Golden visas are shrinking for crypto investors
Golden visa programs let applicants secure citizenship after investing a sum, often in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, in a local investment fund or real estate. While this can stimulate local economic development and attract talent from around the globe, some jurisdictions are rethinking the strategy.
In May, Malta's golden passport program was ruled illegal by an EU court. The EU Commission said that Malta's Exceptional Investor Naturalisation (MEIN) program was commercializing European citizenship. Cyprus and Bulgaria ended their golden visa programs in 2021 and 2022, respectively.
Global citizenship in the form of multiple passports may be attractive for crypto investors, especially as different countries implement more friendly tax and regulatory regimes for crypto. But getting that second or even third passport is becoming more difficult. Golden visa programs get stricter as crypto investors seek citizenship
Golden visa regimes have often been touted as a solid way for countries to boost economic development.
Alessandro Palombo, co-founder and CEO of Bitizenship — an advisory firm working with Portugal's golden visa program — told Cointelegraph, 'It's a mutually beneficial exchange: Countries gain investment and growth, while investors secure residency rights, enhanced mobility and, in some cases, a path to citizenship.'
When US President Donald Trump unveiled his plan for a 'Trump Gold Card,' granting 'green card privileges plus,' he said that the program would bring wealthy people to the US who would be 'spending a lot of money, paying a lot of taxes, employing a lot of people.'
This can be particularly true for smaller countries with limited opportunities for economic development.
But critics and observers have flagged the potential for these programs to be abused. In the aforementioned case of Bulgaria, members of the European Parliament raised concerns that the program created an incentive for corruption and money laundering. According to Al Jazeera, the program's main beneficiaries were from China, Russia and the Middle East.
The sudden entrance of rich investors and high earners can also lead to economic problems for residents.
On April 3, Spain canceled its golden visa over concerns about skyrocketing housing costs locals couldn't afford. The path to citizenship through Spain's golden visa program was an investment in the real estate market, and lawmakers believed that the program was contributing to the crisis.
The golden visa program in Portugal, which has long been touted as the premier crypto hub of Europe, is also getting stricter. Palombo said, 'Portugal is moving toward more restrictive policies, including tightening residency and citizenship eligibility.'
Whether it comes from security and money laundering concerns, particularly after the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine war, or due to the economic problems of suddenly injecting a large amount of wealthy investors into a community, gold visa options are winding down. Why golden visa programs appeal to crypto investors
Golden visa programs can be particularly enticing for wealthy globe-trotting crypto investors as they provide the benefits of residence, and often citizenship, of a country while imposing next to no residency requirements.
In some cases, applicants are required to spend as little as five days per year in a country while still receiving the benefits of citizenship.
Furthermore, some golden visa programs have integrated crypto directly into their investment schemes. In Portugal, the Bitcoin Eco Golden Visa lets investors get exposure to Bitcoin and local companies through an investment fund while getting the benefits of the Portuguese golden visa scheme.
El Salvador, the first country to recognize Bitcoin as legal tender, also passed a law in 2023 granting citizenship to anyone who invests $1 million in Bitcoin or Tether's USDt.
In Italy, Bitizenship is launching a golden visa route that would allow investors to get a route to Italian residency by investing 250,000 euros in a local Bitcoin startup.
There is clearly appetite for crypto-related visa programs, particularly in countries with existing crypto-friendly regimes. Hype about a possible new crypto-related golden visa program led to a publicity nightmare earlier this month when the TON Foundation made a premature announcement of a golden visa regime it's reportedly developing for the UAE.
The TON Foundation, the organization behind the network started by encrypted messenger Telegram, announced in early July that investors could secure a '10-year Golden Visa with a one-time $35,000 processing fee' in addition to staking $100,000 on The Open Network blockchain for three years.
The UAE's Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security, the Securities and Commodities Authority and the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority issued a joint statement denying the announcement.
TON later clarified that the announcement was premature and that it was working independently with a 'licensed partner' to develop the scheme, with final approval ultimately resting with UAE regulators.
Options for investment may be expanding within existing golden visa regimes, like the Bitcoin Eco Golden Visa in Portugal or the crypto startup option in Italy. However, overall, the trend is moving toward fewer and stricter regulations around such visa schemes. Since 2020, at least nine countries have scrapped their golden visa programs: the UK, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Montenegro, Moldova and Malta.
Palombo said, 'What's possible today may become legally impossible within months or weeks. This pattern is accelerating. Golden visas, once abundant, are fast becoming scarce.'
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/golden-visas-shrinking-crypto-investors
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
4 minutes ago
- Zawya
ECB's Kazimir says big unexpected economic shift needed for September rate cut
FRANKFURT - The European Central Bank is not in any hurry to lower borrowing costs again and it would take a major unexpected economic shift to make a case for action in September, Slovak policymaker Peter Kazimir said on Monday. The ECB kept rates unchanged last week as widely expected and offered a moderately upbeat assessment on the bloc's economy, prompting investors to scale back their bets on further policy easing. "When it comes to incoming data, I don't expect anything significant to happen that would force my hand to act as soon as September," Kazimir said in a blog post. "It would take something like clear signs of unravelling in the labour market for me to act." This assessment aligns with comments from ECB sources that the bar for a cut in September is high after the bank has already halved rates to 2% since June 2024. Sunday's EU trade deal with the U.S. was clearly a positive since it reduces uncertainty for businesses, but the impact on prices, the ECB's chief focus, was still unclear. "This (trade deal) can help to ease concerns and regain confidence," Kazimir said. "We now have more clarity, but we will need time to see to what extent this new environment will affect inflation." Weighing in on a key debate among policymakers, Kazimir said he did not see a risk that inflation would now undershoot the ECB's 2% target, much like it did in the pre-pandemic decade. Price growth is seen dipping below 2% next year and only rebounding in 2027, raising worries among some governors that once inflation is well below 2%, expectations also fall and could perpetuate weak price growth. "I see no looming spectre of a sustained undershooting of inflation," Kazimir, an outspoken policy hawk, said. "The expected dips below target in the coming year should be temporary." He added that trade turmoil also created upside risks for inflation, particularly if global supply chains were realigned, creating bottlenecks.
Middle East Eye
9 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli settlers torch cars, vandalise property in Taybeh attack
Israeli settlers torched two vehicles and spray-painted racist graffiti in the majority Christian-Palestinian village of Taybeh in the occupied West Bank early on Monday morning. According to Anadolu Agency, one of the homes belonged to a Christian-Palestinian journalist and the other to a village council member. There are no reports of settler arrests, which are rare occurrences amid near-daily settler attacks occurring across the West Bank. Settler attacks in Taybeh have increased in recent weeks, attracting concern from Western leaders and religious figures. A visit to Taybeh from a delegation of Christian leaders and European diplomats on 14 July was followed by a visit from US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on 19 July. He condemned the attacks as "unacceptable". "To commit an act of sacrilege by desecrating a place that is supposed to be a place of worship, it is an act of terror, and it is a crime," said Hukabee in a statement.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump's strategy for Middle East 'peace' is built on Israeli dominance. It will fail
The Trump administration is attempting to reshape the Middle East after launching strikes on Iran last month, adopting a strategy characterised by "peace through strength" and "commerce, not chaos". While this approach is presented as pragmatic, it risks destabilising the region in favour of maximising US and Israeli military and economic advantage. President Donald Trump considers himself an "expert dealmaker", believing that calculated military strikes create leverage for diplomatic gains - particularly by pressuring Iran back to the negotiating table. His strategy emphasises overwhelming but short-term military force to achieve defined goals, avoiding prolonged entanglements or "forever wars". It also marks a rejection of nation-building, shifting the burden of regional stability onto local partners. Though the strategic value of Middle Eastern energy resources has declined for the US, the region remains crucial - perhaps even more so under the current administration. As Med This Week reports, three primary factors shape recent US actions. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The first is the ideological alliance between far-right governments in the US and Israel, which transcends the traditional "special relationship" and reflects a deeper political and strategic alignment. The administration also views Israeli hegemony as a vehicle for regional stability, envisioning a dominant "Greater Israel", backed by overwhelming US support, capable of unilaterally enforcing peace and marginalising Iran. At its core, the Trump doctrine envisions a Greater Israel, backed by US power, enforcing peace and sidelining Iran Finally, personal financial interests - particularly those of Trump and his family - were prominently on display during his recent Gulf visit. The immediate objective of the 12-day war was to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons. Trump declared key sites "destroyed" or "shut down", hailing the campaign as a critical blow against a perceived existential threat. (A recent US intelligence report found that only one of the three targeted nuclear facilities was completely destroyed, with the others expected to be operational again within months.) These military operations have significantly reshaped regional power dynamics, pushing forward the Trump administration's regional strategy: normalising relations between Israel and Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia, and potentially extending to Oman, Indonesia, Qatar and even Syria. Yet this pursuit of realignment remains constrained by Israel's ongoing war on Gaza. A ceasefire and the release of Israeli hostages are seen as prerequisites for advancing and expanding normalisation. Israel: A hegemonic power? The US has demonstrated its willingness to act unilaterally with overwhelming force - particularly through the use of "bunker-buster" bombs on Iranian nuclear sites. This was portrayed as a show of unmatched American might, aimed not only at Iran but also as a deterrent to rivals like China and Russia. America's costly backing for Israel is enabling China's unstoppable rise Read More » Meanwhile, Israel has sought to project itself as a formidable military force with deep intelligence reach into Iran's nuclear and security infrastructure. Some Israeli officials have even claimed the country has joined the ranks of global powers, though the strikes, which killed large numbers of civilians, have drawn widespread criticism and raised questions about the legitimacy of such claims. Yet the question remains: can Israel truly become a hegemonic power in the region? Despite its recent operations and short-term tactical gains, Israel faces structural and political barriers to sustained dominance. It remains heavily reliant on US military, diplomatic and economic support. Deep-rooted regional conflicts persist, particularly the unresolved Palestinian issue, which continues to inflame public opinion and obstruct meaningful diplomatic engagement. Key regional powers such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt are unlikely to accept Israeli expansionism or hegemony. Meanwhile, Iran's political will to pursue its nuclear ambitions appears undiminished, with some analysts suggesting that the recent strikes may ultimately accelerate, rather than deter, its nuclear development. Iran's leadership, especially Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is unlikely to negotiate from a position of perceived weakness. The recent military escalation follows the US "maximum pressure" campaign and its hostile stance towards Iran after withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or Iran nuclear deal, in 2018. Together, these developments have reinforced Iranian mistrust and further narrowed the space for diplomacy. Furthermore, there is no credible assessment that the recent strikes have permanently crippled Iran's nuclear programme. Many analysts believe any setbacks will last only months, not years, and that Iran will simply shift operations deeper underground. Roadblocks to dominance The unresolved Palestinian question remains the greatest obstacle to expanding the Abraham Accords and achieving regional peace. Saudi Arabia has made its position clear: it demands an unambiguous commitment to establishing a Palestinian state. Yet the Netanyahu government - shaped by ultra-right forces - prioritises military dominance over meaningful negotiations, particularly in Gaza and the West Bank. Israel's military assault on Gaza has inflamed Arab public opinion, making normalisation politically costly for Gulf leaders. Without a clear post-war vision for Gaza and a comprehensive ceasefire, Israeli dominance is unsustainable. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Regional actors, especially in the Gulf, fear appearing complicit with a state widely viewed as violating Arab rights. Israel's prolonged war in Gaza and lack of a political roadmap have tarnished its global image, leading to growing international condemnation and even weakening support from traditional allies like the EU (though it declined to take any action). Israel's military assault on Gaza has inflamed Arab public opinion, making normalisation politically costly for Gulf leaders The erosion of diplomatic support for Israel - alongside the continued refusal to hold it accountable for its war crimes - has only furthered its isolation, undermining any bid for genuine regional leadership. Meanwhile, Israeli national security doctrine under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu relies on military superiority as the only guarantee of peace. But even claimed military "victories" come at staggering human and economic costs - both for Palestinians and for Israelis. Even if external military actions temporarily consolidate internal support - as seen in Iran - they often fail to trigger regime change or long-term stability. Decades of foreign interventions have shown that externally imposed political transitions are more likely to produce chaos than lasting peace. Regional and internal pressures have compounded the challenges facing Israel's hegemonic ambitions. Gulf states, wary of Iranian collapse, fear the resulting chaos, humanitarian crisis, refugee flows and nuclear proliferation. Domestically, Netanyahu faces mounting pressure amid public frustration over his failure to secure a full ceasefire in Gaza or release all hostages - exposing internal fractures that challenge any coherent long-term strategy. Crucially, Israel has not established a legitimate Palestinian governing authority to assume control of Gaza, nor has it succeeded in imposing external or co-opted leadership. The result is chaos and the emergence of new resistance movements - mirroring US failures in Iraq and Afghanistan. Regional defiance Saudi Arabia has remained unwilling to embrace Israeli ambitions, insisting that any normalisation must be preceded by a concrete commitment to establishing a Palestinian state. However, Israel's aggression has made further agreements politically untenable. Gulf states must act to avoid Israel's war on Iran spiralling into chaos Hadi Kahalzadeh Read More » Some Gulf countries are reassessing their approach to Israel, questioning whether its actions foster stability or provoke further conflict. Many now prefer a long-term weakening of both Iran and Israel, rather than a decisive victory for either, to reduce threats to their own regimes. Saudi and Emirati strategies of hedging - including outreach to Iran - suggest a desire to avoid taking sides in regional conflicts, reducing their willingness to join an anti-Iran alliance led by Israel. Turkey, too, is unlikely to accept Israeli regional dominance. What was once a "golden age" of cooperation in the 1990s has devolved into mutual suspicion. Turkish leaders have grown increasingly vocal in their condemnation of Israel's actions, particularly in Gaza, and Ankara views Israel's deepening alliances with Greece and Cyprus as a threat. Turkey continues to build its own military and missile capabilities and asserts regional influence in Syria. It also positions itself as a potential mediator in Israeli-Iranian tensions - an indication of its desire to act independently. A fragile vision Trump's military campaign may have weakened Iran's nuclear ambitions and its regional allies, but long-term regional stability remains elusive. The current "peace" is more accurately described as a fragile truce than a durable shift. At its core, Israeli military superiority has failed to deliver political solutions. Without addressing the Palestinian question, stabilising Gaza, and navigating complex regional rivalries, lasting peace is impossible. Even if armed groups are temporarily subdued, the region's capacity to generate new forms of resistance endures Even if armed resistance groups such as Hezbollah or Hamas are temporarily subdued, the region's capacity to generate new forms of resistance endures. Israel may maintain its military edge, but it will continue to struggle for legitimacy and leadership in the Middle East. As violations of international law by the US and Israel mount, the message appears clear: "Only the weak follow the rules." Such a precedent erodes collective security and undermines any meaningful regional consensus. Real, enduring peace will not come through dominance alone - it demands diplomacy, justice, and the courage to confront the root causes of conflict. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
