Chris Minns stares down backbench revolt over handling of Sydney Harbour Bridge protest
Members of the right and some of the left faction had sought to move a motion condemning the destruction of Gaza and the 'Israeli government's endorsement of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the territory'.
It condemned all crimes against against humanity, including genocide, the murder of civilians and hostage taking.
The motion also called for a recognition of the right to protest and called on the Minns government to begin work on options for a human rights bill, similar to Victoria.
But the motion was effectively removed from consideration by caucus and a far more modest motion, which recognised the scale of the protests, was passed.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
About a dozen caucus members voiced their unhappiness at the premier's willingness to block the march and prioritise public safety over the right to protest.
In the first two years of his government, Minns has enjoyed very solid support from his party and, through his top-down style, has avoided outbreaks of dissent from his backbench.
But the huge public turnout emboldened backbenchers to express their concern about Minns' stance to block the protests.
Police estimated 90,000 people took part, while organisers estimated it was closer to 300,000.
Meanwhile the NSW opposition put forward a private member's bill in parliament on Tuesday morning to amend the summary offences act, which deals with approving protests.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
The bill proposed to limit each cause to three protests a year, with organisers potentially liable to pay for the costs of policing if more protests were held, unless a court ruled it could go ahead.
The opposition leader, Mark Speakman, said that every dollar spent on managing public safety at protests meant police resources were being drained from domestic violence and fighting organised crime.
The government declined to support the opposition bill.
Prior to the march, 72 organisations, including all major NSW trade unions, civil rights organisations and community groups signed a letter by the Australian Democracy Network calling for the premier to ensure police facilitated the march going ahead, and criticising what they called the premier's anti-protest agenda.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Pauline Hanson makes explosive claim about Anthony Albanese's election win - as she warns her prediction about Australia has come true
Pauline Hanson has launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, claiming Labor lacks a genuine mandate to pursue its net zero emissions agenda - because the majority of Australians didn't give the party their first preference at the election. In a fiery exchange with 10 News political reporter Ashleigh Raper, the One Nation leader dismissed the government's legitimacy on climate reform, arguing: that '65 per cent of Australians didn't give Labor their first preference'. 'Doesn't the science and the election results tell us that people don't want us to have this debate anymore,' Raper asked, suggesting Hanson's motion to scrap net zero was not supported by the majority. But Hanson hit back. 'No, you're wrong. When I put up the notice motion on my Facebook page, in less than a day it got 90,000 likes, 9,000 comments and 9,000 shares - and people are interested in it.' Raper then said: 'But does not the election result suggest something different? Labor were put in place with an overwhelming mandate - it was very clear what they would put in force.' But Hanson questioned this. 'Sorry, a mandate - of what? 35 per cent? 65 per cent of Australians did not vote their number one vote to Labor. Are you saying Labor has a mandate? No, they have not.' Labor received 34.56 per cent of first-preference votes in the House of Representatives. However, Australia uses preferential voting, not first-past-the-post, meaning a party can win government even without a majority of first-choice votes, as long as they win enough seats through preferences. In the May 2025 election, Labor achieved a landslide victory, winning 94 of 150 seats in the House of Representatives - far surpassing the 76‑seat threshold needed for majority control. For nearly 30 years, Hanson has built her political brand on a tough stance against immigration. Now, as Australia faces a worsening housing crisis amid record-high migration, she says the nation is finally realising she was right all along. Fresh from doubling One Nation's Senate numbers at the May election, Hanson claims more Australians are aligning with her long-held views. In an interview with 10 News First, the One Nation leader said she feels vindicated in her warnings about the impacts of mass migration, arguing the system is now clearly broken and hurting everyday Australians. 'A lot of people say we should've listened to her years ago,' she said. 'But Australians have now come on board, because now it's impacting them. 'They know the generations coming through possibly will never own their own home.' Ms Hanson said she isn't against immigration, but it has to be done in 'managed way.' 'If we don't wake up to ourselves, we're going to be a third world country, and that's exactly where we're going,' she said. In her controversial 1996 maiden speech to Parliament, Pauline Hanson warned that Australia was in 'danger of being swamped by Asians,' and claimed most Australians wanted the nation's immigration policy radically reviewed. Two decades later, in her first Senate speech in 2016, she argued the country was now at risk of being 'swamped by Muslims who bear a culture and ideology that is incompatible with our own.' The latest federal data shows net overseas migration reached historic highs in 2024, with more than 500,000 arrivals - numbers economists say have intensified pressure on rental markets and home prices. Next year, Australia will increase its near-record number of international student places by 25,000 to 295,000, despite a Reserve Bank report finding that the soaring number of international students is putting pressure on the housing market during a time of high construction costs. In cities absorbing the bulk of new arrivals, such as Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, and increasingly Brisbane, competition for rentals is fierce, sending rents and house prices soaring. While the Albanese government defends migration as critical to economic growth and filling workforce gaps, Hanson argues it's creating deeper divides and resentment. But it's unlikely Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will listen, with Hanson stating her relationship with him is non-existent. She argued policies like Net Zero and high immigration don't reflect the will of the majority. 'I'm not anti-renewables. I put some solar panels on my roof at home this year,' she said. But what she is opposed to is putting 'millions' of solar panels on agricultural land. She has also been vocal in her support of keeping coal-fired power stations open and is pro-nuclear. While critics say Hanson's rhetoric remains inflammatory, she said her party has evolved past being anti-immigration - despite calls to cut immigration by more than 570,000 people from current Labor levels to ease pressure on housing. She credits her expanding reach with younger voters to her animated video series Please Explain, which, among other things, satirises what Hanson portrays as Australia's 'addiction' to rising migration, linking it to housing stress. Many episodes underscore Hanson's core message that unchecked immigration is incompatible with social cohesion and national values. But Hanson said she won't back down, and believes her legacy lies in her conviction to stand up without fear or favour in her quest to deliver a fair go for all Australians. 'People want that from their politicians,' she said.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Jeremy Rockliff reappointed as Tasmanian premier despite lack of majority parliament support
Tasmania's Liberal government has been recommissioned after weeks of political limbo after a snap election that failed to deliver either major party a majority. The premier, Jeremy Rockliff, met with the governor, Barbara Baker, on Wednesday at Government House to formally ask for his minority government to remain. Baker accepted the request after Rockliff told her he expected to gain the confidence of the lower house, the governor said. Rockliff said on Wednesday he would serve as premier for a full four-year term. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Through sensible communication, everyone working together, pragmatism, working together on policies, working together in the best interests of Tasmanians, this is a government and a parliament that will last the full term,' he told reporters after the governor confirmed his appointment. 'What we want to do, by evidenced of today, is get on with the job,.' He said he had taken 'learnings' from the previous parliament which was cut short by a vote of no confidence. 'We want to build on the progress that was made in terms of how parliament works for the betterment of all members of parliament and, of course, that means the betterment of all Tasmanians. And move forward.' In a statement, the governor explained why she appointed Rockliff despite his inability to demonstrate a majority backing in parliament. 'In a hung parliament, where no one clearly holds the confidence of the majority of the House of Assembly, the incumbent has the right to remain in office in order to test the numbers in the House of Assembly and for parliament to have the final say in who should be premier,' Baker said. 'I consider the convention of incumbency applies in the current circumstances. 'I shall reappoint the premier. 'It is better for confidence to be determined inside and not outside the parliament.' Rockliff and his cabinet are set to be sworn in next week, before state parliament returns in a fortnight on 19 August. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The governor said the detailed reasons for her decision would be published on her website later on Wednesday. On Tuesday, Rockliff said he had not secured supply and confidence agreements with key crossbenchers but thought it was 'not necessary' in this instance. The Labor leader, Dean Winter, was still vying for his party to form government, revealing he had stepped up negotiations with crossbenchers, independents in particular, in recent days but ruled out a deal with the Greens. The final makeup of Tasmania's parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents. The 19 July election was triggered after Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state's second election in 16 months. A key sticking point in forming government is the major parties' backing of a new $1bn stadium in Hobart, which the Greens and some independents oppose.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Jim Chalmers refuses to rule out drastic change for property owners - what you need to know
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has left the door open to reforming tax breaks for investor landlords after trade unions called for a restriction on negative gearing. ACTU secretary Sally McManus, a participant in the government's Economic Reform Roundtable, has called for negative gearing and the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to be restricted to one investment property. Under her proposal, arrangements for existing investors would be grandfathered for five years before new restrictions were introduced. 'You can have as many investment properties as you want but in terms of the tax benefit, limit that to one,' she told ABC Insiders on Sunday. 'Unless we change it, working people can't live where they work, they can't live where they grew up, and it is causing an enormous amount of pressure for people.' Chalmers on Wednesday declined to rule out restricting negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount, despite Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ruling out changes in Opposition after Labor had lost the 2019 election. 'What I've tried to do, and not just in relation to the ACTU and others who've made these suggestions, is I don't want to get in the habit of knocking off ideas before we get in the room,' he told reporters in Canberra. 'I want people to feel like their contributions are valued because they are. 'Firstly, when it comes to those areas, the government hasn't changed its policies or its positions on those areas.' Ms McManus rebuffed a suggestion reforming negative gearing and the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount would amount to a broken promise, given Albanese won the 2022 election by scrapping his Labor predecessor's policies. 'I just say that we've got to bite the bullet, like, otherwise we're just saying "too bad young people, you're not going to be able to ever own a home, forget even thinking about it",' she said. 'Since 2019, the problem's just got worse, it's going to continue to get worse unless the government's brave enough to do something about it. 'We are just abandoning those generations and we think that's fundamentally wrong.' Australia's median capital city house price of $1.045million is so expensive that someone with a 20 per cent mortgage deposit would now have to earn $161,000 a year just to get a mortgage. That is significantly more than the average, full-time salary of $102,742, which means only high-income earners or a dual-income couple can afford a house in a big city. Labor under former leader Bill Shorten lost the 2016 and 2019 elections with a plan to restrict negative gearing to just future purchases of brand new properties and halve the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 25 per cent. Since September 1999, an investor who made a $100,000 capital gain on a property would only have to add $50,000 to their taxable income for that financial year. The Greens have a similar position to the ACTU, in that they want negative gearing and the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount restricted to one investment property. Since July 2024, the federal government and the states have had a plan to build 1.2million homes over five years, hoping that will boost housing supply and address affordability issues. Real estate data group Cotality, however, noted Australia hadn't built more than a million homes over a similar time frame since the five years to 2019. Cotality Australia's head of research Eliza Owen said that period coincided with quality issues in new apartments, especially in Sydney. 'While a lot of new dwellings were completed, this did not necessarily lead to good housing outcomes - capital growth outcomes for investors have generally been very poor for 2010s apartments and defects were so rife that some new dwellings could not even be lived in,' she said. She added that building companies would be unlikely to be able to build more homes, even with government targets. 'While state and local governments focus on approvals and improving the feasibility of new projects, building companies continue to be stretched thin across an already swollen pipeline and reduced margins,' she said.
