
With Ohtani's two-way return and Devers' arrival, Padres need their stars more than ever
LOS ANGELES — A day after the trade of Rafael Devers rocked the baseball industry, this city reclaimed at least temporary status as the epicenter of the sport. Here, Shohei Ohtani was scheduled to make his long-awaited pitching debut for the Los Angeles Dodgers. Here, too, the San Diego Padres sounded eager to face another high-profile challenge in a division now filled with them.
Advertisement
'As Ric Flair would say, to be the man, you gotta beat the man,' Padres manager Mike Shildt said before Monday's series opener at Dodger Stadium. 'And if we're going to be the best, we gotta beat the best. That's what this is all about, and it's what I signed up for and our group signed up for. So, we're excited. But it's about our star power as much as it is anybody else's.'
For portions of the ensuing game, the Padres appeared to match the Dodgers in that critical category. Ohtani, pitching in the big leagues for the first time in 22 months, reached 100.2 mph in a somewhat scattershot top of the first; San Diego nicked him for a run, taking advantage of a pair of singles, a wild pitch and a sacrifice fly off the bat of third baseman Manny Machado. In the bottom of the first, Dylan Cease matched a career high by firing a 100.4 mph fastball to Freddie Freeman. The right-hander wound up striking out the Dodgers' first five batters amid two perfect innings, displaying a ceiling that occasionally puts him among the best starters in the world.
Then, the next seven innings confirmed a tendency toward inconsistency and a stark reality that overshadows San Diego's glaring positional needs: With Ohtani's return as a two-way unicorn and Devers' arrival in the rugged National League West, the Padres need their healthy stars more than ever.
'This division just got better,' Machado said. 'It was good already and great already. So, it just got better.'
Monday night's 6-3 loss to the Dodgers brought mixed results. The first five batters in the Padres lineup all recorded at least one hit. Machado homered in the top of the sixth, continuing his march toward 2,000 hits. Meanwhile, the bottom half of the lineup went hitless, squashing the chances of an extended rally. On the mound, Cease went from dominating the Dodgers to running into a buzzsaw.
Advertisement
'It's frustrating,' Cease said after the sport's deepest lineup batted around and scored five runs in a decisive bottom of the fourth. 'You give up that many runs, you don't really give your team a good chance. But, I mean, I really am pretty happy with my execution. It's just one of those games.'
As much as any player, Cease has embodied a team straining to get the most out of its considerable talent. The Padres, citing budgetary constraints, explored trading him last offseason. They ended up keeping him after months of rumors, reasoning that they needed his contract-year production more than they needed to rebalance their resources. So far, however, that gamble has yet to produce the desired returns.
Through 15 starts, Cease has a 4.69 earned run average. His 2.95 fielding independent pitching mark indicates a significant amount of poor luck, but the Padres can ill afford further misfortune. Fellow top starters Michael King and Yu Darvish are on the injured list with uncertain timetables. The rotation has recently leaned on the far greener trio of Randy Vásquez, Stephen Kolek and Ryan Bergert.
A continued reliance on their inexperience could end up costing the Padres in September. So could an offense that has too often slumbered. Toward that end, last weekend's series against the Arizona Diamondbacks brought more promising results. Most notably, leadoff man Fernando Tatis Jr. emerged from a career-worst slump to go 8-for-13 across three games. The Padres, after a crushing loss, salvaged a crucial win in the series finale.
Then, moments after it was over, national baseball writer Bob Nightengale approached Xander Bogaerts and showed the Padres shortstop his phone. On it was the rapidly spreading news that Devers, one of the best hitters in baseball, had been traded from the Boston Red Sox to the San Francisco Giants.
Advertisement
'We both thought that it was maybe a joke or something,' Bogaerts recalled Monday afternoon.
The former Red Sox infielder texted Devers, who promptly confirmed it wasn't.
'I don't know if I can remember a trade kind of like this,' Bogaerts said. 'Man, it made them a lot better. We aren't going to deny it. He's a big-time player.'
Monday night, the Padres attempted to keep pace with a team full of big-time players. Tatis scored the game's first run and logged another multi-hit performance. First baseman Luis Arraez singled off Ohtani. Machado clubbed his 11th homer of the season to keep San Diego within striking distance. Gavin Sheets followed Machado's solo shot with a double. Bogaerts, who has been the Padres' least productive star, connected on an RBI double.
X marks the spot.
⭐️: https://t.co/ARilN7zMDX pic.twitter.com/9IfsFY0328
— San Diego Padres (@Padres) June 17, 2025
But without center fielder Jackson Merrill, who went on the concussion injured list Sunday, the rest of the offense remained dormant. And there is no guarantee that Merrill will return as soon as he is eligible.
'It's definitely a wait-and-see,' Shildt said. 'It's just too early to tell. Clearly, we're all hopeful it's seven (days), but we're going to do what's in the best interest of Jackson.'
Shorthanded, the Padres still managed to make things interesting in the series opener. The bottom of the fourth, amid a parade of offense, saw Cease plunk Dodgers center fielder Andy Pages in the left elbow. Pages reacted with visible anger. He alleged after the game that the pitcher had acted in retaliation.
'When I got on in the (third) inning, they thought I was giving all his signs to the team,' Pages said in Spanish. 'I probably shouldn't have reacted like that, but he doesn't miss with a slider on the corner, yet he can miss with a fastball.'
Advertisement
In the other clubhouse, Cease said he did not understand Pages' reaction.
'But, I mean, it's not going to deter me from throwing inside,' Cease added. 'I don't know if I've ever hit a Dodger before. You know, it just happens. It's part of the game.'
Regardless of intent, the Padres can ill afford to allow free base runners. They now trail the Dodgers by four games. They are 1 1/2 games behind a newly reinforced Giants team. The Diamondbacks remain within striking distance.
Monday brought largely encouraging results from San Diego's collection of high-profile players. In baseball's most competitive division, the Padres will need even more.
'Good competition, man. Good competition,' Machado said. 'It's going to be till the end. It's what we play for. So, it's definitely going to be fun.'
(Photo of Manny Machado celebrating with Fernando Tatis Jr.: Jayne Kamin-Oncea / Imagn Images)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
40 minutes ago
- Washington Post
J.J. Spaun takes a long road of hard work to become US Open champion
OAKMONT, Pa. — J.J. Spaun faced his first big moment on a big stage in golf and he wasn't ready for it. He didn't even have a club in his hand. Spaun was a 26-year-old PGA Tour rookie at Torrey Pines in 2017. He was not eligible for the pro-am and wanted to see the North course when he came across an enormous crowd that could mean only one thing: Tiger Woods.


Washington Post
41 minutes ago
- Washington Post
New PGA Tour boss: World's best golfers should compete against each other
Brian Rolapp begins his new job as CEO of the PGA Tour intent on appeasing golfers, fans, sponsors and media partners alike. So it's no secret what the top of his to-do list looks like: Resolve the lingering conflict with LIV Golf and its Saudi benefactors and somehow draw together a bitterly divided sport.


New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
Let CFP committee finally use advanced stats, plus the $8M transfer offer
Until Saturday Newsletter 🏈 | This is The Athletic's college football newsletter. Sign up here to receive Until Saturday directly in your inbox. Today in college football news, your music rec of the week is Particle House. Every song by anyone should have synths and saxes. Remember years ago, when coaches and broadcasters in various sports still thought of advanced stats as deceptive witchcraft? (I say this as if many of them aren't still of that mindset. Bear with me.) The contemporaneous subplot that still feels surreal: Despite having an especially old-school power structure, college football had long entrusted a handful of computer ratings with helping to decide which two teams got to play in its most important game. That BCS system's computer formula — originally based on ratings by Jeff Sagarin, the New York Times and the Seattle Times — started in 1998, five years before 'Moneyball' was a book, let alone a movie. College football! Wildly progressive somehow! And then those two perspectives flipped. As most sports people slowly realized there is more to life than what can be gleaned by a single pair of human eyeballs, college football fans went the opposite way, growing tired of the BCS computers — for reasons that often had little to do with the computers themselves. In 2011, for instance, the machines tried to steer us clear of the reviled Alabama-LSU championship rematch that killed the BCS, but human polls overruled them. Now in the College Football Playoff era, we're headed back in the other direction. You often hear (and/or say), 'The BCS was actually fine,' or even, 'We should bring back the BCS,' whenever the CFP's human committee ranks your team one spot too low. That felt especially valid during the committee's only actual disaster, the 2023 robbery of undefeated Florida State, when the computers would've had the Noles in the field of four. Technically, the committee has used lots of stats since its inception in 2014, but not anything 'advanced.' Eleven years ago, Bill Connelly criticized the committee's usage of lackluster math (in a post edited by your boy, of course), and now he appears in a new article by The Athletic's Ralph Russo on the state of the committee, still making a similar argument … because nothing has really changed. In a time when the ground-and-pound SEC is out here promoting itself via fancy numbers, why is the committee still stuck pretending its basic statistical comparisons are all the numbers college football fans can handle? We're way past the BCS backlash by now, man. These days, everybody knows Vegas spreads are punishingly predictive only because they're informed by computer ratings. It's long been time to empower the committee to use and cite Connelly's SP+, Brian Fremeau's FEI, ESPN's FPI, the Massey Composite and all the other great tools out there. (Besides, unlike the BCS' mysterious computers, the public can actually learn details about how most of these actually work.) Anyway, that's just one rant spinning off of Ralph's article, which also has a lot of stuff about other potential changes coming the committee's way in the 16-or-whatever-team era of the CFP. (Usual note, because I mentioned FPI, the rating that some people believe is nothing but a devious ESPN propaganda tool: FPI is solid. Against Vegas, it typically holds up about as well as any other rating. When evaluating teams, look at a bunch of rankings, which irons out each rating's individual quirks.) 💰 'His dad said other schools reached out to see if he was interested in transferring, and the biggest offer he heard was for $8 million for two years.' Bruce Feldman on South Carolina redshirt soph QB LaNorris Sellers, one of my favorite players to watch last year. 〽️ How to attempt to stop Michigan five-star freshman QB Bryce Underwood, according to his high school opponents: 'We wanted to … force them to throw (laughs). That sounds crazy.' 🧢 Florida! USC! Pitt! UCLA! Stanford! Cal! Lots of schools with grumbling fan bases have some significant recruiting hope right now. 🎭 Former NFL players who were once bullied by Bill Belichick are now having a good chortle at him being an offseason sideshow. 🌎 Texas State is teasing a move to the Pac-12, potentially joining the impending crowd from the Mountain West. (Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State, San Diego State and Utah State, in case you've forgotten. In addition to Oregon State and Washington State, that's so many states! Plus Gonzaga in non-football. Gonzaga State!) 🏆 Texas won its fourth Directors' Cup in the last five years, having officially taken over for Stanford as the school that constantly wins the award for the best all-sports athletic department. Speaking of all sports: Last week, during Until Saturday's slapdash preview of Conference USA and the MAC (part of a chaotic series that debuted with a glance at the FCS, Division II and Division III), I asked which FBS straggler you'd take over, if you had a chance to build one of them for years into a College Football Playoff power. Advertisement This was of course inspired by the upcoming entry in EA Sports' college football series, where for decades now, people have enjoyed overhauling the little guys. But it's a fun thought exercise regardless. In your survey responses, your most popular pick: UMass. Some of you chose the woebegone Minutemen because you attend there (hello, Zach) or have family there (hello, Kathy's niece), while others simply crave the benevolent masochism that goes along with attempting to make UMass football matter (hello, various freaks). Otherwise, Tulane was your No. 2 pick (even though they're way too good to qualify for the question), thanks mostly to their blue uniforms. Among your other responses, this one from Carter jumped out as a really fun reason to take charge of Hawaii: For more on the massive challenge that is Making Something Of UMass, read this story by Matt Baker on exactly how hard that has been. OK, that's all for today. Email me at untilsaturday@ with any thoughts! Last week's most-clicked: The ranking of college football's 25 biggest storylines since 2000.