Trump buries Biden foreign policy in first 100 days
One hundred days into his new administration, President Donald Trump has reset negotiations with allies and foes across the globe, and experts say one is certain: it is all transactional.
Gone are the days when the U.S. could be drawn to throw its force around the world solely in the name of defending or spreading democracy. Global leaders are learning to speak a new language with U.S. leadership, one that is less about ideology and more about how their interests benefit U.S. interests.
"There is a lot more transactional engagement rather than I think we're ideological-based, policy decisions that were sort of the hallmark of the Biden administration," said Gregg Roman, executive director of the Middle East Forum.
Here is a round-up of how Trump has changed U.S. foreign policy since taking office:
Former President Joe Biden toyed with reviving a nuclear deal with Iran and criticized Trump's decision to pull the U.S. out of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, but his administration made little progress toward serious negotiations.
Trump has now expressed interest in a new nuclear deal. He told Israel the U.S. would not come to their aid in attacking Iran until diplomatic negotiations played out.
As Trump's team met with Iranian counterparts in Oman this weekend for a second round of nuclear talks, he issued another threat: if negotiations whither away, the U.S. would not be dragged by Israel into war with Iran but will be "leading the pack."
An offensive campaign against Yemen's Houthi terrorists launched six weeks ago has struck more than 800 targets and cost nearly $1 billion – a sharp departure from the tit-for-tat retaliatory strikes seen under the Biden administration, when Houthis attacked U.S. naval ships and Western commercial vessels.
"Biden pursued a policy of retaliatory strikes: If you hit us, we'll hit you," said Roman. "What Trump is trying to do is what I call a salting the earth strategy. If you dare challenge American military supremacy or the ability for us to conduct free trade to the bottom of or through the Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Yemen, Red Sea, Suez … We will attempt to end your ability to wage war on the United States in its interests."
While Biden had promised the U.S. would stand by Ukraine "as long as it takes" in the war against Russia, Trump expressed a desire to see the war come to an end, promising that he could end the war on "day one" of his presidency.
One hundred days in, the war is not over. Negotiations are ongoing, and Trump has jumped between sounding off in frustration with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
As Putin continues to strike even civilian regions of Ukraine, Trump questioned on Saturday whether the Russian leader truly wants peace or is "tapping me along."
He again questioned whether he would need to slap "secondary sanctions" on nations that do business with Russia to starve its war coffers.
On Monday, Russia offered a three-day ceasefire from May 8-10, but the White House was not satisfied. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump wants a "permanent ceasefire."
Trump met face-to-face with Zelenskyy in Rome on Saturday, the first time since their infamous Oval Office spat in February, after slamming Zelenskyy's latest rejection of his peace proposal, one that would have formally ceded Crimea to the Russians.
The Monroe Doctrine is back, analysts say, and Trump wants both Greenland and the Panama Canal under U.S. control.
The proposals drew shock across the world, but at least in Panama, Trump's bold words prompted a proposal to offer the U.S. "first and free" passage for its warships, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said earlier this month. It also spurred the proposed sale of two ports of entry from Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison to U.S.-based BlackRock, though that deal has been delayed by Chinese regulatory and political scrutiny.
Efforts to attain Greenland have proved less successful. Tough talk against Denmark and its ownership of Greenland has ratcheted up tensions with the NATO ally and Greenland's leadership has expressed little interest in becoming a part of the U.S.
However, Trump has called out the threat of Russia and China's increasing arctic military capabilities – the shortest range for a missile to travel from Russia to the U.S. would be over the icy island's territory. Trump is also interested in the rare earth mining potential of the massive swath of land.
Trump's threats to pull out of the NATO alliance – or refuse to come to the defense of allies that do not contribute enough military spending – has left nations across the world planning for the contingency that they may have to defend themselves without U.S. aid.
The European Union announced a plan for its nations to spend $840 billion to "re-arm Europe" after Trump halted all aid to Ukraine in March.
Countries like Spain, Belgium and Sweden have all announced plans this year to increase defense spending to meet NATO's 2% target, while eastern European states near Russia's border, including Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland, have announced plans to increase defense spending to around 5%.
Concern over China's hegemonic ambitions bridges the partisan divide, but the Biden White House never considered such drastic measures as 145% tariffs.
Trump has said the goal of the tariffs is to both bring back US manufacturing after decades of offshore production and punish China for intellectual property theft, a massive trade imbalance, and fentanyl flowing from China to the U.S. A free trade push in the early 2000s had wrongly assumed liberal trade policies would bring democratic values and free markets into Chinese borders, his supporters argue.
Trump has insisted that President Xi Jinping wants to cut a deal to lower the soaring tariffs, even as China has rejected the prospect of talks.
It is unclear what sort of realistic concessions the U.S. could get out of a deal, perhaps promises to buy more American-made agricultural products, fuel or other specialty goods.
For now, steep tariffs remain, and China is choking off U.S. supply of critical minerals, which could spell deep trouble for everyday electronics, electric vehicles and defense equipment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
6 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump debates bombing Iran in pivotal moment for presidency
President Donald Trump faced one of the most monumental decisions of his presidency on Tuesday as he debated whether to join a war against Iran that risked sucking Washington into a new Middle Eastern conflict but also offered the chance to eliminate a rival's nuclear program. In a string of social media posts across the day, the president said that the United States has 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' warned Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khameini that he was an 'easy target,' and demanded 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' without defining what that would mean. As the day closed and after an 80-minute meeting with top aides in the Situation Room, he spoke to Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu, a White House official said. The tough language came at a moment of extraordinary weakness for Tehran, whose power is at a low ebb following a year of Israeli attacks against its allies and proxies in the Middle East. Trump has long taken an aggressive approach toward Iran, although he also campaigned on ending global conflicts and as recently as last week continued to seek a new agreement to restrict its nuclear program. Trump's current posture could rebound in unpredictable ways. If he succeeds in wresting concessions from Iranian leaders to dismantle their nuclear program or destroys it by military force without provoking major retaliation, he could be hailed as a president whose unpredictable approach to foreign policy yields results. Mishandling the situation could pull Washington into a major war, with dangerous and unpredictable consequences for U.S. citizens. And it could also lead to a nuclear-armed Iran, if strikes fail and the government resolves to develop the nuclear weapon that it has long declared it does not seek. 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff,'' Trump said Tuesday, before meeting with his advisers in the Situation Room for 80 minutes. 'Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.' Leaders who met with Trump at a Group of Seven summit of like-minded industrial democracies in Canada on Monday said that the U.S. leader had floated the possibility of joining Israeli strikes against Iran — an extraordinary departure after months in which he had pushed for a diplomatic solution to Tehran's nuclear program, sometimes over the objections of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who accompanied Trump to Canada, was calling counterparts on Monday to discuss the situation, but told some of them that the United States did not intend to join the Israeli attack on Iran, according to three officials familiar with the calls who spoke on condition of anonymity to talk frankly about the private discussions. By Tuesday, those officials said they believed the U.S. position had changed, and that Trump was considering joining the attack. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), long one of the GOP's most vocal Iran hawks, said he spoke to Trump Monday night and believes Trump wants to help Israel to 'finish the job' in destroying the country's nuclear program, including a key facility in Fordo, south of Tehran. 'I think he's very calm, very resolved," Graham said. 'I don't think Israel can finish Fordo without our help, and it's in our interest to make sure this program is destroyed, as much as it's Israel's. And so if there's something you need to do to help Israel, do it.' Trump was supposed to remain in Canada on Tuesday, but he dashed back to Washington a day early, saying that he needed to be in Washington to monitor the situation in the Middle East. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who met with Trump in Canada, expressed gratitude on Tuesday for Israel's attack on Iran, saying that Israel was doing 'the dirty work … for all of us.' 'We are also affected by this regime,' Merz told Germany's ZDF broadcaster on the sideline of the summit. 'This mullah regime has brought death and destruction to the world.' While some of Iran's nuclear facilities have been attacked in recent days by Israel, the most significant is the Fordo enrichment plant, which is buried deep underground and inside a mountain. U.S. officials have said the center can be effectively attacked only with massive, 'bunker-busting' bombs, including the GBU-57, a 15-ton round known as the 'massive ordnance penetrator,' or MOP. The 20-foot-long bomb is carried by the B-2 Spirit, the bat-wing-shaped stealth bomber. The fleet is based at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri and previously has been deployed for global bombing runs in which they rely on aerial refueling to fly to and from targets without stopping. Should the Pentagon use other kinds of bombs to attack Iran, it could rely on an array of other aircraft, including fighter jets already in the region and B-52s. The Pentagon temporarily relocated some of these aircraft recently to Diego Garcia, an island with a joint U.S.-British military base in the Indian Ocean. Trump's claim of control over Iran's skies may be an indication that U.S. officials have assessed that most of Iran's air defense have been destroyed by Israel in recent days. Since Israel launched the attack on Iran late last week, U.S. officials have bolstered their extensive presence in the region but have repeatedly stressed that they are doing so for defensive purposes only. Trump has contradicted that messaging, however, warning Iranians in Tehran, a city of about 10 million people, that they should evacuate. While the U.S. military had not launched any strikes on Iran as of Tuesday afternoon, defense officials said, it has assisted Israel in other ways, including using Navy destroyers off the coast and fighter jets to shoot down Iranian munitions fired toward Israel. Gen. Michael 'Erik' Kurilla, the top U.S. commander overseeing operations in the Middle East, who has advocated a hawkish approach toward Tehran, told the House Armed Services Committee last week that he has presented a 'wide array of options' to Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth if they choose to pursue military force against Iran. Kurilla told lawmakers that the United States 'now stands in a strategic window of opportunity to secure its national interests' in the Middle East – including preventing a nuclear-armed Iran. Most experts assess that Iran would need a week to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a bomb. But they say that it would take months, up to a year, to turn the uranium into a weapon. In Canada, while Merz backed Israel, other leaders were less outspoken or spoke in thinly-veiled disagreement. French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters in Canada on Tuesday that a ceasefire and ongoing negotiations were the only solution. 'I think that people are sovereign, they change their leaders by themselves and all those who have wanted in the past to change regimes through strikes or military operations have made strategic errors,' he said. Kaja Kallas, the top European Union diplomat, said that EU foreign ministers who held an emergency virtual meeting Tuesday morning were united in their call for de-escalation. 'When it comes to the United States getting involved, then it will definitely drag the region into a broader conflict, and this is in nobody's interest,' Kallas said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in a telephone call Monday night, 'emphasized that it is also not in their interest to be drawn into this conflict,' she said. Elsewhere in the Middle East, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty urged de-escalation and negotiations in phone calls Tuesday with both Araghchi and U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff. In Qatar, Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari said his government was one of many in the region exerting efforts to 'reach calm that spares the region the repercussions of this dangerous escalation of the Israeli aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran.' Israel continued to pummel Iran Tuesday, using about 60 fighter jets to target 12 missile launch and storage sites, many in western Iran, Israel Defense Forces spokesman Effie Derfin said Tuesday night. Israel's military also claimed Tuesday to have killed Ali Shadmani, whom it described as Iran's wartime chief of staff. Israel did not present evidence of the assassination, and Iran did not immediately confirm his death. Iran's supreme leader appointed Shadmani to his position four days ago after his predecessor, Gholam Ali Rashid, was killed in Israeli attacks on Friday. Iranian media reported explosions and heavy air defense fire in Tehran and explosions in the northwestern city of Tabriz on Tuesday. Iranian civilians streamed out of the capital overnight and into Tuesday. Israeli strikes also appear to have made 'direct impacts' on the underground section of Iran's Natanz nuclear enrichment site, the United Nations nuclear watchdog said Tuesday, citing analysis of high resolution satellite imagery. It was the International Atomic Energy Agency's first assessment that the centrifuge halls buried deep underground may have been damaged. Iran's retaliatory barrages against Israel carried on for a fifth day, triggering Israel's air defenses on an 'hourly basis,' the military official said. The Iranian attacks have killed 24 people in Israel and injured more than 600, the Israeli government said Tuesday. Iranian authorities said that 224 people had been killed by Israeli strikes as of Sunday, the most recent figures available. They did not differentiate between military and civilian casualties. Parker reported from Cairo. Susannah George in Doha, Qatar, Ellen Francis in Brussels, Kate Brady in Berlin, Yeganeh Torbati, Joshua Yang, Lior Soroka in Tel Aviv, Abbie Cheeseman and Mohamad El Chamaa in Beirut, Annabelle Timsit in London, Evan Hill in New York, Gerry Shih in Jerusalem, Cat Zakrzewski in Calgary, Alberta, and Abigail Hauslohner, Matt Viser, Natalie Allison and Nilo Tabrizy in Washington contributed to this report.
Washington Post
7 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Cuban diplomat defends foreign medical missions under pressure from US
UNITED NATIONS — A senior Cuban diplomat has accused the Trump administration of trying to discredit the thousands of Cuban doctors working around the world and deprive the country of an important source of income. Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Fernandez de Cossio, who was at U.N. headquarters this week for a debate on sanctions, told The Associated Press that the U.S. is putting pressure on other countries and financial institutions to break their ties with Cuba. Cossio said over the decades Cuba has sent more than 100,000 doctors to more than 70 countries to provide much needed medical care. More than 22,000 doctors are now working in more than 50 countries, according to the government. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has described the program as 'forced labor.' He announced visa restrictions in late February on Cuban and foreign government officials involved in Cuba's medical missions. In June, the Trump administration imposed visa restrictions on several unidentified officials from Central America for their involvement with the Cuban program. And in a letter obtained by AP last week , the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights asked the 34 members of the Organization of American States for details of any agreements with Cuba for medical missions. It specifically requested information on whether the medical workers have labor and union rights, and about any labor complaints. The commission, an independent body of the OAS, which is heavily funded by the United States, said it would analyze the data and make recommendations, 'given the persistence of reports of rights violations.' The State Department said Tuesday it was pleased its action 'has prompted meaningful discussion of this exploitative labor export program after years of denial.' It said the U.S. will not stop raising these issues until Cuba curtails the 'forced labor' of its own citizens. Cossio defended the program in an interview on Monday. He said all Cuban doctors working abroad receive their regular salary, plus 'a dignified stipend.' Starting about 15 years ago, he said, Cuba began receiving compensation from wealthier countries for providing the doctors. That money covers the stipends, with the rest going to finance Cuba's public health system, he said. Cossio accused the United States of trying to discredit the medical missions, first by saying that Cuba was not sending doctors but agents to 'subvert' these counties. He said the U.S. then accused Cuba of human trafficking and put pressure on the countries that have agreements with Cuba to refuse any future medical missions. He said the U.S. wanted to stop the praise Cuba has received for sending doctors to many poor and developing countries and to deprive Cuba of a 'legitimate source of income.' Cossio said Cuba would not break its agreements. Cossio also criticized the Trump administration for reversing a U.S. policy of welcoming Cubans into the country. The administration has started cracking down on Cubans who have entered the U.S. since October 2022 on two-year permits to live and work, a Biden administration program known as humanitarian parole. President Donald Trump this month also announced additional restrictions on visitors from Cuba, among other countries. The restrictions have come as a shock to the 2.4 million Cuban-Americans. They strongly backed the Republican president in both elections and have long enjoyed a place of privilege in the U.S. immigration system.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Cuban diplomat defends foreign medical missions under pressure from US
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — A senior Cuban diplomat has accused the Trump administration of trying to discredit the thousands of Cuban doctors working around the world and deprive the country of an important source of income. Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Fernandez de Cossio, who was at U.N. headquarters this week for a debate on sanctions, told The Associated Press that the U.S. is putting pressure on other countries and financial institutions to break their ties with Cuba. Cossio said over the decades Cuba has sent more than 100,000 doctors to more than 70 countries to provide much needed medical care. More than 22,000 doctors are now working in more than 50 countries, according to the government. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has described the program as 'forced labor.' He announced visa restrictions in late February on Cuban and foreign government officials involved in Cuba's medical missions. In June, the Trump administration imposed visa restrictions on several unidentified officials from Central America for their involvement with the Cuban program. And in a letter obtained by AP last week, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights asked the 34 members of the Organization of American States for details of any agreements with Cuba for medical missions. It specifically requested information on whether the medical workers have labor and union rights, and about any labor complaints. The commission, an independent body of the OAS, which is heavily funded by the United States, said it would analyze the data and make recommendations, 'given the persistence of reports of rights violations.' The State Department said Tuesday it was pleased its action 'has prompted meaningful discussion of this exploitative labor export program after years of denial.' It said the U.S. will not stop raising these issues until Cuba curtails the 'forced labor' of its own citizens. Cossio defended the program in an interview on Monday. He said all Cuban doctors working abroad receive their regular salary, plus 'a dignified stipend.' Starting about 15 years ago, he said, Cuba began receiving compensation from wealthier countries for providing the doctors. That money covers the stipends, with the rest going to finance Cuba's public health system, he said. Cossio accused the United States of trying to discredit the medical missions, first by saying that Cuba was not sending doctors but agents to 'subvert' these counties. He said the U.S. then accused Cuba of human trafficking and put pressure on the countries that have agreements with Cuba to refuse any future medical missions. He said the U.S. wanted to stop the praise Cuba has received for sending doctors to many poor and developing countries and to deprive Cuba of a 'legitimate source of income.' Cossio said Cuba would not break its agreements. Cossio also criticized the Trump administration for reversing a U.S. policy of welcoming Cubans into the country. The administration has started cracking down on Cubans who have entered the U.S. since October 2022 on two-year permits to live and work, a Biden administration program known as humanitarian parole. President Donald Trump this month also announced additional restrictions on visitors from Cuba, among other countries. The restrictions have come as a shock to the 2.4 million Cuban-Americans. They strongly backed the Republican president in both elections and have long enjoyed a place of privilege in the U.S. immigration system.
