UPL lawyers fight NPA prosecution decision on Durban chemical blaze
A tide of farm chemicals poured into the environment north of Durban in July 2021, killing more than four tons of fish and other aquatic life. It also led to the prolonged closure of several swimming beaches north of the city, while thick clouds of poisonous black smoke swirled around parts of the city for several days, sparking concern about the long-term health impact on people exposed to the fumes.
Now, in response to questions from the Daily Maverick, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has confirmed that KwaZulu-Natal's director of public prosecutions (DPP) has reached a decision on laying criminal charges against UPL in criminal case docket CAS 06/09/2021.
While the NPA did not state explicitly what the decision was, or the exact nature of the charges, a spokesperson confirmed that UPL had been notified of the provincial director of public prosecutions' decision, and that the company was now 'requesting a review of the decision' — strongly indicating that representatives of the Mumbai-based agrochemicals group will end up in the dock shortly if their latest legal representations to the national director of public prosecutions are rejected.
UPL has consistently argued that, as one of the many companies whose premises were looted or set alight by arsonists during the July 2021 unrest, it was not responsible for the consequent chemical spill, which led to ecological damage to large sections of the uMhlanga River lagoon, the closure of beaches and widespread air pollution.
UPL, the fifth largest agrochemicals company in the world after Bayer, Corteva, Syngenta and BASF, has also claimed that the security measures and 'state-of-the-art safety features' at its brand-new Cornubia chemical warehouse were overwhelmed during the riots.
However, it later emerged that UPL had rented space in a newly built goods warehouse (shared with a clothing retailer), apparently without any specific environmental impact studies or detailed assessments on public health impacts while storing hazardous compounds at Cornubia, a mixed-use commercial, residential and light industrial development at Umhlanga.
Health risks
Roughly three months after the incident, a preliminary compliance report by the Green Scorpions environmental inspectorate noted that the National Water Act and National Environmental Management Act recognised that 'any unlawful, intentional or negligent conduct' that results in serious pollution or degradation of the environment or water resources was considered to be criminal conduct.
At the time, the inspectorate said that: 'Further investigation is required to determine whether UPL, as a result of its failure to comply with specific legal requirements (either in terms of the National Environmental Management Act or other relevant legislation), acted negligently by creating a point source of pollution which resulted in significant environmental impacts, despite the fact that the fire was started by other individuals…
'Had the relevant licences been applied for, the environmental assessment processes that would have been required may have identified risks that could have been avoided, or could have been guarded against,' read the report.
'The desirability of storing large quantities of agricultural chemicals in close proximity to people and sensitive environments would have been evaluated. Bypassing these processes, no doubt, contributed to the seriousness of the pollution that resulted.'
According to the compliance report: 'It is the view of the investigative team that UPL may not have undertaken the necessary (Major Hazardous Installation risk) assessment.'
Since then, a human health risk assessment commissioned by UPL has suggested that residents living in the immediate vicinity now face increased risks of cancer, heart disease and other health impacts due to the toxic dust particles they inhaled while the warehouse burnt or smouldered.
UPL responds
In a statement at the weekend, UPL said it 'cannot comment on an ongoing investigation and open case'. However, it continued to engage with all relevant authorities and governmental departments.
'Despite suffering substantial damage from the riots, UPL South Africa has made extensive efforts to contain the aftereffects of the incident and has committed enormous resources to this effort.
'In the immediate aftermath of the event, UPL South Africa instituted an extensive and ongoing rehabilitation and remediation plan of the affected area under the direction of a team of independent experts and a Rehabilitation Action Plan approved by the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE).'
Last week, a public meeting of the Cornubia Multi-Stakeholder Forum was held at the Grace Family Church in uMhlanga to discuss the ongoing treatment of chemically polluted water that is still being stored in a dam close to the fire site.
At this meeting, the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment was scheduled to provide an update on the status of the proposed criminal charges against UPL.
Department officials were not present to provide this update, but UPL attorney Norman Brauteseth told the meeting that he understood that criminal charges were still being investigated against UPL — as well as the Fortress property group (which developed the Cornubia warehouse) and Tongaat Hulett and eThekwini Municipality (joint landowners of the Cornubia development).
Limited charges
Significantly, however, the NPA said it was not aware of charges against Fortress, Tongaat Hulett or eThekwini.
A spokesperson said:
'The NPA received one docket addressing a criminal complaint against UPL. We are not aware of the other matters you mention.
'The matter is at an advanced stage, and we can confirm that the NPA is addressing legal representation from UPL.
'A decision was taken by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), and this was brought to the attention of UPL through their legal representation. UPL has now written to the National Director of Public Prosecution, requesting for a review of the director of public prosecutions KZN's decision.'
A spokesperson for Tongaat Hulett Limited said: 'We don't have any knowledge of a criminal investigation against Tongaat Hulett Limited on this matter. Since the incident, as an impacted party we continue to actively engage with the authorities and UPL on the remediation work undertaken by them as land owned by Tongaat Hulett Limited surrounds the UPL warehouse.'
A Fortress spokesperson said: 'No — we are not aware of any criminal investigation (against Fortress).'
The eThekwini Municipality said: 'We are not aware of the matter in question.'
Regarding Brauteseth's comments at the Grace Family Church last week, UPL said: 'In 2021 the findings of a governmental joint preliminary investigation into the incident recommended that the role that all parties played should be investigated, including not only UPL but also Tongaat Hulett, Fortress, and the relevant authorities.' DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
SA Indians and Muslims warned about fraud and Extortion Calls
A person claiming to be from the Indian consulate in Pretoria makes allegations of South Africans linked to the recent terror attacks in Indian-administered Kashmir. South African Indians and Muslims have been urged to be wary and take precautions against scammers purporting to be from the Indian Consulate in Pretoria who are using the recent war between India and Pakistan over Indian-administered Kashmir to extort money. This writer was contacted last week by a person claiming to be from the Indian consulate in Pretoria about the alleged terror attacks in Kashmir on 22 April, which killed 26 people. Allegations India blamed the attack on Pakistan, which ignited a conflict between the two countries. During the call last week, the person claimed that the writer had registered a telephone number in India and that his South African mobile number was listed as an alternate contact. 'The number you registered in India is linked to the recent attack in Kashmir, and I have to ask you questions if you registered it.' ALSO READ: Dirco slams old travel advisory about terrorism in South Africa The caller asked a series of questions, including recent travels and inquiries about identity documents and passports. Scammers The writer was aware of potential scammers taking advantage of South Africans and people across the globe with telephone calls from call centres originating from India to extort computer IP addresses to fleece people of their money. An attorney told The Citizen that if the call was legit, the individual should email the copies of the document so that the allegations could be verified. The Citizen contacted the Indian consulate in Pretoria and was told that embassy officials would not contact people using a mobile number. Fraud and extortion The official said the Indian consulate had issued an alert titled 'Fraud and Extortion Calls: An Alert!' about people of Indian origin in South Africa being targeted by scammers. 'We have been informed that some criminal and anti-social persons are attempting to spoof the Consulate General's telephone numbers to call persons of Indian origin to threaten them with legal or other consequences and demand money purportedly on behalf of the Consulate General or Government of India agencies. 'Please be assured that no one from the Consulate General will be calling members of the public over the telephone to demand money for Government purposes. Please report any such calls that you receive to your local police after noting the number and any details that the callers leave with you,' the Indian Consulate said. The Citizen tried calling the person who made the allegations, but the number was 'unavailable' and switched off. ALSO READ: US level 2 travel alert for SA 'nothing new', Presidency says
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
Five years in jail for man who made hoax bomb threat to skip work
A Western Cape man who made a hoax bomb threat last year to avoid going to work the next day has been sentenced to five years in prison. The Bellville regional court on Monday convicted Ferdinand Fortuin, 50, who had contacted the Bellville police on Sunday, November 10 2024, telling them he had planted bombs at the department of water & sanitation offices, Transnet Park building and the Bellville taxi rank. 'He gave police hours to evacuate the premises. The accused made these threats after heavy drinking on Sunday and decided that he did not want to go to work on Monday, November 11, 2024,' National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said. Fortuin left his home in Mamre with the hope that the roads leading to Bellville would be closed because of his bomb threats. 'They were not and he worked the whole day.' In his plea and sentencing agreement, Fortuin confessed he had bought a cellphone from a drug user, which he used to make hoax calls to the police and a toll-free emergency number regarding the placement of explosive devices in the buildings, including the one where he worked. This resulted in the deployment of substantial state resources and the evacuation of thousands of people from the sites he mentioned. At the water & sanitation department offices on Voortrekker Road, police — assisted by three bomb disposal technicians, the K-9 Dog Unit using explosive detection canines and visible policing unit members — evacuated 164 people. Meanwhile, 151 people were evacuated from the department's Bellville South offices. Police also evacuated 250 people from the Transnet Park Building offices, and 3,000 people were evacuated from the taxi rank. 'The taxi rank was closed and roads leading to and out of the taxi rank were closed, resulting in huge panic in the area.' Fortuin was arrested and charged with four counts of contravening the Protection of Constitutional Democracy Against Terrorism and Related Activities Act (Pocdatara) and for contravening the Explosives Act. The prescribed minimum sentence for contravening Pocdatara is 15 years' imprisonment unless the court finds substantial and compelling circumstances to deviate from the prescribed sentence. 'He was convicted on three counts of Pocdatara and, for purposes of sentencing, the charges were taken together and he was sentenced to five years' direct imprisonment.' The court found that he was a first offender, he had pleaded guilty, had strong personal circumstances, had shown remorse and his acknowledgment of guilt made him a good candidate for a rehabilitative sentence. 'The NPA accepts the sentence of the court and warns that anyone who makes such threats will face tough consequences,' Ntabazalila said. TimesLIVE
Daily Maverick
13 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
UPL lawyers fight NPA prosecution decision on Durban chemical blaze
The National Prosecuting Authority has finally reached a decision on prosecuting the Indian UPL agrochemicals group — more than four years after thousands of tons of poisonous chemicals went up in flames at a warehouse north of Durban. A tide of farm chemicals poured into the environment north of Durban in July 2021, killing more than four tons of fish and other aquatic life. It also led to the prolonged closure of several swimming beaches north of the city, while thick clouds of poisonous black smoke swirled around parts of the city for several days, sparking concern about the long-term health impact on people exposed to the fumes. Now, in response to questions from the Daily Maverick, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has confirmed that KwaZulu-Natal's director of public prosecutions (DPP) has reached a decision on laying criminal charges against UPL in criminal case docket CAS 06/09/2021. While the NPA did not state explicitly what the decision was, or the exact nature of the charges, a spokesperson confirmed that UPL had been notified of the provincial director of public prosecutions' decision, and that the company was now 'requesting a review of the decision' — strongly indicating that representatives of the Mumbai-based agrochemicals group will end up in the dock shortly if their latest legal representations to the national director of public prosecutions are rejected. UPL has consistently argued that, as one of the many companies whose premises were looted or set alight by arsonists during the July 2021 unrest, it was not responsible for the consequent chemical spill, which led to ecological damage to large sections of the uMhlanga River lagoon, the closure of beaches and widespread air pollution. UPL, the fifth largest agrochemicals company in the world after Bayer, Corteva, Syngenta and BASF, has also claimed that the security measures and 'state-of-the-art safety features' at its brand-new Cornubia chemical warehouse were overwhelmed during the riots. However, it later emerged that UPL had rented space in a newly built goods warehouse (shared with a clothing retailer), apparently without any specific environmental impact studies or detailed assessments on public health impacts while storing hazardous compounds at Cornubia, a mixed-use commercial, residential and light industrial development at Umhlanga. Health risks Roughly three months after the incident, a preliminary compliance report by the Green Scorpions environmental inspectorate noted that the National Water Act and National Environmental Management Act recognised that 'any unlawful, intentional or negligent conduct' that results in serious pollution or degradation of the environment or water resources was considered to be criminal conduct. At the time, the inspectorate said that: 'Further investigation is required to determine whether UPL, as a result of its failure to comply with specific legal requirements (either in terms of the National Environmental Management Act or other relevant legislation), acted negligently by creating a point source of pollution which resulted in significant environmental impacts, despite the fact that the fire was started by other individuals… 'Had the relevant licences been applied for, the environmental assessment processes that would have been required may have identified risks that could have been avoided, or could have been guarded against,' read the report. 'The desirability of storing large quantities of agricultural chemicals in close proximity to people and sensitive environments would have been evaluated. Bypassing these processes, no doubt, contributed to the seriousness of the pollution that resulted.' According to the compliance report: 'It is the view of the investigative team that UPL may not have undertaken the necessary (Major Hazardous Installation risk) assessment.' Since then, a human health risk assessment commissioned by UPL has suggested that residents living in the immediate vicinity now face increased risks of cancer, heart disease and other health impacts due to the toxic dust particles they inhaled while the warehouse burnt or smouldered. UPL responds In a statement at the weekend, UPL said it 'cannot comment on an ongoing investigation and open case'. However, it continued to engage with all relevant authorities and governmental departments. 'Despite suffering substantial damage from the riots, UPL South Africa has made extensive efforts to contain the aftereffects of the incident and has committed enormous resources to this effort. 'In the immediate aftermath of the event, UPL South Africa instituted an extensive and ongoing rehabilitation and remediation plan of the affected area under the direction of a team of independent experts and a Rehabilitation Action Plan approved by the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE).' Last week, a public meeting of the Cornubia Multi-Stakeholder Forum was held at the Grace Family Church in uMhlanga to discuss the ongoing treatment of chemically polluted water that is still being stored in a dam close to the fire site. At this meeting, the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment was scheduled to provide an update on the status of the proposed criminal charges against UPL. Department officials were not present to provide this update, but UPL attorney Norman Brauteseth told the meeting that he understood that criminal charges were still being investigated against UPL — as well as the Fortress property group (which developed the Cornubia warehouse) and Tongaat Hulett and eThekwini Municipality (joint landowners of the Cornubia development). Limited charges Significantly, however, the NPA said it was not aware of charges against Fortress, Tongaat Hulett or eThekwini. A spokesperson said: 'The NPA received one docket addressing a criminal complaint against UPL. We are not aware of the other matters you mention. 'The matter is at an advanced stage, and we can confirm that the NPA is addressing legal representation from UPL. 'A decision was taken by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), and this was brought to the attention of UPL through their legal representation. UPL has now written to the National Director of Public Prosecution, requesting for a review of the director of public prosecutions KZN's decision.' A spokesperson for Tongaat Hulett Limited said: 'We don't have any knowledge of a criminal investigation against Tongaat Hulett Limited on this matter. Since the incident, as an impacted party we continue to actively engage with the authorities and UPL on the remediation work undertaken by them as land owned by Tongaat Hulett Limited surrounds the UPL warehouse.' A Fortress spokesperson said: 'No — we are not aware of any criminal investigation (against Fortress).' The eThekwini Municipality said: 'We are not aware of the matter in question.' Regarding Brauteseth's comments at the Grace Family Church last week, UPL said: 'In 2021 the findings of a governmental joint preliminary investigation into the incident recommended that the role that all parties played should be investigated, including not only UPL but also Tongaat Hulett, Fortress, and the relevant authorities.' DM
