logo
South Carolina's first-in-the-nation primary status looks fraught as Dems sour on Biden

South Carolina's first-in-the-nation primary status looks fraught as Dems sour on Biden

Yahoo31-05-2025
COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA — Democrats here took a vital first step in delivering Joe Biden the presidency five years ago. Now, they're hoping his tarnished legacy won't jeopardize their future as an early primary state.
Already, there are hints some Democrats will revert to New Hampshire holding the party's initial primary contest, while progressives want to see labor-heavy Nevada take the lead. And there's even talk of friendlier southern states, like Georgia or North Carolina, leapfrogging South Carolina.
'The unfortunate part is, Democrats are saying that, and they think that [South Carolina leading] is a bad part of Biden's legacy,' said Bre Booker-Maxwell, a national committeewoman, Saturday on the sidelines of the state party's convention.
She questioned the rationale of such a decision, before answering herself. 'The fact that the man ran the second time, and he probably shouldn't have run?' she asked skeptically. 'Some people just need to get over themselves and whatever issues they have with Joe Biden.'
Attempts to move past Biden and the bad aftertaste of 2024 got underway this weekend as state party insiders hosted a pair of out-of-state governors with obvious, but still publicly undeclared, sights on the 2028 nomination.
Govs. Wes Moore of Maryland and Tim Walz of Minnesota took turns gracing the outdoor stage while onlookers feasted on whiting filet on white bread, at the World Famous Fish Fry, an annual tradition hosted by the state's Democratic kingmaker, Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.).
Walz, the first to greet the crowd, spoke of the missteps from the last cycle and Democrats needing to expand their reach beyond a handful of swing states.
'I went to the same seven damn states over and over and over,' Walz said. 'People are pissed off in South Carolina, they're pissed off in Texas, they're pissed off in Indiana. … We need to change the attitude, compete in every district, compete for every school board seat.'
Moore, who earlier Friday delivered the keynote address at the state party's Blue Palmetto Dinner, drew cheers from the mostly Black attendees of the fish fry when he said 'we come from a resilient culture' and encouraged them not to run in the face of challenge. He then pivoted to Trump and the havoc his so-called big beautiful bill would create if passed, which Moore suggested would push tens of thousands of kids into poverty while enriching the president's billionaire buddies.
Once speeches wrapped, several in the crowd broke into line dance while South Carolina crooner 803 Fresh's campaign anthem 'Boots on the Ground' blared over loudspeakers.
It was not the rip-roaring affair of 2019 when a cavalcade of 21 presidential candidates — including Biden — wooed attendees with stump speeches. Friday night's gathering at the EdVenture Children's Museum was held as many Democrats are still grappling with the pain of widespread electoral defeats.
Biden's return to the national spotlight — through negative coverage detailing how those in his inner circle shielded the president's deteriorating condition from the outside world — has only resurfaced some long-held misgivings about his legacy.
'All this talk about President Biden and what should have and what could have, what might have, is a bunch of bullshit,' said Trav Robertson, a longtime Democratic operative and former chair of the state party. 'We can peck that to death if you want to, but that is in the past. South Carolina represents going into the future.'
South Carolina, a state where Black Democrats make up a substantial portion of primary voters, played a pivotal role resurrecting Biden's moribund campaign. When Clyburn threw his support behind Biden ahead of the South Carolina primary in 2020, it vaulted him to the nomination and later, the presidency. In return, Biden pressured the Democratic Party to upend its traditional nomination calendar by moving the state to the lead-off position.
But that electoral situation was tenuous. By running for reelection, Biden sapped energy out of the 2024 primary. Now, party officials are bracing for its status as the kickoff state to be ripped away.
'I think it would be a mistake to act like South Carolina's place [at the top] is just because of Biden, when this has been a conversation we've been having for 20 years,' said Nick Sottile, an attorney and executive director of the South Carolina House Democrats.
Like nearly every Democrat in the state, he points out the benefits of South Carolina are vast. In addition to paying homage to a vital Democratic voting bloc, the small state with relatively cheap media markets won't bankrupt campaigns, which can hit upstate, midlands and the coast — a mix of urban, suburban and rural areas — all on a single tank of gas. Then there's the robust defense of South Carolina primary voters' history of picking presidents — Bill Clinton in 1992, Barack Obama in 2008 and Biden in 2020 — particularly in contrast to New Hampshire and Iowa.
'We get it right, and it's a proven track record,' Sottile added. 'It's not one election and one candidate that we're talking about.'
That feeling is not shared by many outside the state.
A longtime member of the DNC's committee that helps determine the presidential primary order granted anonymity to discuss informal discussions suggested South Carolina's current spot atop the calendar will undoubtedly come under scrutiny in the coming months.
'Clearly South Carolina members will want to continue to be first in the calendar for obvious reasons,' the person said. 'I think that no one else is going to feel any kind of obligation to keep South Carolina at the top of the calendar — because Biden is gone.'
Biden may have unintentionally shattered South Carolina's standing next cycle, which only adds to a sense of betrayal over his role in ushering in another Trump presidency.
'There are people who are just mad as hell about everything that happened in 2024,' said Sam Skardon of Charleston.
He admits he was one of the few in the state party who believed Biden's promise to be a 'bridge' candidate to the next generation. He took the job as chair of the Charleston County Democrats in March 2023 hoping to preside over a robust primary. A month later, Biden announced his reelection bid.
'There's a special connection here that's a deeper attachment, I think, than most states' Democratic Parties have to President Biden, probably up there with Delaware for thinking of him as our own,' Skardon added. 'But yeah, then there is additional anger, I think, at Biden for … not not letting us put our best foot forward.'
Some believe Biden is simply too convenient a scapegoat for the party's broader problems. Backpedaling on giving Black voters more of a say in picking the party's nominee could erode trust in a bloc that's already drifting away from the party.
'It is a slap in the face … to Black Americans, where people are questioning Joe Biden at this point,' said Antjuan Seawright, a Democratic strategist who resumed his role as emcee of the fish fry. 'It was Joe Biden who had the steel spine, the guts and the courage to declare that Black Americans' voices should be heard first in the presidential preference process.'
But Seawright also shared concerns that too many voters here view Democrats as out of touch.
'I think trust was a part of the formula for Trump's success in the last election cycle,' Seawright added. 'You had some people who, in my opinion, did not necessarily vote for Donald Trump, they voted against the Democratic brand.'
At the Palmetto Dinner, Jaime Harrison, the chair emeritus of the Democratic National Committee and Orangeburg, South Carolina, native revved up the crowd by putting a positive spin on the party's standing in state since Biden left the stage.
'We are more organized, we are more energized, and we are more focused than ever before,' he said, heaping praise on the state's party chair Christale Spain who was elected to a second term on Saturday. 'I am going to be on record right now to the South Carolina Republican Party, 2026 is going to be a reckoning.'
Amanda Loveday, a Democratic strategist based in Columbia who worked on Biden's 2020 presidential campaign, is another South Carolina defender. But she is less optimistic given South Carolina's Democrats, who have long been locked out of power in the state, suffered setbacks last cycle.
'We lost [state] Senators and House members that we have absolutely no business losing,' Loveday said, which included two prominent Black lawmakers including state Sen. Gerald Malloy and state Rep. Joseph Jefferson.
Republicans flipped four state Senate seats last cycle, leaving just 12 Democrats in the chamber. And in the presidential election, Trump's victory was never in doubt, but he increased his margin by 6 percentage points over 2020.
All this is fueling speculation that South Carolina's neighbors — North Carolina and Georgia — which have notched statewide wins for Democrats in recent cycles, have better arguments to hurdle South Carolina in the primary calendar.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What historians say is at risk if Trump expands his culture war beyond Smithsonian
What historians say is at risk if Trump expands his culture war beyond Smithsonian

Axios

time21 minutes ago

  • Axios

What historians say is at risk if Trump expands his culture war beyond Smithsonian

Politics & Policy A White House official told Axios that President Trump intends to expand his review of American museums for "woke" ideology beyond the Smithsonian Institution. Why it matters: The size and scope of Trump's inquiries represents an unprecedented level of museum oversight in the nearly 250 years of American democracy, historians say. It also represents an escalation of the president's attack on cultural institutions. Here's what historians and curators fear could happen if Trump reframes museums through his perspective. What exactly does the president have in mind? Trump said that the "Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL" on Truth Social earlier this week. He then directed his attorneys to conduct a comprehensive review of the museum system, similar to the process officials have conducted at colleges and universities. What they're saying:"President Trump will explore all options and avenues to get the Woke out of the Smithsonian and hold them accountable," a White House official told Axios. "He will start with the Smithsonian and then go from there," they continued. Reality check: The Smithsonian is not a federal agency under control of the president, according to the institution. It's an independent institution, governed by a Board of Regents, which is composed of seventeen members, including the Vice President. Trump has no authority over private museums. Yes, but: The president could freeze the federal funding that some private museums receive, the way he has for schools that don't align with his anti-diversity views on education. What does Trump's perception of American history look like? Trump claims that there has been a "widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history" over the past decade. He insists that these efforts "undermine" America's achievements by casting its founding principles as "inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed." Historians say the administration's singular, sanitized approach to the past, focusing solely on America's positive moments misses out on the nuance of American history and excludes the lived experiences of Black, Indigenous, Latino, and LGBTQ+ people. Friction point:"That is anti-democratic," Beth English, executive director of the Organization of American Historians told Axios, referring to the administration's push to stifle and sanitize information, debate and historical facts. "It's not education, right?" English questioned. "It begins to kind of veer into the space of indoctrination, selecting, sort of a selective memory of what is and isn't going to be part of our national story." Why is Trump's push to install political appointees to review museums problematic? Curators said distilling history into accurate, engaging examples that the public can understand requires a level of expertise that an untrained political appointee likely lacks. The majority of curators at national museums have PhDs, or have been trained in museum studies through rigorous degree programs and research. "It's not like people are creating exhibitions to tell a story, to win a political agenda," Omar Eaton-Martinez, former board president of the Association of African American Museums said. "People are actually curating exhibitions based on scholarship that is supported by evidence," he continued. Don't museums reframe and reevaluate history all the time? Historians say museums expanding their collections isn't evidence of nefarious behavior, but rather, it's simply how the static nature of history grows. Zoom out: Collections have increasingly included the perspectives of sociologists, psychologists and other social scientists over the past few decades, in addition to more thorough reviews of census records, genealogy, oral histories, archeology, objects, and images. "We're constantly building on prior scholarship to help ask more nuanced questions about a topic," Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association said. "We're always peeling back the layers of the onion, so to speak." Black, Indigenous and Latin scholars have been digging into their respective histories for centuries, and those experiences have been recognized and incorporated into museums in recent decades. That includes history that was once ignored, such as the burning of records in thriving Black neighborhoods such as the massacres in Tulsa, Oklahoma or Rosewood, Florida; the forced removal of Indigenous nations from one part of America to another during the " trail of tears"; and urban renewal projects to upgrade cities that ultimately gentrify communities of color. What funding and programs has Trump already taken aim at? The Trump administration has taken aggressive action to reduce the staffing and funding available for the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS,) the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the National Endowment for the Arts. Stunning stat: IMLS's acting director testified in court that the administration cancelled roughly 92% of the agency's Grants to States. Only 100 grants remain out of the original 1,200 managed by the institute prior to Trump's executive order. The president also attempted to fire Kim Sajet, the director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, earlier this year due to her support of diversity initiatives, despite not having the authority to do so. The Smithsonian has legal authority over personnel decisions, but Sajet eventually decided to step down in the weeks following Trump's announcement. What other times has an American museum pivoted after political influence? An exorbitant amount of debate goes into exhibit decision-making, so museums have already determined the best way to display potential controversies. When museums modify exhibits, it's typically due to public pressure, and has never been under significant force from the president. Case in point: The Smithsonian's 90s exhibit on Enola Gay, the B-29 bomber that dropped the atomic bomb, sparked opposition from veterans and members of Congress on how to interpret the bomb's dropping and America's role in World War II. The bottom line:"These kinds of controversies exist frequently, and that's a good thing, because public debate about the nation's past is healthy," James Grossman, former executive director of the American Historical Association told Axios. "But the President of the United States has no business telling museums what to exhibit, telling teachers what to teach, and has no business telling Americans what to think," Grossman continued.

California is set to act fast after Texas advances congressional maps to boost Republicans
California is set to act fast after Texas advances congressional maps to boost Republicans

Boston Globe

time21 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

California is set to act fast after Texas advances congressional maps to boost Republicans

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The added complexity is because California has a voter-approved independent commission that Newsom himself backed before Trump's latest redistricting maneuver. Only the state's voters can override the map that commission approved in 2021. But Newsom said extraordinary steps are required to counter Texas and other Republican-led states that Trump is pushing to revise maps. Advertisement 'This is a new Democratic Party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said Wednesday on a call with reporters. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' Texas Democratic lawmakers, vastly outnumbered in that state's legislature, delayed approval of the new map by 15 days by fleeing Texas earlier this month in protest. They were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring upon their return to ensure they attended Wednesday's session. Advertisement That session ended with an 88-52 party-line vote approving the map after more than eight hours of debate. Democrats have also vowed to challenge the new Texas map in court and complained that Republicans made the political power move before passing legislation responding to deadly floods that swept the state last month. A battle for the US House control waged via redistricting In a sign of Democrats' stiffening redistricting resolve, former President Barack Obama on Tuesday night backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterm election. On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing districts puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Trump is going beyond Texas in his push to remake the map. He's pushed Republican leaders in conservative states like Indiana and Missouri to also try to create new Republican seats. Ohio Republicans were already revising their map before Texas moved. Democrats, meanwhile, are mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps as well. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. The struggle for — and against — Texas redistricting Texas Republicans openly said they were acting in their party's interest. State Rep. Todd Hunter, who wrote the legislation formally creating the new map, noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed politicians to redraw districts for nakedly partisan purposes. Advertisement There was little that outnumbered Democrats could do other than fume and threaten a lawsuit to block the map. Because the Supreme Court has blessed purely partisan gerrymandering, the only way opponents can stop the new Texas map would be by arguing it violates the Voting Rights Act requirement to keep minority communities together so they can select representatives of their choice. House Republicans' frustration at the Democrats' flight and ability to delay the vote was palpable during the Wednesday vote. House Speaker Dustin Burrows announced as debate started that doors to the chamber were locked and any member leaving was required to have a permission slip. The doors were only unlocked after final passage more than eight hours later. Republicans issued civil arrest warrants to bring the Democrats back after they left the state Aug. 3, and Abbott asked the state Supreme Court to oust several Democrats from office. The lawmakers also face a fine of $500 for every day they were absent. Associated Press journalists John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas, and Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, contributed to this report.

Former top aide to NYC mayor among 7 facing new charges in City Hall corruption probe
Former top aide to NYC mayor among 7 facing new charges in City Hall corruption probe

Los Angeles Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Former top aide to NYC mayor among 7 facing new charges in City Hall corruption probe

NEW YORK — A former top aide to New York City Mayor Eric Adams was hit Thursday with a second wave of bribery charges in a swirling corruption investigation of City Hall, with prosecutors alleging she exchanged political favors for cash, home renovations and a speaking role on a TV show. Ingrid Lewis-Martin, Adams' former chief of staff and closest confidant, her son Glenn D. Martin, former state Sen. Jesse Hamilton and two of Adams' political donors, siblings Tony and Gina Argento, are among those facing new charges. Lewis-Martin and the other defendants were expected to appear in court on Thursday. Adams himself has not been charged, but the case will thrust the corruption allegations that have dogged the Democrat back into focus as he seeks to regain voters' trust ahead of a contested election in November. A spokesperson for Adams did not immediately return a request for comment. On Thursday, Lewis-Martin was charged with four additional counts of conspiracy and bribe receiving in a series of indictments Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg described as 'classic bribery conspiracies that had a deep and wide-ranging impact on city government.' 'As alleged, Lewis-Martin consistently overrode the expertise of public servants so she could line her own pockets. While she allegedly received more than $75,000 in bribes and an appearance on a TV show, every other New Yorker lost out,' Bragg said in a statement. Lewis-Martin's attorney, Arthur Aidala, vowed to fight the charges, saying, 'This is not justice — it is a distortion of the truth and a troubling example of politically motivated 'lawfare.'' She resigned last December ahead of her indictment in a separate case in which she and her son are accused of taking bribes in exchange for speedy approval of construction projects. That case is still pending. She has continued to volunteer for the Adams campaign while awaiting trial. The fresh round of indictments brought against Adams' close allies could add to political headwinds already facing the mayor, whose own indictment on federal bribery charges was abandoned by President Trump's administration earlier this year. The corruption scandals have opened the door to challengers in the upcoming election, including the Democratic primary winner, Zohran Mamdani, and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Adams is running as an independent, claiming the case brought against him — in which he was accused of accepting bribes and travel perks from foreign interests — had prevented him from campaigning in the Democratic primary. Those charges were dismissed in April following an extraordinary intervention by U.S. Justice Department officials, who said the case was impeding Adams from assisting in Trump's immigration crackdown. In the months since, the status of other federal probes linked to Adams' key allies, including his former police commissioner and several deputy mayors, has remained uncertain. The new charges were brought by Bragg, who prosecuted Trump last year and who is also running for reelection. Both federal and state investigators seized Lewis-Martin's phone at Kennedy Airport last September as she returned from a trip to Japan with several colleagues. Hours later, Lewis-Martin appeared on her attorney's radio show, denying that she had 'done anything illegal to the magnitude or scale that requires the federal government and the DA's office to investigate us.' Both she and her son pleaded not guilty to charges of accepting improper gifts worth more than $100,000 in exchange for speeding construction approvals for two real estate investors. Earlier this week, a spokesperson for Adams' campaign, Todd Shapiro, said the mayor would stand with Lewis-Martin. 'Ingrid has dedicated her life to the people of New York City,' Shapiro said, 'and she deserves the presumption of innocence and the support of those who know her best.' Last week, federal prosecutors wrapped up their two remaining Adams-related cases. Mohamed Bahi, who served as the mayor's chief liaison to the Muslim community, pleaded guilty to soliciting straw donations to Adams' campaign, and Brooklyn construction magnate Erden Arkan was sentenced to a year of probation for his involvement in a straw donor scheme. Offenhartz, Sisak and Izaguirre write for the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store