logo
Drift in India's foreign policy a matter of serious concern; time for course correction: Congress

Drift in India's foreign policy a matter of serious concern; time for course correction: Congress

The Hindu17-07-2025
The Congress on Thursday (July 17, 2025) accused the government of departing from India's traditional position on foreign policy matters without consulting Parliament and said it was time for recalibration, honest introspection and course correction to reclaim the country's stature globally.
The main Opposition party also alleged that the government was weakening national consensus on the country's foreign policy, claiming that it had lowered and weakened the country's position globally, and demanded a comprehensive discussion on the issue in both houses of Parliament.
The party also took strong exception to India abstaining on the UN Resolution on Gaza ceasefire, claiming this was not just unfortunate, but a painful and unacceptable decision.
Congress spokesperson Anand Sharma said that the 'drift' in India's foreign policy was a matter of serious concern as it had weakened India's voice in the comity of nations and suggested the government recalibrate its policy, do honest introspection and course correction in the country's foreign policy approach.
He also said the Indo-U.S. trade agreement, talks for which were continuing, should be done keeping national interest foremost and no trade pact should be done under pressure.
'There's a matter of serious concern: that is a drift in our foreign policy — a visible decline of India's influence in the world and the very fact that there had been fundamental departures to the detriment of India's standing in the comity of nations at the United Nations,' Mr. Sharma said at a press conference.
The Congress leader called for a comprehensive debate on India's foreign policy matters in Parliament and said no country in a democracy avoids or evades a discussion on its foreign policy.
'...more damage is done by being non-transparent or opaque and not communicating with their own country first in a correct manner, so that we retain the strength of our voice in global affairs. Today, the multilateral world order of governance is under siege,' he said.
'Foreign policy of a country and in case of India, historically, is meant to promote India's national interest and also to take our worldview to our strategic partner countries to mobilise in support of what we feel is right and what would serve the larger cause of peace and humanity,' Mr. Sharma, a former Union Minister who handled key ministries including commerce and external affairs, said.
Foreign policy, as it had evolved since Independence, always had the backing of a broad-based national consensus, he said, adding that it had never been captive or hostage to partisan politics.
The Congress leader said the government of the day had the mandate to make decisions, but when it came to foreign policy, it involved everyone, and that's why consensus was important.
'Unfortunately, that national consensus has been weakened in recent years, if not completely broken down...on many occasions the government has arbitrarily chosen to depart from India's traditional positions without consulting either the Parliament or informing it,' he alleged.
Mr. Sharma said India commanded an authority and respect in the world not because 'we were a major economic or military power, but because we had the moral authority'.
'We were acknowledged as a voice of humanity. And that's why wherever the crisis came in the world, those affected countries looked up to India. Unfortunately, that's no more the case,' he noted, adding that it was up to the government that how it retrieves India's standing and rebuilds national consensus.
'Looking at the situation as it is, it's time for recalibration, honest introspection, and course correction in our foreign policy approach,' the former Union Minister asserted.
Stressing that equally important and integral to this was the neighbourhood policy, he said India was acknowledged as the pre-eminent power of South Asia.
'Nobody can say that today. It's for us to rethink our strategy, to engage in a manner that despite the challenges and complexities of the neighbourhood, India regains its strength and standing in its own region.'
'Our advice to the government will also be that while engaging with the neighbourhood, we have to be cautious. A foreign policy is meant to engage with other sovereign countries. It must not be linked to the furtherance of any domestic, partisan or political agendas,' he stressed, cautioning 'that would be not only a mistake but a blunder'.
'Our purpose is not to just criticise or score points. It is to caution, to share our concerns,' he said.
Mr. Sharma also said that on June 12, when the UN General Assembly discussed the issue of Israeli attacks on Gaza and a resolution for immediate ceasefire and cessation of hostilities was brought on the matter and voted upon, 149 countries voted for the resolution, while India, the land of Gandhi, chose to abstain and didn't vote for peace and ceasefire.
'That's painful and unacceptable. This one action diminished India's credibility as the leader of the Global South. All the countries of the Global South voted for peace. How come the leader did not?' he asked.
Mr. Sharma claimed that not just the Global South, major European countries, including two permanent UN members, as well as 'our traditional partners in BRICS, all four', voted in favour of a ceasefire.
'These countries in Europe also have good relations with Israel and the U.S., yet they voted for humanity, but we did not,' he said, adding that this was a fundamental departure from India's traditional position.
'We would urge the government that they should, as we wish to be, reclaim our moral standing as the voice of the Global South by speaking on this and prevail on our strategic and traditional partners to work for bringing peace in Gaza and the region,' the Congress leader said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The racist penalty of Western visa regimes
The racist penalty of Western visa regimes

Scroll.in

time6 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

The racist penalty of Western visa regimes

Sudanese climate activist Roaa should have been leading meetings with other youth advocates at a United Nations climate conference in Germany in June. Instead, the 24-year-old was at home, having wasted hundreds of dollars and nearly two months preparing for a visa that was denied in less than 48 hours. Many of her peers, mostly from the Global North, flew into the city of Bonn without a hitch. 'I was the one who was leading the whole process, but I wasn't on the ground. I cried a lot, like literally every night,' Roaa, who asked that her surname and location not be published, told Context. 'Knowing everyone is there (at Bonn), but you are not there maybe because of your nationality gives you a very bad feeling, like I'm less than those people,' she said from her home in the Middle East after leaving Sudan in 2023 when civil war began. Stricter border and visa rules are increasingly limiting the participation of nationals from the Global South in high-level talks that tackle climate, global health, economic systems, conflicts and other pressing issues, policy researchers say. 'We are the ones who are affected the most, but we are not in the room,' said Roaa, a medical student. 'Most of the conferences happen in Europe and in the US. They are talking on behalf of us.' The rejections also have an economic cost. In 2024, Africans paid some 60 million euros ($70.10 million) for rejected Schengen visa applications, up from nearly 54 million euros in 2023, according to analysis by Britain-based research group LAGO Collective. Despite its lower volume of visa applications compared to other continents, Africa had some of the highest rejection rates from the European Commission, which issues Schengen visas for short visits to the European Union, the data showed. In recent years, far-right and populist parties have made gains in places like Italy, Sweden, Germany and the US, fuelling anti-immigrant policies across Western countries, where most global conferences are held. Underrepresented Nations most vulnerable to climate impacts, from flooding to droughts and rising seas, are often among the poorest, the least polluting and underrepresented at global talks, according to UN climate body, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The UNFCCC, which hosts the Bonn summit and November's COP30 climate conference in Brazil, said it had no sway on visa processes, but had taken steps to diversify participation at its events by boosting the quota for Global South delegates. 'The major international conferences are the places where big decisions are being made with respect to global commitments,' said Kathryn Nwajiaku-Dahou, director of politics and governance at Britain-based think-tank ODI Global. If those who are expected to implement global policies 'are not at the table', it compounds the inequalities they have been campaigning to change, said Nwajiaku-Dahou. Despite providing details of her job, university studies, financial accounts and letters of support to attend the UNFCCC summit, Roaa was told she did not submit sufficient evidence to prove she would return home from Germany. Roaa said she was denied the visa even after an appeal. The European Commission said in emailed comments that cases are assessed according to the 'purpose of stay, sufficient means of subsistence, and the applicants' will to return to their country of residence'. Not fair Ugandan HIV/AIDS youth advocate Joseph Robert Linda said he secured around $4,000 from sponsors to pay for flights, visa and hotel fees to attend last year's International AIDS Conference in Munich, Germany, only for his visa to be rejected. Linda said he was told there were 'reasonable doubts' about the authenticity of his documents and his intention to leave Germany, leading to his visa refusal. 'That was not fair at all to me because they gave me feedback just three to four days before the conference, so there is no way I could appeal,' the 28-year-old said in a phone call. Although the majority of global diseases occur in poorer countries, where around 80% of the world's population live, only 4% of health summits were held in these regions, according to a 2021 paper by Harvard Medical School researchers that reviewed more than 100 conferences spanning three decades. Between 1997 to 2019, just 39% of health conferences analysed had attendees from developing countries, the study published in BMJ Global Health journal added. While Linda was able to attend the conference virtually, he said that option required stable and affordable internet, something not available to people in many parts of the world. He said conference organisers should work more closely with authorities to get visas approved so more people can have their voices heard. Geneva-based group International AIDS Society, which runs the International AIDS Conference, said it has been switching its host city since 2023 after many delegates were unable to attend the year prior in Canada due to visa issues. Large conferences have to prioritise finding safe and welcoming spaces for 'the most marginalised among us', an International AIDS Society spokesperson said. Sudanese medical student Saida, who was refused a visa to attend a medical workshop in Italy this month, said it was ultimately up to Global South citizens to keep demanding change. 'You have to speak up ... This is a pattern that we see happening and that's something that needs to be changed,' said Saida, who also asked that her surname not be published.

PM Modi, Shah meet President amid buzz over VP poll, cabinet reshuffle
PM Modi, Shah meet President amid buzz over VP poll, cabinet reshuffle

New Indian Express

time17 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

PM Modi, Shah meet President amid buzz over VP poll, cabinet reshuffle

NEW DELHI: Amid speculation that the Vice Presidential election may be held soon following Jagdeep Dhankhar's resignation, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah met President Droupadi Murmu separately at Rashtrapati Bhavan on Sunday. The back-to-back meetings of the top government functionaries have triggered speculation about an impending cabinet reshuffle or a key political move linked to the Vice President's post. While no official details of the meetings were shared, the timing has raised eyebrows, especially in light of the ongoing Parliament deadlock and other pressing national issues. In a post on X, the Rashtrapati Bhavan said: 'Prime Minister Shri @narendramodi called on President Droupadi Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan.' In another post, it added: 'Union Minister for Home Affairs and Cooperation, Shri Amit Shah called on President Droupadi Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan.' The Prime Minister's meeting comes amid the Opposition's demand for a debate on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar, ahead of the Assembly polls in the state. Shah's meeting, meanwhile, gains significance as the Rajya Sabha prepares to take up the statutory resolution passed by the Lok Sabha to extend President's Rule in Manipur beyond August 13. Though such meetings are often described as courtesy calls—especially following foreign visits—the presence of both leaders at Rashtrapati Bhavan within hours has intensified talk of significant political developments. Adding to the context is international pressure: US President Donald Trump recently announced a 25 percent tariff on Indian exports and hinted at penalties over India's continued trade with Russia. According to sources, a major cabinet reshuffle could follow the Monsoon Session of Parliament, which concludes on August 21 and the Vice Presidential election is scheduled for September 9. This could involve the removal of a few of the ministers in the government and new faces could be taken on board in the government. Key ministries including Finance, External Affairs, Information and Broadcasting, and Petroleum and Natural Gas may see new appointments, sources added.

Miami's mystery billboards: All about the billionaire who was once a Republican, and is now targeting them in Florida
Miami's mystery billboards: All about the billionaire who was once a Republican, and is now targeting them in Florida

Time of India

time36 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Miami's mystery billboards: All about the billionaire who was once a Republican, and is now targeting them in Florida

Billionaire philanthropist Michael B. Fernández, formerly a Republican, is funding an ad campaign to challenge Cuban American Republican members of Congress in Florida. He aims to highlight parallels between the politicians' actions and the authoritarian regimes that Cuban Americans fled. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Who was paying for the ads, billboards? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads After months of anonymity, the identity of the person behind the mysterious billboards and digital ads which surfaced in April, difficult for Miami's drivers, internet surfers and social media users to miss, targeting Republicans has been revealed."Deporting immigrants is cruel," one said, featuring the faces of Cuban American Republicans in Congress. More ads followed, most recently trying to denounce the politicians for a new state-run immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades known as "Alligator Alcatraz." Fernández , a billionaire philanthropist and chair of MBF Healthcare Partners, a private investment firm based in Coral Gables, Florida, told The New York Times on Friday that he hopes to "wake up the conscience" of Miami residents—particularly fellow Cuban Americans. He expressed concern that many are overlooking the similarities between the authoritarian leaders they once fled and what he sees as the declining state of democracy in the United States."We are seeing a replay of what I saw when I was 12 years old and left Cuba," Fernández told is a former Republican who left the party more than a decade ago to register without party affiliation, reported ad campaign, backed by the political group Keep Them Honest , has turned Fernández into a rare voice of dissent in a state that has shifted sharply to the right. This conservative wave has swept through Miami-Dade County, despite the region being home to some of the nation's highest concentrations of foreign-born residents, many of them Hispanic. Republicans have stood by former President Donald Trump's tough stance on illegal immigration, framing it as essential for upholding the rule of law amid a surge in border crossings in recent immediate goal is to help oust in next year's midterm elections at least one of the state's three Cuban American Republican members of Congress: Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Carlos A. Gimenez and Maria Elvira three Republicans, however, have not entirely supported the White House's immigration crackdown. They have pushed back against the administration's move to strip deportation protections from hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans, a rare instance of dissent between congressional Republicans and Trump. Salazar has also noted that she filed legislation to provide some immigrants a path to legal status, though the effort has not gained much said he had privately persuaded more than 30 donors, about a third of them Republicans, to contribute since April to Keep Them Honest. As a "dark money" group, Keep Them Honest can fund issue ads and does not have to disclose its would like more of them to speak publicly but is not sure if they will for fear of retaliation. Fernández said he had received threats and lost investors, friends and close contact with some family members as a result of his political his estimation, Fernández donated more than $30 million to Republican candidates over the years, including small contributions in the past to Salazar, whom he is now targeting. He also served as finance co-chair of the 2014 reelection campaign of former Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican, and donated millions to Jeb Bush's Republican presidential campaign in 2016. After Trump won that year's primary, Fernández endorsed Hillary Clinton, a Democrat, in the general family arrived in New York in 1965. He remembered how other immigrants in the city, from Mexico and Ireland, gave him snow boots and a coat. He later served as a paratrooper in the U.S. recently rescinded a $10 million donation to Miami Dade College and a $1 million donation to Florida International University, both public institutions. It was a response to state lawmakers and Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, repealing legislation from 2014 that allowed certain immigrants who were brought into the country illegally as children to pay in-state tuition had forcefully lobbied for the original law, which hangs framed on his office wall. He said he was redirecting some of that money to a nonprofit that provides students lacking permanent legal status with scholarships to private schools."I have to leave a mark," he said, "an example to my family and my children."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store