Court of Appeal upholds Siti Bainun conviction and sentence
A three-judge panel chaired by Justice Azman Abdullah dismissed her final appeal after hearing submissions on Thursday (Aug 14).
The other judges on the bench were Justices Azmi Ariffin and Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz.
'We unanimously find no error of fact or law by the High Court judge who affirmed the Sessions Court decision,' he said.
'After considering all testimonies, the prosecution proved both offences beyond a reasonable doubt and the defence failed to raise any reasonable doubt,' he added.
'Therefore, the conviction is safe and the appeal is dismissed,' he said.
The appellate court also upheld the sentence imposed on Siti Bainun.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
26 minutes ago
- The Star
Drug trafficker gets death sentence commuted after Singapore President Tharman grants clemency
The man's sentence for drug trafficking was commuted to life imprisonment. - Photo: ST SINGAPORE: A man who was on death row for drug trafficking has had his death sentence commuted to life imprisonment after succeeding in his petition for clemency, which is rarely granted. Tristan Tan Yi Rui, 33, was sentenced to death in February 2023 after he was found guilty of trafficking 337.6g of methamphetamine. His conviction and sentence were upheld by the Court of Appeal. In response to queries from The Straits Times on Friday (Aug 15), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said that on Thursday (Aug 14), President Tharman Shanmugaratnam, on the advice of the Cabinet, granted a pardon to Tan. The statement said the Cabinet was advised that the sentence imposed on Tan was legally sound. 'Nevertheless, a recommendation was made to grant clemency to him because of the specific facts and circumstances of the case,' said MHA. The statement said Tan was arrested as part of a Central Narcotics Bureau operation which involved the arrest of several other subjects. One of the other subjects arrested in the operation, who was tried separately on a capital charge, eventually received a non-capital sentence. 'The Cabinet decided to advise the grant of clemency to Tan to reduce the disparity in their respective outcomes,' the MHA said. The statement added: 'Clemency is an exceptional power that is exercised as an act of executive grace.' The Constitution provides that the President may, on the advice of the Cabinet, grant a pardon, reprieve or respite of the execution of the sentence, or remit the whole or any part of the sentence, penalty or forfeiture imposed by law. In cases involving death row prisoners, a sentence of death may be commuted to a sentence of imprisonment or fine or both, said MHA. The statement did not identify the subject who was given a non-capital sentence. Tan was arrested on Sept 27, 2018, by CNB officers in Tampines. He was behind the wheel of his car, a white Volkswagen, while another man was in the front passenger seat. The officers found 499g of a crystalline substance in a packet, which was analysed and found to contain not less than 337.6g of methamphetamine. The prosecution contended that Tan intended to traffic in the drugs. It relied on evidence showing that he had made arrangements with his drug supplier, known to him as 'Hari', to take possession of the drugs. This included messages found on a mobile phone which involved negotiations with Hari regarding the sale and handover of the drugs. The defence argued that Tan did not know the nature of the drugs nor intended to traffic in them. Tan said the drugs were bought by members of Hari's group, and that he had merely been acting as a driver for the man who was tasked to collect the drugs. Tan testified that he was a regular drug user and that Hari sometimes gave him drugs for free in exchange for favours such as ferrying Hari's friends around in his car. He said the mobile phone was left in his car by one of Hari's friends. In convicting Tan, the High Court found that he was the sole user of the mobile phone, had actual knowledge of the nature of the drugs and had failed to rebut the presumption of possession for the purpose of trafficking. In imposing the mandatory death sentence, the judge said Tan's role was not limited to that of a courier. Moreover, the prosecution did not certify that he had substantively assisted the CNB in disrupting drug activities, which could allow him to be given a life sentence and caning instead of the death penalty. Tan was represented by lawyer Ramesh Tiwary. - The Straits Times/ANN
The Star
9 hours ago
- The Star
Najib betrayed public's trust, court told
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here was told that former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak betrayed the public's trust by misusing RM42mil from SRC International Sdn Bhd, funds that were meant to benefit Malaysia's energy future and civil service pensioners. Counsel Kwan Will Sen, representing SRC International and its subsidiary, Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd, in a civil suit against Najib, said it has been 10 years since the money ended up in Najib's personal accounts and now, the two companies want it returned. Kwan made these remarks while delivering the opening statement on the first day of the trial in the civil suit filed by SRC International and Gandingan Mentari against Najib, who is the sole defendant. 'Three courts, namely the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court, have already found him criminally guilty of these very acts beyond a reasonable doubt. 'Najib was the finance minister at the time and had full control over SRC International. He held key positions, including that of adviser emeritus. 'As such, no significant transaction occurred without his knowledge or consent,' he said yesterday, Bernama reported. Kwan added that evidence will show the RM42mil was transferred from SRC International and ultimately ended up in Najib's personal bank accounts. Of this sum, RM32mil was immediately transferred to two companies that had previously covered shortfalls in Najib's accounts. 'These transfers were made pursuant to instruction letters bearing his personal signature. 'The remaining RM10mil was spent through personal cheques issued by Najib himself. 'We say that the money trail is clear, the documentary evidence is overwhelming, and Najib's own sworn admissions are damning. 'We will prove our case under three complementary causes of action: knowing receipt, dishonest assistance and misfeasance in public office. 'On any of these grounds, justice demands that these public funds be returned to their rightful owners, the Malaysian people,' Kwan said. The court also heard testimony from the first witness, former chief executive officer of Yayasan Rakyat 1Malaysia, Ung Su Ling, 57, whose appointment was approved by Najib. The hearing before Justice Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan is set to continue on Nov 6. The lawsuit, filed in May 2022, accuses Najib of breach of fiduciary duties, knowing receipt of funds, dishonest assistance, tort of misfeasance in public office, and abuse of power in relation to the misappropriation of SRC International funds.
New Straits Times
12 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Syed Saddiq turns down offer to return as Muda president
KUALA LUMPUR: Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman has declined an offer to return as Muda president following his acquittal of corruption charges. The Muar member of parliament said he needs more time to decide on the position. "I have informed the party's leadership that I need a little bit more time. I want to spend time with my family, focus on my constituency work in Muar, and continue fundraising for local needs. "I've already relayed my decision to the party leadership, and I will leave it at that," Free Malaysia Today quoted as saying. On June 26, Muda's acting president, Amira Aisya Abd Aziz, offered the party's presidency back to Syed Saddiq. Syed Saddiq, who was the Muda president, vacated his post during his corruption trial. He was acquitted of four charges of abetting criminal breach of trust, misappropriation of party funds and money laundering. A three-judge Court of Appeal panel led by Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim allowed the former youth and sports minister's appeal, setting aside his conviction, seven-year prison sentence, RM10 million fine and two strokes of the rotan.
