
At least 39 dead as chemical reactor explodes at drug factory reducing building to rubble in India
Dozens are still missing after the horror blast sparked an inferno at the building and left workers trapped inside.
2
2
The chemical factory, used by Sigachi Industries, sat in the Pashamylaram industrial estate in Telangana's Sangareddy district.
Police in Telangana said more than 140 people were working in the plant at the time of the blast with more than 60 directly impacted.
Seventeen workers are still unaccounted for as officials fear they may be trapped under the charred debris.
A massive rescue team was deployed to extinguish the flames and try to move the rubble with excavators seen at the factory this morning.
GV Narayana Rao, director of the fire response team, confirmed the factory had completely collapsed due to the explosion.
He said: "We are still clearing the debris and once we are all done with the clearing, only then we will be able to assess if any other body is still remaining under the debris or if it is all clear."
Terrified plant worker Chandan Gound, 32, added: "I came out [of the plant] to use the restroom and heard a loud blast.
"It sounded like a bomb blast. I came out and saw fire. A part of the fire also spread towards me. I jumped the wall and escaped.
"Many of them [working inside] managed to escape, but a large number were trapped and could not come out."
Investigations are still ongoing into what caused the explosion.
Telangana Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy has now told officials across the state to conduct thorough inspections into all chemical companies.
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
‘A second exile': Nepal moves to expel refugees already deported by the US
Ashish Subedi never imagined he would be deported once, let alone twice. Subedi, 36, had grown up in the Beldangi refugee camp in eastern Nepal where his family, along with over 100,000 other ethnic Lhotshampas, ended up after being expelled from Bhutan in the early 1990s. His family eventually resettled in the US under a UN third-country program, and Subedi built a life there. But a domestic dispute with his wife in Pennsylvania led to his arrest, brief detention, and eventually deportation by US immigration officials. 'I thought I'd be released soon,' he recalls. 'The Ice officers even said so. I never thought I'd be deported, let alone twice.' Subedi was put on a flight to Bhutan via the Indian capital of Delhi. But Bhutan, the country that had once stripped his family of citizenship, refused to take him back. Bhutanese officials immediately pushed him toward the Indian border. Stuck at the border, Subedi paid a middleman to be smuggled into Nepal by paying middlemen and traveled to the Beldangi refugee camp, where his father still lived. But he was arrested by Nepalese authorities shortly after arriving on 28 March, and charged with illegal entry. 'The country that once gave us shelter detained me,' he says, still stunned. 'Being handcuffed again felt like a second exile.' His father, Narayan Kumar Subedi, protested on the spot, forcing police to remove the cuffs. The treatment was a bitter sequel to what Subedi endured in the US. 'In Franklin county jail, inmates beat me up. But worse was being stateless again,' Subedi said. Now, Nepal has initiated formal procedures to deport Subedi and others like him, sparking outrage among refugee rights groups. According to Govinda Rijal, director general of Nepal's Department of Immigration, Nepalese law requires that anyone entering without a visa be fined and removed. 'After presenting a passport or travel document they will be deported to Bhutan,' he said. But this requirement has been widely condemned as unrealistic. 'If Bhutan were willing to accept them, they wouldn't be in Nepal now,' says Subedi's father. 'How can Nepal deport them back to the country that once expelled them?' Another deportee, Ashok Gurung, tells a similarly grim story. In 2011, he had also resettled in the US as part of the third-country program. But two years later, a fight between Bhutanese and Burmese refugees in Georgia led him to be charged with assault. Gurung maintains he was not directly involved, but that a witness named him in a statement. He served four and a half years in prison. After his release, Gurung says, he worked legally for years in Pennsylvania before being abruptly detained by Ice officers on 9 March. He, too, was deported to Bhutan, where authorities refused to accept him. Like Subedi, he was pushed into India and then crossed back into Nepal. But the refugee camp that once sheltered him now refuses to register him. 'There are still thousands of refugees in the camp, but now they say we are not one of them,' Gurung says. Narayan says so far at least 25 Bhutanese deportees from the US have returned to Nepal under similar circumstances. And yet, Nepal is preparing to deport them again. 'This is an alarming reversal,' says Gopal Krishna Siwakoti, former chair of the Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network. 'These people were made stateless once by Bhutan. Now they're being rejected again by Nepal. What's left for them?' Nepal's decision to fine and expel them, he says, is legally and morally flawed. 'They're being punished for being stateless. Worse, Nepal is demanding travel documents from Bhutan, the very country that created this crisis. It's not only impractical, it's inhumane.' Some deportees, like 24-year-old Sandesh Giri, are in even more precarious situations. Giri was deported from the US on charges of reckless driving. His mother and family remain in Pennsylvania. Alone in Nepal, he spent 10 days in a hotel before being evicted for not being able to pay. 'I had no Nepali ID, so I couldn't work or stay anywhere,' he says. 'I was stranded.' Eventually, his mother told him about other deportees being accepted into the Beldangi camp. 'It was the only place I could go.' New deportees continue to arrive at the camp, but the system has no mechanism to re-absorb them. In a visit to the camp last Friday, representatives from the UN refugee agency UNHCR, including its Nepal chief, met with camp residents and deportees to assess the situation. Advocates like Siwakoti are now preparing to challenge Nepal's deportation orders in the supreme court. 'It's time the international community pays attention,' he adds. Subedi, meanwhile, longs only for a reunion with his daughter, now three years old. He hasn't seen her since being taken into custody in the US. 'I tattooed her name, Akshata, on my arm in jail,' he recalls, sitting in the bamboo hut of his father. 'Every time I think of her, it tears me apart.'


The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Sikh activist who died in UK could have been poisoned, says pathologist
The family of a Sikh activist who died suddenly in 2023 have made new calls for an inquest after a pathologist found the result of the postmortem exam 'does not mean that a poisoning can be completely excluded'. Avtar Singh Khanda, 35, died in June 2023, four days after being admitted to a hospital in Birmingham feeling unwell. The official cause of death was acute myeloid leukaemia, a blood cancer. In a letter to the West Midlands coroner Louise Hunt seen by the Guardian, Michael Polak, a barrister acting for Khanda's family, said samples were not tested for 'nerve agents, biological agents or nuclear agents', which could have brought about an aggressive cancer, and urged her to reverse the previous decision not to open an inquest into his death. Khanda's death, which family and friends believe was suspicious, happened against the backdrop of India's alleged involvement in an international campaign of transnational repression targeting Sikh separatists, denied by India. UK police had said there was no reason to suspect foul play in Khanda's case, but Polak's letter includes a witness statement from Jaswinder Singh, a friend of Khanda and an adviser to Sikh Federation UK, who said West Midlands police had confirmed in a 2024 meeting that the police investigation did not include 'reviewing (Khanda's) phones, laptop, talking to his friends, co-workers, searching his home address (or) considering information about attacks on Sikh activists around the world'. Two activists, also linked to the separatist movement, were murdered within weeks of Khanda's death in Canada and Pakistan, while a third survived an attempt on his life in the US. Polak's letter includes the report of consultant forensic pathologist, Dr Ashley Fegan-Earl, who was provided with Khanda's death certificate, hospital notes, and a toxicology report. 'Consideration should be given as to whether the deceased could have been exposed to substances that may result in the development of an acute leukaemia,' he said. In his statement Fegan-Earl, who was commissioned by lawyers acting for Khanda's family, noted that 'toxicological analysis in hospital did not provide any unusual results' in Khanda's case, but said the 'limitations of such analysis must be borne in mind', before describing how 'not all poisons leave behind them a defined clinical signature' and how some toxins required specialist testing to detect. He added: 'I make no criticism of the toxicology that has been carried out in this case, but hope that the above highlights that a negative drug screen does not mean that a poisoning can be completely excluded, particularly with the use of more exotic substances that are not frequently encountered.' Fegan-Earl added: 'I have been involved with a number of cases where there has been suspicion of poisoning by unusual agents. One case … required extremely specialised testing at Kew Gardens … two other cases involved potential poisoning by foreign powers. 'These involved the use of multiple experts above and beyond the normal expertise of toxicologists, including expertise from Porton Down. There are some poisons that can only be identified if they are suspected.' Khanda applied for asylum in the UK in 2016, saying his life was at risk from Indian authorities. His father and uncle were reportedly murdered in extrajudicial killings after advocating for a Sikh homeland, Khalistan, in the 1990s, and from 2015 onwards, it is understood Khanda was on Indian authorities' radar, against a backdrop of unrest in his native Punjab. Singh said in the weeks before his death, Khanda feared he was being followed, while his mother and sister had been detained by authorities searching for the Sikh separatist leader Amritpal Singh Sandhu. Meanwhile, in the letter to the coroner, Polak said Khanda had received 'threats to his life' after a 'wide-ranging campaign' in which he was falsely accused in Indian media of tearing down the Indian flag outside the Indian High Commission in London during March 2023 protests. The protests became a diplomatic incident, making Khanda, a 'chap who delivered parcels in Birmingham, public enemy number one of a superpower', Jaswinder Singh said. 'His funeral was attended by over 5,000 people,' Singh added. 'And not one person has said '(Khanda) told me he was ill, or knew he was ill'. The loss to the community is huge. He'd be the main fixture, the main speaker in every gurdwara. Every weekend, he'd be speaking somewhere. His mum and sister are distraught – there is no closure for them.' Jagjit Singh, Khanda's next of kin in the UK, said: 'We want answers. How did Avatar die amidst all these threats? If it was Russia or Iran involved rather than India, this investigation would have been a whole different scale. Too many questions remain unanswered.' West Midlands police was approached for comment. Birmingham and Solihull coroners office said they were 'unable to comment on specific cases'.


The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Women in India don't want ‘safe zones' – they want to enjoy public spaces as equals
A couple of weeks ago, I was in an upmarket neighbourhood in Delhi for a photoshoot. The sun was already unforgiving, and only a handful of walkers and joggers had dared to step out in the heat. A few children, on their summer break from school, gave curious glances in our direction, but they quickly lost interest and returned to their games. Women walking by offered quick looks, but the men stared – every single one who passed us. Then one went a step further. Mid-shoot, he walked straight up and interrupted us. At first, we smiled – out of habit, out of conditioning – thinking that he would leave. But he didn't. Instead, his questions turned increasingly personal. From 'What are you doing?' to 'Do you have an Insta page?' and 'Where do you stay?', the questions grew increasingly intrusive. He even wanted photography tips. By then, the polite smiles the photojournalist Elke Scholiers and I were wearing had faded. We were irritated, even angry – but when we told him firmly that he was interrupting our work, we still said it with a smile, albeit a strained one. Did he get the message? No! He hung around for longer before finally, reluctantly, shuffling off. This incident got me thinking about several things. First, Elke, a Belgian woman, and I, an Indian woman, remained unfailingly polite the whole time. But we should not have had to do so. What we really needed to do was hold our boundaries – clearly, calmly, without guilt. Not rude, just firm. But we have been taught that even basic assertiveness in women can be too much. And it is here that the larger narrative strikes me – one that plays out across societies that raise women to be nice and polite under all circumstances. Studies back this up. In 2022 research found that incivility is considered a masculine trait and hence women are often judged harshly for being blunt, firm or unapologetically assertive. Furthermore, the institutional response to gender-based violence in India has mostly been to segregate women further. They want women to be confined to 'safe' zones – pink carriages in the metro, pink autos, pink bus tickets, pink parks, pink toilets, separate queues. This segregation does not make public spaces any safer or more comfortable for women – it only reinforces the idea that the public sphere belongs to men. In the process, women are not just isolated – they are exoticised; their presence is made exceptional, even unnatural, to the point of near-erasure. This also makes women's relationship with public spaces purely functional – they must move from point to point with a purpose. More than 50% of women in Indian towns and cities do not leave their homes even once a day – and only 48% of women in urban India are even allowed to leave home alone. With so few women occupying public spaces, our presence continues to feel unfamiliar – something to be stared at, questioned or interrupted. What is needed is to socialise boys and men to be more comfortable around women – as equals, not anomalies. Studies have shown that a majority of Indian boys grow up without meaningful interactions with girls or any kind of education that teaches respect, equality or consent. The idea that women belong at home, in the private sphere, is still deeply rooted. Sign up to Her Stage Hear directly from incredible women from around the world on the issues that matter most to them – from the climate crisis to the arts to sport after newsletter promotion But at the end of it, this isn't just about one man. It's about the culture that raised him, and millions like him. Take for example, a recent controversy where a video surfaced online of an Indian man in Venice making inappropriate comments about a foreign woman. His tone is condescending and lewd. This is not just misogyny; this is the discomfort of a society that believes in keeping its women at home – a society that does not believe women have the same rights to be in public spaces as men do. A society that is so violent towards its women that they prefer to stay away from shared spaces. India's own data backs this up. The latest report from the National Crime Records Bureau shows that 445,256 cases of crime against women were registered during 2022 – an increase of 4% over 2021. More than three-quarters of these cases were either domestic abuse, abductions, sexual assaults or rapes. Every time I am in a public space in India, I find myself unconsciously calculating – my safety, risk, attention, tone – even when I don't need to. And that man's behaviour? Just another periodic reminder of why we move through public spaces with caution, not comfort. Nilanjana Bhowmick is a writer based in Delhi, India. She is the founder of a platform dedicated to empowering women through honest, informed storytelling