Unilever impressed by Sydney Sweeney's bathwater soap, moves to acquire Dr. Squatch
Founded in 2013, Dr. Squatch quickly captured the attention of Gen Z men with its unique range of grooming products and collaborations with influencers and celebrities. Recently, the brand gained widespread attention for its partnership with actress Sydney Sweeney to release her signature 'bathwater' soap.
The brand's success has been largely attributed to its social-first marketing strategies, limited-edition collaborations, and organic buzz generated through platforms like Instagram and TikTok.
This acquisition marks a notable expansion for Unilever, which has a history of purchasing smaller, promising brands. Notably, Unilever acquired Dollar Shave Club (DSC) in 2016, another viral brand. However, the DSC acquisition eventually faltered as the company struggled to maintain its original appeal post-acquisition. According to Forbes, DSC's former CEO Larry Bodner stated that Unilever's corporate structure 'neutered' the brand's original vibe, ultimately leading to its sale in 2022 due to underperformance.
For Dr. Squatch, Unilever faces several challenges. Maintaining the brand's independent, creative culture will be crucial to retaining its loyal customer base. Forbes' Ranjay Gulati suggests that successful startups rely on three pillars: purpose, customer connection, and employee autonomy. If Unilever can preserve these elements while scaling the brand, it may avoid the pitfalls that led to DSC's decline.
As Unilever moves forward, it will need to carefully balance expansion with staying true to Dr. Squatch's identity to ensure the brand's continued success.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Sydney Sweeney helps spike denim profits
Sweeney's campaign is the company's most expensive. Photo: File American Eagle Outfitter surged 10 per cent on Thursday after unveiling a new denim campaign with Sydney Sweeney, as the apparel retailer bets on the Euphoria and The White Lotus actor to reconnect with Gen Z shoppers and boost sales. The company has partnered with Sweeney for its fall season denim collection that includes a limited-edition denim jacket as well as a "The Sydney Jean." The campaign, called "Sydney Sweeney Has Great (American Eagle) Jeans," is the company's latest effort to revive demand as it navigates muted consumer spending and higher potential costs due to tariffs. The retail industry in the United States has been struggling to spur demand as consumers grappling with financial constraints cut back on non-essential buys, including apparel and accessories. In May, American Eagle, which primarily sources from China, pulled its annual forecasts due to tariff uncertainty. "(The campaign) is its bid to stand out more and make some noise. Denim is popular right now, so putting money behind marketing makes sense for American Eagle," GlobalData managing director Neil Saunders said. The Sweeney partnership is not the first time a celebrity tie-up has helped drive shares of a company. In 2020, Crocs shares jumped after singer Justin Bieber teased a collaboration with the shoe maker. American Eagle has previously teamed up with celebrities, including tennis player Coco Gauff and actor Jenna Ortega. "Well known personalities are always an easier way to tell a story quickly. It is one of the reasons athlete endorsements work so well," BMO Capital Markets analyst Simeon Siegel said. Sweeney's campaign, which launched on Wednesday and is reportedly the company's most expensive campaign to date, will also run across the exosphere of Las Vegas's 3D display orb Sphere. American Eagle's stock was discussed on retail trader-focused social media forums including Stocktwits and Reddit, indicating interest among small-time traders who have driven up shares of retailer Kohl's and other highly shorted names in recent days.
1721029080-0%2FBeFunky-collage-(7)1721029080-0-640x480.webp&w=3840&q=100)
Express Tribune
6 days ago
- Express Tribune
Jon Stewart criticizes CBS over Colbert cancellation and questions network's motives amid Trump-linked merger
Jon Stewart used Monday's episode of The Daily Show to sharply criticize CBS's recent decision to cancel The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, calling out the network for not protecting its highest-rated late-night program. Stewart questioned whether the move was purely financial or a strategic decision linked to CBS's $8 billion merger with Skydance Media. 'Was this purely financial,' Stewart asked, 'or the path of least resistance for your $8 billion merger?' He accused CBS and its parent company Paramount Global of backing away from politically charged content to avoid angering Donald Trump. 'If you believe you can make yourselves so innocuous, so flavorless... you are f**king wrong,' Stewart said. CBS attributed the cancellation to financial difficulties, citing rising production costs and declining advertising revenue across late-night programming. However, critics have pointed to the recent $16 million settlement between Paramount Global and Trump over a "60 Minutes" interview, as well as a reported 'side deal' that would see CBS air PSAs tied to Trump's agenda. Stewart previously called the settlement 'shameful.' Several fellow hosts expressed public support for Colbert. Jimmy Kimmel responded with 'Love you Stephen. F**k you (…) CBS.' Seth Meyers and Jimmy Fallon posted reactions on Instagram, while John Oliver described the decision as 'terrible news for the world of comedy.' Stephen Colbert, who began hosting The Late Show in 2015 and first gained prominence as a correspondent on Stewart's Daily Show in 1995, has not publicly commented since the announcement. The show's cancellation is scheduled for May 2026, just months before Colbert's contract ends in December. Stewart's remarks reflect broader concerns within the entertainment industry about the future of politically pointed comedy under increasing corporate consolidation.
Business Recorder
15-07-2025
- Business Recorder
CCP imposes Rs1bn in penalties on cartels and deceptive advertisers
ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) issued 12 major orders during FY 2024-25, imposing penalties worth Rs1.007 billion on businesses involved in anti-competitive practices across key sectors including fertilizers, poultry, automobiles, pharmaceuticals, real estate, food, hygiene products, paints, and education. The Commission has strengthened its enforcement arm and streamlined hearings by curbing unnecessary delays. This fast-track approach is helping CCP resolve cases swiftly and enforces the law more effectively. Out of the 12 orders issued, eight were related to deceptive marketing. Three orders involved cartelization and price fixing. One order was issued on the direction of the Lahore High Court to address the issue of CCP's jurisdiction in a case involving the deceptive and fraudulent use of a trademark under Section 10(2) of the Competition Act. In a landmark case, CCP fined six urea manufacturers and their trade group — Fertilizer Manufacturers of Pakistan Advisory Council (FMPAC) — a total of Rs375 million for price-fixing. Each company was fined Rs50 million; the association was fined Rs75 million. Another major penalty of Rs155 million was slapped on eight poultry hatcheries for fixing prices of day-old broiler chicks. In deceptive marketing cases, Kingdom Valley was fined Rs150 million for false claims about its housing project. Unilever and Friesland Campina Engro were fined Rs75 million each for marketing frozen desserts as ice cream. Unilever also faced an additional Rs60 million penalty for deceptive ads for Lifebuoy products. Al-Ghazi Tractors was fined Rs40 million for false fuel efficiency claims. Hyundai Nishat Motors received Rs25 million fine for misleading ads about the Hyundai Tucson SUV. 3N Lifemed Pharmaceuticals was fined Rs20 million for using fake certification for dialysis machines. The fine was later reduced to Rs2 million by the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT). British Lyceum and Diamond Paints were fined Rs5 million each for publishing misleading advertisements. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
