The Battle for TikTok Is at the Forefront of a Deeper Geopolitical Trend
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
World
The Battle for TikTok Is at the Forefront of a Deeper Geopolitical Trend
Shweta Singh
44 minutes ago
US politicians worry that its owner, ByteDance, could be forced by the Chinese government to hand over American user data, or manipulate TikTok's algorithm to serve Beijing's political agenda.
Representative image of a person holding phone with the TikTok app open on it. Photo: Solen Feyissa/Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0).
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
After years of mounting scrutiny over TikTok's data practices, in 2024 the Chinese video platform was threatened with a forced sale in the US or a nationwide ban. With the deadline looming on June 19, US–China tech rivalry has entered a new and more aggressive phase. TikTok vowed to fight forced divestment, claiming it would 'trample' free speech.
But what started as a controversy over data privacy now has global implications. This conflict is about more than just an app. It represents a shift in the balance of digital power — one that could redefine how nations view national security, economic sovereignty and the internet itself.
In light of my research on AI bias, algorithmic fairness, and the societal impact of digital platforms and my experience advising government on AI regulation and digital ethics, I see TikTok as the flashpoint of a broader, more dangerous trend. Digital spaces are becoming battlefronts for geopolitical influence.
TikTok has evolved from a social media app to – in the eyes of some policymakers – a digital weapon. Its massive global following has made it a cultural juggernaut. But this viral success has also made it a prime target in the escalating US-China tech war.
US politicians worry that its owner, ByteDance, could be forced by the Chinese government to hand over American user data, or manipulate TikTok's algorithm to serve Beijing's political agenda.
The concerns are serious, even if not proven. Platforms have been used to sway political sentiment before — as with Facebook in the Cambridge Analytica scandal. But TikTok is different. Its algorithm isn't like those of other social platforms that rely on a user's social graph (what you follow, who you know) to connect people, organisations and places.
Instead, TikTok uses a real-time recommendation system based on micro-interactions: how long you watch a video, whether you pause or replay it and even your swipe patterns. The result is an ultra-addictive content stream. This gives TikTok an almost unprecedented power to shape opinions, whether intentionally or not.
TikTok in the US: three possible scenarios
There are three potential outcomes for TikTok. The first is a forced sale to a US-based entity, which could satisfy lawmakers but likely provoke severe retaliation from China.
The second is a ban, which may be more symbolic than effective, but would send a strong message. The third, and perhaps most likely, is a long, drawn-out legal battle that results in a stalemate. Trump seems set to extend the June 19 deadline, after all.
But there's a deeper issue here. The world is becoming increasingly divided along digital lines. The US and China are building rival digital ecosystems, each suspicious of the other's platforms.
Like past restrictions on Huawei and Nvidia chip exports, this case signals how national security and economic policy are merging in the digital age. This threatens to splinter the internet, with countries choosing sides for their suppliers based on political and economic allegiances rather than technical merit.
For China, TikTok is a symbol of national pride. It's one of the few Chinese apps to achieve global success and become a household name in western markets. Forcing ByteDance to sell TikTok, or banning it, could be seen as an affront to China's ambitions on the global digital stage. It's no longer just about a platform — it's about control over the future of technology.
TikTok's defenders argue that banning the app would undermine free speech, stifle creativity and unfairly target a foreign-owned platform. These concerns are valid, but the broader landscape of digital platforms is far from straightforward.
Other platforms have faced criticism over allegations of spreading misinformation, amplifying bias and contributing to social harm. However, the key distinction with TikTok lies in its algorithm and its ability to sway opinions on a global scale.
TikTok's 'for you' feed tracks micro-interactions, serving up personalised content with an addictive intensity. As a result, users can find themselves pulled deeper into curated content streams without realising the extent to which their preferences are being shaped.
While its competitors might be able to spread misinformation and stoke division in more traditional ways, TikTok could potentially do so through the finely tuned manipulation of the user's attention. This is a potent tool in the world of digital politics.
It also raises critical questions about how the US approaches regulation. Is TikTok a genuine national security threat or simply a symbol of the growing strategic competition between two superpowers?
Rather than relying on bans and trade wars, what is needed is robust, cross-border frameworks that prioritise transparency, data protection, algorithmic accountability and the mitigation of online harms.
Concerns about harassment, disinformation, addictive design and algorithms that amplify toxic content are not unique to TikTok. US legislation such as the Kids Online Safety Act and the proposed Platform Accountability and Transparency Act signal growing concern. But these efforts remain piecemeal.
The EU's Digital Services Act is a welcome model for accountability. But global coordination is now essential. Without it, there is the risk of further fragmentation of the internet (what has been called the 'splinternet' — where access is determined by geopolitics rather than universal principles).
The digital world has long been dominated by a handful of powerful corporations. Now it is increasingly shaped by state rivalries. The battle over TikTok is a harbinger of deeper tensions around how data, influence and trust are distributed online.
The real question now is not whether TikTok survives, but whether nations can craft a digital future that prioritises democratic values, cross-border collaboration and the public good. This isn't just about national security or free speech. It's a defining moment in the battle for the future of the internet.
This article was originally published on The Conversation.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
Two Systems, Two Spheres: The Slow, Painful Divorce of the US and China
Weakened Russia, Rising China and an Unsteady US: A Strategic Triangle That India Must Navigate
China Agrees to Supply US With Rare Earths: Trump
US-China Trade Talks to Move Forward After Trump-Xi Call
Officials of ED Are Evolving by Expanding Their Powers Day by Day: Madras HC
Post Op Sindoor, Experts Say India Should Look Beyond Traditional Suppliers For Defence Procurement
'Same Sex Marriage Not Legalised But Couples Can Very Well Form A Family': Madras HC
Number of Companies Awaiting Licences From China For Importing Rare-Earth Magnets Double in Two Weeks
LA Protests: Trump's Decision to Deploy Military Criticised, California Governor Terms Move 'Deranged'
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
19 minutes ago
- The Wire
Israel Strikes Iran Again: UN Nuclear Body Says Two Centrifuge Production Facilities Hit
Smoke rises from the building of Iran's state-run television after an Israeli strike in Tehran, Iran, Monday, June 16, 2025. Photo: AP/PTI Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute Now Iran's supreme leader on Wednesday (June 18) refused to heed US President Donald Trump's call for an unconditional surrender. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made his first public remarks since Friday in a statement that was read live on Iranian TV by a presenter. 'Intelligent people who know Iran, the Iranian nation, and its history will never speak to this nation in threatening language because the Iranian nation will not surrender,' the statement on Wednesday said. 'The Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage,' it added. The Washington-based group Human Rights Activists (HRA) said that Israeli airstrikes on Iran have killed at least 585 people and wounded another 1,326 since hostilities escalated last week. The human rights group said it identified 239 of those killed as civilians and 126 as security personnel. Iran has not been publishing regular death tolls from the conflict. The most recent number cited by a Health Ministry spokesperson was 224 deaths, announced early on Monday. HRA cited nongovernmental sources in its report. The organization previously compiled detailed casualty figures during the 2022 protests following the death of Jina Mahsa Amini, the 22-year-old Kurdish-Iranian woman who was arrested by Iran's 'morality police' in September of that year. Her death in custody sparked months of anti-government protests across Iran. Two centrifuge production facilities struck in Iran: IAEA The UN's nuclear watchdog said it had information that two facilities in Iran that made centrifuge parts have been hit. The International Atomic Energy Agency said: 'The TESA Karaj workshop and the Tehran Research Center, were hit.' The agency added that both sites had previously been under IAEA monitoring. 'At the Tehran site, one building was hit where advanced centrifuge rotors were manufactured and tested. At Karaj, two buildings were destroyed where different centrifuge components were manufactured,' the IAEA wrote on X. Centrifuges are machines used in enriching uranium, a process necessary for nuclear power and also nuclear weapons development. Iran's UN ambassador warns of response 'without restraint' to Israeli strikes Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Ali Bahreini, said the country would 'respond strongly' to Israel's 'aggression' as well as to the United States, should it join the hostilities. 'We will not show any reluctance in defending our people, security and land,' he told reporters in Geneva. 'We will respond seriously and strongly, without restraint.' Bahreini accused the United States of being 'complicit in what Israel is doing.' 'We have given a message to the United States that we will respond very firmly and will stop the aggression by anybody — including the United States,' he said Bahreini also said Israeli strikes on nuclear sites were an act of 'war against humanity.' 'The deliberate targeting of Iran's nuclear facilities not only constitutes a grave violation of international law and UN Charter but also risks exposition of all people in our neighbourhood to possible hazardous leak,' he said. 'This is not an act of war against our country,' he said. 'It is war against humanity.' Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes. Israel and the United States accuse Iran of working toward a nuclear weapon. The comments come as thousands flee Tehran and other major cities as Israel and Iran continuing launching strikes on one another. US President Donald Trump has called for Tehran's unconditional surrender. These updates first appeared on DW. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will US join the Israel-Iran war? Ex-Harvard professor says his AI can predict wars
As the Israel-Iran war enters its sixth day, global concerns are growing over potential U.S. involvement. While President Trump claims the U.S. is not directly part of the conflict, American fighter jets have entered Iranian airspace, raising questions about Washington's role. Amid escalating missile exchanges, former Harvard professor Arvid Bell has introduced an AI tool called North Star, designed to simulate geopolitical scenarios and predict war outcomes. The system uses digital models of world leaders to forecast responses to military actions. While the AI aims to prevent war through early insights, critics warn of its potential misuse. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads AI That Predicts War: How It Works The Ground Reality: Sixth Day of Conflict Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US Involvement: Ambiguity and Pressure Can AI Prevent What Comes Next? As missile exchanges continue between Iran and Israel, the global community is on edge — not only over the potential spread of violence but also over whether the United States will deepen its involvement. While U.S. President Donald Trump has stated that Washington is not directly participating in Israel's ongoing military operations, the rhetoric and movement of American forces suggest a complex strategic stance. Meanwhile, an ex-Harvard academic claims that his AI system may already know what happens Business Insider, at the recent AI+ Expo in Washington, Arvid Bell, a former Harvard professor and current CEO of the startup Anadyr Horizon, showcased an AI tool called North Star. The system, designed in collaboration with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Ferenc Dalnoki-Veress, generates simulations of geopolitical conflict using artificial 'digital twins' of world leaders. These models respond to different scenarios — such as economic sanctions or military actions — offering probabilistic forecasts of how real-world events might AI was previously used to simulate the consequences of enforcing a no-fly zone over Ukraine, predicting a 60% chance of further escalation by Russia. Some believe similar modeling could help anticipate developments in the Israel-Iran conflict and guide diplomatic choices before violence spirals out of Israel-Iran conflict, now in its sixth consecutive day, has escalated significantly. Israel launched 'Operation Rising Lion' on June 13, targeting Iranian nuclear sites. Tehran responded with missiles and drones, claiming to have fired hypersonic Fattah-1 missiles into Israeli territory. The Israeli military has reported multiple missile barrages from Iran, with explosions heard in Tel Aviv. Meanwhile, Israeli airstrikes targeted military installations near Tehran, prompting civilian evacuation Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has vowed to retaliate without restraint, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared further attacks are imminent. Iran also claims to have hit intelligence sites in Tel Aviv, while Israel asserts that it has maintained control over Iran's death toll is rising. Iranian sources report over 220 fatalities, including dozens of civilians, while Israeli officials acknowledge at least 20 deaths on their side. Humanitarian concerns are mounting, with international groups confirming casualties and injuries on both President Trump's public denial of direct U.S. participation, he has issued a warning to Iran and called for its 'unconditional surrender.' Reports also confirm that U.S. fighter jets have entered Iranian airspace, raising questions about America's neutrality. At the G7 Summit in Canada, world leaders urged de-escalation. French President Emmanuel Macron stated that Trump was considering a ceasefire proposal, while Germany noted that Israel and the U.S. combined could potentially dismantle Iran's nuclear U.S. intelligence has acknowledged Iran's extensive ballistic missile arsenal, warning of its deterrent power across the region. Concerns have also emerged about Iran's ability to target American bases and hopes his AI model can offer early warnings to prevent conflicts rather than merely predict them. However, critics caution against over-reliance on such systems. Some fear that governments may act rashly based on AI-driven forecasts, possibly triggering the very wars they hope to avoid. Others are wary of the opaque nature of the technology and its funding links to defense-sector interest in the tool is growing. Anadyr Horizon has drawn support from high-level entities, including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt's office. Bell maintains that the system is meant to safeguard peace — not manipulate the situation between Israel and Iran intensifies, all eyes are on whether U.S. involvement will deepen — and whether AI might soon play a role in shaping not just how wars are fought, but whether they begin at all.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Amid Israel-Iran conflict, FBI's secret file on Albert Einstein's anti-nuclear fears resurfaces
As Israel 's strikes on Iran and counterstrikes continue to rattle global nerves—targeting top nuclear scientists and key infrastructure—an eerie echo from the past is capturing public imagination: the FBI's massive, once-secret 1,400-page file on Albert Einstein. On Reddit and social media, many are stunned to learn that America's most celebrated physicist spent over two decades under government surveillance—not for his science, but for his politics, pacifism, and powerful opposition to nuclear warfare. The Guardian recently reported that Israel's attacks, though tactically impactful, have not critically derailed Iran's nuclear program. Experts warn that this military gamble could, paradoxically, hasten Iran's nuclear ambitions if no diplomatic resolution follows. Amid this volatile context, Einstein's historic warning about unchecked nuclear proliferation is more relevant than ever. Why Einstein Alarmed the FBI Albert Einstein, whose 1939 letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt helped catalyze the U.S. atomic program, would later become one of its fiercest moral critics. Yet, what truly irked J. Edgar Hoover's FBI wasn't just Einstein's views on war—it was his unwavering activism. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo According to the FBI file, which ballooned to 1,427 pages by the time of Einstein's death in 1955, Hoover branded him 'an extreme radical.' The file details years of spying on the Nobel laureate for opposing segregation, speaking out against capitalism, and maintaining friendships across racial and ideological lines. It also flagged his association with civil rights icons, like African-American singer Marian Anderson, who once stayed at his home after being denied hotel entry in segregated New Jersey. In a quote cited from Einstein's 1931 writing, he stated, 'I regard class differences as contrary to justice and, in the last resort, based on force.' This, during the Great Depression and amidst the rise of communism, was enough to draw the ire of Hoover's Red Scare-fueled regime. You Might Also Like: Living Nostradamus had warned of Iran-Israel conflict escalation last year. What are his predictions for rest of 2025? — IntlSpyMuseum (@IntlSpyMuseum) A Complicated Bond With the Bomb Einstein's involvement in the creation of nuclear weapons was reluctant but prescient. Though a committed pacifist, he warned in his 1939 letter that Nazi Germany might be developing atomic bombs, pushing the U.S. to act. But after Hiroshima and Nagasaki , Einstein was filled with regret. He championed global nuclear disarmament , describing modern warfare as 'a form of insanity,' and insisted that the future of nuclear technology be governed by international cooperation. According to a report in The Guardian , Israel's military efforts have only bought 'a few months' of delay in Iran's nuclear breakout capability—if that. Some U.S. intelligence assessments, as cited by CNN , even suggest Iran is not actively pursuing a bomb at this moment. Yet, the stakes remain sky-high, with tensions in the Middle East feeding global anxieties over a potential nuclear escalation. — phalpern (@phalpern) Einstein's Prophetic Warnings in a Nuclear World In the same week that Stockholm International Peace Research Institute reported on the growing stockpiles of nuclear weapons across nine countries, Einstein's warnings are ringing louder. His call for a world where war was obsolete and nuclear arms were tightly controlled was not naïve—it was urgent. As his biographer Walter Isaacson noted, Einstein loved America not for its power, but for its 'tolerance of free thought, free speech, and nonconformist beliefs.' But this same nation kept him under surveillance for decades, fearful that his ideas might challenge the status quo. You Might Also Like: Will US join the Israel-Iran war? Ex-Harvard professor says his AI can predict wars One viral Reddit comment sums up public reaction to the resurfaced file: 'Anyone that can 'change the world with ideas' is a threat to those in power.' Another adds, 'I didn't know this was a thing… damn.' The Cycle of Nuclear Fear Nearly seventy years after Einstein's death, his fears are once again being played out on the global stage. Nuclear capability remains a bargaining chip and a threat. Iran says its enrichment is peaceful; Israel fears otherwise. Meanwhile, the U.S., China, Russia, and other nuclear powers continue to expand their arsenals while urging restraint in others. Einstein once warned, 'The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking—and thus we drift toward unparalleled catastrophe.' That drift now seems less hypothetical and more real.
