Recognition of a Palestinian state has become a punishment for Israel, says its former prime minister
recognise a Palestinian state
,
Britain
,
France
and
Canada
have moved closer to a step that Palestinians have sought for decades.
But their announcements leave unanswered a crucial question: in the gritty context of today's conflict – with
Israel waging war in a shattered Gaza Strip
, threatening to annex the occupied West Bank and administering East Jerusalem as part of its own capital – what is left of
Palestine
to recognise?
They also upend the sequence of the now-moribund Middle East peace process, in which detailed talks between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) were intended to be followed by international recognition of whatever Palestinian state emerged from those discussions.
Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert said the gesture by Israel's western allies of recognising Palestine had taken on a different meaning.
READ MORE
What was intended to be a reward for Palestinians – a celebration for successfully ending more than eight decades of conflict – had in 2025 become a punishment for
Israel
.
Ehud Olmert was the last Israeli prime minister to truly address the complexities of a two-state solution. Photograph: Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images
It was a reflection of 'the real desperation of losing trust', said Olmert, whose premiership between 2006 and 2009 was the last time an Israeli leader seriously tussled with the complexities of a two-state solution.
To Olmert, it is as if they are saying to his successor, prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu: 'You didn't listen to us, to anything we are trying to do – so what else do we have but to use this, something you are so opposed to.'
Olmert said the promised recognitions amount to a threat to dismantle the legacy of Israel's longest-serving premier, who has spent his nearly two decades in power blocking a Palestinian state from taking shape.
Netanyahu's governments have expanded settlements, taken more land into Israeli state control and demonised the internationally accepted Palestinian Authority (PA) as supporters of terrorism akin to Hamas, the militant group that wrested Gaza from the PA in 2007.
Netanyahu has lambasted the British and French proposals as a reward for Hamas, which triggered the current war with its cross-border attacks on southern Israel on October 7th, 2023.
Now Netanyahu, who refuses to take responsibility for the scale of civilian suffering that Israel has wrought on Gaza, faces the prospect of four out of five permanent UN Security Council members recognising the state of Palestine. China and Russia have already done so.
This would deepen Israel's diplomatic isolation as it fights accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice, the UN's highest court, and as the premier himself faces charges of war crimes at the International Criminal Court.
The pledges by three G7 nations to recognise a Palestinian state ahead of the UN General Assembly in September all come with conditions.
Mahmoud Abbas, Palestinian Authority president, speaks during the United Nations General Assembly in New York last year. Photograph: Jeenah Moon/Bloomberg via Getty Images
UK prime minister Keir Starmer's hinge on Netanyahu ending the crisis in Gaza, while Canada is demanding that the PA, run by the ageing and unpopular president Mahmoud Abbas, enacts serious reforms and hold its first elections in nearly two decades.
The announcements have been met with deep hostility from Netanyahu's far-right coalition, which is propped up by parties seeking to annex the West Bank.
The last time Netanyahu – reluctantly – engaged with the peace process was in 2014, under great pressure from the Obama administration.
The process of recognising a Palestinian state would also run up against the limits of international law: the 1933 Montevideo Convention sets out minimum criteria for a state, which include a permanent population, defined borders and a government.
Two-year-old Yazan Abu Foul, held by his mother Naima, is suffering from severe malnutrition as a result of Israel's campaign in Gaza. Photograph: Haitham Imad
That is one reason that Canadian prime minister Mark Carney has insisted that the PA – a semi-autonomous body set up by the Oslo Accords in the 1990s – commit to reforms that would restore a measure of democratic legitimacy to Abbas's government, said a Canadian diplomat briefed on the matter.
Palestinian statehood also faces practical difficulties as formidable today as it did in 1988, when PLO chair Yasser Arafat first set out a formal claim to a Palestinian nation that mingled the poetry of Mahmoud Darwish with the prose of UN resolutions. He created a government in exile, based in Algiers.
Most crucially, Israel controls all the borders and occupies the land on which any Palestinian state could be built. World powers have largely supported Palestinians governing an area that roughly aligns with the 1967 armistice line, which includes the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip – territories wrested from Jordan and Egypt by Israel.
Israel's defence minister Israel Katz, whose government in May announced
plans to build 22 new West Bank settlements
, has said of the push for recognition: 'They will recognise a Palestinian state on paper – and we will build the Jewish-Israeli state on the ground.'
Yet even if western recognition would bring little change in the territory, Palestinians say it would buoy morale and add weight to the beleaguered PLO's claim to statehood.
Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu with US president Donald Trump at the White House. Photograph: Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times
'It would still be very useful because it confirms the right of self-determination for the Palestinian people, which Israel is trying to eliminate,' said Mustafa Barghouti, a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council and regular interlocutor with western diplomats.
'The issue of recognition is a political matter – admitting into law what these countries always speak about, the two-state solution.'
Palestinian delegations to the UK, France or Canada would also become fully fledged embassies, getting diplomatic rights and immunities, and able to sign treaties as a state.
'States have allies, allies have responsibilities,' said a Palestinian diplomat based in the UK. 'Until then, all we have as Palestinians are friends.'
These recognitions would undermine Israel's traditional argument that it is not alone in opposing unilateral Palestinian statehood, said Victor Kattan, who has served as a legal adviser to the Palestinian Negotiations Affairs Department in Ramallah.
Some 147 countries already recognise a Palestinian state, but the addition of the UK, France and Canada would represent a significant shift on the part of powerful western states traditionally seen as Israel's unflinching allies.
That shift is especially resonant on the part of the UK, the colonial power that administered Mandate Palestine after the first World War, issuing the Balfour Declaration that paved the way for a Jewish state to take shape on Palestinian land and fuelling a conflict that rages decades later.
'The Israelis had always had a strong 'moral minority' argument, that so long as some of the major western states . . . still don't recognise Palestine, there will always be a question mark over its claims to statehood and sovereignty,' said Kattan, who now teaches international law at the University of Nottingham.
Protesters hold a banner showing starving Palestinian children during a rally in solidarity with the Palestinian people, at Sana'a University in Yemen. Photograph: Yahya Arhab/EPA
'But now that that's crumbling – it looks like nearly everybody is going to recognise Palestine, except for the United States – it greatly strengthens Palestinian claims to statehood.'
The moves by the UK, France and Canada have infuriated the White House, with US president Donald Trump saying they pose a threat to trade talks with Canada. The US's long-standing policy has been to resist attempts by supporters of Palestine to assume some of the markers of statehood.
On Thursday, the state department imposed sanctions on the PLO, for among other things 'taking actions to internationalise its conflict with Israel such as through the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice'.
Other diplomatic efforts to upgrade Palestinian claims to statehood are also under way, said western diplomats based in Jerusalem, including an attempt to upgrade the fledgling state of Palestine's UN 'observer status' to full membership.
The US has twice vetoed those attempts, most recently in April 2024.
One of the diplomats said: 'They will undoubtedly veto again – but this time, they will be running against a large wave of international opinion, not just a technical vote that is ignored as a matter of course.'
– Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
International recognition of Palestinian statehood
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
If states can be shamed into action, Israel will be forced to change
Earlier this week, the renowned Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem released Our Genocide, an analysis of Israeli policy towards Palestinians since October 7, 2023. The report finds that, since October 2023, the Israeli regime has been responsible for carrying out genocide against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. The finding of genocide is based on two prior conclusions, supported by evidence gathered by the organisation: Mass crimes by Israel are being 'perpetrated systematically, as part of a coordinated attack aimed at annihilating all facets of life in the Gaza Strip'; The intent of Israel's political and military leadership is to 'irreversibly destroy Palestinian life'. The international community, B'Tselem argues, has not only failed to halt this genocide, but enabled it 'through statements affirming Israel's right to self-defense" or active support — including the shipment of weapons and ammunition' to Israel. The foundations for the genocide, the report states, have been laid through Israel's settler-colonial project, notably three of its fundamental elements: Apartheid, imposing separation, and ethnic cleansing; systematic and institutionalised violence against Palestinians, perpetrated with impunity; and the institutionalised dehumanisation of Palestinians, including through the framing of them as an existential threat. B'Tselem points to the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023 — which it finds 'included many war crimes and likely also crimes against humanity' — as 'the catalyst for the ruling system to carry out genocide". The B'Tselem report is based on 20 months of research and documentation of human rights violations committed by Israel against Palestinians. It was released on the same day as an equally damning and clear report by a second Israeli organisation, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, which has concluded the following: 'The destruction of life-sustaining systems, the cumulative patterns of destruction, the bodily and mental trauma inflicted, and the direct killing of civilians, when understood in light of the implemented policy and the public rhetoric, make clear that Israel's campaign in Gaza constitutes genocide under international law.' In publishing their reports, the Israeli organisations join a host of other internationally recognised human rights organisations — first and foremost Palestinian — in describing the slaughter being perpetrated by Israel in Gaza as genocide. On October 13, 2023, in light of the Israeli onslaught and statements by high-ranking Israeli politicians that followed the Hamas attacks of October 7 that year, Al-Haq, Al Mezan Centre for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights issued a statement calling on the international community to urgently intervene to protect the Palestinian people from a genocide by Israel. The Palestinian organisations warned that other states not only had an obligation under international law to intervene to prevent the potential genocide, but that they may be held responsible if they failed to take all measures within their power to do so. Since then, all three Palestinian organisations have continued to document the mass crimes being perpetrated by Israel. They have denounced its actions as amounting to genocide, and have called on all states do all within their power to bring it to an end. Their work, and that of other Palestinian human rights defenders, has reverberated around the world It has been reinforced by international human rights organisations and UN mechanisms. However, it has been cruelly, callously ignored and disregarded by many states which continue to defend Israel's actions, provide weapons and other equipment for its army, and allow the crimes to continue. The result: A famine engineered by Israel with international support; more than 60,000 Palestinians killed by Israel with international support, including more than 1,000 Palestinians killed trying to access humanitarian aid; cities completely destroyed, and millions displaced with international support; hospitals, schools, mosques, and churches bombed one by one by Israel with international support; more than 100,000 Palestinians injured by Israel with international support; and companies profiting from these crimes with international support. The atrocities go on. All the while Israeli cabinet ministers proclaim that Gaza will be entirely destroyed and cleared of all Palestinians in what B'Tselem calls 'the exact definition of genocide'. UN special rapporteur Mary Lawlor: 'International belief in a system of universal human rights has been eviscerated by the atrocities permitted to happen since October 7.' And what is the response by States? Crumbs dropped from the sky by former colonial powers and Middle Eastern states; an internal conclusion by the EU that there are 'indications' Israel is in breach of its human rights obligations, but no concrete measures to pressure it to abide by them; and the British government arguing in court that there is no evidence of genocide in Gaza. Where is the action? It is with the people in the streets, communities, associations, and organisations all around the world who are organising and protesting to demand an end to Israel's crimes, apartheid, and occupation — doing so despite being beaten by police, designated as terrorists, and smeared as antisemites. Action is with the Palestinian people among them and in Gaza and the West Bank, supporting one another despite the bombardments, massacres, displacement, and starvation. It is with Palestinian human rights defenders and their allies in Israel, such as B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, documenting these crimes and demanding justice. Recent days have shown what an increase in international pressure can do as aid trucks were finally permitted into Gaza by Israel, albeit on an extremely limited basis and while the killing continues. This is far too little, far too late for far too many, but it does demonstrate that if states can be shamed into action, Israel's behaviour will be forced to change International belief in a system of universal human rights has been eviscerated by the atrocities permitted to happen since October 7. In order to rescue the remnants of this system and resuscitate that which remains, the atrocities must stop, Israel must be held accountable, and the Palestinians must be guaranteed their full rights — including their right to self-determination. Mary Lawlor is the UN special rapporteur on human rights defenders
Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Israel's military chief opposes Gaza war expansion
Israel 's military chief has pushed back against Binyamin Netanyahu 's plans to seize areas of Gaza it doesn't already control, three Israeli officials said, as the prime minister faces increasing pressure over the war both at home and abroad. During a tense, three-hour meeting on Tuesday, Eyal Zamir, the military chief of staff, warned the prime minister that taking the rest of Gaza could trap the military in the territory, which it withdrew from two decades ago, and could lead to harm to the hostages being held there, the sources briefed on the meeting said. The Israeli military says it already controls 75 per cent of Gaza after nearly two years of war, which began when militant group Hamas attacked southern Israeli communities in October 2023. It has repeatedly opposed imposing military rule, annexing the territory and rebuilding Jewish settlements there – policies advocated by some government members. Mr Netanyahu is under intense international pressure to reach a ceasefire in the coastal enclave, which has been reduced to rubble in the fighting. Most of the population of about two million has been displaced multiple times and aid groups say residents are on the verge of famine. The UN has called reports about a possible expansion of Israel's military operations in Gaza 'deeply alarming' if true. READ MORE The military, which accuses Hamas of operating among civilians, has at times avoided areas where intelligence suggested hostages were held and former captives have said their captors threatened to kill them if Israeli forces approached. Mr Netanyahu told Mr Zamir that so far the military had failed to bring about the release of the hostages, the officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. Most of those freed so far came about as a result of diplomatic negotiations. Israel's military chief Eyal Zamir pushed back against Binyamin Netanyahu's plans to seize areas of Gaza it doesn't already control. Photograph: Menahem Kahana/AFP via Getty Images Defence minister Israel Katz wrote on X Wednesday that the military chief has both the right and the duty to voice his opinion, but said that the military would carry out the government's decisions until all war objectives are achieved. The prime minister's office confirmed the meeting with Mr Zamir on Tuesday but declined to comment further and the military did not respond to a request for comment. The prime minister is scheduled to discuss military plans for Gaza with other ministers on Thursday. A fourth source said Mr Netanyahu wants to expand military operations in Gaza to put pressure on Hamas. Mr Netanyahu, who in May said that Israel would control all of Gaza, leads the most right-wing coalition government in Israel's history and some of his key partners have in the past threatened to quit if the government ended the war. [ Analysis: Resignation of army chief over Gaza occupation would further divide Israel Opens in new window ] Following a 40-minute meeting with the prime minister on Wednesday, opposition leader Yair Lapid told reporters he had advised Mr Netanyahu that the public was not interested in continuing the war and that a full military takeover would be a very bad idea. A public poll last month by Israel's Channel 12 also showed support for a diplomatic deal that would end the war and secure the release of the hostages. There are 50 hostages still being held in Gaza, of whom at least 20 are believed to be alive. Videos released by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, another militant group in Gaza, last week of two extremely emaciated captives triggered international condemnation. Close to 200 Palestinians have died of starvation in Gaza since the war began, about half of them children, according to Gaza's health ministry. More than 20 died on Wednesday when a truck believed to be carrying food overturned as it was swarmed by a desperate crowd, according to local health authorities. The latest ceasefire talks in Qatar broke down last month. Hamas insists any deal must lead to a permanent end to the war, while Israel accuses the group of lacking sincerity about giving up power afterwards and says it must be defeated. An expansion of the military offensive in heavily populated areas would likely be devastating. 'Where will we go?' said Tamer Al-Burai, a displaced Palestinian living at the edge of Deir Al Balah in central Gaza. 'Should people jump into the sea if the tanks rolled in, or wait to die under the rubble of their houses? We want an end to this war, it is enough, enough,' he told Reuters by phone. [ Gaza is also a war on the human instinct for compassion Opens in new window ] The war in Gaza has also overextended Israel's military, which has a small standing army and has had to repeatedly mobilise reservists. It is not clear if more reservists would be needed to expand operations and take more territory. The military continued to carry out air strikes across Gaza on Wednesday, killing at least 135 people in the past 24 hours, the Gaza health ministry said, with the death toll since the beginning of the conflict now at more than 61,000, mostly civilians, it says. About 1,200 people were killed, including more than 700 civilians, and 251 hostages taken to Gaza after the Hamas attack on Israel, according to Israeli tallies. – Reuters
Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Resignation of army chief over Gaza occupation would further divide Israel
Israel 's top general has warned that the country will be falling into a strategic trap that endangers the lives of hostages if it pushes ahead with plans to occupy the entire Gaza Strip . Israel's cabinet is expected to convene on Thursday to approve such a move, despite the opposition of the top military echelon. A senior official close to Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu was quoted as saying this week: 'The die is cast – we are going for a full occupation of the Gaza Strip. There will be operations even in areas where hostages are being held. If the chief of staff doesn't agree, he should resign.' Israel Defense Forces (IDF) chief of staff Lieut Gen Eyal Zamir was personally appointed by Netanyahu five months ago, as part of the policy to replace generals connected to the debacle of the October 7th 2023 Hamas attack. He was chosen, partly to appease Netanyahu's right-wing base, as an 'aggressive' general who could defeat Hamas. READ MORE But, with the IDF already controlling some 75 per cent of the coastal enclave and following the collapse of the Gaza ceasefire talks, Zamir has made clear his opposition to a manoeuvre to conquer the entire territory. Instead, he presented a plan to seal off Gaza city, the central refugee camps and the Muwassi humanitarian zone in the south, enabling Israeli forces to carry out what the plan called pinpoint raids against remaining Hamas militants. But Netanyahu rejected the plan, opting for a full-scale assault despite the dangers, and issuing a statement saying the army was 'ready to implement any decision the security cabinet makes'. In August 2024 Hamas gunmen murdered six hostages being held in a tunnel in Rafah when they believed IDF troops were approaching. The IDF is concerned that the remaining 20 hostages believed to be alive will be in danger if it advances into areas where the hostages are held. Militants guarding the bodies of 30 deceased hostages may also flee or be killed, raising the possibility that the bodies will be lost forever. [ Egyptian president condemns Israel over reported plan for full military takeover of Gaza Opens in new window ] Zamir is also worried by the possibility of high IDF casualties and about burnout among combat soldiers after 22 months of fighting, particularly among reservists who have served hundreds of days in uniform since the start of the war. An escalation of the war will likely require a substantial call-up of additional reservists, while Netanyahu's government is working to ensure that ultra-Orthodox Jews do not have to enlist. According to some analysts, Zamir will be forced to resign if the cabinet approves an occupation of all Gaza, causing further division in Israeli society, with polls showing more than 60 per cent of people support a ceasefire to end the war.
