Police appeal after motorcyclist seriously injured in crash with car
Police appeal after motorcyclist seriously injured in crash with car
A man remains in hospital after the collision which saw a road shut for several hours
The A493 at Penmaenpool, North Wales
(Image: Google Maps )
Police have launched an appeal for information after a crash near Dolgellau left a motorcyclist with serious injuries. The major incident happened on the A493 at Penmaenpool.
It is reported that the collision involved a blue Suzuki motorcycle and a black Volkswagen Passat, resulting in the road being closed for several hours.
Emergency services rushed to the scene, and the motorcyclist was transported by ambulance to Ysbyty Gwynedd, where he remains with serious injuries. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
North Wales Police are asking for anyone who many have witnessed the collision, which happened just before midday on the first May Bank Holiday (Sunday, May 5) or who was travelling in the area before the incident and may have dashcam footage, to come forward.
A spokesperson from the force said: "Allwch chi ein helpu ni os gwelwch yn dda? Can you please help us?
Article continues below
"We are appealing for witnesses to come forward after a motorcyclist was left with serious injuries following a road traffic collision near Dolgellau last month.
"The collision involved a blue Suzuki motorcycle and a black VW Passat and took place on the A493 at Penmaenpool just before midday on the first May Bank Holiday (May 5th).
"The motorcyclist was taken to Ysbyty Gwynedd by ambulance where he remains with serious injuries.
Article continues below
"Anybody who may have been travelling along that stretch of road and who may have witnessed the incident, or who may have been in the vicinity prior to the collision and who may still have dashcam footage is urged to contact us via the website or by calling 101, quoting reference number 25000371349."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
5 hours ago
- Wales Online
Man left fighting for life after crash as lorry driver arrested
Man left fighting for life after crash as lorry driver arrested The van driver was airlifted to hospital with potentially life-threatening injuries Lower Denbigh Road in St Asaph (Image: Google Street View ) A man is fighting for his life after a serious crash involving a van, a lorry and a car in St Asaph. The crash occurred on Tuesday, June 11 during the late morning, and the van driver was airlifted to hospital with potentially life-threatening injuries. A 21-year-old lorry driver was arrested on suspicion of causing serious injury by dangerous driving and has been released under investigation. A spokesperson for North Wales Police's Roads Policing Unit said: 'A man remains in hospital with serious injuries following yesterday's road traffic collision in St Asaph.' For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here They added: 'At 10:55hrs on Tuesday, 10th June, officers responded to a report of a collision on the B5381 Lower Denbigh Road involving a HGV, a Peugeot Partner van and a Dacia Duster. 'Officers responded along with the Welsh Ambulance Service and North Wales Fire and Rescue Service and the driver of the van was airlifted to hospital in Stoke by the Air Ambulance. Article continues below 'He remains in hospital with serious, potentially life-threatening injuries. 'The 21-year-old male driver of the HGV was arrested on suspicion of causing serious injury by dangerous driving and he has since been released under investigation whilst enquiries continue. 'Officers are appealing for witnesses and information, or anybody who had travelled in the area and who may have dash cam footage is urged to contact DC 2882 Colley at the Serious Collision Investigation Unit via the website or by calling 101, quoting reference number 25000475769.' Article continues below
Auto Express
5 hours ago
- Auto Express
Used Suzuki Across (Mk1, 2020-date) buyer's guide: a Toyota RAV4 in disguise
With the narrowest possible model range and a high asking price, the Suzuki Across was never going to be a big hit with buyers. But while the Across has never been all that alluring as a new purchase, as a used buy it's more enticing. The entry cost makes more sense, and with all Acrosses being so well equipped, as a £25k buy it's easy to be tempted. We wouldn't try to dissuade you from making the leap, but before you do, bear in mind that the more expensive RAV4 comes with an extra two years of warranty as standard, and 90 litres of extra boot space thanks to its smaller battery pack. Advertisement - Article continues below When is a Toyota RAV4 not a Toyota RAV4? Answer: when it's a Suzuki Across (pronounced A-Cross). As soon as Toyota bought a 4.9 per cent stake in Suzuki in 2019, it was inevitable that the two companies would share resources. But Suzuki went way beyond that with the Across: it simply stuck its own badges onto Toyota's popular mid-size SUV, and it's none the worse for that. The RAV4 is a great car, but many Suzuki owners are very loyal to their local dealer, so by offering a rebadged RAV4 it opened up a new market for Suzuki. But not a very big one... The Suzuki Across arrived in the UK in November 2020. There was just one model available: a 302bhp plug-in hybrid with a 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine and two electric motors. An 18.1kWh battery was fitted, while every Across came with four-wheel drive and a continuously variable automatic transmission. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below View Across View Across View Across Just one high-spec trim level was offered, priced at £45,599. From summer 2022 the on-board AC charger was increased from 3kW to 6kW, to bring charging times down (at home and when using public chargers), while much of the interior lighting was upgraded to LED, and some of the minor switchgear gained illumination. You can tell the updated cars by their USB-C charging ports inside; earlier cars had type A ports. The Across is big and heavy (it weighs 1,940kg), but Toyota has done a pretty good job of disguising that bulk because the handling is tidy and grip levels are high. The transmission is super-slick, refinement is superb and the performance is also strong; 0-62mph takes just six seconds on the way to an electronically limited top speed of 112mph. What lets the Across down is the ride, which isn't as composed as it should be. All you have to decide is what colour you want and what mileage suits you best. Having said that, there are very few high-mileage Acrosses, with most examples yet to go beyond the 30,000-mile mark. Advertisement - Article continues below Equipment levels are generous, with all examples coming with heating for the front and rear seats as well as the steering wheel, synthetic leather trim, dual-zone climate control, an electric tailgate, a nine-inch touchscreen with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, front and rear parking sensors plus a rear camera, and (unusually) a spare wheel. Also on the standard kit list were 19-inch alloy wheels and LED headlights; there were no options available, but dealers do offer a range of accessories. Toyota's RAV4 is the most obvious alternative; it's far more readily available than the Suzuki and there's a wider model range. If a plug-in hybrid powertrain is important to you, we'd also suggest you take a look at the Hyundai Tucson, Peugeot 3008 and Vauxhall Grandland, all of which come as a PHEV. You should also shortlist the Ford Kuga, while BMW offers the X1, X2 and X3 in plug-in form. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below The Honda CR-V Mk6 (from 2023) is a seven-seat alternative, while the Jaguar E-Pace and F-Pace are less obvious choices. Or you could buy a Range Rover Evoque, Mazda CX-60, Mercedes GLC or Renault Rafale – and don't forget the Volkswagen Tiguan or the Volvo XC60. All of these came as plug-in hybrids. On the pull Advertisement - Article continues below The Across is able to tow any caravan or trailer weighing up to 1,500kg; the limit for anything unbraked is half this, at 750kg. Safety Euro NCAP has tested the RAV4 but not the Across. The Toyota earned five stars thanks to a huge array of standard safety kit, which is also offered in the Suzuki. Economy Suzuki claims a 46-mile range on electric power and up to 282mpg. It's not hard to achieve that EV range in everyday use, while 50mpg is a realistic average. Peace of mind The Across comes with a three-year warranty with a 60,000-mile cap. But have your Across serviced by an official dealer and this can be extended to as much as 10 years or 100,000 miles. We like the Across's cabin because it's well laid out and features high-quality materials, so there's a premium feel. Impressive infotainment systems are now the norm, but the Across's set-up disappoints with its lack of sharpness and slightly small size. The dashboard layout is easy to get on with, thanks to well placed switchgear and generally clear instruments, although the latter is a bit busier than it needs to be. There's lots of space around the cabin for oddments, while fully grown adults can easily get comfy in the back seats thanks to decent head and leg room. Boot space is good at 490 litres, or 1,168 litres with the back seats folded; that's 90 litres less than in the RAV4. There are probably more Acrosses up for sale than you might think, although the classifieds are bolstered by brand-new cars in stock at dealers. Discounts of £2,000 aren't hard to find, but at this level you'll still have to stomach a lot of depreciation. Black and white are the most popular colours, but not far behind are blue, grey and silver. Red is the least common hue. Advertisement - Article continues below Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below Check the price of a Suuzki Across with our free car valuation tool... The Across needs to be serviced every 12 months or 12,500 miles, with the first two services priced at £241 and £407. From year three, discounted maintenance kicks in and the schedule runs Minor (oil and filter change for £149), Intermediate (Minor plus fresh brake and clutch fluid for £219), Minor again, then Major (Interim plus new air and pollen filters for £299). The engine is chain-driven so there's no cambelt to change. Insurance is group 40 (the RAV4 is groups 34-37), and because all Acrosses cost more than £40,000 when new, the annual road tax bill (at current rates) is a hefty £620 until the car's sixth birthday. Suzuki has issued two recalls for the Across so far. The first one came in March 2023 and it affected 234 cars made in the 12 months from June 2020; the RAV4 had the same recall. The problem centred on the hybrid drive system, which could shut down in low temperatures, potentially leading to a crash. The solution was to reprogramme the system's ECU with fresh software. Faulty circuit boards were fitted to 362 Acrosses made up to May 2022, and this led to the second recall, in August 2023. To see if any Suzuki that you're thinking of buying is subject to any recalls, just type its VIN into The Across has never appeared in a Driver Power survey, but the RAV4 came a very impressive fourth out of 50 in our 2024 poll. There were lots of top-five scores including for the powertrain, safety, practicality, reliability, all-round visibility, gearbox smoothness, fuel economy and the number of standard safety features – among many others. The infotainment is the only significant black mark. You can find your perfect new Suzuki Across with our Find A Car service. View Across View Across View Across Car Deal of the Day: A Volkswagen Golf R Estate for less than a GTI Car Deal of the Day: A Volkswagen Golf R Estate for less than a GTI The Golf R Estate is one of the best performance estates around – and right now it's criminally cheap. It's our Deal of the Day for 9 June. Should Citroen make a new 2CV? Some say oui, others say non Should Citroen make a new 2CV? Some say oui, others say non A new Citroen 2CV could be inbound, but would this be a French fancy or a financial flop? Car Deal of the Day: A fully-loaded Jeep Avenger for under £200 per month Car Deal of the Day: A fully-loaded Jeep Avenger for under £200 per month The petrol-powered version of Jeep's charming baby SUV is our Deal of the Day for 8 June
Wales Online
6 hours ago
- Wales Online
Company linked to Tory Peer Baroness Mone should pay back £121m for ‘faulty' PPE, High Court hears
Company linked to Tory Peer Baroness Mone should pay back £121m for 'faulty' PPE, High Court hears PPE Medpro is being sued for an alleged breach of contract over the supply of PPE during the Covid pandemic, with the Government claiming the gowns were unusable The company in court is linked to Baroness Mone (Image: PA Archive/PA Images ) A company linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone should pay back more than £121 million for breaching a Government contract for 25 million surgical gowns during the coronavirus pandemic, the High Court has heard. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) is suing PPE Medpro for allegedly breaching a deal for the gowns, with lawyers for the Government telling the court they were "faulty" because they were not sterile. The company, a consortium led by Baroness Mone's husband, businessman Doug Barrowman, was awarded Government contracts by the former Conservative administration to supply PPE during the pandemic, after she recommended it to ministers. Any wrongdoing has been denied. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, as well as the costs of transporting and storing the items, which amount to an additional £8,648,691. PPE Medpro said it "categorically denies" breaching the contract, and its lawyers claimed the company had been "singled out for unfair treatment". Opening the trial on Wednesday, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: "This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. Article continues below "It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns." Mr Stanley said in written submissions the "initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone", with discussions about the contract then going through one of the company's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained "active throughout" the negotiations, Mr Stanley said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had "years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains". But he told the court Baroness Mone's communications were "not part of this case", which was "simply about compliance". He said: "The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody." In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October, 2020, with £121,999,219.20 paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December, 2020, and told the company it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage, unable to be used. In written submissions for trial, Mr Stanley said 99.9999% of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract, equating to one in a million being unusable. The DHSC claims the contract also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise the gowns using a "validated process", attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said "none of those things happened", with no validated sterilisation process being followed, and the gowns supplied with invalid CE marking. He continued that 140 gowns were later tested for sterility, with 103 failing. He said: "Whatever was done to sterilise the gowns had not achieved its purpose, because more than one in a million of them was contaminated when delivered. "On that basis, DHSC was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs." In his written submissions, Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the "only plausible reason" for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to "the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject", after they had been delivered to the DHSC. He added the testing did not happen until several months after the gowns were rejected, and the samples selected were not "representative of the whole population", meaning "no proper conclusions may be drawn". He said the DHSC's claim was "contrived and opportunistic" and PPE Medpro had been "made the 'fall guy' for a catalogue of failures and errors" by the department. He said: "It has perhaps been singled out because of the high profiles of those said to be associated with PPE Medpro, and/or because it is perceived to be a supplier with financial resources behind it. "In reality, an archetypal case of 'buyer's remorse', where DHSC simply seeks to get out of a bargain it wished it never entered into, left, as it is, with over £8 billion of purchased and unused PPE as a result of an untrammelled and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money." He also said there was a "delicious irony" that Baroness Mone was mentioned in the DHSC's written submissions, when she had "zero relevance to the contractual issues in this case". Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence in the trial, and did not attend the first day of the hearing on Wednesday. A PPE Medpro spokesperson said the company "categorically denies breaching its obligations" and will "robustly defend" the claim. Article continues below The trial before Mrs Justice Cockerill is due to last five weeks, with a judgment expected in writing at a later date.
