Bargain Hunt star jailed over art sales linked to suspected Hezbollah financier
Oghenochuko Ojiri, 53, from Brent, north London, sold around £140,000 worth of artwork to Nazem Ahmad, a man designated by US authorities as a suspected financier for the Lebanese organisation, a court heard last month.
Ojiri, from Brent, north London, previously pleaded guilty to eight offences under section 21A of the Terrorism Act 2000. He is believed to be the first person to be charged under the specific offence.
The art dealer, who also appeared on the BBC's Antiques Road Trip, was charged with failing to disclose information about transactions in the regulated art market on or before dates between October 2020 and December 2021.
US prosecutors say Mr Ahmad was a 'major Hezbollah financial donor' who used high-value art and diamonds to launder money and fund the group.
He is accused of helping to evade terrorism sanctions by using front companies to obtain more than $160 million (£120 million) worth of art and diamond services.
After new money laundering rules brought the art market under HMRC supervision in January 2020, Ojiri reportedly discussed the changes with a colleague, indicating he was aware of the regulations.
The court previously heard that the total value of the artwork sold was around £140,000.
Ojiri was sentenced to two years and six months in prison at the Old Bailey on Friday, with a further year to be spent on licence.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
38 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos
The Equality and Human Rights Commission has written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to remind them that the 'right to protest is a cornerstone of any healthy democracy'. The letter, from EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner, raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. The commission referenced a report by the Guardian newspaper about a woman said to have been threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act for holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. The woman was reportedly told by police that her demonstration in Canterbury, Kent, in July expressed views supportive of Palestine Action, an organisation which has been banned by the Government. The woman said neither of her signs mentioned Palestine Action and that she had told police she did not support any proscribed organisations. Kent Police confirmed it had 'received correspondence from a legal firm representing a person spoken to by officers in Canterbury on July 14 2025' after the Guardian reported the woman is taking legal action against the force. Baroness Falkner said any interference with protest rights 'must be lawful and assessed case-by-case'. She added: 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' The EHRC said Government and police authorities must 'ensure that all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' when it comes to protests. 'This guidance should ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights,' Baroness Falkner added. Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK Government in July, with the ban meaning that membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. More than 500 people were arrested last weekend on suspicion of displaying an item in support of a proscribed group, as demonstrations took place in central London. Downing Street has described Palestine Action as 'violent' and said it has committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, adding that evidence and security assessments shared in closed court supported its proscription. Palestine Action said Downing Street's accusations were 'false and defamatory' and 'disproven by the Government's own intelligence assessment'. Asked for their response to the EHRC letter, the Home Office referred to Ms Cooper's previous statement about last week's march, in which she said: 'The right to protest is one we protect fiercely but this is very different from displaying support for this one specific and narrow, proscribed organisation.' The Metropolitan Police declined to comment when asked for their response to the letter. Meanwhile, campaigners including Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and Quakers in Britain have written to the Attorney General asking for prosecution decisions of those arrested at the London march at the weekend to be delayed until after further legal action over Palestine Action's proscription. A High Court hearing is set to take place in November challenging the group's ban as a terror organisation. In their letter to Attorney General Richard Hermer, the groups argued that 'prosecuting individuals for offences connected to that proscription before the court has determined its legality raises significant legal and moral questions' and said delaying prosecution decisions 'would demonstrate restraint, fairness and respect for the ongoing legal process'. The Attorney General's office has been contacted for comment. Separately, the Liberal Democrat party's home affairs spokeswoman, Lisa Smart, has written to the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, Jonathan Hall, calling on him to review part of the Terrorism Act, to assess whether it is being used correctly or if it 'requires amendment to prevent misuse in future'. She said: 'Acts of terrorism, antisemitic hate and violence, and violent disorder should all be punished to the fullest extent of the law and are totally unacceptable. 'It is right that the police already have the powers to make clear to organisations and individuals that we, as a society, will not stand for it and the consequences will be serious. 'In the case of arresting hundreds of peaceful protesters not engaging in these actions, in a country that prides itself on democratic debate, these measures appear disproportionate. 'The Conservatives clamped down on the right to protest peacefully and this Labour Government now risks doing the same.'
North Wales Live
5 hours ago
- North Wales Live
BBC security manager fired after claims he spent 12 hours trawling CCTV for kitchen mess culprit
A security manager at BBC Wales' headquarters was sacked following an allegation he spent 12 hours poring through CCTV to find out who made a mess in the kitchen. Mohammad Rakib was fired by the broadcaster's security contractor Mitie after an investigation found he did not have a licence to review CCTV — but he has now won a £31,637 payout after a judge ruled he was unfairly dismissed. Mr Rakib was a duty security manager for Mitie from April 2022 until his dismissal in September 2023. He managed a team of around five security officers at the BBC's Central Square building in Cardiff city centre. The employment tribunal centred on the events of May 8, 2023, when he was alleged to have breached data protection rules by looking through CCTV footage in the control room without a suitable SIA (Security Industry Authority) licence. According to Mitie's investigator Martyn Barrass, Mr Rakib gave multiple explanations — at one point saying he reviewed the CCTV because another member of staff had misplaced a bag, and at another point saying he could not remember the reason. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter. Mr Rakib said during an investigation meeting: "I don't know why. I don't really do CCTV reviews that often, but there was a reason why I was doing it." Another security officer claimed to have had a conversation in which Mr Rakib admitted going through the footage for 12 hours "to catch who had made a mess in the kitchen". Questioned on this allegation, Mr Rakib said he thought the "kitchen incident" happened on a different day. He denied spending 12 hours trying to find the culprit. When Mr Barrass informed the BBC of the matter, the broadcaster's corporate security manager Joel Adlington described the alleged data protection breach as "unacceptable", adding: "I must put on record that it is a significant breach of trust between the staff member and the organisation, and you have my full support in your assessment of gross misconduct." Mitie held a disciplinary hearing over the alleged CCTV misuse as well as a claim that Mr Rakib had bullied a security officer. The bullying allegation was found "not proven on the evidence" but the firm did conclude Mr Rakib had reviewed footage without the correct licence — and that his explanations for doing so would not have been appropriate even if he did have a licence. Mitie's regional operations manager Marc Pearson took into account Mr Rakib's decade of service and that he had relocated from London to Cardiff for the job. But he said the damage to trust with the BBC was "so serious" he had to be sacked. He appealed but the decision was upheld by the deputy account director for the BBC contract, Lee Hill, who acknowledged Mr Rakib had a door supervisor licence entitling him to view live feeds but not to "review footage for any form of investigation without prior approval from the data controller". At the Cardiff employment tribunal, Judge Rachel Harfield found Mr Hill failed to check whether there was a pattern of other duty security managers reviewing CCTV. "Instead, all Lee Hill did in his appeal outcome letter was fudge the issue by saying if there was evidence of other duty security managers undertaking such activity then appropriate action would be taken to address it," she said. The judge noted Mr Pearson had failed to properly investigate Mr Rakib's claim that a former colleague had told him a licence was not needed for internal reviewing. Mr Pearson did not attempt to contact that ex-colleague and instead "presupposed" what he would say, the judge said. The judge also found Mitie had not given Mr Rakib any standard operating procedures on CCTV use. She concluded he had been unfairly and wrongfully dismissed. Judge Harfield said Mr Rakib was now only earning the minimum wage as a security officer at SGD Guarding. She added: "It took the claimant eight years and a move to Cardiff to get promoted. The claimant says he is now at back of the queue at SGD Guarding in terms of promotion opportunities. He says he thinks it will take another five years." Following Judge Harfield's ruling against Mitie, the parties agreed to a payout for Mr Rakib totalling £31,637.
Leader Live
7 hours ago
- Leader Live
Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos
The Equality and Human Rights Commission has written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to remind them that the 'right to protest is a cornerstone of any healthy democracy'. The letter, from EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner, raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. The commission referenced a report by the Guardian newspaper about a woman said to have been threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act for holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. The woman was reportedly told by police that her demonstration in Canterbury, Kent, in July expressed views supportive of Palestine Action, an organisation which has been banned by the Government. The woman said neither of her signs mentioned Palestine Action and that she had told police she did not support any proscribed organisations. Baroness Falkner said any interference with protest rights 'must be lawful and assessed case-by-case'. She added: 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' The EHRC said Government and police authorities must 'ensure that all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' when it comes to protests. 'This guidance should ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights,' Baroness Falkner added. Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK Government in July, with the ban meaning that membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. More than 500 people were arrested last weekend on suspicion of displaying an item in support of a proscribed group, as demonstrations took place in central London. Downing Street has described Palestine Action as 'violent' and said it has committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, adding that evidence and security assessments shared in closed court supported its proscription. Palestine Action said Downing Street's accusations were 'false and defamatory' and 'disproven by the Government's own intelligence assessment'. The Metropolitan Police, Home Office and Kent Police have been contacted for comment. Meanwhile, campaigners including Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and Quakers in Britain have written to the Attorney General asking for prosecution decisions of those arrested at the London march at the weekend to be delayed until after further legal action over Palestine Action's proscription. A High Court hearing is set to take place in November challenging the group's ban as a terror organisation. In their letter to Attorney General Richard Hermer, the groups argued that 'prosecuting individuals for offences connected to that proscription before the court has determined its legality raises significant legal and moral questions' and said delaying prosecution decisions 'would demonstrate restraint, fairness and respect for the ongoing legal process'. The Attorney General's office has been contacted for comment.
