logo
EXCLUSIVE I went to prison for genetically editing human babies - here's why I'd do it again in a heartbeat

EXCLUSIVE I went to prison for genetically editing human babies - here's why I'd do it again in a heartbeat

Daily Mail​5 days ago
When He Jiankui stood before a court in 2019, he did so accused of a crime no one in history had ever committed.
The year prior, Mr He had triumphantly announced the birth of the world's first gene-edited babies - a pair of twins named Lulu and Nana.
For that crime, Mr He got three years in jail, a fine of three million Chinese Yuan (£310,000), and instant worldwide infamy.
However, out of prison and back in the lab, Mr He has told MailOnline he would do it all again if he had the chance.
Speaking from his home in Beijing, where he has remained since Chinese authorities confiscated his passport, he explained his plans to start a new research lab in the US.
Totally unapologetic and unrepentant, his ambition seems to have only grown following his years of incarceration.
Mr He said: 'When I think about the long term, I would like embryo gene editing to be as popular as the iPhone.
'It's going to be affordable to most families. So we will see the majority of babies born having gene editing, because doing so will make them healthy.'
Throughout 2018, Mr He and his colleagues took sperm and eggs from eight couples who had tested positive for HIV and used these to create embryos with IVF.
In each of these embryos, he edited a gene to make the children resistant to HIV.
He then took those gene-edited embryos and inserted them into women's wombs, where they matured into healthy, living foetuses.
In two cases, this resulted in a pregnancy - one leading to the twins Lulu and Nana, who were born in November 2018, and another leading to a third child born later.
In doing so, Mr He not only violated China's criminal law prohibiting human genetic engineering, but went well beyond the limits of ethical research.
While Mr He had, and still has, his supporters, he was also criticised by researchers around the world who deemed the work premature, irresponsible, and unjustified.
Scientists from around the world pointed out that Mr He had made no attempts to ensure that these methods were safe or effective.
With our current level of understanding of these techniques, we simply do not know whether what Mr He did will cause lifelong health issues.
Who is He Jiankui?
He Jiankui is a disgraced Chinese scientist who was jailed for three years in 2019 after announcing he had genetically engineered human babies.
Although this was initially met by some as a major scientific breakthrough, criticism followed as the details of his experiments emerged.
Mr He had forged ethical review documents, falsified blood tests, hidden from government scrutiny by personally funding the research, and misled doctors into unknowingly implanting gene-edited embryos.
Following his release from jail, his application to work in Hong Kong was rejected after it emerged that he lied on his application form.
Although Mr He told MailOnline he is in regular contact with the parents of all three children, there is no way to confirm that they really are as healthy as he claims.
Likewise, experts in HIV argued that there was 'zero risk' of the children being infected with HIV in the first place, provided the mother took widely available and provenly safe antiretroviral therapy.
Dr Kathy Niakan, embryo research group leader at the Francis Crick, said at the time: 'This would be a highly irresponsible, unethical and dangerous use of genome editing technology.
'Given the significant doubts about safety, including the potential for unintended harmful side-effects, it is simply far too premature to attempt this.'
Even among researchers who support research into embryo editing, Mr He was slammed for potentially undermining years of work spent convincing the public that these methods could be done ethically.
Professor Darren Griffin, a geneticist from the University of Kent, said at the time that Mr He had taken trust in science 'back to the Stone Age'.
As the trial took place, it also emerged that Mr He had taken a number of highly unethical and often illegal steps to hide his research from prying eyes.
Mr He and his colleagues were accused of forging ethical review documents, misleading doctors into unknowingly implanting gene-edited embryos.
How did He Jiankui genetically edit babies?
Throughout 2017 and 2018, Mr He recruited eight couples in which the male was HIV positive.
He took sperm and eggs from these couples and created fertilised embryos.
Using CRISPR gene editing technology, Mr He altered a gene that would give the baby protection against the HIV virus.
He then took these embryos and implanted them into their mothers' wombs.
Two women then became pregnant and gave birth to three babies, including a pair of twins.
Since HIV positive parents are not allowed to receive assisted reproduction, he asked others to take the volunteers' blood tests on their behalf to avoid regulations.
It was also revealed that he had used private funds from his two biotech companies to finance the research personally to avoid scrutiny.
Despite all that, Mr He, who requested he be introduced as a 'pioneer of gene editing', appeared confused by the criticism.
'I have three babies born now, and the two families thanked me. They thanked me for what I did for them, for their family. They have a healthy baby and a happy life now,' said Mr He.
'The three babies are normal, healthy, free of HIV. They are living a happy life. That's the proof that what I've done is ethical.
'People don't want to get involved with me because I have a bad name. But actually, nothing happened. There's no bad result, I'm not breaking the law.
'I do everything legally, I do everything ethically. So nothing bad has happened yet.'
Although Mr He said he is 'actively' petitioning the Chinese government to legalise embryo gene editing, he doesn't want this to be totally unregulated.
In 2018, He Jiankui announced that he had used CRISPR-Cas9 to edit the genes of human babies in an attempt to make them HIV resistant. This was a violation of China's prohibition on human genome editing
In fact, he is staunchly opposed to any editing which tries to enhance intelligence, appearance, or create 'super-soldiers' - adding that these should be 'permanently banned'.
In Mr He's view, genetically editing embryos is simply the obvious solution to the health problems affecting the world.
'10 years ago, my dream was to be a physicist - to be Einstein the second,' said Mr He.
'But then, when I went to the US, my grandfather died of some disease. It would not be a big problem today, but 15 or 20 years ago in China, the medical conditions were not so good.
'I gradually realised that all the problems of physics have mostly been solved, but there are lots of things we could do in human biology and human health.'
Mr He describes this as a 'transition moment' in his life, after which he became unflinchingly dedicated to his goal of bringing embryo gene editing to the masses.
Gene therapy works by fixing or replacing faulty genes to prevent the body from getting sick or make it able to fight off a disease.
This treatment has a lot of promise for tackling conditions such as cancer, Alzheimer's, cystic fibrosis, heart disease, diabetes, haemophilia and AIDS.
Why is editing human embryos controversial?
He Jiankui's gene editing experiments were roundly criticised by the scientific community, even by those who support embryo research.
There is not enough evidence to show that these methods are safe or effective, nor are the potential side effects understood.
Mr He made little effort to ensure that the procedure would be safe, and his published results were not peer-reviewed.
The procedure was also entirely unnecessary to prevent HIV infection, since a regular course of antiretroviral medication would have the same effect.
The drawback is that a single course of gene therapy can be prohibitively expensive, with treatments sometimes costing upwards of £3 million per dose.
However, making those same genetic changes on a single-cell embryo before someone is born requires only tiny amounts of medicine.
In the future, Mr He said he wants these kinds of preventative treatments to become the norm for the vast majority of children.
'I see this happening very soon, maybe in 10 years,' said Mr He.
'The reason is that it's affordable. The current gene therapy is super expensive. No one can afford it. It's a ridiculous price, and it's not benefiting people at all.
'But embryo gene editing, it only costs a few thousand dollars, so most families can afford it.
'Embryo gene editing is the future. It will get cheap, maybe not as cheap as an iPhone, but maybe as cheap as 10 iPhones.'
In service of that goal, Mr He said he is opening a new research lab in Houston, Texas, where he will pursue embryo gene therapies.
Mr He said he already has two American researchers lined up to start the lab in early August this year.
He insists that there will be 'no pregnancies' and no gene-edited babies born in Austin.
However, the same secrecy that plagued his earlier research once again threatens to cast a shadow over this latest project.
Mr He refused to disclose any details about the lab, including the names of the researchers or the two Chinese 'colleagues' from his earlier projects that are overseeing the lab on his behalf.
Mr He would not even name the disease that the lab is supposed to be investigating, other than to say it was a rare muscular disease.
This time around, his sources of funding are also even more obscure.
Mr He said he has received private donations from an American family suffering from the unnamed disease, as well as from some 'Southeast Asian families'.
He also released a 'meme coin' cryptocurrency called GENE, which supposedly provides direct funding for the research.
He claims that these measures are necessary to preserve his employees' safety, fearing attacks on the laboratory if the location were revealed.
This comes after a supposed attack by a group of rivals last September, which supposedly led to Mr He needing hospital treatment.
However, physical assaults are only the beginning of Mr He's troubles.
In addition to the three million Chinese Yuan he was fined, he now says that the local government of Shenzhen is demanding the repayment of a further five million Chinese Yuan (£500,000) lent to Mr He to start a research lab.
Mainstream funding bodies have also shunned his research, leading to his application for funding being rejected by the Muscular Dystrophy Association in 2024.
Mr He said that researchers have declined to work with him, university professors won't answer his emails, and potential collaborators have refused to be associated with him.
Although Mr He said these challenges make him 'angry', he remains characteristically undaunted.
'I think it's totally fair. It's fair, because every pioneer, every prophet, has to serve those difficulties and until one day they have been fully recognised by society,' said Mr He.
'People only believe what they want to believe. So, only when those old people die, the young people will accept it. It's natural.'
As for why he is so willing to endure these hardships, Mr He appears to be caught between two conflicting motivations.
At times, he seems genuinely concerned for those he sees as needlessly suffering from curable conditions, and outraged that gene therapy is only affordable for the super-rich.
But at others, his underlying drive seems to be nothing more than a simple desire for fame.
Mr He is obsessed with social media, in particular X, where he has amassed 135,000 followers.
He claimed to be the 'most influential biologist on X' and boasted that he had 'more followers than Nobel Prize winners' while bitterly complaining that he had been banned from social media in China.
He candidly told MailOnline: 'One side, I am always looking for fame. I want my name to be put into history.
'Second, I want to bring glory to my country, China. I want to make it so the Chinese people feel proud of me.'
Although he claims that he only wants fame 'on the condition that it's better for the patient', his focus always seems to be on proving to the world that he was right.
Asked whether going to jail, facing millions in fines, and becoming an outcast from the world of science was worth it, Mr He replied without hesitation: 'Of course. That's worth a Nobel Prize.'
And despite his criminal record and lax attitude towards medical ethics, Mr He doesn't see this as an unreasonable goal at all.
Comparing himself to the inventor of IVF, Sir Robert Geoffrey Edwards, Mr He said: 'When Edwards was given the Nobel Prize in 2010, there were already five million IVF babies born all over the world.
'So when we have five million babies born with gene editing, they will give me the Nobel Prize.'
'One day, when China has changed its law, I will have a Nobel Prize.'
WHAT IS CRISPR-CAS9?
Crispr-Cas9 is a tool for making precise edits in DNA, discovered in bacteria.
The acronym stands for 'Clustered Regularly Inter-Spaced Palindromic Repeats'.
The technique involves a DNA cutting enzyme and a small tag which tells the enzyme where to cut.
The CRISPR/Cas9 technique uses tags which identify the location of the mutation, and an enzyme, which acts as tiny scissors, to cut DNA in a precise place, allowing small portions of a gene to be removed
By editing this tag, scientists are able to target the enzyme to specific regions of DNA and make precise cuts, wherever they like.
It has been used to 'silence' genes - effectively switching them off.
When cellular machinery repairs the DNA break, it removes a small snip of DNA.
In this way, researchers can precisely turn off specific genes in the genome.
The approach has been used previously to edit the HBB gene responsible for a condition called β-thalassaemia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The million dollar question: are diamonds losing their sparkle?
The million dollar question: are diamonds losing their sparkle?

Times

time7 hours ago

  • Times

The million dollar question: are diamonds losing their sparkle?

It takes three billion years, volcano-like pressure and 1000C-plus temperatures to form 'natural' diamonds that are mined and polished before being lovingly placed on the third finger of the left hand of millions of women across the world. Technological advances mean, however, that engagement ring sized-diamonds are increasingly being made in vast laboratories, predominantly in China, in as little as a week. These lab-grown diamonds, chemically and visually identical to mined diamonds, are much cheaper to produce than the cost of extracting real diamonds from deep below the earth's surface in Russia, Canada and southern Africa. Boyfriends and fiancés can now pick up lab-grown diamonds for less than a tenth of the price of similarly sized natural diamonds and their prices are falling sharply as the technology improves further and lab production increases. • Diamonds in the rough: struggling industry's fight against the lab-grown fake 'Man-made diamonds have captured about a 25 per cent share of global diamond demand by value spent,' Paul Zimnisky, founder of Diamond Analytics, said. 'This is up from nil ten years ago.' He said that although some consumers were drawn to the lower prices of lab-grown diamonds he did not expect them to replace the allure of natural diamonds. 'Lab diamonds are a manufactured product that can be produced at will so they are not rare, and this is reflected in the price,' he said. 'Natural diamonds are still one of the most valuable things you can own on a value to size and weight ratio. Humans have valued rare and precious metals and gems since the beginning of time. I don't think this will change anytime soon.' The spectacular growth of lab-grown diamonds has, however, helped to send the price of natural diamonds reeling and plunged the traditional diamond mining industry into crisis. The price of a one carat natural diamond, roughly the size of an average engagement ring, has fallen about a third from a peak of $6,819 (£5,030) in May 2022, according to the jewellery analyst firm Tenoris. The wider Bloomberg polished diamond index, which takes in prices across the '4Cs' of diamonds — cut, colour, clarity and carat weight — has fallen 53 per cent from a peak of 6,270 in March 2022. Prices had spiked after the pandemic as weddings put on hold by Covid finally took place and consumers had lockdown savings to burn. Olya Linde, a partner at Bain & Company, who specialises in natural resources, said: 'The million dollar question everyone in the diamond industry is asking is: is this bottom?' She thinks it might be, as the price of both polished and rough diamonds showed slight signs of growth in the first two quarters of this year. 'It gives a lot of hope for the industry that the worst might be over and the market will stabilise,' she said. 'But there is a lot of inventory for people to work through.' The traditional diamond industry has hugely cut back production in order to try to reduce that stockpile and recreate some of diamonds' original allure: scarcity. De Beers, the diamond miner founded by Cecil Rhodes in 1888, which coined the slogan 'a diamond is forever', has cut its 2025 production expectation from 30 to 33 million carats to 20 to 23 million. Its owner, Anglo American, has put De Beers up for sale with a price tag of about $4 billion, about half its 2023 valuation. London-listed Gem Diamonds announced plans this week to cut a fifth of its workforce and temporarily cut executives' salaries to try to 'protect shareholder value'. The company's market value has collapsed to £7.9 million from £550 million when it floated in 2007. Linde is confident that natural diamond prices will not fall much lower but she warned that they were unlikely to return to anywhere near their peak. In order to achieve some price growth she said natural diamonds needed to be 'returned to their position as a luxury product' and consumers needed to have faith in a growing world economy. Ben Davis, head of European mining research at RBC Capital Markets, said it was entirely possible that natural diamond prices could return to recent highs but it 'would require significant curtailment of both mining and synthetic supply and heavy and length investment in marketing'. The tariff trade war is also distorting the market, he said, by 'incentivising destocking further' and damaging consumer confidence to buy such expensive luxury items. Davis and Linde agreed that a huge advertising campaign was needed to remind people of the luxury and scarcity of natural diamonds. 'We know it has been done before and it can be done again,' Linde said. 'There needs to be buy-in not just from the miners but throughout the value chain.' Yoram Dvash, president of the World Federation of Diamond Bourses, called for the industry to unite to protect the natural diamond industry's value from the threat of lab-grown diamonds. 'The diamond industry is currently at a critical juncture,' he said. 'The meteoric rise in the penetration of synthetic diamonds into the market, which began as a marginal phenomenon, has become an unprecedented flood that threatens the value, image and future of the natural diamond.' He warned that consumers were 'already having difficulty distinguishing between a natural diamond and a lab-grown imitation' and said a considerable marketing campaign was needed to protect natural diamonds' integrity. 'This trend is not just about sales, it demonstrates changes in values and culture,' he said. 'It is about the loss of the sense of intrinsic worth, wonder and uniqueness that have underpinned the natural diamond for generations.' Robert Wake-Walker, co-founder of WWW International Diamond Consultants, said it was not just the growth of synthetic diamonds that had hit the prices of natural diamonds. 'The primary reason for the growth of synthetic diamonds over the last three years is that people have fundamentally been hit on all sides by macroeconomic pressures: mortgages are higher, childcare costs are higher, everyone's essential outgoings have increased,' he said. 'In that context, spending £2,000 to 5,000 on a purely discretionary product becomes a huge challenge to most. There needs to be a situation where people can aspire to buy these luxury products for each other again.' Another industry analyst said lab-grown diamonds were 'an alternative that allows people to purchase something that does the same thing, but they can afford to buy. You'll have people saying to their girlfriend, 'We have this pot of money: we could buy a natural diamond or if we go for a lab-grown diamond we will have a bit left to go into the kids' college fund.' ' • Gemfields' Bruce Cleaver: 'We're like De Beers was 30 years ago' Wake-Walker added that many lab-grown diamonds were being sold to people who would not have bought natural diamonds. 'It is bringing more people into the broader jewellery market, people who would never have considered diamonds before but when you can get a pair of diamond earrings at Accessorize for £50 for a night out, why not?' He said the two industries could co-exist and warned that hostile attacks on each other damaged the public's perceptions of the whole industry. Not all agree with this approach. At the International Gold and Diamond Conference in New York last week Stuart Samuels, president of the diamond jewellery manufacturer Premier Gem Corp, described the lab-grown diamond industry as 'parasites' when asked if the two industries could work together. 'The parasite always likes to co-exist with the host,' he said. 'It's the host that doesn't want the parasite. So it's very nice to say let's co-exist but you're looking to replace me, to kill me off.'

Discovery at Earth's 'most dangerous glacier' sparks joy among climate skeptics
Discovery at Earth's 'most dangerous glacier' sparks joy among climate skeptics

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

Discovery at Earth's 'most dangerous glacier' sparks joy among climate skeptics

Scientists have made a startling discovery that may debunk global warming at Earth's 'most dangerous glacier,' sending climate change deniers into celebration. Based on a surprising photo taken by the International Space Station (ISS) in 2023, researchers from around the world have concluded that three glaciers in Asia 's Karakoram mountain range have been gaining ice and merging. The NASA image revealed that the Lolofond and Teram Shehr glaciers have been slowly merging with the Siachen glacier near the borders of India, Pakistan, China, and Afghanistan. The region has long been referred to as the world's most dangerous glacier range due to the ongoing conflict between India and Pakistan, with both nations positioning troops on their side of the glaciers since 1984. Long before the photo was revealed, scientists had called the unexplained ice gains the 'Karakoram anomaly,' since many climate studies have found that most glaciers worldwide are losing mass due to rising temperatures. However, this is the second major glacier location to see more ice being formed in recent years. In May, researchers in Shanghai discovered that Antarctica started to reverse its decades-long trend of catastrophic melting and has seen record amounts of ice forming since 2021. The latest development from Karakoram has set off climate deniers on social media, who have continued to claim that the alarmism over global warming has been nothing more than a hoax. 'UH oh, Democrats. Are we back to a new Ice Age?' one person joked on X, referring to Democrat-led climate bills in Congress. 'This anomaly has baffled scientists for years, no doubt upsetting #ClimateChange fanatics,' another person posted. To the climate deniers' point, scientists studying the Karakoram anomaly since the 1990s still haven't been able to pin down a clear reason why more ice has been forming and the glaciers are merging. One possible explanation could be that favorable weather patterns in the region have kept the ice from melting. That includes seeing cooler summers and more snow in the winter. A 2022 study in the Journal of Climate found that wintertime precipitation intensity (snow) in the Karakoram range rose by roughly 10 percent between 1980 and 2019. However, a 2023 study in Earth System Science Data claimed that the phenomenon likely wouldn't last due to rising global temperatures countering this short stretch of cold weather. 'This may indicate a weakening of the abnormal behavior of glaciers in the Karakoram owing to the continuous warming,' the researchers said. Despite the latest climate findings, the region has continued to show signs of unusual ice growth that have left geologists and climatologists stumped. Another theory, posed by geology professor Kenneth Hewitt of Wilfrid Laurier University in Canada, suggested that thick layers of dust and debris could be keeping the ice underneath from melting in the sun like other glaciers. His 2005 paper in the journal Mountain Research and Development found that less than two inches of debris from local avalanches and rockfalls over the centuries would be enough to start protecting the ice from melting. However, researchers from the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado shot this theory down, noting that if the Karakoram anomaly only started in the 1990s, as studies show, something else would need to spark this trend besides centuries of dust. Siachen has been the world's second-longest glacier outside of Greenland and Antarctica. NASA scientists have measured it to be around 47 miles long and 2.2 miles in width. Sitting near K2, the world's second-highest mountain, the Siachen glacier's peak starts around 19,000 feet above sea level and descends to around 11,800 feet. The photo released by NASA also highlighted the dark-colored moraines, which are parallel bands formed from rock and dust wedged between the glaciers as they merge. These layers were particularly noticeable around the Teram Shehr glacier as it smashes into the Siachen glacier from the right side. As scientists struggle to answer the question of why more ice is growing in this disputed part of Asia, the mystery has given skeptics of climate science even more evidence to use against so-called 'climate alarmists.' University of Cambridge professor Mike Hulme told in 2023 that climate alarmists have created tremendous distrust and ill will among the public by blaming almost all of society's issues on the climate emergency. 'Climate change is cited as the sole explanation for everything going wrong in the world. Drought, famine, flooding, wars, racism – you name it. And if it's bad, it's down to global warming caused by humans,' Professor Hulme said. 'I disagree with the doom-mongers. Climate change is not like a comet approaching Earth. There is no good scientific or historical evidence that it will lead to human extinction or the collapse of human civilization,' the professor of human geography added.

Country diary: Komorebi is a green world within a green world
Country diary: Komorebi is a green world within a green world

The Guardian

time2 days ago

  • The Guardian

Country diary: Komorebi is a green world within a green world

Komorebi is a Japanese noun for sunlight passing through tree leaves. It seems to mean more than the rays of light, the play of dappled shadow; more than the ephemeral quality of a green shade; it's an aesthetic experience of sunlight interacting with foliage. Today is the hottest day of a heatwave. The air is stifling. Sunlight is burning. Under a canopy of leaves, a small wing lands on the table where I'm writing this in a notebook. How did it get here? The flickering hoverflies drone before they alight on lilies and dahlias in pots. A small fountain dribbles against ferns in the rocks. There is a dense canopy of Japanese maple, plum, fatsia and clematis. Komorebi is a green world within a green world. Its direct translation suggests the sunlight 'leaks' or 'escapes' from the leaves. All these chloroplasts in leaf cells, turning light into life. For many leaves, this heat must be hotter than their optimum temperature for photosynthesis, and those in the lower layers may benefit from light escaping from above; photosynthesis removes carbon dioxide and increases transpiration (water vapour) to produce cooling. Mine and other lives are grateful for this cool sanctuary. But komorebi is not such a still, peaceful world, as evidenced by this fallen wing. It's likely that a wasp ambushed a hoverfly in the leaves overhanging the table. Starting with its head, the scimitar blades of the wasp's jaws would have dismembered the hoverfly, discarding the legs and wings with surgical precision, the wasp returning to the nest to feed the chewed-up, protein-packed hoverfly to the larvae. What they are fed may determine their sex and caste – wasp destiny shaped by the beautifully banded bodies of hoverflies. This tiny wing is all that's left of the aerial magic trick of motionlessness; it's like a flake of celluloid film containing the places, lives and times composed of this green light of leaves. More importantly, komorebi is an experience life shares, a mood not described by just what it looks like or what it does. This heatwave is a sign of the coming climate; for komorebi, we need more foliage on all ecological levels. Under the Changing Skies: The Best of the Guardian's Country Diary, 2018-2024 is published by Guardian Faber; order at and get a 15% discount

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store