
I never thought Canada would face the threat my homeland did
I was a PhD student at the University of Waterloo when Russia invaded my homeland — the small country of Georgia, which straddles southwestern Asia and Europe — in August 2008.
Within days, Russian troops were less than 80 kilometres away from the capital Tbilisi, where my family lived. I called my parents and brother to persuade them to leave, but they refused. Thousands of kilometres away, I felt utterly powerless and desperate, unable to do anything amid the oncoming catastrophe.
By this time, I had been in Canada for about a year. I was enjoying the intellectual excitement of graduate studies and the sunlit streets of Waterloo, Ont., thanks to a generous scholarship. Yet, the quiet, predictable surroundings of the university campus were in sharp contrast with the internal turmoil I was experiencing.
Russia eventually retreated without taking over Tbilisi, but some areas remain occupied to this day. Last year, Russia's influence strengthened, and Georgia now has an administration increasingly aligned with Moscow following a disputed national election in October.
The shadow of Russia's imperialism is long and dark, stretching across centuries and countries. For me, it is quite personal — three of my family members were victims of Stalin's Great Terror of 1937 to 1938, when more than one million citizens were arrested and convicted mostly for anti-Soviet activity. Two of my family members were executed and one disappeared in a labour camp somewhere in Siberia.
When I was born, the Soviet Union was entering the last decade of its existence. Its last years in Georgia were marked by the night of April 9, 1989 when the Soviet army violently attacked a group of peaceful anti-Soviet protesters in front of the Parliament building in Tbilisi, leaving 20 people dead. Although I was a kid, I remember that day very well. There was mourning but also hope for an emerging independent country. The Soviet Union collapsed a few years later, in 1991, yet the road to freedom after 200 years of Russian and Soviet imperial rule would be long and painful.
The anxiety that comes with the constant threat to your country has always been something I associated with that part of my life and that part of the world. Only after resettling in Canada did I appreciate what it meant to live in a country where you could plan your life without worrying about political and economic instability or an armed conflict.
That's why reliving the familiar anxiety here in Canada was unexpected.
Since Trump began referring to Canada as "the 51 st state" and our prime minister as "a governor," I have had a terrible, nauseating feeling of déjà vu. Canadians who are unfamiliar with Eastern European politics may not see the similarities between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. But my experience shows me that their playbooks are very similar.
The start of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine is marked on February 24, 2022 — the day Russian troops crossed the Ukrainian border. But the day I remember is two days earlier when Putin delivered a two-hour televised address in which he once again claimed that Ukraine was not really a country — that it was created by Russia and has never had a statehood of its own. What I heard was Putin voicing a pretext to justify military action just like he did before the annexation of Georgian territories, and I came to the chilling conclusion that the war in Ukraine was now inevitable.
Every time Trump repeats his claims that the Canada-U.S. border is an "artificial line" or when Elon Musk tweeted that "Canada is not a real country" (a tweet he has since deleted), I can't help but recall Putin's terrifying speech.
I see other narratives used by Putin to justify his war on Ukraine in Trump's rhetoric, too. Putin has claimed that those living on the territories targeted for takeover actually want to be part of a stronger, bigger country. In Canada's case, Trump has claimed that Canadians want to become a U.S. state.
I also remember Russia imposing trade bans on Georgia's most lucrative exports — wine and mineral water — as tensions between the two countries escalated before the 2008 war. My family thankfully wasn't directly impacted, but for some of our acquaintances, this meant losing their jobs when finding a well-paid job was already a challenge. I recognize a similar pattern in President Trump's tactic with Canada — punish us with tariffs on one hand and promise things like lower taxes if Canada becomes a U.S. state.
For me, these parallels are too obvious to ignore. It feels like I am being followed by the shadow of Putin's Russia here in Canada, where I thought it could never reach me.
When I took the oath of Canadian citizenship about a decade ago, I never imagined that the country I now call home would be threatened by a United States headed by a president who seems to have an affinity for a Russian dictator. But that's exactly the position I find myself in today.
My life experience has taught me to never take my freedoms for granted. I grew up in a country accustomed to defending its sovereignty from a mighty and powerful neighbour, and now it's my responsibility as a Canadian citizen to stand up for Canada's sovereignty, too.
90% of Canadians don't want to be a 51st state. What's up with the rest?
1 month ago
Duration 4:25
Polls show that 90 per cent of people in Canada have no interest in being a part of President Donald Trump's threatened 51st state, but what about the rest? CBC's Lyndsay Duncombe sets out to understand why the other 10 per cent want to be a part of the U.S.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Much ado about nothing: the Baked Alaska summit
They came. They saw. They left. They achieved nothing. So much for the 'Baked Alaska' summit. 'Russian America' just ain't what it used to be. It's plain old America nowadays, although on a clear day, disconsolate Russian border guards can be spotted on Big Diomede Island. About 10 of them are there, against whom some 75 Alaskans stand firm on Little Diomede Island. This is probably a secure border, at least for the moment, as the closest Russian Orthodox community is in Nome, about 215 kilometres away. Anyway, these 'Arctic Ivans' won't try anything. Surviving island life in the Bering Strait is much easier than staying alive in sunny Crimea, to say nothing of on the battlefields around Pokrovsk. The guy who wasn't there wasn't invited. You might think he would be offended. He isn't. He knows who's won. And that's not U.S. President Donald Trump, much less Russian President Vladimir Putin. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had no role to play. He is neither a real estate developer nor a dictator. Instead, he is 'Ukraine's Moses,' determinedly leading his nation away from Moscow's pharaoh, continuing along a well-beaten and rather 'long and winding road' in the historical experience of Ukrainians. Once the crippling legacy of Russia's imposed settler colonial project has been fully shed, as it will be, Ukraine will resume its rightful place in Europe. Meanwhile, Muscovy will just further mire. Zelenskyy has repeatedly confirmed that Ukrainians will never reward the aggressor. For the forgetful, he means Russia, which started the war against Ukraine in 2014 and escalated its brutality on Feb. 24, 2022. There will be no 'land for peace,' not after more than three and a half years of fighting. Why? Because any such settlement would not secure a just or lasting peace. It would merely provide a respite for the marauders, allowing Putin's now-increasingly enervated Russia a chance to recuperate before launching yet another attack. At least, Putin has been candid. He has said he wants all of Ukraine. He doesn't believe Ukraine is a legitimate country or that a people known as Ukrainians exist. Erasing Ukraine and Ukrainians is his goal. That is known as genocide. Putin's legions even continued bombing Ukraine as the summit was being held. So there you have it: Ukraine seeks peace, but Russia intends to wage war, after war, after war until there is no more Ukraine. You can't fault Ukrainians for finding this an unpalatable prescription. What is now evident, as never before, is that Ukrainians never were, are not now, and never will be Russians. Indeed, never before in history have Ukrainians been as well-known and admired as they are today. The valour of their soldiers, the stoicism of the Ukrainian people, and the principled and stalwart leadership of Zelenskyy have earned them widespread respect, a silver lining in the dark clouds of Putin's war against the West. But the admiration of others is not enough. To achieve a real peace, Ukraine must defeat Russia. And it will, by continuing to target Russia's oil and natural gas-production facilities, railway and logistics networks, and by killing as many Russian soldiers as it can. It is doing a good job on all those fronts. If, sometimes, that means having to give up a farm field, or a destroyed hamlet, it will. Ukraine is a large country. Kyiv can trade space for time. Wherever they withdraw from today is land Ukrainians will reclaim tomorrow. Russia will pay reparations for what needs to be restored. The West can help by providing more advanced weapons systems to Ukraine's defenders. All frozen Russian assets must be allocated to Kyiv, increasing the resources it needs to defend itself. And the West needs to tighten sanctions against all those who directly or indirectly contribute to the war-making capacity of the so-called Russian Federation. Putin is little more than a dead man walking. His confederate, Trump, is a lame-duck president, desperately trying to make himself look better in history, contrasted with what his actual record warrants. Compared to these two men — a man wanted for war crimes, and a boor — Zelenskyy is a wartime leader who has earned the respect of the civilized world. He is not perfect, by any means. Indeed, I remain skeptical about his chances of being re-elected once this war against Russian revanchism has been won. But then Winston Churchill wasn't returned to the prime minister's office even though he steered Great Britain to its great victory over the Nazis. That shouldn't matter. Zelenskyy is, by far, the most deserving of candidates for a Nobel Peace Prize, a distinction that should be bestowed upon him as soon as Putin's imperial plan is undone and a just peace won. Zelenskyy can then decide if he wants to invite Donald to his party. Lubomyr Luciuk is a professor emeritus of the Royal Military College of Canada.


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Letters, Aug. 19
Opinion What a waste Re: Trump-Putin takeaways: no agreement, no questions but lots of pomp (Aug. 15) You are so very accurate in your headline reporting on the Trump-Putin 'summit.' What a colossal waste of effort and global attention. Just another Trumpian waste of time that could been handled by an email. Slava Ukraine! Roland Stankevicius Winnipeg There are things one encounters that can never be unseen and remain in memory forever. The sight of U.S. President Donald Trump smiling and applauding as Russian President Vladimir Putin emerges from his plane in Alaska and walks toward Trump on the red carpet awaiting him, like a conquering hero, and then gleefully smiling and chatting jovially together like best buds reuniting, is one. The memory of emergency workers in Ukraine removing bodies and wounded women from a bombed maternity hospital is another. Others are sights of bombed apartment blocks in Ukraine, both the 'military targets' Russian Foreign Affairs Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed are the justified Russian targets of the Ukrainian offensive. That Trump says he 'gets along great' with a war criminal like Putin and 'understands him,' is beyond repulsive, as it goes far beyond appeasement. Len Lewkowich Winnipeg An embarrassing display Wow! Did you watch the TV coverage of this much anticipated summit. What an embarrassing event for the American people and the world. Russian President Vladimir Putin, an alleged war criminal, pariah, kidnapper, and murderer, being warmly welcomed by the president of the United States, Donald Trump, giving Putin the appearance of legitimacy? Then after a short two-hour meeting, both leaders attended a scheduled news conference, where Trump made the mistake of allowing Putin to speak first, setting the stage in his direction and leaving Trump with little to say. At no time were the words ceasefire or peace used. This was a complete letdown, a nothing conference, with Putin winning the day and Trump being played by a skilled dictator. Terry Meindl Winnipeg Hiding hog realities Re: Agricultural fair shuts down Humane Society's pig-crate display (Aug. 17) On Aug. 15 the Hanover Ag Society asked The Winnipeg Humane Society (WHS) to pack up their display of a life-sized sow model in a real gestation stall, along with another stall the same size which was open for humans to step in to help them understand the intense confinement experienced by female pigs. The WHS was asked to leave the ag fair in Grunthal even though they had received permission to set up a display. This move on the part of the Hanover Ag Society can only be interpreted as their desire to keep the public in the dark about the use of gestation stalls in the hog industry. Although the cessation of the use of these stalls by 2024 had been agreed to by the hog industry in Canada, there are still many thousands of sows confined in them in Manitoba. The sows are moved into the stalls around six months of age and remain in stalls that size for the remainder of their adult life, perhaps another 12 to 18 months. Imagine forcing any animal to live in such a tiny space that they can only take a step or two backwards or forwards and they must eat, sleep, relieve themselves and give birth in that confinement. The practice of using gestation stalls in the hog industry is considered to be one of, if not the most, egregious practice in industrial animal agriculture. The Hanover Ag Society's recent action towards the Winnipeg Humane Society says it all. They know how inhumane this is, and they want to hide the truth from the public. Vicki Burns Winnipeg Air Canada strike a test Air Canada's flight attendant strike isn't just about wages. It's about a broken industry standard called 'block pay,' where attendants are only paid once the plane pushes back from the gate. Boarding, deplaning, delays — the very moments when attendants do some of their hardest work — are unpaid. Forward-thinking executives like Ray Dalio often remind us that businesses thrive when they align with reality. The reality is this: attendants are working long hours they're not paid for. Correcting that is not only fair, it's good business. Customers increasingly choose brands that reflect their values — just as people pay more for fair-trade coffee, many would welcome the chance to fly with an airline that treats its employees with dignity. The truth is, full pay for ground duties would add only a few dollars to the cost of a ticket. For that, passengers would get better morale, better service, and the satisfaction of knowing the people responsible for their safety are compensated for every hour they work. Progressive executive leadership would seize this as an opportunity, not a burden. Imagine Air Canada announcing: 'We pay for all hours worked, because fairness isn't negotiable.' Like fair-trade coffee, many Canadians would gladly pay a little more for fair skies. This strike is a test. Air Canada can cling to outdated norms, or it can set a new standard in aviation. Leadership means choosing the latter. Robert Mitchell Winnipeg Don't give up on U.S. market Re: Confusion as exemption pause nears (Aug. 16) Some small business owners are pausing their offerings to American customers because of tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. Why would you pause and take the U.S. market completely out of your books instead of adding the tariffs to your prices and telling American customers that the price increase is because of their president? If they choose to not buy then you're no worse off. Some may continue to buy at the increased price. And some will certainly complain to their representatives that these tariffs are ridiculous because Americans are the ones paying for the supposedly billions of dollars coming into the country. At the very least you can make these people realize how much tariffs hurt their economy. Small businesses have an opportunity to reach individual Americans and highlight the effects of tariffs. Don't throw in the towel yet. Chuck Halikas Winnipeg Cattle don't cut it Re: 'Benefits of grassland' (Letters, Aug. 15) The beef producer who wrote in last week raised a very important issue: Canada's Prairie grasslands are an indispensable ecosystem – teeming with biodiversity and serving a number of key roles including carbon sequestration – yet 75 per cent have been dispensed with over time. However, contrary to what many in the beef industry would have us believe, cattle grazing is not the be-all and end-all of grassland maintenance. While cattle are essentially the modern-day analogue of bison in this regard, the two ruminants differ considerably in how they move, stand, and graze. For example, unlike bison, which walk with a relatively light gait and move in smaller groups, cattle can actually damage the soil crust with their trampling, compacting the soil and hindering root growth. A study in 2022 that analyzed nearly three decades of data bears this out. The fact remains that industrial animal agriculture is inherently unsustainable on account of its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and its inefficiency as a means of food production. True, not all land is suitable for crops – which is why innovations like vertical farming are gaining momentum. If we are to come out on the other side of the ecological crisis we are in, it will mean embracing alternative ways to feed ourselves – and yes, manage grasslands. Let's get on with it. Tracy Groenewegen Winnipeg


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Carney's patterns discouraging on human rights front
In his outstanding book, One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, author Omar El Akkad criticizes Western governments for their limp and immoral response to the deaths of thousands of innocent children in Gaza. He essentially argues that they invariably look away from the human carnage, calculate their national interests and say that they truly care — though their words never translate into meaningful deeds. Near the end of the book, he asks the reader to finish the following sentence: 'It is unfortunate that tens of thousands of children are dead, but…' There are many other pertinent queries such as, 'What are you willing to give up to alleviate someone else's suffering?' Power? Wealth? Position? Self-interest? Then there's this critically important line in the work: 'I don't know how to make a person care for someone other than their own.' As I scope out my September course at University of Prince Edward Island on international human rights, I'm certain that my students will struggle mightily with that one, too. But I wonder whether Prime Minister Mark Carney — notwithstanding his recent move to advance Palestinian rights — has ever given any thought to whether he cares about the well-being of others outside his own immediate family. Does the advancement of human rights register as a top priority for his government? Or, is it more about words and less about actions for him? I know, I know. Canadian governments never fail to tell us how important values, basic freedoms and human rights considerations are. We are told over and over again that they raise this thorny issue all the time with non-democratic governments around the world. But, alas, then they often quickly move on to more important matters like signing trade deals, investment protection agreements and a slew of lucrative business contracts. In a major foreign policy speech in June to the Munk School of Global Affairs in Toronto, Carney made one or two passing references to human rights, our values and Canada's principles. He made it very clear that 'Canada will lead with the values the world respects, the resources the world wants and an economy that leads the G7.' Again, it looks like economics trumps human rights to me. I understand that Carney has only been in power for a few months now — so we shouldn't judge him harshly on his short record to date. Perhaps he will surprise us yet. But we can already see patterns of behaviour and direct actions thus far that are not very encouraging on the human rights front. Take a look at the recent G7 gathering of Western industrialized countries in Kananaskis, Alta., where there was one joint statement on 'transnational repression' (to appear tough on China). Almost all of the other ones had a commercial or trade component that was said to boost economic prosperity. To add insult to injury, Carney thought it was wise to compose a G7 guest list of what can only be described as international bad boys: Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. If Amnesty International is to be believed, none of these characters has a human rights record that would necessitate a personal invite to such an exclusive G7 gathering. More to the point, humanitarian and human rights crises in Africa alone were not given the time of day. Not a word was uttered about the conflict, sexual violence and displacement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the violent conflict, food insecurity and climate shocks in the Sahel region or even the ongoing civil war in Sudan. Lastly, there was a great deal of brouhaha over having Carney use the G7 — especially after word broke that the House of Commons was ready to confer honorary citizenship on Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai (who is now wasting away in solitary confinement) — to focus the world's attention on Lai and China's massive human rights violations in Hong Kong. Instead, nothing was said at the G7 and the anticipated House of Commons unanimous motion initiative was actually pulled at the last moment. A spokesperson for the Government House Leader's office actually had the temerity to say that a unanimous consent motion was not the best method of conducting Canadian foreign policy. But Russian pro-democracy campaigner Vladimir Kara-Murza was granted honorary Canadian citizenship in June 2023 by unanimous consent in Parliament. Let's be clear: this was all about not offending Beijing. Accordingly, I just don't see Mark Carney incorporating a human rights agenda into his foreign policy posture. This is a Liberal government that will be consumed by commercial and trade matters, investment and economic growth and business deal-making. Perhaps that's a sign of the times. But as El Akkad explains in his thought-provoking book: If that's the case, then world leaders should at least be honest about that and stop pretending and saying publicly just how central human rights are to their governments. Peter McKenna is professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Island in Charlottetown.