logo
M.C. Davar's Behind-the-Scenes Role in Trying to Stop Partition

M.C. Davar's Behind-the-Scenes Role in Trying to Stop Partition

The Wirea day ago

Excerpted with permission from He Almost Prevented Partition: The Life and Times of M.C. Davar (Speaking Tiger).
Why the Shimla Conference failed is recorded by [then Viceroy Lord] Wavell: 'He (Jinnah ) refused even to discuss names unless he could be given the absolute right to select all Muslims and some guarantee that any decisions which the Muslims opposed in Council could only be passed by a two-thirds majority – in fact a communal veto. I said these conditions were entirely unacceptable.'
Praveen Davar
He Almost Prevented Partition: The Life and Times of M.C. Davar
Speaking Tiger, 2025
Dr [M.C.] Davar, who was so passionately devoted to the prevention of Partition, made sure that he was present in Shimla for the entire duration of the Conference which lasted for almost 15 days in June-July 1945. While he was there, staying at the house of Sanjiva Roy, Chairman of the Federal Public Service Commission, one day at 11 PM, he got a telephone call from Mrs Rajen Nehru asking him to reach the Grand Hotel. When Dr Davar reached within less than twenty minutes, he found her hotel room packed: it was full of a dozen frontline leaders of the Muslim League – all members of the League Working Committee. They included Khaliq-ur-Rahman, Mohd. Ismail and Abdul Majid Sindhi. Rajen Nehru wanted Davar to convey to Pt Nehru that these Muslim League members were prepared to resign from the working committee of their party if Jinnah remains adamant on his condition of having only Muslims from the League. On being asked by Davar why she couldn't speak to Jawaharlal herself being a close relative, Rajen replied that 'your work in this field is well known and you will be able to convince Panditji.'
So under tremendous pressure from Rajen Nehru, Davar after speaking to the League leaders left for Armsdale, where Nehru was staying. When he reached there at almost twenty minutes past midnight, he found Dharam Yash Dev, a local personal assistant of Nehru's, waiting for Panditji to return from dinner at Mashobra from where he was, as per his habit, walking back. It was thirty minutes past midnight when Panditji reached, he asked Dharam the purpose of being awake so late. Dharam replied pointing towards Davar that 'Doctor Sahib's business seems to be more important.' Panditji then said: 'Davar, come in' while entering the house. But he could not find the switch to put on the light. Then Dharam Yash Dev came to his rescue and found the switch at the bottom of a wall while Nehru and Davar were trying to locate the switch on the middle of the wall.
Davar narrates: 'Now Panditji said, 'sit down Davar.' We sat down on the sofa, and he asked what brought me here to which I replied 12 League members are at Grand Hotel and want to meet you… 'What for do they want to meet me? ' asked Panditji. I said: 'Jinnah is pressing for 5 seats as Liaqat Ali got in writing from Bhulabhai Desai that League will get 5, Congress 5 and others 3. Now Maulana Azad is demanding one seat for Nationalist Muslims as also the Unionist Party of Khizar Hayat Khan. So Jinnah is adamant…he wants all five Muslim seats…that is why this Conference seems to fail and that is why they want to meet you.'
Then Panditji asked why should they not meet Maulana? (Davar narrated to Panditji details of his meeting with Azad five years ago at Kolkata wherein Maulana after great persuasion had agreed to bless his efforts for Congress-League unity but now seemed to be backing out.) But Panditji, though partially convinced, kept insisting that they must Maulana and that 'I will not interfere in Maulana's work.' (Despite Davar telling Nehru that Muslims of India had more faith in him than any leader, and these 12 League leaders were ready to ditch Jinnah provided he 'holds their hand ', Nehru refused to listen). [Davar says,] 'When I told him that I was the original author of the Liaqat-Desai formula, which actually is Davar -Sultan formula, Panditji remarked: 'Oh, then you are the person who has put us in trouble.' After I left I rang up Dharam Yash as I had left my umbrella there. Dharam told me Panditji had guessed it was your umbrella which is lying safely, but your discussion with him created a deep impression on him, and he kept asking me about you, though he appeared to know about your homoeopathic and revolutionary background.'
Deeply disappointed, Davar left Simla in the morning, but before doing so dropped a line at Wavell's house telling the Viceroy about his meeting with Pt Nehru who did not agree to his suggestion of meeting the Muslim League members. He therefore concluded that the Simla Conference would fail. That it failed was not only due to Jinnah's intransigence, equally it was because of Wavell's lack of firmness. HV Hodson, who was the Reforms Commissioner in 1941-42, wrote in his memoirs, The Great Divide : 'Lord Wavell had in effect capitulated to Jinnah… Mr Jinnah's control of the Muslim League was at that time far from complete. The Unionist Party was still strong, and Mr Liaqat Ali Khan favoured a settlement. There were still many uncommitted Muslims in the country. It is arguable that if the Viceroy had been as adamant as Mr Jinnah, the latter would have been obliged to give in; that the destruction of the Unionist Party, which paved the way for partition of Punjab,would have averted.'
But probably Wavell also could not forget so soon that it was the Congress which had challenged the Empire with the Quit India Movement during the period when he, as the Commander-in-Chief himself, had to bear the brunt, and hence he let Jinnah sabotage the Conference which would also please Churchill who was, naturally, in sympathy towards the 'enemy's enemy'. But within two weeks, Churchill's Conservative Party lost elections, displaying the maturity of the British electorate that victory in war was no passport to better governance in peace times.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BJP Minority Morcha to hold yoga camps in UP madrasas
BJP Minority Morcha to hold yoga camps in UP madrasas

Hans India

time2 hours ago

  • Hans India

BJP Minority Morcha to hold yoga camps in UP madrasas

Lucknow: The BJP Minority Morcha is set to conduct yoga camps in selected madrasas across all 403 Assembly constituencies in Uttar Pradesh on June 21 -- International Yoga Day. The initiative is part of a wider campaign commemorating 11 years of governance under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. According to Uttar Pradesh BJP Minority Morcha president Basit Ali, the party's outreach will specifically target maulanas and madrasa students, encouraging them to participate in the yoga sessions. These camps aim to create engagement and promote wellness while simultaneously highlighting the Modi government's policies within the minority community. As part of the broader effort, the Morcha is also launching a campaign titled 'Alpsankhyako ka ye paigaam: Modi ke saath Musalman (Minorities' Message: Muslims are with Modi)'. This drive, focused on building a better understanding and support among Muslims, will roll out across major cities in Uttar Pradesh. The main event is scheduled to take place in Lucknow on June 12 and will include participation from members of the intellectual community, including doctors, teachers, engineers, and lawyers. 'To mark the 11 years of Prime Minister Modi's governance, the party will organise programmes in all 403 Assembly constituencies, specifically targeting 403 madrasas across Uttar Pradesh. These events will involve maulanas, madrasa students, and local community members, beginning with yoga sessions followed by district-level programs,' Basit Ali told IANS. One of the standout components of this campaign will be the initiative 'Desh Ka Paigham, Pratibha Ko Samman', which will honour high-achieving individuals from the minority community. This includes meritorious students and those who have become IAS or IPS officers or contributed meaningfully to the country's development.

Delegitimising Pakistan's two-nation theory: An imperative for India and the West
Delegitimising Pakistan's two-nation theory: An imperative for India and the West

First Post

time10 hours ago

  • First Post

Delegitimising Pakistan's two-nation theory: An imperative for India and the West

De-legitimising the Pakistani model of exclusivity would not be humiliating a neighbour, but would be about defending the universal standard that religion cannot be the standard of legitimacy for the state read more (File) Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir (C) prays after laying wreath on the martyrs' monument during a guard of honor ceremony at General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi on May 21, 2025. Photo by Handout/ Pakistan's Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR). AFP Ever since it emerged in 1947, Pakistan has been an ideological 'outlier' in the international system—created not on the basis of language, ethnicity, or culture shared between the people, but on the exclusivist premise of religion as the sole basis for the nation. Pakistan's then Chief of Army Asim Munir, and now Field Marshal, made this clear in his now viral Address to Pakistan's diaspora on April 15 this year, though not the first by any leader of consequence since its birth. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The ostensibly Two-Nation Theory, which is the notion that Muslims and Hindus form two distinct peoples who cannot live together within one state, is the Pakistani state's myth of origin. This vision of exclusivity, problematic in the context of South Asia, has since 9/11 turned into a more immediate global danger, one that erodes the principles of pluralism, resists the values of liberal democracy, and sustains transnational Islamist radicalism and terrorism. India and the Western liberal democracies of the day, particularly the United States and Europe, have to acknowledge this ideological project as a long-term threat to global order today. Delegitimising the Two-Nation Theory is not merely a regional imperative for India anymore but is now a global imperative for upholding the values of peaceful coexistence, religious diversity, and democratic secularism. The very rationale of Pakistan's existence—a state for Muslims only—set the precedent for the acceptance of rejecting multi-ethnic, multi-religious coexistence. In contrast with India, which had adopted the notion of secular, pluralist democracy in spite of the multicultural diversity of its society, Pakistan canonised the perception that identity and statehood are determined along strict religious lines. This over time took the form of an apparatus of exclusion not only of religious minorities such as Hindus, Christians, and Ahmadis but of dissident ethnic groups such as the Baloch and Sindhis as well. Even within Muslims, only a narrow, Punjabi-centric, Sunni vision was hallowed. The turning moment for the global community, however, arrived after 9/11. The Taliban government of Afghanistan, supported by Pakistan's military-intelligence establishment, gave refuge to Al-Qaeda & Osama bin Laden, the perpetrators of the most horrific terrorist strike on American terrain. In spite of official partnerships with the US-led 'War on Terror', Pakistan went on providing strategic depth and logistical support for jihadist organisations. Pakistan's shenanigans stood fully exposed with the US killing of Osama bin Laden on May 2, 2011, in his hideout in Abbottabad, very close to Pakistan's elite military academy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The ideological origins of this duplicity reside in the same exclusivist worldview that delegitimises pluralism and espouses Islamic terrorism as an instrument of strategic depth and religious obligation rather than as a threat. Ever since, Pakistan's soil has spawned several internationally recognised terrorist groups- lending support includes Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and the Haqqani Network-whose attacks against Western interests and citizens add to their role in destabilising India and Afghanistan. The connection is no longer local: Pakistan's state ideology has global implications. For decades, the West has been equivocal in dealing with Pakistan- straddling strategic imperatives in Afghanistan, nuclear containment fears, and economic pressure, while willfully turning a blind eye to Pakistan's ideological roots that sow radicalism. This policy of ticklish engagement has proven counterproductive. Pakistan today is more than a willing host of extremism; it is an active ideological sponsor. Its military and clergy maintain an environment in which terror surrogates can operate, in which minorities are silenced through the force of their blasphemy laws, and where schools indoctrinate anti-Western, anti-India views. It is no coincidence that Europe has experienced an influx of radicalised youth, who drew their ideological roots from the Islamist networks of the Indian sub-continent. The West needs to realize that by legitimizing Pakistan's strategic value while turning a blind eye towards its ideological path, they empower the actor who undermines the liberal international order from its core. The time has arrived for a recalibration – an arrangement with India for calling out, challenging, and diplomatically isolating the main ideology that keeps Pakistan's perilous course intact. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India, being the main victim of Pakistani ideological enmity, has most stakes. India's response, however, is not only required to be reactive or securitised but has to be ideational and normative and initiate an international discourse bringing into the open the vitriocity of the Two-Nation Theory based on its actual impact: terrorism, sectarianism, and civilisational backwardness. There are several tangible diplomatic initiatives that India can take along with Western democracies: First, India needs to embark on focused public diplomacy targeted against Pakistan's ideology, portraying it as against the norms of the international community. Just as apartheid was diplomatically and morally besieged during the 1980s, so should Pakistan's founding exclusivity be challenged in international forums. Second, India needs to further bond with pluralism-oriented countries such as the US, France, Germany, and Australia based on common civilisational values instead of security interests only. Interfaith discussions, diaspora partnerships, and parliamentary friendship groups should be utilised for forging across-nation narratives against religion-based exclusivist nationalism. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Third, India and like-minded countries need to bring the question of ideological statehood and its linkage with terrorism on the agenda of organizations like the UN Human Rights Council, FATF, and the G20. Karachi's ideology export needs to be connected with international volatility from European radicalisation to Afghan Taliban resurgence. Fourthly, India needs to spend on international research institutes that study the threat of religious exclusivisms, bring out comparative studies of pluralistic and ideological states, and construct cultural centres overseas celebrating India's inclusive civilisational tradition vis-a-vis the sectarian intolerance of Pakistan. Fourth, diplomatic and economic pressure should be directed strategically against Pakistan's military and clergy elites who have emerged as chief custodians of the ideological state. Asset freezes, visa sanctions, and travel bans against key figures who assist with terrorism or for blasphemy-related persecution should be included in Western policy. The Pakistani state's ideological project is no longer peculiar to South Asia, it is now an international outlier. The Two-Nation Theory in its current sophisticated incarnation presents a danger directly threatening the moral and political structure of the international system. India and the West should now share a shared civilisational project: defending pluralism, safeguarding minorities, and reviving faith in the possibility of variegated societies coexisting harmoniously together. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD De-legitimising the Pakistani model of exclusivity would not be humiliating a neighbour, but would be about defending the universal standard that religion cannot be the standard of legitimacy for the state. Manish Dabhade is an Associate Professor of Diplomacy in the School of International Studies, JNU & Founder of The Indian Futures, an independent think tank based in New Delhi. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Bengal cops probe conspiracy angle behind clash in South 24 Parganas
Bengal cops probe conspiracy angle behind clash in South 24 Parganas

Hindustan Times

time17 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Bengal cops probe conspiracy angle behind clash in South 24 Parganas

KOLKATA: The West Bengal police said on Thursday that it was investigating whether an illegal construction, which triggered a clash between two groups on June 11 afternoon, was part of a conspiracy to fuel communal tension in South 24 Parganas district. 'A clash between two groups occurred yesterday afternoon in Rabindra Nagar police station area and adjacent areas of Nadial over illegal construction and plantation on govt land without any permission whatsoever and replacing an existing shop in the process, resulting in brick-batting at police and isolated vandalism in the vicinity. Whether the illegal construction was planned and designed as a conspiracy to fuel communal tension is also being probed in all seriousness,' the West Bengal police said in a post on X. The trouble erupted on Wednesday afternoon after an attempt to plant Tulsi saplings in front of a temple on a pavement where a Muslim fruit seller used to run his shop. About 10 police personnel were injured when they tried to stop the two groups. Several shops were ransacked by the mob on Wednesday. Rahul Goswami, superintendent of police (SP) Diamond Harbour police district, told a news conference on Thursday that at least 40 people involved in the attacks had been arrested till Thursday afternoon. 'Raids will continue. On Wednesday evening we also arrested a Rabindra Nagar resident named Nabin Chandra Roy and four others when they were carrying bomb making materials on three motorcycles,' Goswami said. The police officer said Roy had claimed to be a member of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Bharatiya Janata Party and said that the bomb making materials were procured for self-defence. 'We are investigating the role of Roy and his associates. Similarly, the role of Muslims involved in the violence is also under scanner,' Goswami said. 'Since the controversial site is very close to the Rabindra Nagar police station, the role of local policemen will be reviewed as well,' Goswami added. The RSS countered the claim, saying Roy was never its member. 'We never had any member called Nabin Chandra Roy. Should the police go by his claims or probe his antecedents instead? Six political murders took place in the Diamond Harbour police district after the 2021 assembly polls. Did the police hold a press conference like this after those incidents?' Jishnu Basu, the RSS general secretary in south Bengal region, told HT. In its post on X, the West Bengal police said the situation was now peaceful and under control. 'Prohibitory orders under 163 BNSS have been imposed in Rabindra Nagar PS area in the interest of peace. Representatives of all political parties or groups are advised not to visit the area till 163 BNSS is in place,' the state police said. BJP's Suvendu Adhikari, the leader of the opposition in the state assembly, has demanded that the case be handed over to the federal National Investigation Agency (NIA) and central police forces be deployed in the area. 'The @WBPolice's statement is a shameful attempt to whitewash a blatant communal attack on Hindus by Jihadists, reducing it to a mere 'clash between two groups'....' Adhikari wrote on X. BJP legislators protested inside the state assembly and staged a walk-out after assembly speaker Biman Banerjee refused to admit two adjournment motions moved over the Rabindra Nagar violence. Some BJP legislators met governor CV Ananda Bose as well. 'The governor assured the delegation that their concerns will be duly noted and taken forward with appropriate authorities for immediate necessary action and report,' the Raj Bhavan said in a statement. BJP state president Sukanta Majundar tried to visit Maheshtala but was stopped by the police. He was later detained by police for trying to stage a demonstration near the residence of chief minister Mamata Banerjee. The ruling Trinamool Congress alleged that the incident was part of a larger conspiracy by BJP to incite violence across Bengal 'When an active BJP and RSS worker has been arrested with explosive materials, BJP leaders such as Suvendu Adhikari, Sukanta Majumdar and Amit Malviya are making provocative statements to incite unrest,' TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store