Teacher claims trial to sexual assault of 11-year-old pupil
Syahril Faiza Zakaria, 51, was charged with committing two of the offences in a car at 2 pm in March 2024, while the remaining two were allegedly committed in a toilet at a resort in Pantai Cahaya Bulan here in May the same year.
The charges were framed under Section 14(b) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, punishable under the same section and read together with Section 16 of the same Act, which provides for a jail term of up to 20 years and whipping for each count upon conviction.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ahmad Faiz Fitri Mohamad did not propose bail, citing public interest, the welfare of the victim, and the position of trust held by the accused.
However, lawyer Mohd Saifullah Che Mat, representing the accused, appealed for bail to be granted, saying that his client was not a flight risk, had been suffering from a heart condition since May 2024 and was battling severe depression.
He also said that his client, formerly posted at a primary school in Tumpat, had since been transferred to the district education office.
Judge Zulkifli Abllah set bail at RM30,000 for all charges and imposed additional conditions prohibiting the accused from harassing the victim and requiring him to report to the nearest police station every two months.
The case has been set for mention on Sept 10.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
24 minutes ago
- The Star
Temple priest claims trial to charge of sexually abusing teenage boy
ALOR GAJAH: A 32-year-old temple priest claimed trial at the Sessions Court here to a charge of committing physical sexual abuse against a teenage boy. The accused, P. Deva, entered the plea before Judge Aiza Khairuddin on Thursday (August 7). According to the charge sheet, the accused allegedly committed oral sex abuse on a 13-year-old boy. The act was allegedly committed in a bedroom of a house in Taman Melaka Perdana, here, between 3pm and 4pm on July 4. If convicted, the accused may face up to 20 years' imprisonment and whipping under Section 14(b) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017. Earlier, Deputy Public Prosecutor Muhamad Ali Hussain proposed bail at RM30,000 with additional conditions, that the accused report to the police station monthly, surrender his passport to the court and refrain from contacting any prosecution witnesses until the case is concluded. The accused's lawyer, Datuk P. Aravindhakshan, appealed for a lower bail amount, stating that the accused comes from a poor family with no fixed income and relies solely on earnings from odd jobs. The court later set the bail at RM15,000 with the additional conditions requested by the prosecution. The next mention date is fixed on Sept 8.
New Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trio suspected of feeding leftovers to homeless man released on police bail
SEREMBAN: Three teenagers believed to be involved in a viral video showing them giving leftovers to a homeless man recently were released on police bail yesterday. Seremban police chief Assistant Commissioner Mohamad Hatta Che Din said the boys, aged 14, 18 and 19, were brought from Johor to be remanded here on Tuesday for statement recording purposes. "A police report was lodged in this district," he told reporters here today. Hatta said the case was being investigated under Section 504 of the Penal Code, Section 14 of the Minor Offences Act 1955, and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. It was reported that the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) had recorded the statements of the three boys, believed to be social media influencers, in connection with the circulation of the video. MCMC stated that the individuals were called in for questioning, and further investigations were conducted at the Iskandar Puteri district police headquarters in Johor on Aug 5, where three mobile phones and three SIM cards were seized to assist the probe. It said that the video allegedly contained excessively obscene content, which had triggered widespread anger and condemnation from netizens and touched on the sensitivities of Malaysia's multicultural society. According to the statement, the case is being investigated under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, which provides for a maximum fine of RM500,000, imprisonment of up to two years, or both, upon conviction. A Bernama check on TikTok found that several account holders had reposted the nearly two-minute video. In the video, three local young men are seen placing chicken bones in a rice packet and handing it to a homeless man sleeping on the pavement.
New Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
'Pencil box lawyer' not liable in RM7.7mil Medi Circle case, court rules
rahmat@ SHAH ALAM: A High Court here has dismissed a lawsuit brought by a hospital operator against its former lawyers, who were accused of professional negligence in a separate medical negligence case. The ruling means Medi Circle Sdn Bhd, which runs a hospital in Bangi, has failed in its bid to sue its former legal counsel. Judge K. Muniandy ruled that the law firm Messrs A M Zaharil & Co, and its partner, Datuk Ahmad Zaharil Muhaiyar, had not breached their duty of care when representing the company. The judge said Medi Circle failed to prove its claims of professional negligence. The case was over a medical negligence claim where the company was ordered to pay RM7.7 million in damages. Ahmad Zaharil is known as the "pencil box lawyer" for a story in which he represented a mother charged with shoplifting a pencil box for her son. The son was later inspired by Ahmad Zaharil's compassion and became a lawyer himself. Medi Circle, which was represented by Ahmad Zaharil in the original medical negligence suit, later filed a separate action claiming that the lawyer had failed to competently defend the company. The hospital operator alleged that key witnesses were not called and that the cross-examination of the plaintiff's witnesses was inadequate. The court, however, ruled that legal strategy decisions, including the conduct of cross-examination and the decision to rely on evidence tendered by co-defendants, fall within the purview of counsel and should not be judged with the benefit of hindsight. "The defendants carried out their scope of duty as retained, and there is no conclusive evidence to show that the alleged professional negligence caused the adverse outcome in the medical negligence claim," the judge said in his 20-page written judgment dated Aug 5. "The plaintiff failed to establish a direct causal link between the alleged negligence and the loss suffered, particularly given the affirmation of liability against the plaintiff by the appellate courts." Muniandy said Medi Circle had the opportunity to raise concerns or appoint alternative counsel during the trial, but did not do so until a much later stage. "Even then, the plaintiff could have taken steps to recall witnesses or adduce further evidence, but such steps were not taken," he said. The court also found that the hospital had failed to provide its lawyers with crucial information and medical records needed to mount a proper defence. The judge said the absence of these documents was cited by the appellate courts as a major factor in upholding the finding of negligence against the hospital. Muniandy also dismissed the company's allegation that Ahmad Zaharil had fallen asleep during the trial, citing a lack of conclusive evidence. "Based on the available evidence, this court finds no conclusive proof that the second defendant was in fact asleep," he said, adding that Ahmad Zaharil was also assisted by an associate who was present at the trial. The court also awarded RM20,000 in costs to the defendants.
