with information. Text-based formats, such as plain text files or Word documents, are inherently easier for AI to tokenize, making them ideal for tasks like summarization or content generation. On the other hand, more complex formats, such as spreadsheets or vast datasets like data lakes, can pose challenges due to their intricate structures and size. The quality of your data plays a pivotal role in determining how effectively AI performs. Clean, well-organized data enables the system to focus on the task at hand rather than wasting resources interpreting messy or unstructured inputs. For instance, if you want AI to summarize a report, providing a plain text version will yield far better results than submitting a cluttered PDF filled with extraneous formatting. By understanding tokenization, you can prepare your data in ways that align with AI's strengths, making sure smoother processing and more accurate outputs. Jagged Intelligence: Why AI Excels in Some Areas and Struggles in Others AI is not a uniformly intelligent system; its capabilities are uneven, a phenomenon often referred to as jagged intelligence. This means that while AI can excel in certain areas, it may struggle in others. For example, AI is highly effective at tasks like generating coherent text, identifying patterns in large datasets, or performing repetitive, rule-based operations. However, it often falters when faced with challenges requiring long-term memory, nuanced reasoning, or even basic arithmetic under specific conditions. To work effectively with AI, it is crucial to understand and navigate these inconsistencies. By focusing on the areas where AI excels and compensating for its weaknesses, you can achieve better results. For instance, high-quality prompts and intentional input can help bridge performance gaps. If you're using AI for creative writing, a clear and detailed prompt will guide the system to produce more relevant and coherent outputs. Conversely, expecting AI to handle complex, multi-step reasoning without guidance will likely lead to disappointing results. Recognizing the concept of jagged intelligence allows you to set realistic expectations and design workflows that capitalize on AI's strengths. This approach not only improves the quality of the outcomes but also minimizes frustration when working with these systems. AI Jargon Demystified Watch this video on YouTube. Browse through more resources below from our in-depth content covering more areas on Artificial Intelligence. Big Prompts vs. Casual Chats: Tailoring Your Approach The way you interact with AI—whether through detailed, big prompts or shorter, iterative exchanges—can significantly influence the quality of its outputs. Each approach has its advantages, depending on the nature of the task at hand. Big Prompts: These are ideal for tasks that require structured, context-rich responses. For example, if you're asking AI to draft a business proposal, a comprehensive prompt that outlines your objectives, target audience, and key points will produce the best results. Big prompts provide the AI with a clear framework, reducing ambiguity and improving the quality of the output. These are ideal for tasks that require structured, context-rich responses. For example, if you're asking AI to draft a business proposal, a comprehensive prompt that outlines your objectives, target audience, and key points will produce the best results. Big prompts provide the AI with a clear framework, reducing ambiguity and improving the quality of the output. Casual Chats: Shorter, iterative exchanges are better suited for exploratory tasks like brainstorming or generating ideas. This approach allows you to refine the AI's output step by step, adapting your input based on its responses. For instance, when brainstorming marketing slogans, you might start with a broad idea and gradually narrow your focus through a series of back-and-forth interactions. Choosing between big prompts and casual chats depends on your specific goals. Structured tasks benefit from detailed instructions, while exploratory tasks thrive on flexibility and iteration. By aligning your interaction style with your objectives, you can maximize the AI's potential and achieve more effective results. Key Takeaways for Effective AI Collaboration To collaborate effectively with AI, it is essential to understand its core mechanisms and limitations. Here are the main points to keep in mind: Tokenizable Data: AI processes clean, structured data more efficiently. Prepare your inputs in simple formats like plain text to ensure optimal results. AI processes clean, structured data more efficiently. Prepare your inputs in simple formats like plain text to ensure optimal results. Jagged Intelligence: AI excels in specific areas but struggles in others. Focus on using its strengths and use high-quality prompts to address its weaknesses. AI excels in specific areas but struggles in others. Focus on using its strengths and use high-quality prompts to address its weaknesses. Big Prompts vs. Casual Chats: Tailor your approach based on the task. Use detailed prompts for structured outputs and iterative exchanges for exploratory work. By mastering these concepts, you can unlock the full potential of AI systems. Whether you're analyzing data, generating content, or brainstorming ideas, a deeper understanding of tokenization, jagged intelligence, and prompt design will empower you to achieve better outcomes. These principles are not just theoretical—they are practical tools that can help you navigate the complexities of AI and make the most of its capabilities. Media Credit: AI News & Strategy Daily | Nate B Jones Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store