
‘British bidder' for Telegraph vows to fight on
The leader of a bid to disrupt the £500m sale of The Telegraph to a consortium led by RedBird Capital Partners has vowed to fight 'to the very end'.
Dovid Efune, the publisher of The New York Sun website, made an appearance on Sky News on Sunday to insist that his 'British bid for The Telegraph is alive and well, and not going anywhere'.
Mr Efune has secured financial backing from the hedge fund manager Jeremy Hosking and Nadhim Zahawi, the former cabinet minister. They are attempting to contrast their Britishness with RedBird, an American private equity firm which is seeking to acquire The Telegraph alongside British minority investors.
Mr Efune faces a steep challenge. On Friday RedBird announced an agreement in principle to take majority ownership of The Telegraph from IMI, the UAE's media investment arm.
The British-born publisher said: 'What's been announced is an agreement in principle. And if the history of The Telegraph's ownership saga teaches us anything, it's that the ownership of The Telegraph and, frankly, any other crown jewel of British public life, will not be determined by means of a press release.
'The British public will yet have their say via their elected representatives, The Telegraph's staff and The Telegraph's readers will have their say, as will the rest of the British press.'
RedBird IMI, a joint venture between RedBird and the UAE, majority funded by the Gulf state, was blocked from taking full control of The Telegraph last year following an outcry over press freedom.
Now, RedBird's founder Gerry Cardinale is working to make RedBird the controlling shareholder, with IMI expected to retain a passive stake of up to 15pc.
Mr Efune said: 'There are quite a lot of questions surrounding RedBird themselves, obviously – where does their capital come from?'
Mr Cardinale, who also controls AC Milan and is set to become a major shareholder in the Hollywood studio Paramount, has said none of the money that RedBird will use to acquire The Telegraph will be drawn from sovereign sources.
Mr Efune added: 'I suspect that because of all of these questions that surround it, there will need to be a public interest intervention, likely an in-depth investigation, which means the saga of The Telegraph could take another year to resolve.'
Enders Analysis, a media industry research firm, said last week that Mr Cardinale's status as a newcomer to news publishing meant the regulatory process could be smooth and complete by September. The potential involvement of Lord Rothermere, the owner of The Daily Mail, as a minority shareholder alongside RedBird could complicate matters.
But it is unclear how in practice Mr Efune hopes to disrupt the sale. IMI has publicly endorsed RedBird's planned takeover of The Telegraph, saying it will 'secure its future and enable it to thrive for years to come'.
Mr Efune, who prior to acquiring the defunct New York Sun and reviving it as a subscription website was the publisher of Algemeiner, a Jewish community newspaper, has shown great persistence in his pursuit of The Telegraph, however. He emerged as the winner of an auction back in early October last year, but has struggled since to raise the necessary funds.
Even now, by his own account Mr Efune's consortium has only 'the bulk' of the capital, although he has said he remains in talks with potential backers.
His 11th-hour appeal for more time has come wrapped in the Union flag.
He said: 'At the end of the day, I expect that most Britons would want to see The Telegraph in British hands should there be a choice – and there is a choice, a clear choice, and we are 100pc committed to seeing it through.'
The approach won rhetorical support this weekend from Lord Ashcroft, the Conservative donor and publisher. In a post on X he said Mr Efune was 'seeking British investors for an alternative to foreign ownership … I wish him well'.
Mr Efune has not said whether he envisages the UAE retaining a stake and has not always been so focused on securing British finance. He initially sought to raise funding from American hedge funds. They all declined to invest in his proposed deal after he was named preferred bidder.
In November it was reported that Sir Mohamed Mansour, the Egyptian-born billionaire and former Conservative party treasurer, was in advanced discussions to bankroll the bid.
A former minister under the dictatorship of Hosni Mubarak, Sir Mohamed ruled out participating, following questions from The Telegraph. They covered topics including the regulatory scrutiny his political past and business interest might face.
Mr Efune then turned to Leon Black, the billionaire former boss of the Wall Street giant Apollo Global Management.
Mr Black pulled out of detailed discussions to back the bid after The Telegraph asked questions about potential regulatory scrutiny of his regrettable relationship with the paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, and legal problems related to it.
These incidents appear to have frustrated Mr Efune, who on Friday complained that the 'turbulent undertaking' of raising finance had faced 'unwanted interference'.
One possible tactic for Mr Efune's consortium is a legal challenge against the Government's handling of The Telegraph if and when it decides to approve the RedBird takeover. Mr Hosking is said by those who have worked directly with him to have an unusually strong appetite for litigation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour is doing almost everything badly, say voters in poll showing huge public dissatisfaction with Starmer over immigration, the economy and the NHS
The public think Labour is handling almost every major issue poorly, according to bleak new polling. A survey of more than 8,000 Britons has shown that most think the Government is doing badly on all but two of 15 important policies. The YouGov research found that people are particularly scathing about the way Sir Keir Starmer 's administration is tackling three crucial areas. 'Undoubtedly, the public do mostly think the government are handling many key issues badly, with this particularly noticeable on the three issues that have consistently topped our most important issues tracker since the election: the NHS, immigration and the economy,' the pollster said. Three-quarters think immigration is being handled badly, with a majority (52 per cent) saying ministers are doing 'very badly', while only one in seven (14 per cent) give Labour positive marks. Seven in ten say the economy and NHS are being handled badly, in surveys carried out since May, compared with just one in five who support ministers' efforts. In addition, more than six in ten say the Government is doing a bad job on welfare (69 per cent), housing (66), crime (64) and inflation (62). The only faintly positive result concerns Labour's handling of terrorism, where 37 per cent say the Government is doing well and 34 per cent disagree. And on defence the public are split which 34 per cent disapproving of ministers' approach and 41 per cent backing it. However YouGov pointed out that 'the last Conservative government was also seen as doing better than average on these two issues, particularly terrorism, suggesting credit may not be due to Labour for managing these issues uniquely well'. It comes after Sir Keir plumbed new depths of unpopularity in YouGov's ratings tracker, with even half of Labour's own voters now holding an unfavourable view of him. In detailed findings that may particularly alarm No 10, the survey found that women have a particularly negative view of the Government. Only 16 per cent of women questioned said ministers were handling health well, compared with 26 per cent of men. 'Although the 20-point gender difference on the handling of the NHS is exceptionally large, the pattern is not unusual, with the government's net handling score lower among women on all but one issue polled (transport),' YouGov said. It comes amid claims five million pensioners face paying extra tax to claw back their winter fuel allowance. A complicated solution being mooted to defuse fury at Labour slashing the benefit - worth up to £300 - would see it handed to all the older generation this season. However, around half - with annual incomes over £37,000 - would repay the money later through higher tax bills. The idea has been condemned by unions amid fears bereaved families could be hit with unexpected demands for cash. Labour insiders have voiced alarm at the 'optics' of trying to recoup the allowance from the estates of those who died after getting it. Introducing a tough means test on winter fuel allowance was one of the first announcements Rachel Reeves made after entering No11, and has been blamed for triggering the dramatic slump in Labour's popularity. Only those on the lowest incomes, receiving pensioner credit, have been entitled to the handout. Keir Starmer dramatically announced a U-turn last month, without saying what exactly was being proposed or when it would take effect.


BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
Germany's Merz to meet Trump with Ukraine war high on agenda
Update: Date: 15:58 BST Title: Merz's trip comes one day after 50% steel tariffs kick in Content: Tariffs are likely to be high on the German chancellor's agenda. Merz's trip to Washington DC comes just one day after a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports kicked in. The move hikes import taxes on the metals, which are used in everything from cars to canned food, for the second time since March. Trump says the measures are intended to secure the future of the American steel industry. Critics say the protections could wreak havoc on steel producers outside the US, spark retaliation from trade partners, and come at a punishing cost for American users of the metals. The UK has been temporarily spared from the tariff. Trump said in the order that the UK needed "different treatment" because of the US-UK Economic Prosperity Deal (EPD) signed on 8 May 2025. Trump later added that the US might increase the tariff on the UK "on or after 9July 2025" if it "determines that the United Kingdom has not complied with relevant aspects of the EPD". Update: Date: 15:51 BST Title: Merz says he is 'well prepared' for Trump talks Content: Bernd Debusmann JrReporting from the White House Merz is staying at Blair House, just across from the White House. Just a short while ago, Chancellor Merz held a short press briefing for traveling German journalists at Blair House, the location just across the street from the White House where he's staying. In his remarks, Merz said he was "looking forward" to the visit and is "well-prepared". "Nato will be a major topic," Merz told reporters. "As will trade and Ukraine." Merz also suggested he's ready for any potential ambush if Trump or his team bring up Germanys far-right AfD or freedom of speech issues in Germany. "When we talk about German domestic politics, I will use clear words," he said. Update: Date: 15:46 BST Title: The good, the bad and the ugly of President Trump's bilaterals Content: A meeting between two world leaders or representatives isn't always front page news. However, the way President Trump's bilateral meetings have gone in the past few months, the outcomes are harder to predict. Back in February, Indian Prime Minister Modi hailed a "mega partnership" with the US during a two-day visit, as he and Trump agreed on a deal for Delhi to import more American oil and gas. Later in the month, Trump told a joint news conference with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer: "We like each other, frankly, and we like each other's country.' He seemed dazzled when Starmer presented him with a letter from King Charles in the Oval Office. The next day, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky faced an extraordinary dressing down in front of the world's media, after Trump and Vice-President JD Vance demanded that he show more gratitude for US support in its fight against Russia's invasion. And in May, Trump ambushed South African President Cyril Ramaphosa during a live news conference with widely discredited claims of a "white genocide" in South Africa. Update: Date: 15:45 BST Title: What's on the agenda for Trump and Merz? Content: Though there isn't an official list of topics that Trump and Merz plan to address at their first bilateral meeting, the German embassy in Washington has said that war and trade will be on the agenda. 'Key topics will include bilateral relations as well as international issues such as Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, the situation in the Middle East, and trade policy,' the embassy said. Merz has been a hard-line supporter of Ukraine and its president Volodymyr Zelensky, someone with whom Trump has had his fair share of contention. Germany has also pushed back on Trump's tariffs, particularly those on steel and cars, which would heavily impact German manufacturers. As other world leaders have visited Washington for similar meetings over the last few months, that's been a major talking point. Update: Date: 15:40 BST Title: German chancellor to meet Trump in the Oval Office Content: Welcome to our live coverage of the bilateral meeting between US President Donald Trump and newly elected German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Merz, a member of the Christian Democratic Party (CDU), was elected on 6 May, and this is the first official meeting between the two leaders. After initial greetings, Trump and Merz will head to the Oval Office where they will hold what's known as a "spray" - when reporters are invited to shout questions at the two. Stay with us as we bring you the latest.


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
The ONS scandal that has made your bills higher than they should be
Is there a bigger numerical oopsie than getting inflation wrong? Given how important this data point is, and how profoundly it affects all of us, it is hard to find one. Yet this is what happened in April, also known as 'misery month' because of the slew of tax and price rises that took effect and delivered a vicious kick in the guts to the average consumer. These price rises were always expected to send the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) northwards, but not to the extent that the official data showed. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) put CPI inflation at 3.5 per cent, well ahead of the consensus City forecast (3.3 per cent). The trouble is, it got its sums wrong. It has now emerged that the actual number was 3.4 per cent. The cause? Dodgy data on vehicle excise duty – car tax to you and me – submitted by the Department for Transport (DfT) and used in the calculation. An error of 10 basis points mightn't seem like such a big deal. It doesn't look like a big deal on paper – but it really is. That number feeds through to businesses' pricing decisions and to wage settlements. It influences a dizzying array of contracts, too. The older Retail Prices Index (RPI) for the month was also wrong, coming in at 4.5 per cent when it should have been 4.4 per cent, meaning mobile phone contracts with built-in rises linked to RPI increased by more than they should have. The biggest problem, however, is the key role CPI inflation plays in the formulation of monetary policy. The Bank of England 's target is set at two per cent. How are the rate-setters on its Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) expected to set interest rates to hit that if the numbers are constantly moving? Needless to say, getting interest rate policy wrong can choke off growth, leading to higher unemployment, and even recession. So this is no small SNAFU. It matters. It is, in fact, a scandal. Wait a minute, I hear you say, isn't the problem here with the DoT? Surely that's where the red faces should be. Well, yes, but here's the thing: the pointy heads who pore over this stuff when it comes out were ringing alarm bells over the DfT data before the ONS admitted to the error. If outside commentators could smell a rat then you would expect the same to be true of the ONS. At the very least, you would expect someone there to pick up the phone and ask the DoT to double-check its figures. The ONS admits as much – albeit en passant – when it says in its statement that it is 'reviewing our quality assurance processes for external data sources in light of this issue.' The Office for Statistics Regulation was clearly on the right track when, in a recent interim report on the economic stats put out by the ONS, it highlighted that staff had said 'early warnings of emerging problems' were not always welcomed. This begs the question that, if someone did see something off, were they listened to? The report was prompted by signs of institutional weakness. The unreliability of the labour force survey, closely watched by both the MPC and the government, has been a bone of contention for some time. Errors in trade figures were also identified from January 2023 to December 2024. Andrew Bailey, the governor of the Bank of England, was asked about the impact of poor ONS data on interest rate policy at a hearing of the Treasury Committee on Tuesday. 'It does have a bearing on it,' he said. 'We certainly spend more time on it and that's obviously what we should do, given the uncertainty.' That might sound bland but central bankers choose their words carefully and with good reason: they move markets. It's probably overegging it a bit to say that a comma in the wrong place in one of Mr Bailey's speeches could create a crisis, but only a bit. Participants pore over his missives for clues on future interest rate policy. Billions of pounds can be moved if they sense a hardening or softening of the MPC's stance. Behind the scenes, I suspect Bailey has been a good deal more blunt. Despite the error, the ONS said it would not change the inflation figure 'in line with policy' in this area. That policy is partly informed by the sheer number of contracts that depend on the CPI and/or the RPI. Things would get very complicated if money was moving back and forth every five minutes as a result of the inflation data being subject to constant revision. So there will be no mobile phone refunds. However, this also means the records will forever be wrong. Tables and graphs and suchlike will require an asterisk from hereon out. This is an embarrassment when good data has never been so important. The ONS simply has to get its house in order. ONS chief Sir Ian Diamond resigned last month on health grounds. Stopping the rot must be at the top of his successor's inbox.