South Africa's budget 3. 0: A year of fiscal upheaval and strategic changes
As the months slip into May, the fiscal landscape continues to evolve, presenting both challenges and opportunities for the economy.
Image: Ziphozonke Lushaba / Independent Newspapers
In a financial milieu punctuated by unexpected shifts, South Africa's Finance Minister, Enoch Godongwana, unveiled his third National Budget for the fiscal year, titled Budget 3.0.
The intricate journey to this point has been nothing short of extraordinary, marked by the postponement of the first budget and the withdrawal of the second due to legal wrangles.
As the months slip into May, the fiscal landscape continues to evolve, presenting both challenges and opportunities for the economy.
Joubert Botha, Head of the Tax and Legal practice at KPMG in Southern Africa, offered insights into the key elements of this revised budget, focusing on the implications for taxpayers and the broader economic framework.
'This year's budget has been marked by a comprehensive reevaluation of tax revenue projections," Botha said, reflecting on the substantial R61.9 billion downward revision of anticipated revenues.
This significant adjustment signals the government's cautious approach amid ongoing economic uncertainty.
One of the most discussed aspects of Budget 3.0 was the decision to forego an increase in Value Added Tax (VAT) that had stirred controversy in public discourse.
Botha said that there would be no expansion of the zero-rated basket nor any hike in VAT rates.
Instead, the budget placed emphasis on an inflationary increase in the fuel levy, a move set to stimulate various facets of fiscal support.
Moreover, amid the fiscal recalibrations, the government has allocated R7.5 billion in funding to the South African Revenue Authority (SARS).
This infusion of resources aims to enhance tax collection efforts, with projections of raising an additional R20 to R50 billion.
The strategic focus on modernisation of SARS is set to bolster efficiency, ensuring the institution can adeptly tackle its collections mandate in an ever-evolving economic landscape.
Notably, Budget 3.0 does not accommodate inflationary adjustments to personal income tax brackets or medical tax credits, a feature that many taxpayers will keenly feel, particularly as inflation continues to challenge household budgets.
In contrast, adjustments to excise duties on alcohol and tobacco have been made, symbolising the government's stance on ensuring that certain sectors contribute fairly within the tax framework.
As the budgetary processes unfolds, there is an anticipation of new tax measures to be proposed in the upcoming disbursements.
Botha elucidated that further adjustments in the budget could herald innovative approaches to stimulate growth and address national priorities more effectively.
"In summary, South Africa's Budget 3.0 encapsulates the narrative of a nation grappling with economic challenges while attempting to chart a strategic path forward. The absence of immediate VAT increases, alongside targeted funding for SARS and moderated adjustments in other tax areas, creates a complex but compelling fiscal tapestry as the country endeavours to stabilise and grow its economy amid numerous headwinds," Botha said.
BUSINESS REPORT
Visit: www.businessreport.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
14 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Treasury stands firm on unaffordability of continued extension of SRD grant
CAPE TOWN - Treasury is standing firm on the unaffordability of the continued extension of the social relief of distress (SRD) grant introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic. It has budgeted R35.2 billion to pay the grant in this financial year, while also appealing a high court ruling that it relaxes its criteria for eligibility to include thousands more people. Delivering the second version of the budget in March, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announced that the grant would be extended for yet another year. That is unchanged in the current version of the budget. ALSO READ: • SARS expects to see impact of increase in tax collection efforts from Q2 • Expanding list of tax-free food items won't benefit poorer households: Treasury • Treasury defends fuel levy increase However, responding to public submissions on the budget in Parliament on Friday, Treasury's head of public finance, Rendani Randela, said that Treasury has no choice but to appeal January's high court ruling that it include thousands more to receive the monthly R370 stipend. "That judgment is a fiscal risk on its own. And again, we are looking at the bigger picture here. Social assistance is not the only programme that we have, we also have other social assistance programmes outside the Department of Social Development." With 61% of the national budget going towards the social wage, Randela said Treasury believes that the existing social support net covers many of those also eligible for the SRD grant and double-dipping has to be avoided. Government is yet to take a decision on persistent calls from civil society for the SRD grant to become a basic income grant. "There's no way that we can't have a mechanism to filter out undeserving recipients of these social assistance programmes. That's why we are appealing that judgment because the way it is, if we don't challenge it, it is unaffordable."
IOL News
17 hours ago
- IOL News
Generation Alpha: Inheriting property or inequality?
Will Generation Alpha be able to break into the formal property market or will their property future be the informal one? Image: Henk Kruger/Independent Newspapers June marks the beginning of Youth Month in South Africa and also marks almost 50 years since the Soweto Uprising of 1976. It honours the role of youth in the fight against apartheid and it also serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by young people today and their potential for future contribution. As the youngest cohort of youth in our country – Generation Alpha (born between 2010 and 2024) – come of age, almost half a century post-1976, experts say South Africa's property sector should be bracing for a generational shift not seen before considering tech fluency, social awareness and shifting values. However, given the South African context, how much better off will this generation be than those of 1976, many of whom could be Gen Alpha's grandparents? And, in a nation still confronting its structural inequalities, how will it play out when this generation – the oldest of whom is now 15 – make it to adulthood and want to enter the property market? Nomfundo Molemohi, uMaStandi portfolio manager: Eastern and Western Cape, painting a bleak yet realistic picture: 'With so many young people unemployed, poverty rising and the cost of housing out of reach, it's hard to see how this generation, especially our black children, will become homeowners. 'They dream of owning land and building a future, but the road is heavy with obstacles. Even those who are lucky to have family homes often can't afford the legal costs to transfer it into their names or don't know how to take ownership. 'This Generation Alpha is carrying the weight of South Africa's past and present struggles and for some, the hope of a better life may lie beyond our borders.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 1976 to today Post-apartheid South Africa has seen an increase in property ownership for black South Africans, a significant shift from the discriminatory practices of the past where black people had severely restricted property rights. The government has also implemented land reform initiatives to address the historical injustices of land dispossession under apartheid. Despite some progress however, the legacy of apartheid continues to shape property ownership patterns. Inequality persists, and many black South Africans still face challenges in accessing land and property ownership. Affordability issues 'It will certainly be a generation that feels the affect of declining housing affordability,' says property economist, Associate Professor Francois Viruly of UCT, speaking to Independent Media property journalist Given Majola. Even as interest rates ease slightly, property prices remain out of reach for many, especially in urban centres where the cost of living is rising and wages are stagnant. Unemployment among youth aged 15 to 34 (Gen Z and a portion of Millennials) remains high – 46.1% in Q1 2025, according to Stats SA – squeezing the dream of homeownership further out of reach. This means that nearly half of South Africa's young people are unemployed. 'We should be concerned about high youth unemployment. It would also obviously dampen the possibilities of investment in property,' says Viruly. Yet, he believes Gen Alpha may grow up more aware of the importance of property – particularly in communities where ownership has now become possible. 'Increasingly the opportunities associated with property ownership would be discussed around the dinner table – especially in the townships. This is also a generation that will benefit from property inheritance through the legal transfer of properties.' Government and NGOs have been hard at work to try sort out the title-deed issues plaguing many township households who do not have valid title deeds in effect killing the hopes of using the property as an asset. It remains one of the bigger barriers to asset wealth in the country. Inherited wealth According to new research by Rebecca Simson and Mina Mahmoudzadeh (2024), the racial wealth divide in South Africa remains stark, despite some progress. Using probate records, the researchers found that 45% of white South African adults own inheritable wealth of at least R250 000. Among black adults, that figure drops to just 3%. Their findings also show that black South Africans who do leave estates tend to be concentrated in former townships and homelands – suggesting that this emerging black middle class owns property acquired only after apartheid, with limited access to historically white-owned assets or areas of high capital appreciation. The study states that while black South Africans are increasingly formal property owners, structural inequality, localised appreciation and contested inheritance processes are slowing intergenerational wealth accumulation. Success in Gen A era For Gen Alpha, traditional success markers such as stable jobs, financial security, homeownership are being redefined. Flexibility, community and digital integration now sit alongside asset ownership. Vusi Vokwana, the founder of Kasi Catalyst, which helps drive and facilitate outside big investment in the townships, believes Gen A 'will reshape SA's property landscape, being the offspring of the 'quiet quitters', the rockstars who coined the phrase, 'daily work is giving slavery''. 'What they will show us is patience doesn't solve systemic discrimination and generational exclusion, our norms don't apply to them. If they're anything like Gen Z, they will show us flames while affecting real change.' The future of housing According to Christian Hamann, a researcher at the Gauteng City-Region Observatory, the only way to bridge historical divides in property access is through localised integration. In an article in The Conversation he says: 'Opportunities for racial and socio-economic integration can only be created on a very local level if a diversity of housing options is provided in neighbourhoods.' In practice, this means designing new developments that accommodate a range of income levels – pairing upmarket townhouses with more affordable apartments and social housing. 'There should be upmarket townhouses alongside more affordable flats and social housing developments,' Hamann told The Conversation. Split market, split future The divide is growing clearer: while some Gen Alphas may inherit homes and capital, many others will be priced out or forced to rent long-term. Experts say that wealthier Gen Alphas of all races will leverage family wealth to buy homes in secure, eco-conscious estates while lower- and middle-income Gen Alphas will fuel a growing rental sector and build-to-rent developments, unable to cross the ownership threshold.
IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
Point of view: understanding the impact of eFiling fraud on South African taxpayers
Discover the troubling findings of the Tax Ombud's eFiling Profile Hijacking survey, revealing the extent of fraud affecting South African taxpayers and the urgent need for improved security measures. Image: Ziphozonke Lushaba / Independent Newspapers The latest findings from the Tax Ombud's eFiling Profile Hijacking survey paint a stark picture of the vulnerabilities within South Africa's tax system. The Tax Ombud, Yanga Mputa, presented these findings this week. The numbers alone tell a worrying story: nearly half of the respondents were registered tax practitioners, while a significant portion, 32.7%, were individual taxpayers. The hijacking of tax profiles is not a minor inconvenience; it is a direct assault on the integrity of Sars, the security of taxpayers, and the trust that businesses and individuals place in the tax system. Alarmingly, a significant portion of those surveyed had firsthand experience with eFiling hijacking, with 41% reporting that they encountered this form of fraud. Meanwhile, 38% of tax practitioners had clients who fell victim to it, and 21% had witnessed it happening to someone else. These figures highlight that this is not a niche issue affecting a handful of unlucky taxpayers—it is widespread and systemic. The types of tax affected provide further insight into the nature of these attacks. Personal Income Tax was the primary target, making up 65% of reported cases, followed by VAT at 20% and Company Income Tax at 15%. This underscores the fact that individuals, rather than corporations, bear the brunt of eFiling fraud. The financial implications are severe: fraud amounts ranged from sums below R10 000 to staggering figures exceeding R1 million. For many victims, this is not just a bureaucratic headache, it is financial devastation. What is even more concerning is the response-or lack thereof—from authorities. More than half (52%) of the respondents did not report the matter to the police, and an additional 23% did not even know if they should. This raises critical questions about law enforcement's ability to assist victims and deter perpetrators. Even among those who did report their cases, the question remains: What action, if any, was taken? The survey further reveals the enabling factors behind these fraudulent activities: internal fraud and insider involvement, a lack of cybersecurity safeguards, system vulnerabilities, and ineffective response mechanisms from Sars itself. The fraudulent modification of banking details adds another layer to the crisis, demonstrating how easily financial data can be exploited. There is an urgent need for improved security measures and greater education and awareness of the risks. Sars, the institution tasked with protecting taxpayers, does not emerge unscathed from this report. While 71% of respondents attempted to report their cases to Sars, only 11% found the response to be effective. A staggering 89% of those affected indicated that Sars' intervention did little to resolve the issue. The failures range from a lack of communication and responsiveness to inefficiency and delays. Improved security measures, more thorough investigations, and a strengthened customer support framework should be the starting point. The most damning statistic of all is the assessment of Sars' communication and interaction following the discovery of fraud: 82% of respondents found it inadequate and ineffective. The victims of eFiling hijacking deserve better, swift action, transparency, and assurance that their financial records are secure. The findings of the survey make it clear: eFiling hijacking is a pressing issue that demands immediate attention. Addressing this challenge effectively is crucial to maintaining confidence in the tax system and ensuring taxpayers feel secure. Sars has an opportunity to strengthen its processes, enhance its responsiveness, and implement robust measures that protect individuals and businesses alike. By taking decisive action, it can reaffirm public trust and demonstrate its commitment to safeguarding taxpayer information. A proactive and transparent approach will go a long way in preventing further exploitation and ensuring the integrity of the system. * Maleke is the editor of Personal Finance PERSONAL FINANCE
