logo
'One event' arms pause troubling for Ukraine – DW – 07/04/2025

'One event' arms pause troubling for Ukraine – DW – 07/04/2025

DWa day ago
The US says its pause on arms shipments is a one-off. But amid the turbulent US-Ukraine relationship, the assurance is little comfort to Volodymyr Zelenskyy or his European supporters.
Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy will seek "clarity" from Donald Trump on Friday amid a challenging week that saw a scheduled US arms shipment paused and Kyiv pummeled by another Russian drone strike.
The US confirmed earlier this week that a batch of arms shipments to Ukraine would be paused in yet another reminder that the eastern European country's supply of advanced military equipment is not as secure as it once was.
The US has downplayed this decision to withhold crucial arms shipments to Ukraine, as a state department spokesperson told reporters it was a one-off.
"This is not a cessation of us assisting Ukraine or of providing weapons," said spokeswoman Tammy Bruce. "This is one event and one situation, and we'll discuss what else comes up in future."
The US president has continued to press both sides of the conflict to negotiate a ceasefire and spoke with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on the matter on Thursday. But progress, according to Trump said, was limited. "I didn't make any progress with him today at all," he told reporters. "I'm not happy about that. I'm not happy… I don't think he's looking to stop."
Russia followed that call with a massive drone strike on the Ukrainian capital.
Zelenskyy is due to speak with Trump on Friday about the shipment pause.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The pair have had a strained relationship during Trump's second term, publicly evidenced in a televised falling out during a White House sit-down in early March. Following the disastrous visit, Zelenskyy sought to shore up support closer to home with key European allies. Europe has since stepped up their support in financial and supply terms.
But if the US were to continue to withhold support, it would significantly undermine Ukraine's position versus Russia.
"If this were to be a longer-term issue, it would definitely be a challenge for Ukraine to cope," Jana Kobzova, a senior policy fellow specializing at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told DW.
"Partly because some of the US systems are not easily replaceable, that goes especially for air defense, but also some of the longer-range capabilities which Ukraine has started to produce domestically but not in the quantities needed."
Despite the spat between Trump and Zelenskyy, the pause on shipments could be as much about the US needing to weigh its own interests against the support it gives to dozens of other countries, including Israel.
"After the Israel-Iranian exchange, I can imagine that Trump wants to relocate resources," Marina Miron, a defense researcher specializing in military technology and Russian capability at Kings College London, UK, told DW.
Brent Sadler, a research fellow at the conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, told Politico the move is likely a "due diligence" measure to ensure adequate resourcing for US forces elsewhere, including the Indo-Pacific in the event of a conflict outbreak in that region. Retired US Army General Ben Hodges, took a different view, saying the shipment pause was not about stockpiles.
"It's a choice of this administration to placate Russia, at the expense of Ukraine," Hodges said. "It also shows the very limited understanding this administration [has] of the importance to America's strategic interests to help Ukraine and Europe deter Russia."
Irrespective of the US' reasons for pausing its military shipments, the signals from the first months of the new administration suggest Europe's transatlantic ally is not the steadfast partner it once was.
"There is a sober analysis both in Kyiv and the European part of NATO that relying on US military assistance to continue forever in Ukraine is not an option," said Kobzova. "And that has been there ever since March when the assistance was stopped for the first time."
Among the American weapons due for shipping were Patriot air defense missiles and precision-guided artillery, according to officials speaking to newswires anonymously.
The pause on these shipments comes at a critical time, with Russia ramping up weapons production and attacks. Those include strikes on soldier draft hubs in Poltava, the national capital Kyiv, the port city Odesa, and ground advances in key regions in Eastern Ukraine.
Despite increased spending on defense from Europe's NATO members — now 5% of GDP following its June meeting — any long-term US stall on weapons will likely squeeze Ukraine and its neighbors.
"There is recognition at the political level … that [Europe] would need to be increasing production, but none of that happens quickly enough for Ukraine," said Kobzova.
Kobzova also pointed to investments being made into Ukraine's own defense industry to buffer against future supply-line cuts from the US. Europe is now the biggest investor in Ukraine's domestic defense industry.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
But even that might not be enough.
Experts interviewed by DW highlighted the offer made by Zelenskyy to directly purchase armaments from the US, but in reality, arms manufacturing is a time-consuming process.
"It takes two years to produce one [air defense missile] battery," the defense expert Miron told DW. "So even if you buy them now, it doesn't mean that they will be on the battlefield. You place a purchase order and you get in the queue."
Finding a way to more effectively repair and adapt equipment for different missiles could be a potential stopgap to meet immediate needs. But, as defense supplies are again in doubt, Miron questioned whether Ukraine has what it needs to push back Russia's offensive.
"The problem is time and money and we also have the variable of people," she said, adding that about 90 people are needed to operate a Patriot air missile battery.
And Ukraine, Miron pointed out, is losing people, with no guarantee of replacement as the war grinds through its fourth year.
Ukraine's support in Europe has been increasing — both rhetorically and materially.
As it took over the presidency of the EU for the next six months, Denmark has seized the early opportunity to put Ukraine's membership application into the bloc back on the agenda.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on Thursday said the EU "must strengthen Ukraine. And we must weaken Russia."
"Ukraine is essential to Europe's security. Our contribution to Ukraine is also a protection of our freedom. Ukraine belongs in the European Union. It is in both in Denmark's and Europe's interest."
Her comments come on the back of a visit to Ukraine from German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, who branded Ukraine's plight Berlin's most important foreign policy task.
These statements from Europe might be more important than ever, as Miron says she is pessimistic about the future of the US-Ukraine relationship.
"Certainly you can try some diplomacy, and explain to Trump that Ukraine matters, but I think Trump has already made up his mind," she said. "Trump has much more to solve with Russia in terms of global problems than with Ukraine."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DW's Limbourg: "Israel must ensure safety of journalists"
DW's Limbourg: "Israel must ensure safety of journalists"

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

DW's Limbourg: "Israel must ensure safety of journalists"

On July 4, a DW correspondent from the DW office in Jerusalem and a DW cameraman were pelted with large stones and chased by Israeli settlers north of Ramallah, during an attack on the village of Sinjil. They managed to reach safety without physical injuries, but the cameraman's car was severely damaged: a window was shattered and the bodywork was dented. DW Director General Peter Limbourg: "DW condemns this attack on our colleagues who had traveled to Sinjil to cover a planned protest against settler violence. We are relieved that they were not physically injured in the attack and were able to get to safety. There is no justification for this attack. We strongly demand that the Israeli government guarantee the safety of all journalists in the West Bank. Freedom of the press – and therefore the safety of journalists – is an indispensable pillar of any democracy." Sinjil is located in the Palestinian-administered part of the West Bank. Other journalists, mainly Palestinians, also had to flee. In addition to DW, other international media were on location to report, including AFP, the New York Times and the Washington Post. The DW employees wore press vests and were therefore clearly recognizable as media professionals.

DW's Limbourg: "Israel must ensure safety of journalists"
DW's Limbourg: "Israel must ensure safety of journalists"

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

DW's Limbourg: "Israel must ensure safety of journalists"

On July 4, a DW correspondent from the DW office in Jerusalem and a DW cameraman were pelted with large stones and chased by Israeli settlers north of Ramallah, during an attack on the village of Sinjil. They managed to reach safety without physical injuries, but the cameraman's car was severely damaged: a window was shattered and the bodywork was dented. DW Director General Peter Limbourg: "DW condemns this attack on our colleagues who had traveled to Sinjil to cover a planned protest against settler violence. We are relieved that they were not physically injured in the attack and were able to get to safety. There is no justification for this attack. We strongly demand that the Israeli government guarantee the safety of all journalists in the West Bank. Freedom of the press – and therefore the safety of journalists – is an indispensable pillar of any democracy." Sinjil is located in the Palestinian-administered part of the West Bank. Other journalists, mainly Palestinians, also had to flee. In addition to DW, other international media were on location to report, including AFP, the New York Times and the Washington Post. The DW employees wore press vests and were therefore clearly recognizable as media professionals.

How Donald Trump has profited worldwide from his presidency – DW – 07/05/2025
How Donald Trump has profited worldwide from his presidency – DW – 07/05/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

How Donald Trump has profited worldwide from his presidency – DW – 07/05/2025

With Donald Trump's return to the White House, the Trump family's fortune is surging as many question the line between presidential power and private profit. In just six months back in office, Donald Trump's company the Trump Organization has rolled out 12 new international business projects — surpassing the total from Trump's entire first term. And with each new deal, the same question grows louder: Where does President Trump's public duty end, and where does his private empire begin? Back in 2017, Donald Trump publicly called Qatar "a funder of terrorism." Fast-forward to 2025, and the first foreign deal secured by the Trump Organization after Trump's return to the Oval Office is happening in Qatar itself. The project, just outside Doha, will feature a luxury resort and an 18-hole golf course, branded as the Trump International Golf Club & Villas. On paper, the development is being carried out by real estate developers Qatari Diar and the Saudi company Dar Global. But Qatari Diar is no ordinary private company — it was set up by Qatar's sovereign wealth fund and is chaired by a government minister, effectively making it an arm of the Qatari state. Just weeks before President Trump's scheduled visit to Qatar in May 2025, Eric Trump traveled there to help advance the negotiations. The Trump Organization has maintained that the partnership was secured through Dar Global, a Saudi firm, and not directly with Qatari Diar. But that explanation hardly puts the questions to rest, since Dar Global itself has close and well-documented ties to the Saudi royal family. Meanwhile, Trump's May trip brought another issue: The Qatari government offered the United States a customized Boeing 747, a so-called "flying palace" worth around $400 million, as a diplomatic gift. Beyond these business entanglements, the US relationship with Qatar remains complicated. While Qatar has faced criticism for supporting Hamas, it has also positioned itself as a key intermediary in ceasefire negotiations in Gaza. These conflicting roles — friend, funder, and fixer — only deepen the unease about Trump's willingness to entangle presidential diplomacy with private profit. In a series of dubious coincidences, weeks before Trump's Gulf trip in May 2025, the Trump Organization revealed a new partnership with Dar Global. The deal plans to build the Middle East's first Trump International Hotel and Tower in Dubai, marking their fifth regional collaboration. Addressing the US- Saudi Investment Forum during the visit, Trump laid out a regional vision built on "national sovereignty," pointedly rejecting the idea of lecturing Middle Eastern governments about democracy or human rights. The same day, Trump unveiled the largest defense deal in US history — a $142-billion package. This binds Washington even closer to a regime accused of repeated human rights light of this, Trump's closeness with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) is notable. Human rights groups and intelligence agencies have long linked the crown prince to brutal crackdowns and abuses, including the murder of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi — a killing the CIA concluded was personally ordered by MBS. Saudi Arabia has also continued to harass dissidents even on US soil. Furthermore, Saudi Arabia's regional position is also of significance. The kingdom is trying to emerge as a mediator in the Ukraine war and negotiating with Israel in exchange for concessions on Palestine. These contradictions would normally make a US president think twice before rewarding MBS with closer ties. Back in early 2024, five US businessmen with Serbian roots attended a reception at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. By early 2025, Serbian-American ties seemed poised for a fresh chapter. Rod Blagojevich, a longtime Trump ally and former Illinois governor, visited Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić in Belgrade and used the trip to publicly criticize Kosovo's Prime Minister Albin Kurti, accusing him of overseeing what he called "ethnic cleansing" against Serbs living in Kosovo. That rhetoric carried deep echoes of the region's painful past. In 1999, the United States and NATO bombed Serbia to force its military out of Kosovo in order to stop the violent expulsion of ethnic Albanians. Then, a few weeks into Trump's second term, a $500 million real estate project in Belgrade was back in the news. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Led by Jared Kushner's Miami-based firm Affinity Partners, the plan means building a luxury hotel and apartment complex on the site of the former Yugoslav Ministry of Defense — a landmark heavily bombed during the NATO air campaign. Trump himself had shown interest in developing the property as far back as 2014, even though local critics saw the replacement of a war memorial with a luxury tower as deeply disrespectful. By May 2025, the obstacles to that plan had been cleared. Under the agreement, the project will feature a 175-room hotel, more than 1,500 luxury apartments, and a new memorial to victims of the NATO bombing. As President Donald Trump prepared for a July 2025 visit to Vietnam, his family business was moving quickly in the country as well. In late May, the Trump Organization announced a partnership with a subsidiary of Vietnam-listed Kinh Bac City Development Holding Corp. to develop a $1.5-billion golf course, resort, and residential estate in Hung Yen province, just south of Hanoi. Unveiling the project, Eric Trump praised Vietnam as "one of the most dynamic and promising markets in the world today." The timing of the deal was striking, coming just as the US and Vietnam were hammering out the details of a high-stakes trade agreement. That trade deal was crucial for Vietnam. At the time, the government was facing threats from Trump of a punishing 46% tariff on Vietnamese goods. In the end, negotiators settled on a 20% tariff. Against this backdrop, the Trump Organization's massive resort deal raises serious concerns about conflicts of interest. Eric Trump put it bluntly last October: His family, he argued, had not received sufficient credit for actually pulling back during the first Trump administration. But a congressional probe released last January showed that Trump-owned businesses received at least $7.8 million from 20 foreign governments during his first term, including the governments of China, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, and Malaysia. Some independent watchdogs have estimated that the real figures were even higher. Now, with the second-term green light, the Trump Organization is pushing full throttle. Its international expansions, Trump's presidential visits, and personal entanglements continue to blur the line between presidential power and private gain.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store