Five takeaways from leader of Surrey County Council in hotseat
1. Community boards
Tim Oliver has been leading the proposal by Surrey County Council (SCC) to have two new unitary authorities when local government is reorganised. Most of the borough and district councils have said that there should be three instead and there is a fairly robust debate about the issue. One of the ideas is to set up 'community boards' in areas which do not already have a town or parish council, to allow people to have more of a say locally on how services are run.Not everyone is convinced. For example, the leader of the Liberal Democrats at SCC, Paul Follows, has described them as "unelected community boards which will have no legal standing, no powers and will basically be talking shops".But Oliver told BBC Radio Surrey it was ultimately about how these bodies are set up."If you give them powers and responsibilities and money, then they will be effective and that's absolutely key that that happens," he said.
2. Reigate & Banstead and Crawley plan 'a surprise'
Another proposal is for a merger of Reigate & Banstead Borough Council and Crawley Borough Council.Again, that concept has not gone down well with some. Tandridge District Council, for example, has rejected the plans.Oliver said it came as a surprise."It came out of the left field," he said."It was raised very early on in the conversations and then it went very quiet. I think all...the other 11 councils were very surprised to see a submission was put in."
3. Writing off council debt
A lot of the concerns being raised are about what would happen to the debt owed by councils in Surrey when local government is transformed.For example, Woking Borough Council, which effectively declared itself bankrupt in 2023, is estimated to have more than £2bn of debt, although it says the government has agreed to help "aid the reduction".Oliver said there was "active conversation" with ministers and the request would "always be" that the money should be written off."I'm not going to ask my residents in...my division or indeed any resident in Surrey to pick up the debt of those councils," he said."The government will have to step in and they will have to write it off."The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been approached for a comment.
4. Fixing the roads and utility works
When members of the public are asked what service they would like to see dealt with, they will, more often than not, talk about potholes and the amount of utility roadworks.It is a problem which Oliver said that he recognised.He said there were issues with the impact of weather on the roads and the current amount of money being spent by the council and the government to fix them, which he said was "not enough.""The real issue is around utility companies and we have 88 interventions...every single day in this county and that is where you see all these temporary traffic lights going up," he said.He has called for greater powers to prevent firms digging up roads and said ministers had now agreed to set up a working group, which will include SCC.Previously Streetworks UK, the trade association for utilities companies, had said it was "engaging constructively with highways authorities" across the country, while the government has also said it was taking action.
5. 'National challenge' on special educational needs
One of the biggest pressures on SCC is providing support to children who have special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).The support being provided by the service has been criticised by parents, as well as the six Liberal Democrat MPs in Surrey.Oliver, who has previously apologised to families, said there was a "national challenge" and that the number of children with additional needs, including mental health issues, had increased "exponentially", particularly since covid."We have 15,000 children in this county that have an education health and care plan," he said."I absolutely understand, as a parent, that parents want the best for their children...there are times when we can't actually give the parent what they ask for."Oliver said he acknowledged there were people who were struggling with the system and SCC was trying to do its best to help them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Cooper defends live facial recognition expansion amid privacy row
The Home Secretary has defended the Government's expansion of live facial recognition technology as a 'targeted' crackdown on high-harm offenders, amid concerns over privacy. Yvette Cooper denied the technology was being used to catch lower-level crimes such as ticket-touting, as it has been previously in Wales, and said 'safeguards and protections' will govern its deployment. Critics including Labour peer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti have attacked new plans to roll out 10 vans equipped with facial recognition technology across seven police forces in England as part of a Government overhaul of neighbourhood policing. The former shadow attorney general said the expansion was a step towards a 'total surveillance society' in the UK. Asked whether the rollout would infringe on people's privacy, Ms Cooper said: 'Well, the way this technology is being used is to identify people who are wanted by the court, who maybe should be returned to prison, or who have failed to appear before the court, or who have breached things like sexual harm prevention orders, so serious criminals. 'And I think being able to identify them, alongside having proper legal safeguards and a legal framework in place because there do have to be safeguards and protections, but we also need to be able to use the technology to catch dangerous criminals and to keep communities safe.' In 2017, South Wales Police said facial recognition was being used to track suspects including ticket touts as the force prepared for the Champions League final in Cardiff. Pressed on whether she was happy for the technology to be deployed in this way, she said: 'No, that's not how they've (police in South Wales) used it. 'They used it for targeting where there's serious organised crime, where there are criminal gangs, but in every case that they do use it, they need to obviously have safeguards in place and we need to make sure that we've got a new legal framework for it to be operating under, and also that it can be used to tackle serious crimes and keep communities safe.' Ministers have said a new legal framework will be drawn up to support use of the technology following a consultation launching this autumn. Checks would only be done against police watchlists of wanted criminals, suspects and those subject to bail or court order conditions such as sex offenders, the Home Office said. The vans would be deployed across seven forces – Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire – in the coming weeks. They would be manned by trained officers operating within College of Policing guidance. But Lady Chakrabarti said the technology was 'incredibly intrusive' and had been 'developed pretty much completely outside the law'. 'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society – challenges to privacy, challenges to freedom of assembly and association, and problems with race and sex discrimination because of the higher likelihood of false matches in the context of certain groups,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'It's particularly odd that this has all been developed pretty much completely outside the law.' She welcomed plans to consult ahead of possible new legislation, but warned that to date, 'it's been a bit of a Wild West'. Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson dismissed the claims, telling BBC Breakfast: 'With the greatest of respect, that's not what this is about. 'This is about giving the tools to our police officers to enable them to keep us safe.' Forces already deploying live facial recognition had used it to arrest rape, domestic abuse, knife crime and robbery suspects as well as sex offenders breaching their conditions. Meanwhile, the Home Office said every community across England and Wales had now been assigned a 'named, contactable' officer to handle reports of crimes such as anti-social behaviour. Their details would be made available for residents on their local force's website, it is understood. The pledge was made as part of the Government's previously announced Neighbourhood Policing Guarantee, under which forces have signed up to a commitment to respond to neighbourhood queries within 72 hours. The Government said the move would help ensure 'the public will have consistent direct links to their local force, with dedicated anti-social behaviour leads and new visible patrols in town centres'.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour councillor ‘horrified' by own cutting throats comment at rally, jury told
A Labour councillor who called at an anti-racism rally for far-right activists' throats to be cut has told a jury he felt 'horrified' after realising what he had said. In the wake of rioting after the Southport murders last summer, Ricky Jones, 58, described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists', his trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court heard. He told jurors on Wednesday that his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them. A video showing Jones addressing the crowd in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year, went viral on social media after the protest. Wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, the councillor said: 'You've got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays. 'They don't give a shit about who they hurt. 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd. Jones, who at the time worked as an official for the Transport Salaried Staff's Association (TSSA) union, later sent an edited version of his speech video to union members, the court heard. Asked by his defence barrister, Hossein Zahir KC, why he edited the video, Jones replied: 'When I had time to view the footage after the demonstration, I was shocked at what I had actually said. 'I was horrified. 'Under no circumstances did I want to portray that to anybody, so I edited that last bit out.' The unedited video was eventually posted on social media platform X, formerly Twitter, where it attracted millions of views, the trial heard. Jones told jurors he felt 'very emotional and very upset' after receiving pictures, the day before the rally, of National Front stickers that had been left on a train, which had razor blades hidden behind them – supposedly so that people who tried to remove the stickers would injure themselves. He had also received reports from union members that more razor blades had been found stuck between seats, Jones added. 'I was very concerned about what had happened on the train. 'I was thinking, this (the speech) is a good opportunity to raise what happened.' The father-of-four and grandfather described the mood in the crowd at the time as 'happy and joyful', adding: 'There clearly wasn't any upset or anger from any people in that scene, because they clearly knew it was about what happened on the train.' Prosecutor Ben Holt, cross-examining, told the defendant: 'Your words about slitting people's throats were not cheerful or happy.' Jones replied: 'I totally agree, I'm ashamed.' The defendant however denied intending to encourage violence towards far-right protesters. 'What violence could have anyone caused to those people in the train?' Jones said. 'It was nonsensical – I didn't believe there was a risk.' Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the alleged incident. He was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton Police Station that night. The demonstration had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau. It followed the disorder in parts of the UK last summer after the Southport murders. Jones, of Dartford, denies one count of encouraging violent disorder. The trial continues.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour minister vows ‘every community' in England and Wales to have contactable police officer
Labour minister Diana Johnston has vowed that 'every community' in England and Wales will now have a named and contactable police officer. Appearing on Good Morning Britain on Wednesday (13 August), the policing minister explained that 3,000 new police officers have been recruited to help in neighbourhoods 'up and down the country'. She said that members of the public are now able to find their local officer by entering their postcode on their force's website or enquiring over the phone. ' We wanted to make sure this works for policing. We're not just telling them we want them to make it work for them,' she said, confirming that the government has given the police £200m to implement this scheme.
