High costs after tariffs pose threat to Trump and GOP
More than six months into Trump's second term, however, the costs of groceries, and other essential goods, such as cars, have continued to rise, corresponding with a drop in Trump's job approval rating and a souring public view of Trump's handling of the economy.
The cost of even 'cheap' eats has become fodder for debate on social media, as people grumble about everything from the price of McDonald's hash browns to Coca-Cola.
The price of eggs has come down in recent months, but a dozen are still, on average, 64 cents more expensive than a year ago, while the price of chicken, ground beef and orange juice were more expensive last month compared to a year ago.
While inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index has stabilized at 2.7 percent, policymakers fear the prices of goods and services could spike up again, which is a big reason the Federal Reserve is hesitant to cut interest rates, a major point of tension between Fed Chair Jerome Powell and Trump.
Trump's tariffs are expected to put upward pressure on costs. Experts project that higher fees on goods from Canada, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and other major trading partners could cost the average family of four an additional $2,400 or more in annual expenses.
A Republican strategist who requested anonymity said Republicans need to be careful that inflation and costs don't become an anchor on their candidates in next year's election.
'That's why Trump's beating that Fed rate cut like a dead horse,' the strategist quipped, referring to the immense pressure the president has put on the Fed to cut rates.
The strategist explained that while spurring the economy by making money cheaper to borrow might increase inflation over the long term, it will give voters a sense that the economy and their income-earning ability is on the rise.
Vin Weber, a Republican strategist and former member of the House GOP leadership, said while some voters might hope to see prices come down, he warned that is extremely difficult for any president to accomplish.
'I think that we've made a mistake as Republicans a little bit, in talking about bringing down costs. Bringing an end to inflation but actually reducing prices is a lot more difficult,' he said.
'We can do that with some things, like certain commodities like gasoline. But broadly speaking, to say we're going to bring down prices, it's very, very difficult and not necessarily desirable. In traditional economic terms, prices coming down is deflation and is usually identified with a recession,' he said.
Republican strategists say the 'jury is still out' on what the economy will look like a year from now when the battle for control of Congress heats up, but they warn that Republicans' political fortunes will ride on how voters view their own ability to keep up in a world that gets more expensive every month.
'The two most important reasons why Donald Trump won the presidency in 2024 were to bring down inflation and juice the economy. The progress on those two efforts will go a long way toward determining the president's job approval and the fortunes of Republicans going forward,' said Whit Ayres, a leading Republican pollster.
'There's been a tremendous amount of attention paid to the [Jeffrey] Epstein case, but progress on inflation and economic growth will be far more important than the Epstein case to the vast majority of Americans,' he added.
Ayres said that polls show voters increasingly view the economy as Trump's economy, a perception that took hold after Trump announced sweeping reciprocal tariffs on most countries on April 2, 'Liberation Day.'
'Polls show increasingly that the status of the economy is due to policies adopted during the Trump administration rather than those adopted in the Biden administration. That has been the case ever since Liberation Day on April 2 with the tariff announcement,' he said.
A Gallup poll of 1,002 adults nationwide last month found that Trump's job approval rating has dipped to 37 percent and that his approval rating on the economy has dropped from 41 percent in March to 37 percent last month.
A University of Massachusetts Amherst poll of 1,000 respondents conducted from July 25-30 also found Trump with a 38 percent job approval rating and a 58 percent disapproval rating. Respondents in that poll gave Trump a 37 percent approval rating on 'jobs' and a 31 percent approval rating on 'tariffs.'
That has Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill feeling nervous about the latest round of tariffs Trump imposed on foreign trading partners last week.
A new analysis by the Yale Budget Lab projects Trump's tariffs could increase prices by 1.8 percent in the short term and cost the average American household $2,400 a year. The nonpartisan research group calculates that consumers face an average effective tariff rate of 18.6 percent, the highest since 1933.
This has some Republicans in Congress worried about a political backlash.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) late last month unveiled a proposal to send a $600 rebate check to every American — man, woman and child — to help offset higher costs from tariffs. His bill would allow for higher rebates if tariff revenues exceed projections.
A family of four would receive $2,400 in economic assistance under his plan.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) warned colleagues in April that the enactment of the 1930 Smoot-Hawley act, which raised tariffs substantially, led to the defeat of the Republican authors of the legislation in the 1932 election, and lost Republicans control of Congress for decades.
'The economics of tariffs are bad, the politics, if anything, are worse,' he warned at the time.
Congressional Democrats, who are struggling with their own dismal job approval ratings, see the high costs of daily living as an issue that can help them win back control of the Senate and House.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) traveled across upstate New York on Tuesday to highlight how the administration is raising costs and hurting the economy.
Appearing at an event in Niagara Falls, he called Trump's 35 percent tariff rate on Canada 'destructive' and tariffs more generally as 'a dagger aimed at the heart of Upstate New York.'
Democrats are hoping to flip several Republican-held seats in New York, and state lawmakers are discussing legislation to allow New York to redraw its congressional lines mid-decade.
A group of Democratic senators from New England sent a letter to Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin on Thursday slamming him over rising energy prices after Trump signed into law the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, which drastically cut tax incentives for renewable energy.
'While energy demand surges, your policies are strangling America's cheapest and quickest-to-deploy sources of energy — solar and wind — by hiking costs, creating insurmountable permitting hurdles and injecting uncertainty into the market,' they wrote.
The signatories included Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Angus King (Maine), an independent who caucuses with Democrats.
Ron Bonjean, a GOP strategist and former Senate and House leadership aide, said 'voters vote with their wallets and that's why they voted Trump in.'
But he questioned whether Democrats will have credibility on the issue of the economy and inflation after voters came away from Biden's four years in office with a strongly negative view of his handling of those issues.
'The Democrats are having a really difficult time seizing on a number of opportunities because they lack the organization and the message,' he said. 'They just seem so disorganized.
'We're 15 months out' from the election and 'while historically the Republicans would likely lose the House, it doesn't feel that way. It feels it could go in any direction,' he added.
'We'll see what the economy is looking like a few months before the election,' Bonjean said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
21 minutes ago
- Newsweek
California High-Speed Rail Protects $4B in Federal Funding Amid Lawsuit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California officials have reached an agreement with the Federal Railroad Administration that places $4 billion in federal grants for the state's high-speed rail project into a legal trust while a lawsuit challenging the funding cancellation moves through court. The agreement, which the California High-Speed Rail Authority confirmed to Newsweek, would set aside the funding while state authorities worked to prevent President Donald Trump's funding revocation. Why It Matters Years of delays and an inflated budget have damaged public and political faith in California's high-speed rail project, but the past few years have seen progress, with construction happening throughout the state and tracklaying set to begin later this year. Proponents of the project say that to call if off now, as many of its detractors in the White House desire, would waste years of advancement. That has not stopped Trump, a long-standing critic of the project, from regularly threatening to take away the federal funding that has been vital to the project's progress, a threat he and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy carried out in July. An Amtrak Pacific Surfliner train headed north arrives at the Moorpark Train Station in Moorpark, California, on June 15, 2024. An Amtrak Pacific Surfliner train headed north arrives at the Moorpark Train Station in Moorpark, California, on June 15, 2024. Getty Images What To Know The agreement with the Federal Railroad Administration places the contested $4 billion into a legal trust, which state officials said would prevent the funds from being redirected while the legal challenge proceeded. The California High-Speed Rail Authority, which does not comment on pending litigation, confirmed to Newsweek that the agreement had been reached. The authority has previously called the Trump administration's funding decision an "unwarranted and unjustified" move that was "based on an inaccurate, often outright-misleading, presentation of the evidence." The project has faced long-running delays and cost increases since voters approved it in 2008, with early estimates near $33 billion and more recent estimates ranging broadly in reporting between roughly $128 billion and $135 billion. The authority and state officials have pointed to continuing construction milestones. Officials said the project had entered or neared a tracklaying phase, with 171 miles under active construction and more than 50 major structures completed. What People Are Saying California Senator Dave Cortese, the chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, said in a statement on the agreement: "I'm encouraged that the California High-Speed Rail Authority has reached an agreement with the Federal Railroad Administration to prevent $4 billion in federal high-speed rail funding from being lost while litigation is pending. "These funds were terminated under the Trump Administration following a compliance review, despite no findings of fraud, waste, or abuse. The Authority promptly challenged that decision in court, and this agreement ensures that the funding will remain available until the legal process is resolved. "As Chair of the California Senate Transportation Committee, I will continue to defend our progress on high-speed rail, and efforts like my bill SB 545 will help secure opportunities for major residential and commercial development along the high-speed rail corridor, creating the kind of public-private synergy that can help fund the infrastructure of the project itself and deliver long-overdue economic benefits to communities across the state." What Happens Next The state's lawsuit challenging the federal withdrawal was filed in U.S. District Court. Initial litigation is expected to proceed in the coming months, with the trust arrangement intended to keep the grants intact until the court resolves the dispute.


Newsweek
21 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Russia Reveals Plans for Trump-Putin Alaska summit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Kremlin has confirmed the names of those who will attend the summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump in Alaska this Friday, August 15, among other details about the schedule. Alongside Putin will be Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Defence Minister Andrey Belousov, presidential aide Yuri Ushakov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, and Special Envoy Kirill Dmitriev, who heads Russia's sovereign wealth fund. The summit, to be held at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage and centred on agreeing a settlement on Ukraine, will begin at 11:30 a.m. local time, the Kremlin said, according to state-run news agency RIA. It will begin with a head-to-head meeting between Trump and Putin, the Kremlin said, leading into negotiations between the two delegations and a working breakfast. Trump and Putin will then hold a press conference after the talks. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
For Texas Democrats, fleeing to fight redistricting comes at a personal cost
When dozens of Texas Democratic lawmakers left their state this month to block a redistricting plan aimed at preserving the GOP's House majority, they knew they might be forced to pay large fines or even be arrested under the orders of Texas Republicans.