
China's India Headache: The growing pharmaceutical industry
Sometime in April, Vivek Sharma, executive chairman of
Suven Pharmaceuticals
, was on a trans-continental call with the top officials of a tech-driven global pharmaceutical ingredients company, for a potential deal. It could possibly be a future asset for the Hyderabad-based firm that is evaluating high-end, specialised platforms in a bid to bulk up its technological prowess and grab manufacturing mandates from pharma and biotech giants in the West.
Before that, in December,
Suven
acquired a controlling stake in NJ Bio Inc, a contract research organisation based in Princeton, US, that focuses on antibody-drug conjugates, a targeted therapy for cancer. The $65 million acquisition has positioned Suven as a key player in the market of contract development and manufacturing organisations or CDMOs. These are third-party companies that provide a range of services to global pharma—from early-stage re - search to regulatory submissions to the manufacturing of the latest drugs.
Suven is one among a host of Indian CDMOs like Aurigene, Sai Life Sciences, and
Syngene International
, which are prepping for the next phase of growth and expansion through strategic mergers and acquisitions abroad amid a rising call from global pharma companies to nearshore projects in US and Europe. 'We remain focused on building a technology-led global CDMO platform. Our acquisition strategy is around assets that bring in cutting-edge technology and strong scientific talent,' says Sharma.
Meanwhile,
Biocon
company
Syngene
International has just completed its acquisition of
Emergent BioSolutions
, a biologics-manufacturing facility in Baltimore, US.
Biologics
are medications that come from living organisms, like proteins and genes. The $36.5 million deal gives Syngene 'a strategic foothold in the US by bringing it closer to the wider customer market,' says Peter Bains, MD and CEO, Syngene International.
Several Indian CDMOs, which have been helping drive the innovation engines of large pharmaceutical companies in the West, are scouting for suitable assets in the US and Europe to fast-track their capacity building.
'The business development guys of almost every CDMO in
India
are out there on the US East Coast and some parts of the West Coast, evaluating possible acquisition targets,' says a top industry official.
While the Indian facilities of these companies have been helping global drug makers for years, they are now exploring strategic acquisitions in specialised, high-growth therapeutic areas such as biologics, cell and gene therapy and oncology.
'What we are looking for are enhanced capabilities—particularly in research and complex chemistry. The idea is to establish highly specialised labs where our scientists co-create solutions alongside innovator partners,' says Sharma. However, 'India will remain our hub for commercial-scale manufacturing, where we continue to enjoy a global cost advantage.'
NEARSHORING & GLOBAL PHARMA
Nearshoring and reshoring are gaining momentum among global pharma majors that are looking to mitigate risks posed by supply chain disruption and rising offshore cost. According to a report by consulting firm LoEstro, pharma companies in the West are investing in local and regional facilities to reduce supply chain risks, ensure regulatory compliance and enhance production resilience amid global disruptions.
Siva Chittor, CFO of Sai Life Sciences, says, 'We are seeing a growing customer preference for nearshoring.' Sai has been an early mover in this space, establishing R&D labs in US and UK about five years ago. 'These labs allow us to be closer to our customers,' he adds.
A key driver is the increasing trend of global customers looking to re-balance their supply chains from China. Multinational pharma companies in US and Europe want to diversify their manufacturing bases in a bid to reduce their over-reliance on China amid geopolitical uncertainties and a growing divide between Washington and Beijing.
However, such is the dependence on China, that US's proposed
BioSecure Act
, which seeks to restrict American companies from doing business with Chinese drugmakers, has been put on the backburner.
If US puts hurdles for Chinese pharma companies, it will create huge opportunities for India. Indian CDMOs, which have a significant presence in small-molecule manufacturing, are now stepping up into biologics, which are large complex molecules, and advanced therapeutic modalities that can help them snatch a large slice of the pie from Chinese manufacturers.
'The Indian CDMO sector is well poised for growth to capitalise on the changing global dynamics,' says Akhil Ravi, CEO of Bengaluru-headquartered Aurigene Pharmaceutical Services. 'Factors such as robust infrastructure, regulatory compliance and highly skilled talent pool have strengthened India's position to become a preferred strategic partner for global companies in drug development. We remain committed to expanding our capabilities and capacity to meet rising demand in small-molecule APIs (active pharma - ceutical ingredients), peptides and bio - logics,' says Ravi. Peptides are smaller forms of proteins.
Says Bains of Syngene: 'India is entering a critical phase in the evolution of its CDMO industry. A CAGR of 15% in 2019- 24, double the global growth rate of 7-8%, indicates that there are strong tailwinds for India.'
At Syngene, the conversations with its customers are around its end-to-end ability to strategically support them in R&D and manufacturing and its long-term sup - ply chain resilience. 'We are seeing in - creased visits by both large and mid-sized pharma companies, which are running comparative pilots with a few organisa - tions as a way of selecting longer-term partners. We have been successful in con - verting a majority of these pilots into fulltime contracts,' says Bains.
Deepak Jain, MD and CEO of Jubilant Ingrevia, which has partnered with glob - al drug firms for manufacturing drug intermediates, expects 6-7x growth in pharma contracts over the next few years. 'This is a golden opportunity for India. If not India, who else?' he asks.
Inorganic expansion, through acquisi - tions abroad, enables Indian companies to stave off the threat of tariffs and geo - political impact and access highly skilled manpower, says Sujay Shetty, global health industries advisory leader, PwC. 'Also, from the IP perspective, it makes more sense if they are on the ground there since they will be running highly confidential projects for clients that could be multinational innovator companies or biotech companies,' he adds.
Piramal Pharma, which recently announced a capex of $90 million for the expansion of two of its US facilities in Kentucky and Michigan, will focus on organic, brownfield expansion in the drug development and manufacturing service business, says chairperson Nandini Piramal.
The company has four manufacturing facilities in North America and two in the UK. 'We are one of the best-positioned CDMOs to benefit from pharma companies wanting to onshore manufacturing in US,' says Piramal.
The overseas facilities of Indian companies will be mostly in advanced therapeutic segments. Says Annaswamy Vaidheesh, former MD of GSK Pharma India: 'Their strategic priorities are in - creasingly aligned with high-value segments such as biologics and advanced technology platforms that require differentiated capabilities and offer greater margin potential.'
Biologics require specialised facilities and expertise that drive up production cost but can generate higher profit margin.
However, Vaidheesh warns that establishing a fully onshore, end-to-end sup - ply chain for US clients through Indian partners will take time, as it involves scaling capabilities and aligning regulatory and operational processes. 'Innovators typically assess whether a CDMO has the bandwidth to take on new programmes. Without demonstrable ca - pacity, even strong technical competen - cies may not suffice,' says Vaidheesh.
Key Indian companies have been in - vesting heavily to enhance capacity. Aurigene has made significant additions to its infrastructure and established a new biologics facility at Genome Valley, Hyderabad.
Chinese companies have been the preferred CDMO partner for US companies —grabbing 80% market share—because they are good in speed and low in cost.
India is well-positioned to play a greater role in global supply chains, but the pace and quality of transition will depend on several factors. Speed of execution has been a major pain point for Indian CDMOs, which have to go through multiple levels of domestic regulatory approvals that delay consignments to customers by three-four months.
'Speed and agility are key expectations from global innovators. Chinese CDMOs have set high benchmarks in terms of responsiveness. Indian players need to invest in systems and capabilities that allow them to meet these expectations competitively,' says Vaidheesh.
RISING PE INTEREST
Rising growth opportunities and the China+1 plan of MNCs have led to sustained investor interest in the Indian CDMO space. Over $900 million has come from private investments and nearly $750 million has been raised through IPOs over the past 15 months, according to Grant Thornton. 'This reflects the segment's growing strategic relevance, driven by global demand for outsourced development and manufacturing and India's established expertise in generics, APIs and complex formulations,' says Bhanu Prakash Kalmath SJ, partner and healthcare industry leader.
Another significant development has been US President Donald Trump's executive order that directed drug companies to reduce the prices of medicines in 30 days. While that could still see negotiations, some experts suggest the direct result will be companies' looking at partners in India to cut their costs of research and production.
This seems like a shot in the arm for Indian CDMOs. Can they now make a dent in the time-tested Chinese pharma supply chain? The results are awaited .
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump advisor criticises India over Russian oil, says tariff to hit where it hurts
WASHINGTON: White House trade advisor Peter Navarro sharply criticised India for purchasing Russian energy and defence equipment, pledging to 'hit India where it hurts' in order to change New Delhi's policy. In an opinion piece for the Financial Times, Navarro termed India's oil trade with Russia 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to isolate the Russian economy. White House trade counselor Peter Navarro walks outside the White House after a television interview, on July 31, 2025, in Washington. (AP FILE) A former economics professor who emerged as a major trade adviser to US President Donald Trump in his first administration, Navarro is seen as a major force behind the US's retaliatory tariffs on trading partners. In his article, Navarro sought to link what he termed as India's 'high' trade tariffs and 'financial support' for Russia's war in Ukraine. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' wrote Navarro. In negotiations with the US for a Free Trade Agreement, India has refused to budge on protections for its agriculture, dairy and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) sectors from unfettered American imports. Trump on July 30 announced punitive tariffs of 25% on Indian goods shipped to America. He subsequently added another 25% levy, which is scheduled to come into effect next week, for purchasing Russian oil. India's foreign ministry has termed the tariffs as 'unreasonable' and 'extremely unfortunate'. Navarro also attacked Indian refiners for 'profiteering' by purchasing Russian discounted oil and exporting the processed petroleum products to Europe, Africa and Asia, stating that the surge in crude oil imports from Russia after 2022 was not for meeting domestic consumption. 'The Biden administration largely looked the other way at this strategic and geopolitical madness. The Trump administration is confronting it,' Navarro said of Trump's tariffs on India that have left the country's exports to the US at a significant disadvantage with those from competing nations. 'This two-pronged policy will hit India where it hurts — its access to US markets — even as it seeks to cut off the financial lifeline it has extended to Russia's war effort,' Navarro said. 'If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one.' Navarro's criticism marks the latest recrimination of India's ties with Russia from a senior member of the Trump administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller have also taken issue with New Delhi's relationship with Moscow. Navarro also added to earlier criticisms of India in a new direction, by taking aim at defence technology transfers from US firms to India. In his view, building factories in India and transferring sensitive technologies does not help improve Washington's trade balance with New Delhi. Navarro also charged India with 'cozying up to both Russia and China'. Former US officials have questioned Navarro's assertions about the India-Russia relationship. 'The larger issue is that the secretary of State and other principals authorized this piece. So those who know better and are supposed to balance American interests either agree with it, don't agree with it but authorized it anyway, or just don't care,' says Evan Feigenbaum, a former diplomat who served as deputy assistant secretary of state for South Asia under George W Bush. 'This completes a strange narrative arc from Washington and has finally shifted U.S. policy from a trade war and strategic friction with China to a trade war and strategic friction with India instead. I'll say it flatly: that is just strategic malpractice,' adds Feigenbaum, who helped negotiate the India-US civilian nuclear deal during the mid-2000s.


Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US FTC sues ticket reseller for evading Taylor Swift's Eras tour ticket limits
By Jody Godoy US FTC sues ticket reseller for evading Taylor Swift's Eras tour ticket limits -The U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued ticket reseller Key Investment Group for evading purchasing limits to buy up thousands of tickets to live events including Taylor Swift's Eras tour and resell them at a markup, according to a complaint filed in Maryland federal court on Monday. The Baltimore, Maryland-based company, which operates ticket resale sites including used thousands of Ticketmaster accounts, including fake or purchased accounts, the FTC said. Ticketmaster faced intense criticism after its botched 2022 sale of tickets to Swift's much-hyped Eras tour, when billions of requests from Swift fans, bots and ticket resellers overwhelmed its website and the company canceled a planned ticket sale to the general public. For one Swift concert in Las Vegas in March 2023, Key Investment Group and its affiliates used 49 different accounts to purchase 273 tickets and evade a 6-ticket purchase limit, netting more than $119,000 in revenue on resales, the FTC said on Monday. The company made more than $1.2 million reselling 2,280 Swift concert tickets it purchased in 2023, the agency said. FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson said in a statement that the lawsuit puts ticket sellers on notice that the agency will go after those who circumvent ticketing platforms' limits on ticket sales. The lawsuit is part of a crackdown President Donald Trump announced in March focused on curbing exploitative ticket reselling practices that raise costs for fans. A Key Investment Group spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday. The company sued the FTC in July to block its investigation, saying that its ticket purchases did not use automated software, or bots, and did not violate the Better Online Ticket Sales Act. The FTC has made it clear that "they intend to use the BOTS Act to shut down the entire secondary-ticket market," the company said in its lawsuit. The agency on Monday accused Key Investment Group and three of its executives of violating the BOTS Act as well as the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive business practices. Ticketmaster and its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment, are facing a lawsuit brought by U.S. antitrust enforcers accusing the company of monopolizing markets across the live concert industry. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Indian broadcasters staring at crores in unpaid license fees from Nepal, Bangladesh
TV broadcasters in India are due hundreds of crores in overdue license fee payments from distributors in Nepal and Bangladesh, a problem that has been getting worse over the last year, two executives with knowledge of the payment issues told The Hindu. The problem has been particularly acute in Bangladesh, where after the ouster of former President Sheikh Hasina, TV distributors have stopped paying Indian broadcasters the fees they are due for transmitting their channels. Many Indian channels are popular in Nepal and Bangladesh, so much so that broadcasters give distributors in that country a 'clean feed,' a stripped-down live broadcast without Indian ads. In Nepal, which has had issues in the last few years of withheld payments to telecom companies like Airtel, the dues exceeded ₹100 crore in the last few weeks. Nepalese Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli is due to visit India in September, and Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri visited Kathmandu on Sunday for a two day official trip. Bangladeshi broadcasters also owe over ₹250 crore, one executive said. The Nepalese embassy and the High Commission of Bangladesh did not respond to queries by The Hindu. The Ministry of External Affairs did not immediately respond to a query on the dues. In Airtel's case in 2023, the telecom company cut off its link to Nepal briefly, before turning it back on in a few hours, underlining the stakes if payments didn't come through. One executive speaking to The Hindu said that the major Indian broadcasters are hesitating to do the same, as broadcasters in both countries could simply pirate an Indian retail feed, ending any hope of recovering due license fees, and posing enormous challenges in reentering the market. In Nepal, Indian channels have been facing issues with the government since April 2023, when the country's Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (MoCIT) gave every broadcaster just two days to implement an 'à la carte' pricing system, practically identical to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's New Tariff Order. Unlike the NTO regime, which was implemented — with much resistance — after several months of consultations, the notice given was so short that Indian broadcasters only came to know of the requirement days after the deadline. In Bangladesh, Beximcom, the country's largest conglomerate with over $1 billion in assets, has not received remittance clearance from the Bank of Bangladesh to pay Indian broadcasters, and the political situation in the country has left diplomats and politicians with little interest to deal with the commercial concerns of broadcasters, one executive said.