Boomers are setting up a showdown with millennials, aging in place and plunking down hundreds of thousands on renovating their homes
Baby boomers make up more than a third of all homeowners, and more than half don't even have a mortgage, Eric Finnigan, vice president of demographics for John Burns Research and Consulting, previously told Fortune. So in our current environment, where mortgage rates skyrocketed from historic lows throughout the pandemic to a more than two-decade high in October 2023, being mortgage-free is like hitting the mother lode. It's partly why boomers aren't moving—because why give up no mortgage rate, or a substantially lower one, for one that's in the 6% to 7% range, plus a higher monthly payment?
On the other hand, some millennials, who haven't even bought their first home, are looking at a much different housing market than before the start of the pandemic—one where the salary needed to buy a starter home has almost doubled, the cost of owning a home is the highest on record, and low inventory levels are much more dire.
And baby boomers are sitting on particularly large homes that millennials who are starting families need. A 2024 Redfin analysis from found empty-nest boomers own 28% of the country's largest homes, those with three bedrooms or more; and millennials with kids own only 14%. As mentioned earlier, there's simply no financial incentive for the former group to let go of their homes. But it wasn't always this way. 'The landscape has transformed over the last decade: 10 years ago, young families were just as likely as empty nesters to own large homes,' the analysis read.
Last year, existing home sales fell to their lowest level in almost three decades; nobody was selling their home or buying. And apart from there being no financial incentive to sell, boomers are aging in place because they can. In doing so, they're remodeling and improving their current homes—not only for safety but to live comfortably and luxuriously, Finnigan previously explained.
For some baby boomers, the idea of renovating their family home—albeit likely too big for their empty nesting—is much more appealing than moving. Plus, there's a housing crisis for baby boomers who try to move with a shortage of retirement homes. More than half of them have no plans to move, although the majority of them have lived in their current homes for more than a decade, according to a 2024 report by home improvement company Leaf Home and Morning Consult.
And some baby boomers have spent tens of thousands of dollars—and in some cases hundreds of thousands of dollars—on home renovations to make their homes feel more updated, comfortable, and safe for aging. A Californian couple in their seventies, Brenda Edwards and her husband, spent more than $100,000 on home renovations to accommodate a wheelchair in case they ever need one.
'We felt comfortable,' Edwards told the Associated Press about why they wanted to stay instead of move. 'We have a pool. We have a spa. We just put a lot of love and effort into this yard. We want to stay.' Plus, 'it would be too hard to purchase anything else' since their house was nearly completely paid off, she said.
Many baby boomer homeowners are 'opting to upgrade their current homes for the long haul,' Marine Sargsyan, chief economist at home renovation and design site Houzz, told Fortune, rather than deal with higher mortgage rates. So much so that baby boomers lead renovation activity across all generations, according to the site's 2024 Houzz & Home Study released in March.
'We're seeing a growing trend toward universal design elements in kitchens and bathrooms specifically as homeowners ready their homes to age in place,' Sargsyan said. 'Changes include wheelchair-accessible pathways, additional lighting, pull-out cabinets, rounded countertops, non-slip flooring, and grab bars.'
Leaf Home also reports seeing an uptick in demand for walk-in showers and tubs as well as stairlifts, making homes more accessible for aging generations. 'We expect to see an increase in boomers' desire to make improvements for their homes to remain comfortable and safe,' Nina George, chief growth officer at Leaf Home, told Fortune.
But some baby boomers are selling and some millennials are buying homes. Millennials surpassed baby boomers as the largest generation of homebuyers, according to the National Association of Realtors.
'The generational tug-of-war between millennials and baby boomers continued this year, with millennials rebounding to capture the largest share of homebuyers,' NAR's deputy chief economist and vice president of research, Jessica Lautz, said alongside a recent generational trends report.
A version of this story was published on Fortune.com on June 6, 2024.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Delta Plans To Put AI In Charge Of Ticket Pricing, Which Should Probably Be Illegal
At least on paper, companies aren't supposed to discriminate against their customers, but Delta Airlines just announced plans to do exactly that. In yet another attempt to boost profits, Delta's president Glen Hauenstein told investors the airline will use AI to dictate ticket prices for at least 20% of all flights by the end of the year. Eventually, the goal is to get rid of static pricing completely, Fortune reports. It will reportedly take several years for Delta to get rid of set pricing, but so far, Hauenstein claimed early results "show amazingly favorable unit revenues." And Delta isn't the only airline looking to boost profits by using software to squeeze as many dollars as possible out of its customers. The company it's partnered with, Fetcherr, also reportedly works with Azul, WestJet, Virgin Atlantic, and VivaAerobus, but Delta is arguably the first to talk as openly as it has about its plans to charge you more if it thinks you might be willing to pay more. When Fortune contacted Delta for a comment, a spokesperson for the airline said it "has zero tolerance for discrimination. Our fares are publicly filed and based solely on trip-related factors like advance purchase and cabin class, and we maintain strict safeguards to ensure compliance with federal law." That said, they didn't respond when asked "what those safeguards were, whether they are human or automated, or where the 3% of fares that are currently set via Fetcherr are publicly filed." But while Delta may not specifically discriminate on the basis of race or gender, that doesn't mean you won't see different prices based on your zip code or other factors that may end up having a disparate impact on protected groups. And since it's all done with software, don't expect independent watchdog groups to have an easy time checking to see what differences there are in the prices Delta charges different types of people. Read more: These Movies And TV Shows Have The Best Car Casting Surveillance Pricing Surveillance pricing isn't new, but AI has definitely supercharged companies' abilities in that arena. And while you might assume that airlines such as Delta would mainly focus on squeezing more money out of the wealthy while little ol' you would get by paying the lowest prices, that isn't necessarily the case. Consumer Watchdog found that when companies use surveillance pricing, they tend to favor the wealthy and instead offer higher prices to customers with lower incomes. The folks at Consumer Watchdog aren't the only ones to have noticed this trend. Back in 2012, a Wall Street Journal investigation into what we now see as the early days of modern surveillance pricing arrived at a similar conclusion, writing that "areas that tended to see the discounted prices had a higher average income than areas that tended to see higher prices." For now, you may be able to circumvent surveillance price gouging by clearing your cookies and using a VPN, but don't expect that to work for long. As travel expert Gary Leff told Fortune, before you know it, airlines such as Delta will likely require customers "to be logged in for purchase of tickets in order to obtain status benefits from an airline, essentially being fully within their ecosystem to gain the benefits of that system (i.e. submit to personalized pricing to get extra legroom seats)." What You Can Do About It At the very least, it sucks knowing you may end up paying more for the exact same product than someone else, but it also feels like the kind of thing that should be illegal. Some lawmakers appear to agree, too, with Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego tweeting, "Delta's CEO just got caught bragging about using AI to find your pain point — meaning they'll squeeze you for every penny. This isn't fair pricing or competitive pricing. It's predatory pricing. I won't let them get away with this." Additionally, since surveillance pricing isn't a completely new development, a few states have already introduced bills that would ban the practice. The list currently includes California, Colorado, Georgia and Illinois. If you live in one of those states, you can help by calling your Governor, state representative and state senator to encourage them to support these bills. And even if your state doesn't already have a bill that would ban surveillance pricing, you can pressure your lawmakers to introduce one of their own. Unfortunately, Republicans are the party of letting businesses do whatever they want (unless it involves making sure unqualified white guys don't give out all the best jobs and highest salaries to other unqualified white guys), so don't expect the federal government to swoop in and save us anytime soon. Getting a federal law passed would require flipping both the House and the Senate, as well as electing a new president who isn't already in Big Business's pocket. But it's absolutely possible to get these laws passed at the state level if we make enough calls and force our elected officials to take surveillance price gouging seriously. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
The 5 cities where home prices are dropping fast as the housing freeze causes inventory to pile up
Home prices are dropping in a handful of major US cities, creating opportunities for buyers. A stuck housing market is causing inventory to pile up, putting pressure on prices. Home prices are elevated nationally, but these five markets are seeing declines. The housing market is still frozen over. While that hasn't translated into meaningful price declines nationally, there are a handful of areas where things look better for home buyers. Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership Personalized rates in minutes Redfin site said the median sales price for a home dropped in 14 of the 50 most populous US metro areas in the last month. That's largely due to the uncertainty hanging over the US economy, which is causing inventory to pile up in the market, Redfin said in its report. "Sellers need to start coming to terms with two things: One, homes are more often going to sit on the market for longer than a week or two before they sell, and two, buyers are gaining the upper hand," James Gulden, a Redfin agent based in Boston, said in a statement. The median home prices notched an all-time high in June, touching $435,300, but some areas cooled in July. Here are the top five cities that saw the steepest drop in median home sales prices in the four weeks leading up to July 27, according to Redfin. 1. Oakland, California Median sale price: $850,000 (June 2025) YoY% drop in four-week period: -6.8% 2. West Palm Beach, Florida Median sale price: $425,000 (June 2025) YoY% drop in four-week period: -4.9% 3. Jacksonville, Florida Median sale price: $300,990 (June 2025) YoY% drop in four-week period: -3.1% 4. Austin, Texas Median sale price: $556,340 (June 2025) YoY% drop in four-week period: -2.9% 5. Houston, Texas Median sale price: $369,000 (June 2025) YoY% drop in four-week period: -2.8% Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
12 Midwest Cities Where Rent Costs 30% or Less of a Middle-Class Income
Plenty of financial experts both past and present insist that you should never put more than 30% of your income toward rent. This once was not a terribly tough rule to live by, but now, with costs of living and, specifically, costs of housing soaring across the U.S. (and wages not keeping up), spending only 30% of your income on housing is just not realistic for many. Not even close. A 2024 Redfin study found that more than 20% of Americans are spending their entire paychecks on rent. Check Out: Try This: But there are some cities, including in the Midwest, where folks in the bottom percentile of middle-class earners can spend 30% or less of their income on average local rent. In a new study, GOBankingRates analyzed cities in the Midwest to find those where rent costs less than 30% of the minimum household income required to be middle class. Take a look at the top 12, where the middle class have the most money remaining after covering rent. 12. Powell, Ohio Average rent, monthly: $2,479 Average rent, annually: $29,746 Minimum middle class income, annually: $127,500 30% of the minimum middle class income: $38,250 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $8,504 11. Northville, Michigan Average rent, monthly: $1,672 Average rent, annually: $20,061 Minimum middle class income, annually: $95,917 30% of the minimum middle class income: $28,775 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $8,714 Explore More: 10. Carlisle, Iowa Average rent, monthly: $825 Average rent, annually: $9,900 Minimum middle class income, annually: $65,555 30% of the minimum middle class income: $19,667 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $9,767 9. Zionsville, Indiana Average rent, monthly: $1,705 Average rent, annually: $20,455 Minimum middle class income, annually: $106,084 30% of the minimum middle class income: $31,825 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $11,370 8. Leawood, Kansas Average rent, monthly: $2,046 Average rent, annually: $24,548 Minimum middle class income, annually: $123,317 30% of the minimum middle class income: $36,995 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $12,447 7. Parkville, Missouri Average rent, monthly: $1,750 Average rent, annually: $20,998 Minimum middle class income, annually: $113,863 30% of the minimum middle class income: $34,159 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $13,161 6. Bloomfield Hills, Michigan Average rent, monthly: Average rent, annually: Minimum middle class income, annually: 30% of the minimum middle class income: Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: 5. Winnetka, Illinois Average rent, monthly: $1,825 Average rent, annually: $21,900 Minimum middle class income, annually: $128,547 30% of the minimum middle class income: $38,564 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $16,664 4. Victoria, Minnesota Average rent, monthly: $1,988 Average rent, annually: $23,858 Minimum middle class income, annually: $137,157 30% of the minimum middle class income: $41,147 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $17,289 3. Lake Bluff, Illinois Average rent, monthly: Average rent, annually: Minimum middle class income, annually: 30% of the minimum middle class income: Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: 2. Ladue, Missouri Average rent, monthly: $2,362 Average rent, annually: $28,340 Minimum middle class income, annually: $166,667 30% of the minimum middle class income: $50,000 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $21,660 1. New Albany, Ohio Average rent, monthly: $1,753 Average rent, annually: $21,035 Minimum middle class income, annually: $155,016 30% of the minimum middle class income: $46,505 Leftover savings after 30% of income pays rent: $25,469 Methodology. For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed cities in the Midwest to find the cities where rent costs less than 30% of the middle class household income. The average rent cost was sourced from Zillow Observed Rental Index for June 2025. Pew Research Center defines middle class income as two-thirds to double the median household income. Using the U.S. Census American Community Survey, the median household income for cities was sourced and used to calculate the middle class income range. Using the finance rule that states that housing costs should cost under 30% of household income, the minimum middle class income threshold was used to calculate the average 30% of household income in each city. The cities with leftover savings after 30% of income covers all of the rent were kept for this study. The cost of living indexes were sourced from Sperlings BestPlaces. Using the average expenditure costs for all households, as sourced from Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey for all households, the average expenditure costs can be calculated for each city. Using the average expenditure costs and rental costs, the average total cost of living for renters was calculated for each city. The livability index was sourced from AreaVibes and included as supplemental information. The cities were sorted to show the largest leftover savings after 30% of household income covers the cost of rent. All data was collected on and is up to date as of Jul. 22, 2025. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on 12 Midwest Cities Where Rent Costs 30% or Less of a Middle-Class Income Sign in to access your portfolio
