Why banks and investors find heat risks easy to ignore
Scientists confirm that global warming is making heatwave events more intense, more frequent and more widespread. Businesses from bakeries to museums have seen impacts from lower spending to forced closure, leaving profits wilting in the sun.
Increasingly, economists link extreme heat to economic losses visible in everything from falling agricultural yields to lower worker productivity and in some cases a shuttering of all business activity.
European Central Bank research says heatwaves can substantially reduce productivity, opens new tab, increase food prices and lower economic growth. Allianz, the German fund manager and insurer, said this month that this year's heatwaves may have knocked half a percentage point off European GDP.
But it is difficult to translate these economic impacts into financial losses. In many cases, fund managers and banks say they are unable to really assess how physical shocks like heatwaves and droughts transmit to asset prices.
Hedge fund giant Man Group gave it a stab and found U.S.-listed firms with facilities concentrated in heat-sensitive regions showed higher volatility during anomalously warm summers. But markets were not pricing in, opens new tab this risk, Man Group researchers said.
"Very few asset managers are very actively looking at what can be done in portfolios to position them for resistance or resilience to more frequent catastrophes," Allianz Group's chief investment officer Ludovic Subran told me.
I put the predicament to Miles Parker, a senior lead economist at the European Central Bank who recently published a blog post on heatwaves, opens new tab. Parker has spent 17 years researching links between climate, the economy and financial performance, though he's not a banking supervisor.
One issue for banks, Parker said, is that the damage caused by heatwaves is not as easy to quantify or assess as that caused by storms or floods, where bridges or houses may be physically destroyed.
"In terms of bank exposure, the loan loss there is obvious," he said. "When it comes to droughts and heatwaves, you don't have this direct physical damage, but there's still economic damage."
Heatwaves reduce regional economic activity, lower incomes, and raise the risk of higher unemployment and more defaults from companies and households.
"Even though it's not physical damage in these events, there is still risk to a bank loan book, and these indirect impacts can be quite big," he said.
Another challenge for banks is how to quantify the prolonged and often indirect impact of the heatwave. ECB research from November showed regional activity can be 1.5% lower two years after a heatwave, opens new tab. While a business that has borrowed from a bank may not be directly exposed to physical risk, its supply chains and the local economy it operates in may be.
"These indirect impacts can matter," he said. "So I think it's important for an institution to take into account this indirect general equilibrium risk."
On the whole, investors like insurance and pension managers are the ones paying more attention to heat risk because they have to think longer-term.
Subran tells me Allianz is actively working with asset managers to try to pick stocks or bonds with a higher tolerance for heatwaves, though the effort is complicated by a lack of data and clear adaptation.
"When you are an insurer, you have to [look at this], that's your mission. That's your purpose," he said. "When you are an asset manager, you have fewer tools. When you're a hedge fund, you don't care."
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Oil tycoon Shvidler loses appeal over UK's Russian sanctions
LONDON, July 29 (Reuters) - Billionaire oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler on Tuesday lost his appeal against British sanctions imposed on him over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine at the UK's Supreme Court, a ruling lawyers said makes it difficult for similar challenges to succeed. Russian-born Shvidler, who is a British and U.S. citizen, was sanctioned over his association with former Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich, plus his former position as a director of London-listed Russian steel producer Evraz (EVRE.L), opens new tab. Shvidler – whose net worth is estimated by Forbes magazine at $1.6 billion – appealed to the Supreme Court, with his lawyers arguing that others with greater involvement in business of importance to Russia were not sanctioned, citing BP's (BP.L), opens new tab previous joint venture with Rosneft ( opens new tab. The Supreme Court rejected Shvidler's appeal by a four-to-one majority in a ruling that Shvidler said "brings me back to the USSR". The ruling also maintains Britain's 100% record of defending its Russian sanctions in court. Shvidler said in a statement that no British companies or business people with ties to Russian state-owned companies have been sanctioned, adding that Britain's sanctions were "more about cheap virtue-signalling for purely political purposes". "There may be little public sympathy for me, as a wealthy US/UK businessman, but this judgment applies to all who face state power," he added. Britain's Foreign Office, which has overseen the sanctioning of more than 1,700 individuals or entities since Russia's invasion, welcomed the ruling "and the message it sends about the strength of the UK sanctions regime". Shvidler had said British sanctions have destroyed his business and disrupted his and his family's lives. His lawyers previously said he has no involvement in or influence over Russian politics and had not even been to Russia since attending the late Russian President Boris Yeltsin's funeral in 2007. But the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that the sanctions struck a fair balance between Shvidler's rights and the aims of the sanctions regime. In the majority's judgment, Judges Philip Sales and Vivien Rose said sanctioning Shvidler "sends a clear signal to people in Mr Shvidler's position that they would be wise to distance themselves from Russian business now". But Judge George Leggatt, in a strident dissenting ruling, said Britain's "flimsy reasons" for sanctioning Shvidler did not justify the "serious invasion of liberty" sanctions entailed. He noted BP's profitable joint venture with Rosneft, having two members on its board, and said it was irrational to only sanction Shvidler if "sanctioning an individual for working as a director of a company which had invested in the Russian extractives sector was thought likely to contribute to achieving the purposes" of British sanctions. BP declined to comment. Maia Cohen-Lask, a partner at Corker Binning, said the Supreme Court's ruling was "a huge blow not just for Mr Shvidler but for any person who has been sanctioned despite their lack of any links to the Putin regime". The Supreme Court also dismissed a separate appeal brought by Russian businessman Sergei Naumenko, whose 44 million euro ($51 million) superyacht was detained in London.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Consortium 'ready' to buy ailing Morecambe
London-based sports investment company Panjab Warriors have released a statement to say they are "ready, willing and able" to buy Shrimps were suspended by the National League until 20 August on Monday over failing to comply with the league's Warriors have been in talks with the club's owner Jason Whittingham for over a year and a deal had looked set to be concluded earlier this have now said in a joint-statement with minority shareholders, the Shrimps Trust and Lizzi Collinge MP that the National League is ready to sanction the deal and "immediately lift the suspension and embargo should it be agreed". As it stands, Morecambe's fixture away to Boston United on 9 August, their first home game against Brackley Town on 16 August, and the trip to Scunthorpe United on 19 August, will no longer take place as who has been looking to sell the club since 2022, announced a new buyer, named as a consortium led by Jonny Cato, had been found earlier in July, but it remains unclear where that bid also said on Sunday he had "not heard from" Panjab Warriors in the past week and talks with Cato were Lancashire side, who were promoted to League One in 2021, were relegated from League Two last season - their second relegation in the past three seasons.


The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
BT refunds £18m to customers over contract failures
BT has refunded £18 million to customers after Ofcom ruled it did not give them enough information about their contracts. The regulator fined BT £2.8 million last year after it failed to provide some EE and Plusnet customers with 'clear and simple' contract information before signing up to a new deal. Since June 2022, phone and broadband companies have been required to give consumers and small businesses the details of a contract, as well as a short summary of the key terms, before signing up. This includes the price and length of the contract, the speed of the service and any early exit fees. Ofcom opened an investigation into BT, which owns EE and Plusnet, having received information it may have failed to provide the documents. It found more than 1.3 million sales were made without providing customers with the adequate information. At least 1.1 million customers were affected. Ofcom found the telecoms giant broke consumer protection rules, requiring BT to contact affected customers, explaining it had not provided them with the necessary information. However, some affected customers left BT before the end of their contract and may have been charged an early exit fee, according to Ofcom. In a statement, Ofcom said: 'As well as fining BT, we also required it to amend its sales process and refund any affected customers who may have been charged for leaving before the end of their contract period. We told the company that if it was unable to refund any money, it must donate it to charity. 'As a result of this enforcement action, BT has now refunded or credited £18 million back to customers and donated £440,000 across 17 charities where refunds or credits were not possible.' A BT spokesman said: 'We're sorry that pre-contract information and contract summary documents were not available to some of our customers in a timely manner. 'We have taken steps to proactively contact affected customers and refund them if they had subsequently paid any early termination charges. We take compliance seriously at BT and have worked closely with Ofcom to implement all remedial actions.'