
China's steelmakers cool competitive fires as price war cuts profit margins
As a fierce price war threatens to turn their revenues microscopic, China's steel firms are calling for changes to make the industry less self-destructive – a move in line with directives from Beijing to suppress a downward spiral that has degraded multiple sectors of the country's economy.
While acknowledging the seemingly endless drive to reduce prices is erasing profit margins, industry insiders still struggle to find a market for their chronic oversupply, and expressed scepticism over the extent to which the state-led campaign can alleviate their burdens.
Steel is regarded as one of several sectors experiencing a phenomenon referred to by officials as neijuan or 'involution', a cutthroat level of competition where firms pour increasing resources into efforts that yield diminishing returns. The term has made more frequent appearances in high-level political meetings.
'Steel firms are selling below cost to clear inventory and maintain cash flow, but the more we produce, the more we lose,' said Michael Cao, who owns a mid-sized steel company in the northern province of Hebei that employs over 100 workers.
'This is actually drinking poison to quench thirst,' he said. 'You may survive for now, but you'll ultimately need to rely on innovation and differentiated services for lasting change.'
However, Cao added, the massive amounts of funding required to upgrade factory infrastructure, coupled with shrinking demand, are keeping companies from pursuing innovation and distinguishing themselves in the market.Unequal labour costs are another challenge, as some rivals skimp on employee benefits to lower costs and slash prices further, Cao noted.
As a positive example, he cited e-commerce giant JD.com's decision to provide social insurance benefits to its delivery workers.
'With everyone on equal footing, price undercutting is harder, fostering fairer competition.' Last week, the country's Supreme People's Court issued a ruling voiding any agreements to skip social insurance contributions, even those mutually agreed upon or initiated by employees.
Employers often dodge these payments, and some workers request cash as a substitute to increase their take-home pay.
After nearly all the country's major steel companies reported losing money in the third quarter of 2024, the industry made production cuts that have led to a slight recovery, said Huatai Securities in a note published on Thursday.
While the industry saw rapid profit growth in the first half of the year, its average sales profit margin ranks among the lowest in all industrial sectors and prices have remained low, according to the China Iron and Steel Association.
In the first six months, selected major companies achieved a total profit of 59.2 billion yuan (US$8.24 billion), up over 60 per cent year-on-year; however, the average profit margin was only 1.97 per cent. Nearly a quarter reported losses, down 18 percentage points from last year.
Policies intended to end the race to the bottom could further reduce crude steel output, boosting profits, Huatai's analysts said.
These could include a price supervision system and cost standards created by the association, its head Zhao Minge was quoted as saying by China Metallurgical News last week.
'The steel industry's core issue remains supply-demand imbalance,' Zhao said, stressing that new policies over excessive capacity have yet to be systematised or clearly defined.
David Wang, a steel company owner from the eastern province of Jiangsu, said oversupply has persisted despite decades of rhetoric about capacity reduction. He expressed doubt that things would change soon.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% of China chip sales to US government, reports say
Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the United States government a share of revenues from chip sales in China as part of a deal to secure export licences for their products, US media have reported. Under the agreement reached with US President Donald Trump's administration, Nvidia will share 15 percent of revenues from sales of its H20 AI chip, while AMD will pay the same percentage of MI308 chip revenues, multiple outlets reported on Sunday. The unorthodox agreement, which has no known precedent, comes after the Trump administration last month agreed to reverse a ban on the sale of Nvidia's H20 chips to China. The Financial Times, which first reported the news, said the Trump administration had yet to decide how it would use the collected revenues. AMD did not respond to a request for comment. Nvidia neither confirmed nor denied the deal, but said it follows US government rules for doing business in overseas markets. 'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide,' a company spokesperson said. 'America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America's AI tech stack can be the world's standard if we race.' Following reports of the deal, which was confirmed by The New York Times, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal and the BBC, trade experts expressed concern about the implications of linking controls on sensitive technology to monetary payments. Christopher Padilla, the former head of the US Commerce Department's International Trade Administration, called the agreement 'astonishing'. 'If the Trump administration is allowing companies to buy their way past export controls imposed to protect US national security, we are in very dangerous waters,' Padilla said in a post on LinkedIn. 'A mix of bribery and blackmail that is certainly unprecedented and possibly illegal.' Peter Harrell, a nonresident fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the deal set a worrying precedent. 'The Chinese would pay a lot for F35s and advanced US military technology, too,' Harrell said in a post on X. 'Regardless of whether you think Nvidia should be able to sell H20s in China, charging a fee in exchange for relaxing national security export controls is a terrible precedent.'


Qatar Tribune
3 days ago
- Qatar Tribune
US tariff ‘unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable': India
Agencies India faces an ultimatum from the United States with major political and economic ramifications both at home and abroad: end purchases of Russian oil or face painful tariffs. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, leader of the world's most populous nation and its fifth-biggest economy, must make some difficult decisions. US President Donald Trump has given longstanding ally India, one of the world's largest crude oil importers, three weeks to find alternative suppliers. Levies of 25 percent already in place will double to 50 percent if India doesn't strike a deal. For Trump, the August 27 deadline is a bid to strip Moscow of a key source of revenue for its military offensive in Ukraine. 'It is a geopolitical ambush with a 21-day fuse,' said Syed Akbaruddin, a former Indian diplomat to the United Nations, writing in the Times of India newspaper. New Delhi called Washington's move 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. Modi has appeared defiant. He has not spoken directly about Trump but said on Thursday 'India will never compromise' on the interests of its farmers. Agriculture employs vast numbers of people in India and has been a key sticking point in trade negotiations. It all seems a far cry from India's early hopes for special tariff treatment after Trump said in February he had found a 'special bond' with Modi. 'The resilience of US-India relations... is now being tested more than at any other time over the last 20 years,' said Michael Kugelman, from the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. Russia accounted for nearly 36 percent of India's total crude oil imports in 2024, snapping up approximately 1.8 million barrels of cut-price Russian crude per day. Buying Russian oil saved India billions of dollars on import costs, keeping domestic fuel prices relatively stable. Switching suppliers will likely threaten price rises, but not doing so will hit India's exports. The Federation of Indian Export Organizations warned that the cost of additional US tariffs risked making many businesses 'not viable'. Urjit Patel, a former central bank governor, said Trump's threats were India's 'worst fears'. Without a deal, 'a needless trade war' would likely ensue and 'welfare loss is certain', he said in a post on social media. Modi has sought to bolster ties with other allies. That includes calling Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who said they had agreed on the need 'to defend multilateralism'. Ashok Malik, of business consultancy The Asia Group, told AFP: 'There is a signal there, no question.' India's national security adviser Ajit Doval met with Vladimir Putin in Moscow, saying the dates of a visit to India by the Russian president were 'almost finalized'. Modi, according to Indian media, might also visit China in late August. It would be Modi's first visit since 2018, although it has not been confirmed officially. Beijing's foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said in response to an AFP question on Friday that 'China welcomes Prime Minister Modi' for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit. India and neighboring China have long competed for strategic influence across South Asia. Successive US administrations have seen India as a key partner with like-minded interests when it comes to China. 'All those investments, all that painstaking work done by many US presidents and Indian prime ministers, is being put at risk,' Malik said. 'I have not seen the relationship so troubled since the early 1990s, to be honest. I'm not saying it's all over, not in the least, but it is at risk.' Modi faces a potential domestic backlash if he is seen to bow to Washington. 'India must stand firm, put its national interest first,' the Indian Express newspaper wrote in an editorial. Opposition politicians are watching keenly. Mallikarjun Kharge, president of the key opposition Congress party, warned the government was 'disastrously dithering'. He also pointed to India's longstanding policy of 'non-alignment'. 'Any nation that arbitrarily penalizes India for our time-tested policy of strategic autonomy... doesn't understand the steel frame India is made of,' Kharge said in a statement. However, retired diplomat Akbaruddin said there is still hope. New Delhi can be 'smartly flexible', Akbaruddin said, suggesting that could mean 'buying more US oil if it's priced competitively, or engaging Russia on the ceasefire issue'.


Qatar Tribune
3 days ago
- Qatar Tribune
China's steelmakers cool competitive fires as price war cuts profit margins
Agencies As a fierce price war threatens to turn their revenues microscopic, China's steel firms are calling for changes to make the industry less self-destructive – a move in line with directives from Beijing to suppress a downward spiral that has degraded multiple sectors of the country's economy. While acknowledging the seemingly endless drive to reduce prices is erasing profit margins, industry insiders still struggle to find a market for their chronic oversupply, and expressed scepticism over the extent to which the state-led campaign can alleviate their burdens. Steel is regarded as one of several sectors experiencing a phenomenon referred to by officials as neijuan or 'involution', a cutthroat level of competition where firms pour increasing resources into efforts that yield diminishing returns. The term has made more frequent appearances in high-level political meetings. 'Steel firms are selling below cost to clear inventory and maintain cash flow, but the more we produce, the more we lose,' said Michael Cao, who owns a mid-sized steel company in the northern province of Hebei that employs over 100 workers. 'This is actually drinking poison to quench thirst,' he said. 'You may survive for now, but you'll ultimately need to rely on innovation and differentiated services for lasting change.' However, Cao added, the massive amounts of funding required to upgrade factory infrastructure, coupled with shrinking demand, are keeping companies from pursuing innovation and distinguishing themselves in the labour costs are another challenge, as some rivals skimp on employee benefits to lower costs and slash prices further, Cao noted. As a positive example, he cited e-commerce giant decision to provide social insurance benefits to its delivery workers. 'With everyone on equal footing, price undercutting is harder, fostering fairer competition.' Last week, the country's Supreme People's Court issued a ruling voiding any agreements to skip social insurance contributions, even those mutually agreed upon or initiated by employees. Employers often dodge these payments, and some workers request cash as a substitute to increase their take-home pay. After nearly all the country's major steel companies reported losing money in the third quarter of 2024, the industry made production cuts that have led to a slight recovery, said Huatai Securities in a note published on Thursday. While the industry saw rapid profit growth in the first half of the year, its average sales profit margin ranks among the lowest in all industrial sectors and prices have remained low, according to the China Iron and Steel Association. In the first six months, selected major companies achieved a total profit of 59.2 billion yuan (US$8.24 billion), up over 60 per cent year-on-year; however, the average profit margin was only 1.97 per cent. Nearly a quarter reported losses, down 18 percentage points from last year. Policies intended to end the race to the bottom could further reduce crude steel output, boosting profits, Huatai's analysts said. These could include a price supervision system and cost standards created by the association, its head Zhao Minge was quoted as saying by China Metallurgical News last week. 'The steel industry's core issue remains supply-demand imbalance,' Zhao said, stressing that new policies over excessive capacity have yet to be systematised or clearly defined. David Wang, a steel company owner from the eastern province of Jiangsu, said oversupply has persisted despite decades of rhetoric about capacity reduction. He expressed doubt that things would change soon.