Mystery Boeing 747 flights leaving China for Iran raise questions amid Israel conflict
Several Boeing 747s have been spotted on radar leaving China for Iran over the last week, according to reports, sparking concerns that the CCP is helping the Middle Eastern nation transport cargo or people out of the country as Israel continues to strike the country's nuclear facilities.
Starting on June 14th, FlightRadar24 shows that at least five flights traveled from China to Iran, and The Telegraph reported that the "mystery transport planes" had flown westward along northern China before crossing into Kazakhstan, south through Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, and then fell off radar as they approached Iran.
Additionally, the report indicated that the flights had a final destination of Luxembourg but don't appear to have ever crossed into European airspace.
Some experts have speculated that these types of planes are typically used for transport and could be evidence of China aiding its longtime ally Iran during the conflict with Israel, although Fox News Digital has not independently confirmed the nature of the flights.
"I think it's important to remember what the relationship is, forty-three percent of China's oil and gas comes from the Middle East, a large volume of that from Iran," Robert Greenway, director of the Heritage Foundation's Center for National Defense, told "The Ingraham Angle" on Wednesday night.
"It likes to buy sanctioned oil below market value, and that fuels the Chinese economy and also its military ambitions, and so, that's the central relationship. They've been relatively quiet – in fact, extremely quiet – about the current conflict and coming to Iran's assistance. We also know that a large fire in Bandar-Abbas port was Chinese solid propellant for missiles that exploded and created a tremendous amount of damage just about a month ago. I think it's unlikely to see Chinese arms shipments under the circumstances to Iran. It's more likely that Iran may be removing material or personnel or regime valuables to safe haven in light of the conflict. I think that's probably the extent to which China is willing to accept the risk associated with the current circumstances."
In 2021, Fox News Digital reported that Tehran and Beijing signed a 25-year cooperation deal amidst great fanfare in the Iranian capital. University of Tehran Professor Mohammad Marandi, who is close to the regime, told Fox News that it is about much more than what's on paper.
"This strategic partnership is important because it allows Iran and China to build a roadmap for long-term relations that will be much more fruitful," he said. "It's also a signal being sent to the United States. The more the U.S. tries to isolate Iran and China, the more it causes countries like Iran and China to move more closely to each other."
Some have cast doubt on the flights representing a nefarious connection between the two nations, including Atlantic Council fellow Tuvia Gering who posted on X that an aviation expert told him the flights are "nothing to write home about."
"There are regular cargo flights by the Luxembourg-based freight company from several locations in China to Europe, with a stopover in Turkmenistan (just a few dozen kilometers from the Iranian border)," Gering wrote.
"Some flight tracking websites lose the tracking signal shortly before landing and continue to show a projected route that appears to enter Iranian airspace. The sites clearly indicate that this is an estimated path; checking the aircraft tail numbers shows they take off again from Turkmenistan a few hours later, and reviewing the flight history of these routes shows they always land in Ashgabat and do not continue into Iran. All this is before even considering the obvious logic that a major European cargo company is highly unlikely to be the channel through which China transfers its super-advanced, top-secret strategic weapons to Iran."
Tensions between Iran and Israel have escalated significantly in recent days, with the United States contemplating whether it will get directly involved in striking Iran. President Donald Trump has repeatedly said that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, and he is expected to meet with national security and defense leaders again on Thursday.
"Yes, I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do. I can tell you this that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate," Trump said Wednesday.
"And I said, why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction? Why didn't you go? I said to people, why didn't you negotiate with me two weeks ago? You could have done fine. You would have had a country. It's very sad to watch this," the president added.
Originally published as Mystery Boeing 747 flights leaving China for Iran raise questions amid Israel conflict
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Albanese government sought legal advice on lawfulness of US strikes on Iran
Shadow Resource Minister Susan McDonald questions the Albanese government seeking legal advice to determine the lawfulness of the US's strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. 'Did they seek advice after the Hamas attack on Israel?' Ms McDonald told Senior Reporter Caroline Marcus. 'Did they seek advice after the Chinese warships circled Australia? 'This seems to me a government that's very willing to pick and choose its friends. 'The Albanese government's willing to try and second-guess and seek legal advice on its actions.'
Sydney Morning Herald
12 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Aren't you worried you are being brainwashed?' The junket that left Richard's friends on edge
Sitting in a cafe in southern Taiwan, tourism graduate Richard Huang makes a frank admission. Some of his friends have questioned whether he is a tool of the Chinese Communist Party, helping to spread Beijing's worldview through his social media. On his Instagram account, Huang spruiks the Beijing-subsidised trips he has taken to places like Xinjiang, a region in China's north-west, and offers to help set up his followers on similar exchange programs targeted at Taiwanese youth. 'My friends have asked me: 'Hey, aren't you worried you are being brainwashed?'' says Huang, a pseudonym that he requested to speak openly about his experience. 'My response is: as long as you are resilient in your own mind, you won't be compromised by the influence coming from these trips.' As part of an eight-day tour to Xinjiang, Huang and about 30 other Taiwanese students and graduates were put up in 4-star hotels and treated to nightly banquets. By day, their itinerary included visits to museums and cultural activities, such as musical performances by Uyghur groups, an ethnic Muslim minority in Xinjiang. The activities were peppered with speeches from Chinese officials about Taiwan and China being 'one big family'. At one event, the group sang Tomorrow Will be Better, a Taiwanese pop song from the 1980s that has since been appropriated by Chinese state media to promote a message of unification between the democratic self-governing island and the mainland. China claims Taiwan as part of its territory, even though the CCP has never controlled the island. The propaganda, Huang says, is the price participants pay for a cheap trip. He paid 20,000 Taiwanese dollars ($1043), about a 50 per cent discount, he says, with the rest subsidised by the Chinese government. But there was another subtle quid pro quo. During the tour, Chinese officials suggested the participants share their experience on social media and tell their friends that Xinjiang was not the terrible place portrayed by Taiwanese media. When he arrived back in Taiwan, Huang did just that. 'The magnificent scenes covered by a blanket of snow, the heaps of food I had, and the diversity of ethnic cultures and traditions I experienced – the list never ends, and the beauty of Xinjiang is beyond what photos and words can describe,' Huang posted on Instagram. He implored his friends to go and see for themselves. Huang made no mention of the reports, including those by the United Nations, of the brutal repression and human rights violations of the Uyghur population by Chinese authorities, claims which the Chinese government denies. Instead, he observed that the different ethnic groups got along with 'great friendliness and tolerance'. United Front campaign State-sponsored travel programs are hardly a new tool in Beijing's soft-power efforts to shape opinions in Taiwan in line with its foremost goal – to bring the island under the control of the Chinese government. But under President Lai Ching-te, the Taiwanese government has become increasingly concerned that Beijing is intensifying its propaganda, with study tours, tourism, cultural exchanges and social media influencers all spreading pro-Beijing messages to Taiwan's youth. These activities are widely suspected by Taiwanese authorities and Chinese analysts to be part of the operations of the United Front Work Department – the CCP's core influence arm that uses diaspora communities to promote Beijing's agenda overseas. China's Foreign Ministry did not respond to a request for comment. Dr Nathan Attrill, a China specialist at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, has tracked United Front activity relating to Taiwan. He identified 67 events in 2024 that sought to cultivate Taiwanese Youth and influencers, more than double the next most targeted group of businesses and entrepreneurs. 'The main themes of these sorts of events are always to emphasise a shared culture, or a shared heritage between the peoples of China and Taiwan, thereby establishing some sort of justification for why China claims to have sovereignty over Taiwan,' Attrill says. Beijing doesn't try hard to hide the United Front's involvement in these tours. The exchanges are often given effusive coverage in Chinese state media, which routinely notes the attendance of United Front officials or their associated organisations at the events. Trips to Xinjiang, a top destination for such cultural tours, serve the dual purpose of presenting a tightly orchestrated, sanitised image of the region while promoting the Chinese government's unification agenda, says Raymond Sung, vice president of the Prospect Foundation, a government-backed institute in Taipei. 'I do not support the idea of being fully controlled by China ... The only thing that I want to do is to foster cultural exchanges between the two sides.' Richard Huang 'By being a participant, you're actually sponsoring or being part of that [Chinese government propaganda],' Sung says. These kinds of exchanges, experts say, are also designed to cleave at the deep political polarisation in Taiwan. Lai's pro-independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party is reviled by Beijing as a separatist force, and bitterly opposed by Taiwan's main opposition party, the Kuomintang, which favours closer ties with the mainland. Beijing's Taiwan Affairs Office has accused Lai's government of inciting anti-China sentiment by 'exaggerating the so-called united front threat' and 'using all means to intimidate and suppress groups and individuals on the island who support and participate in cross-strait exchanges'. For now, Beijing's charm offensive to win the hearts and minds of Taiwan's younger generations doesn't appear to be paying off. Polling consistently shows that a clear majority of people in Taiwan identify themselves as being solely Taiwanese. This rose to as high as 83 per cent for 18-34 year-olds, compared with 15 per cent who identified as being Taiwanese-Chinese and 1 per cent who considered themselves to be solely Chinese, according to a Pew Research survey in 2024. Tensions between propaganda and free speech Nonetheless, the Lai government this year has pursued a crackdown on China's united front and espionage efforts, including tighter regulation of cross-strait exchanges and new disclosure requirements for all public servants travelling to China on such trips. In February, Taiwan banned academic exchanges with three Chinese universities, citing concerns over political influence, and in March, authorities expelled three Chinese influencers for promoting 'unification by force' narratives on their social media accounts. The authorities have since revealed they are investigating 20 Taiwanese celebrities for amplifying CCP messaging. Building on the themes of this campaign, Lai embarked this week on a 10-stop speech tour across Taiwan under the banner of 'uniting the country' in the face of China's pressure. In his first speech on Sunday, he declared 'of course Taiwan is a country' and called for its future to be decided by its 23 million citizens, infuriating Chinese authorities, which slammed his speech as 'deliberately inciting provocations'. The expulsion of the Chinese influencers has fed into a broiling debate about free speech, and the curbs Taiwan is willing to put on its own democracy to counter the tactics of its authoritarian neighbour. Chinese-born influencer Liu Zhenya, who goes by 'Yaya in Taiwan', fell foul of Taiwanese authorities for video comments she made to her 400,000 followers on Douyin (Chinese TikTok), which included praising China's military drills around the island in May 2024. She expressed hope that by morning, 'the island will already be covered with red flags', a reference to China's flag. Taiwanese authorities deemed she had crossed a red line in advocating 'the elimination of our country's sovereignty'. 'There are limits to freedom of speech, and the limits are the country's survival,' Taiwan's Premier Cho Jung-tai said at the time. While Yaya's expulsion was celebrated in Taiwan's pro-independence circles, it was met with concerns about overreach in others. A group of 75 scholars co-signed a statement saying that democracy and the rule of law were 'facing unprecedented damage and threats' under the DPP's crackdown. Separately, academics Michelle Kuo and Albert Wu queried whether Yaya's videos, whilst repulsive in their view, were sufficient to constitute a national security threat and noted that any evidence of her CCP links had not been made public. Her deportation, they wrote on their blog, had 'only served to divide an already incredibly polarised society more, at a time when unity is more important than ever in the face of Chinese aggression'. ' Building a positive image of China' Huang is not an influencer. Nor, he says, is he a member of a political party, though he doesn't support Lai's DPP. His Instagram account has just 2200 followers, and he hasn't parroted Beijing's unification narrative. 'I do not support the idea of being fully controlled by China where we lose all of our freedoms,' he says. 'The majority of Taiwan will not accept this'. But he has become a facilitator, helping would-be participants navigate the online back-channels to those who organise the cultural tours, a role he says he receives no payment for, or any other in-kind benefit. There is nothing illegal in doing this, though he faces potential backlash from the online pro-independence crowd. Huang says he is not naive to the fact that the key reason Beijing funds such trips is to promote its unification agenda, and concedes his glowing testimonials feed its propaganda machine. 'The only thing that I want to do is to foster cultural exchanges between the two sides,' he says. 'If you're asking if that helps build a positive China image, then yes, that certainly is the case.'
The Age
12 hours ago
- The Age
‘Aren't you worried you are being brainwashed?' The junket that left Richard's friends on edge
Sitting in a cafe in southern Taiwan, tourism graduate Richard Huang makes a frank admission. Some of his friends have questioned whether he is a tool of the Chinese Communist Party, helping to spread Beijing's worldview through his social media. On his Instagram account, Huang spruiks the Beijing-subsidised trips he has taken to places like Xinjiang, a region in China's north-west, and offers to help set up his followers on similar exchange programs targeted at Taiwanese youth. 'My friends have asked me: 'Hey, aren't you worried you are being brainwashed?'' says Huang, a pseudonym that he requested to speak openly about his experience. 'My response is: as long as you are resilient in your own mind, you won't be compromised by the influence coming from these trips.' As part of an eight-day tour to Xinjiang, Huang and about 30 other Taiwanese students and graduates were put up in 4-star hotels and treated to nightly banquets. By day, their itinerary included visits to museums and cultural activities, such as musical performances by Uyghur groups, an ethnic Muslim minority in Xinjiang. The activities were peppered with speeches from Chinese officials about Taiwan and China being 'one big family'. At one event, the group sang Tomorrow Will be Better, a Taiwanese pop song from the 1980s that has since been appropriated by Chinese state media to promote a message of unification between the democratic self-governing island and the mainland. China claims Taiwan as part of its territory, even though the CCP has never controlled the island. The propaganda, Huang says, is the price participants pay for a cheap trip. He paid 20,000 Taiwanese dollars ($1043), about a 50 per cent discount, he says, with the rest subsidised by the Chinese government. But there was another subtle quid pro quo. During the tour, Chinese officials suggested the participants share their experience on social media and tell their friends that Xinjiang was not the terrible place portrayed by Taiwanese media. When he arrived back in Taiwan, Huang did just that. 'The magnificent scenes covered by a blanket of snow, the heaps of food I had, and the diversity of ethnic cultures and traditions I experienced – the list never ends, and the beauty of Xinjiang is beyond what photos and words can describe,' Huang posted on Instagram. He implored his friends to go and see for themselves. Huang made no mention of the reports, including those by the United Nations, of the brutal repression and human rights violations of the Uyghur population by Chinese authorities, claims which the Chinese government denies. Instead, he observed that the different ethnic groups got along with 'great friendliness and tolerance'. United Front campaign State-sponsored travel programs are hardly a new tool in Beijing's soft-power efforts to shape opinions in Taiwan in line with its foremost goal – to bring the island under the control of the Chinese government. But under President Lai Ching-te, the Taiwanese government has become increasingly concerned that Beijing is intensifying its propaganda, with study tours, tourism, cultural exchanges and social media influencers all spreading pro-Beijing messages to Taiwan's youth. These activities are widely suspected by Taiwanese authorities and Chinese analysts to be part of the operations of the United Front Work Department – the CCP's core influence arm that uses diaspora communities to promote Beijing's agenda overseas. China's Foreign Ministry did not respond to a request for comment. Dr Nathan Attrill, a China specialist at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, has tracked United Front activity relating to Taiwan. He identified 67 events in 2024 that sought to cultivate Taiwanese Youth and influencers, more than double the next most targeted group of businesses and entrepreneurs. 'The main themes of these sorts of events are always to emphasise a shared culture, or a shared heritage between the peoples of China and Taiwan, thereby establishing some sort of justification for why China claims to have sovereignty over Taiwan,' Attrill says. Beijing doesn't try hard to hide the United Front's involvement in these tours. The exchanges are often given effusive coverage in Chinese state media, which routinely notes the attendance of United Front officials or their associated organisations at the events. Trips to Xinjiang, a top destination for such cultural tours, serve the dual purpose of presenting a tightly orchestrated, sanitised image of the region while promoting the Chinese government's unification agenda, says Raymond Sung, vice president of the Prospect Foundation, a government-backed institute in Taipei. 'I do not support the idea of being fully controlled by China ... The only thing that I want to do is to foster cultural exchanges between the two sides.' Richard Huang 'By being a participant, you're actually sponsoring or being part of that [Chinese government propaganda],' Sung says. These kinds of exchanges, experts say, are also designed to cleave at the deep political polarisation in Taiwan. Lai's pro-independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party is reviled by Beijing as a separatist force, and bitterly opposed by Taiwan's main opposition party, the Kuomintang, which favours closer ties with the mainland. Beijing's Taiwan Affairs Office has accused Lai's government of inciting anti-China sentiment by 'exaggerating the so-called united front threat' and 'using all means to intimidate and suppress groups and individuals on the island who support and participate in cross-strait exchanges'. For now, Beijing's charm offensive to win the hearts and minds of Taiwan's younger generations doesn't appear to be paying off. Polling consistently shows that a clear majority of people in Taiwan identify themselves as being solely Taiwanese. This rose to as high as 83 per cent for 18-34 year-olds, compared with 15 per cent who identified as being Taiwanese-Chinese and 1 per cent who considered themselves to be solely Chinese, according to a Pew Research survey in 2024. Tensions between propaganda and free speech Nonetheless, the Lai government this year has pursued a crackdown on China's united front and espionage efforts, including tighter regulation of cross-strait exchanges and new disclosure requirements for all public servants travelling to China on such trips. In February, Taiwan banned academic exchanges with three Chinese universities, citing concerns over political influence, and in March, authorities expelled three Chinese influencers for promoting 'unification by force' narratives on their social media accounts. The authorities have since revealed they are investigating 20 Taiwanese celebrities for amplifying CCP messaging. Building on the themes of this campaign, Lai embarked this week on a 10-stop speech tour across Taiwan under the banner of 'uniting the country' in the face of China's pressure. In his first speech on Sunday, he declared 'of course Taiwan is a country' and called for its future to be decided by its 23 million citizens, infuriating Chinese authorities, which slammed his speech as 'deliberately inciting provocations'. The expulsion of the Chinese influencers has fed into a broiling debate about free speech, and the curbs Taiwan is willing to put on its own democracy to counter the tactics of its authoritarian neighbour. Chinese-born influencer Liu Zhenya, who goes by 'Yaya in Taiwan', fell foul of Taiwanese authorities for video comments she made to her 400,000 followers on Douyin (Chinese TikTok), which included praising China's military drills around the island in May 2024. She expressed hope that by morning, 'the island will already be covered with red flags', a reference to China's flag. Taiwanese authorities deemed she had crossed a red line in advocating 'the elimination of our country's sovereignty'. 'There are limits to freedom of speech, and the limits are the country's survival,' Taiwan's Premier Cho Jung-tai said at the time. While Yaya's expulsion was celebrated in Taiwan's pro-independence circles, it was met with concerns about overreach in others. A group of 75 scholars co-signed a statement saying that democracy and the rule of law were 'facing unprecedented damage and threats' under the DPP's crackdown. Separately, academics Michelle Kuo and Albert Wu queried whether Yaya's videos, whilst repulsive in their view, were sufficient to constitute a national security threat and noted that any evidence of her CCP links had not been made public. Her deportation, they wrote on their blog, had 'only served to divide an already incredibly polarised society more, at a time when unity is more important than ever in the face of Chinese aggression'. ' Building a positive image of China' Huang is not an influencer. Nor, he says, is he a member of a political party, though he doesn't support Lai's DPP. His Instagram account has just 2200 followers, and he hasn't parroted Beijing's unification narrative. 'I do not support the idea of being fully controlled by China where we lose all of our freedoms,' he says. 'The majority of Taiwan will not accept this'. But he has become a facilitator, helping would-be participants navigate the online back-channels to those who organise the cultural tours, a role he says he receives no payment for, or any other in-kind benefit. There is nothing illegal in doing this, though he faces potential backlash from the online pro-independence crowd. Huang says he is not naive to the fact that the key reason Beijing funds such trips is to promote its unification agenda, and concedes his glowing testimonials feed its propaganda machine. 'The only thing that I want to do is to foster cultural exchanges between the two sides,' he says. 'If you're asking if that helps build a positive China image, then yes, that certainly is the case.'
