Delhi Residents Can Now Resolve Gas, Loan, Banking Disputes Without Court
Delhi residents facing issues loan defaults, gas supply disruptions or service lapses by banks and NBFCs may no longer need to take the long road to court. Delhi Lieutenant Governor V.K. Saxena has approved a proposal designating banking, non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), and gas supply as Public Utility Services, enabling their disputes to be resolved through Permanent Lok Adalats (PLAs).
This decision allows complaints about banking, NBFCs, or gas services—such as billing errors or service delays—to be settled out of court via Lok Adalats.
The Law Department of the Delhi government had sent the proposal, flagging a rising number of consumer disputes tied to banks, NBFCs and gas providers. "Most of these cases involve everyday issues like EMI defaults, faulty billing, or service delays," a senior official from the department said, adding that "a lot of complainants don't have the time or means to fight prolonged legal battles."
Permanent Lok Adalats are quasi-judicial forums that offer a quicker and low-cost alternative to courts for resolving service-related disputes. Unlike regular courts, they can settle cases even if one party doesn't agree to a compromise, provided the matter falls under public utility services and doesn't involve criminal allegations.
This inclusion is expected to ease the load on civil courts while offering consumers a more accessible legal remedy. "People shouldn't have to wait years to resolve simple issues like incorrect bank deductions or faulty gas billing,"an official associated with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) said.
At present, Delhi has three PLAs, mainly handling electricity-related disputes with private discoms. A fourth Lok Adalat is being planned to deal with other notified services like transport, telecom, water, health, sanitation and insurance.
The move is seen as particularly helpful for consumers who are typically at a disadvantage when facing off against large financial or utility companies. "This could be a game-changer, especially for senior citizens, daily wage workers, or those with limited legal access," a legal aid volunteer told NDTV.
For now, the DSLSA will be responsible for implementing the change and facilitating the hearing of cases under the newly included services. Residents can approach the nearest Permanent Lok Adalat for any non-criminal disputes involving these three sectors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
NBFCs nudge RBI for lower risk weight on loans against property
In their discussions with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), non-banking financial companies have requested LAPs be not treated on a par with unsecured loans when assigning risk weights. They have urged the RBI to reduce the current cap of 125% and align more closely with home loans, which attract risk weights in the range of 35% to 50%. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads MUMBAI: Non-bank lenders have approached the central bank to ease, among other curbs, prescribed risk weights on products such as loans against property (LAP), arguing the risk profiles of such assets do not justify bracketing them together with unsecured exposures, or even plain-vanilla mortgages."In our experience, losses on LAP have been significantly lower compared to housing loans, primarily because transaction risks tend to be higher in housing finance," one of the two officials aware of the development told ET. "Risk weights for LAP should ideally be lower or, at very least, on a par with housing their discussions with the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ), non-banking financial companies have requested LAPs be not treated on a par with unsecured loans when assigning risk weights. They have urged the RBI to reduce the current cap of 125% and align more closely with home loans , which attract risk weights in the range of 35% to 50%."There is no justification for equating them with the risk weights applied to personal or unsecured business loans," said the first official cited above. NBFCs have also urged loan-to-value (LTV) ratios on LAP be regularised with home loans. At present, LTVs on home loans can range from 80-90% but for LAP the range is 50-75%.NBFCs have urged the central bank to allow refinancing of self-construction loans in cases where construction is already more than 50% complete."Loan against property is a safer business compared to home loans because it is backed by completed properties, whereas home loans often carry completion risk when the property is still under construction," said the second official cited above. "The title deed for LAP is available upfront. For home loans in markets like Delhi-NCR, the title deed is often executed only upon completion, which poses a risk if the project remains unfinished."NBFCs have also urged the RBI to ensure a level playing field in the enforcement of SARFAESI (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest) housing finance companies (HFCs) are permitted to invoke SARFAESI for loan exposures above ?1 lakh, while for NBFCs, the threshold is significantly higher at ?20 lakh. Industry players argue that this disparity puts NBFCs at a disadvantage and have requested that the ?1 lakh threshold be uniformly applied. At the very least, they contend, loans against property disbursed by NBFCs should be brought under the ?1 lakh eligibility to enable more effective have also requested to revise the computation methodology for principal business criteria (PBC), suggesting that it be based solely on loan assets, rather than the total balance sheet size.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Penalty for power theft unfairly high & out of reach too'
Bhopal: In a rare occasion, the Opposition Congress joined hands with the ruling BJP MLAs in the House on Monday, demanding that the penalty in power theft cases be reduced. Raising the issue through a call attention motion, Ramesh Khatik of the BJP said that a compound interest of 16 percent is charged on a person accused of electricity theft. If the accused person pays the electricity bill five years later, he ends up paying more than double the bill. The case is put up in court and in Lok Adalats, the penalty is waived. Khatik questioned why the penalty can't be waived in the normal course if the person charged with electricity theft fails to turn up in Lok Adalat to settle the case for some reason. Khatik, who said that farmers and domestic consumers are the worst affected due to the excessive penalty of 16 percent compound interest on the bill, noted that no bank or financial institution gives so much interest as recovered from the consumers. He further mentioned that consumers, particularly farmers, often come to know of the case registered against them for electricity theft and put up in court quite late, and they sometimes don't receive notice for the Lok Adalat either, he added. Several MLAs from both sides joined Khatik in demanding that the penalty imposed on the bill in cases of electricity theft should be waived. However, energy minister Pradyamun Singh Tomar said that it's a legal issue and it can't be done by the state govt. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your donations can help this little boy see again clearly Donate For Health Donate Now Undo He further explained that the compound interest of 16 percent has been decided by the State Electricity Regulatory Authority, but Lok Adalat for settling the compoundable electricity theft cases takes place every three months, and the penalty is normally waived there. Khatik, however, pointed out that the Lok Adalat takes place in Bhopal, and the cases at other places are settled online, which may not be convenient for many consumers, particularly farmers. The Electricity Regulatory Authority may also be informed about the debate in the House and asked to reconsider the provision of a hefty penalty on electricity theft cases. The minister, while maintaining that law is law, agreed to take up the issue with MP Electricity Authority as more and more members from both sides joined Khatik in support of his demand.
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
Technology can bring legal aid to doorstep: SC judge
Using technology 'thoughtfully and inclusively…can bridge the persistent gaps in our justice system', said Supreme Court judge Justice Surya Kant Saturday, and underlined that it cannot, however, replace the human element and 'the heart of justice must remain human'. Speaking at the Justice RC Lahoti Memorial Lecture in Manav Rachna University, Faridabad, on 'Bridging the Gap: Reimagining Legal Aid in the Digital Age for Inclusive Justice in India', Justice Kant said: 'With the right vision and safeguards, technology can break geographical barriers, democratise legal awareness, and bring legal aid to the doorstep — or rather the palm of every citizen. If harnessed thoughtfully and inclusively, it can bridge the persistent gaps in our justice system.' He said that though the country has made big technological strides, 'yet, access to justice remains largely analogue.' 'Courts are online, laws are also digitised, but quality legal aid has yet to trickle down to the last person in line. The digital divide has become the new face of inequality,' Justice Kant said. Emphasising the need 'to address the challenges faced by linguistic and cultural minorities,' Justice Kant said that 'digital platforms must not only be multilingual but also culturally nuanced' and 'when citizens see their own stories, customs, and worldviews reflected in legal education content, barriers of alienation and mistrust crumble, making way for genuine engagement and confidence in the system.' Justice Kant called for holding virtual Lok Adalats by harnessing secure video platforms but cautioned that 'the excitement of technology must be tempered with restraint. The digital divide is very real.' 'No technology is neutral. The tools we build reflect the values we embed in them. As we digitise legal aid, we must design systems with built-in ethics. Privacy must be paramount…' he said. Justice Kant said, 'artificial intelligence algorithms must be designed to flag, not exacerbate, the biases so entrenched in society' and that 'privacy by design, user consent, and continuous public oversight should be the hallmarks of all digital legal solutions, assuring citizens that their quest for justice does not come at the cost of their security or dignity.'
