logo
The British left is coming for the Government

The British left is coming for the Government

Photo byWhisper it as yet, but after five long years of confusion and disarray, the British left is rallying. Local political organisations are coalescing, from Chiswick to Liverpool to Newcastle. The Green Party leadership contest has become a straight fight between an energetic, 'eco-populist' left candidate, and the party's more cautious establishment. The prize is clear: local elections due next May across England's major cities, including London councils. After that, who knows. Could Labour's urban fiefdoms fall victim to the rout northern councils saw in the local elections last month?
It won't be easy. Bitterly, almost viscerally unpopular as Labour may be, it is the self-styled insurgents of Nigel Farage's Reform that have been the overwhelming beneficiaries of the Starmer slump. Farage himself has been happy to pilfer from the left – a long-time Thatcherite now turned improbable friend of the welfare state. But the Reform squeeze isn't only on Starmer's Labour, who, after talking up their fiscal discipline at huge political cost are now u-turning on its most unpopular consequences. It's also a squeeze on all those on England's left who fondly imagine that the popularity of their traditional policies, from nationalisation to more welfare spending, is enough to win them votes. Instead, they're now seeing those same demands nabbed by opportunists from the radical right, precisely because they are popular. A new programme for 21st-century England will be needed, focused relentlessly on the everyday cost of living and wealth inequality.
But new organisations are also needed. Peter Mandelson once spoke of a Labour left buried in a 'sealed tomb' by New Labour. This proved to be optimistic, as the Corbyn surge of the 2010s proved. And fearful of a second Corbyn-style resurrection, Starmer's operation has driven a stake through the left's heart, stuffed its mouth with garlic, placed it in a lead-lined coffin, sealed the tomb, and stationed a grim-faced 24-hour armed guard outside, gripping their pistols and blazing torches. The monster will not now escape. As a political force, the Labour left is finished. The tactic of entryism – entering the Labour party and changing it – is finished too.
Instead, the party's steely-eyed Van Helsings should have been looking elsewhere. From the shadows, far away from Westminster, a terrifying new apparition is approaching. Disguised by the size of Labour's majority, the 2024 election saw the non-Labour left win its biggest parliamentary representation in British history, on its biggest vote ever. Four million voters returned nine left MPs, spread between the Greens and five independents, including Jeremy Corbyn in Islington. At the height of its success, in the late 1940s, the Communist Party won two MPs and 94,000 votes. Since the foundation of the Labour Party itself, the non-Labour left has never seen anything like this support.
Against a seemingly monolithic Labour majority, this may have mattered little. Britain's perverse voting system found Keir Starmer foisted into Downing Street with a landslide majority, but with half a million fewer votes than Jeremy Corbyn lost by in 2019. As a result, the party has been left with more marginal seats than ever before in its history. Fifty-one of its seats were won with a margin of less than 5 per cent.
Accurately described after the election by polling expert James Kaganasooriam as a 'sandcastle majority', the turning political tide has now washed away Labour's 2024 support. The main beneficiaries, for now, are Reform, whose spectacular success in the local government elections saw them win control of previously Labour councils from Durham to Derbyshire. Its one-time heartlands in the North of England were already riddled and on the verge collapse, with Boris Johnson's demolition of this so-called 'Red Wall' in 2019 having already delivered the fatal blow. Johnson's failure to hold his new coalition together, coupled with Liz Truss' calamitous 44 days in office, saw many of Johnson's wins fall back into Labour hands five years later – but on the most tenuous and temporary basis.
Demographic change, and a great, decades-long shift in the economy from manufacturing to services, has created new heartlands for the party, concentrated in inner cities and major urban areas across the country: a mix of underpaid, insecure younger workers, often with university degrees; more settled ethnic minority communities; and a solid layer of public sector employees, many of whom are now at or approaching retirement. Generally socially liberal, 15 years of persistent economic failure since the financial crisis have shoved this base increasingly to the economic left. And 25 years of failed military interventions have created a deep cynicism about Britain's role abroad – crystallised in the distance between Starmer's government and its voters on Israel.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Even before entering Downing Street, the horrors of Gaza, and Britain's complicity in them, had been a powerful solvent on Labour's new base of support. That undermined Labour's vote in 2024, and resulted in the arrival of the 'Gaza independents', the four pro-Palestinian MPs elected in the strongly Muslim areas of Leicester, Blackburn, Dewsbury and Birmingham. Combined with Labour's blunders and cruelties in office, from the Winter Fuel Payment to disability allowance cuts, the party's support has been hollowed out. Its voters won't vote, its activists aren't active, and the party's once-fearsome ground game is crumbling.
There was a taste of what could be to come in Haringey last month when a Green Party candidate, Rurairdh Paton, was elected by a landslide in a solidly Labour and solidly working class ward. Tellingly, local campaigners report that Labour grew so desperate for campaigners that local councillors from Folkestone in Kent were drafted in to door-knock. It's the better-established Greens who can seize this opportunity in Labour strongholds. Zack Polanski's leadership bid, and the newly formed internal faction, Greens Organise, have already identified the potential for a breakthrough. Polling shows the Green's support to be younger, and poorer, than the other national parties. These are not the middle-class do-gooders of legend.
The broader left, outside the Greens, needs to recognise how the world has changed. Rumours that Jeremy Corbyn was about to set up a new party have swirled around him since his expulsion from Labour, almost five years ago. National negotiations to establish a new party, organised between different chunks of the post-Corbyn left, have come to little. A combination of political caution, and disagreements over a new party's potential direction and leadership have so far scuppered agreement.
Perhaps wisely, Corbyn himself has been wary of jumping the gun. The history of left-wing breakaways from Labour, from the Independent Labour Party in the 1930s, to Scottish Labour in the 1970s, to Respect in the 2000s, has not been a happy one. Only George Galloway has, to date, made anything like a success of it, and then only via an increasingly eccentric one-man triangulation between the economic left and 'socially conservative' right. Whatever else he may be, Jeremy Corbyn is not George Galloway. And declaring a new party will not magically reproduce his 2015 breakthrough. Cooperation across the non-Labour left is the order of the day.
On the ground, this cooperation is already starting to happen. In Lancashire, Greens have banded together with the newly formed Preston Independents to become the official opposition on the County Council. Greens and Independents are working closely in Islington. Local organisations are being pulled together by prominent independent left candidates, like former mayor Jamie Driscoll in Tyneside, Faiza Shaheen in Chingford, and former ANC MP Andrew Feinstein, who came second place in Keir Starmer's own constituency of Holborn and St Pancras at the 2024 election. Green Party members in all those constituencies are working alongside the independent left.
Local alliances can become a national force. Across the channel, France's New Popular Front, an alliance between forces of the traditional left, the left populist France Insoumise, and the French Greens, was pulled together in weeks on a radical programme that catapulted the alliance to top of the polls in the snap elections – and pushed Marine Le Pen's National Rally to third place. France Insoumise MP Danielle Obono spoke at the London Green Party's conference last month on the practical experience of unity. There's a desire to learn from what worked – and what did not.
The next general election isn't due until 2029. But a string of local council victories next year would pave the way for an unprecedented challenge to Labour – not from the right, as the party has always had to fight, but from its radical flank. And this new movement could take parts of Labour with them: from the tone of his Guardian op-ed on Wednesday, John McDonnell already regards his party as half-lost. Far from the coming in from the cold, what was once the Labour left has a different goal: burning the house down and building something completely new.
[See also: Child poverty is rallying the Labour left]
Related

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reform launches ‘Doge' council unit
Reform launches ‘Doge' council unit

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Reform launches ‘Doge' council unit

Reform UK will launch a new 'Doge' council unit to crack down on waste and inefficiency. Nigel Farage's party has assembled a team of software engineers, data analysts and forensic auditors, which will visit each of the 10 councils Reform controls – starting with Kent on Monday – to look at ways to save money. The group, appointed by Zia Yusuf, the Reform chairman, is modelled on Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency in the US. It will be headed by a leading tech entrepreneur. Reform has not yet named him, although the party says he has a specialism in data analytics and has also been a turnaround chief executive. The announcement comes a month after Reform gained its first foothold in local government when it seized control of eight local authorities from the Tories and two from Labour. Mr Yusuf said: 'For too long, British taxpayers have watched their money vanish into a black hole. Their taxes keep going up, their bin collections keep getting less frequent, potholes remain unfixed, their local services keep getting cut. 'Reform won a historic victory on a mandate to change this. As promised, we have created a UK Doge to identify and cut wasteful spending of taxpayer money. Our team will use cutting edge technology and deliver real value for voters.' Mr Farage told the BBC after the local elections: 'I think every county needs a Doge. I think local government has gone under the radar for too long. 'We've seen the high-profile cases of Croydon, of Thurrock, where they've gone bankrupt, Birmingham indeed, where they've gone bankrupt.' Last week, Mr Musk stepped down from his role in the Trump administration, days after he had attacked the US president's spending plan by claiming it 'undermines' his Doge work. The Reform 'Doge' team's first visit will be to Kent, where it won more than two thirds of the seats in May. The county council has a gross budget of more than £2.5 billion. Linden Kemkaran, the Reform council leader, has written to Amanda Beer, the chief executive, to announce her intention to undertake a review of the council's 'financial management, procurement activity, and associated governance arrangements'. 'This review is part of Reform's commitment to transparency, accountability, the prudent management of public funds and the highest standards in public life,' the letter states. 'Conducting this work was a core part of Reform's local manifesto. We believe it is in the public interest to ensure that the council's financial and procurement systems are robust, lawful, and value-driven. To that end, Kent council has appointed the Doge team, a unit of software engineers, data analysts and forensic auditors to conduct this review on our behalf.' The review will look at contractual arrangements with suppliers and consultants, all capital expenditure, any off-book or contingent liabilities, the use of reserves and financial resilience, and any problems flagged by internal or external auditors in the last three years. The team has demanded access to all relevant documents, reports, records, data, minutes and correspondence, as well as 'any internal investigations or whistleblowing reports relevant to financial matters'. The letter warns: 'Should you resist this request, we are ready to pass a council motion to compel the same and will consider any obstruction of our councillors duties to be gross misconduct. We trust this will not be required.' Last week, Reform announced plans to axe gold-plated pension schemes for council staff. Richard Tice, the deputy leader, said final-salary pension schemes would end in the councils it now controls, describing them as an 'outrage'. He said the money would be redirected to improving council services such as bin collections. The party has also pledged to reduce spending on diversity, equality and inclusion schemes and called for an attack on government waste to save £5 out of every £100.

UK plans for 'fighter jets carrying nuclear bombs' slammed
UK plans for 'fighter jets carrying nuclear bombs' slammed

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

UK plans for 'fighter jets carrying nuclear bombs' slammed

If the Labour Government went through with the purchase, reportedly to counter the growing threat by Russia, it would be the biggest expansion of the UK's so-called nuclear deterrent since the Cold War. The Sunday Times reports that the Government is taking part in 'highly sensitive' talks and that US firm Lockheed Martin's F-35A Lightning stealth fighter jet and other aircrafts are under consideration. READ MORE: Scottish independence support at 58 per cent if Nigel Farage becomes PM However, Defence Secretary John Healey refused to comment on the talks during a media round on Sunday, instead stating that the strategic defence review, due to be published on Monday, would contain further details about the UK Government's plans. It's understood the strategic defence review will not go so far as to back the purchase of the jets, but will suggest the UK looks at expanding its nuclear capability. The newspaper reports that the F-35A can carry the B61 thermonuclear bomb, the kind primarily used by the US, which has a stockpile of more than 3700. It's understood that as part of Nato's nuclear-sharing arrangements, the UK jets, if purchased, would carry these rather than its own nuclear weapons. Before they were decommissioned after the Cold War, Britain previously had a stockpile of tactical nukes and V-bomber aircraft. Now, the Vanguard submarine programme is the only nuclear arsenal the UK has. Healey was asked on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg if the UK should have a 'new, extra way of delivering nuclear weapons'. (Image: PA/BBC) He told the programme that the strategic defence review would 'talk about the new threats that we face, won't get into the sort of discussions that need to remain private, not public". Healey insisted the UK's nuclear deterrent was the 'ultimate guarantee of security in this country'. 'It's what Putin fears most,' he added. David Kelly, member of the executive of the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (SCND), said he was 'not surprised, but shocked' at the possibility of an expansion of the UK's nuclear weapons. 'The British government drones on and on and on about independent nuclear deterrent,' he told The National. READ MORE: Scots minister hits back at Defence Secretary 'student union politics' jibe 'And now the next way of strengthening that apparently is to use American airplanes, which we suspect have a kill switch, with American nuclear weapons, which unquestionably would have a kill switch, to be launched by standoff missiles. 'It's just not very well thought through, like the rest of our defence policies." He added that discussions of war were 'astonishing'. SNP MSP Bill Kidd said: "Many Scots will have concerns about Labour spending billions of pounds of taxpayer money to expand the UK's nuclear arsenal at a time when many families continue to face the impact of the cost of living crisis. "The UK's nuclear capability is not independent, has leaked in recent years putting workers and wildlife at risk, frequently fails in safety tests and is highly unlikely to ever be used. We want an end to these dangerous weapons in Scotland, but Labour are determined to write them another blank cheque. "Any further expansion of the UK's nuclear arsenal must therefore come before parliament for democratic scrutiny.' Alba party leader Kenny MacAskill was also scathing in response to reports about the potential nuclear expansion. The former Scottish justice secretary said: "When we need cool heads, Labour are lurching towards war. READ MORE: SNP criticise Labour's plans to increase UK's defence spending "The UK is already an onshore aircraft carrier for the United States and now British planes are to carry American nuclear weapons. Scotland is already endangered by Trident on the Clyde and the last thing we need is nuclear weapons in our skies. "It's time for peace and investment in jobs, health and housing, not in machines of war and certainly not weapons which would see the annihilation of the human race." Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie also pointed to reports of leaks of radioactive material into Scotland's lochs and rivers around Faslane. 'In the 30 years since it was first deployed, with constant stories of accidents and poor maintenance, Trident has posed a greater threat to people in Scotland than it has to anyone else," he said. 'The simple fact is that nuclear armaments are indiscriminate weapons of mass slaughter, an immoral and unsafe waste of hundreds of billions of pounds that could be far better spent. (Image: Andrew Milligan) 'And relying on US technology at a time when the US president is not only proving to be an unreliable ally, but is an actively hostile threat to our allies in Canada and Greenland, make this an even more bizarre choice. 'I look forward to the day when an independent Scotland can join the 70 other nations who have already signed and ratified the Treaty on the Prohibition on Nuclear Weapons.' It comes as the UK Government is to set up at least six munitions factories, with one rumoured, but not confirmed, to be in Scotland. Ministers pledged £1.5 billion for the factories and will support the procurement of up to 7000 UK-built long-range weapons in response to the strategic defence review, to be published on Monday. The new funding will see UK munitions spending hit £6bn during this parliament. Healey said the additional funding for defence was a 'message to Moscow'.

Fairer elections and the threat of Reform UK
Fairer elections and the threat of Reform UK

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Fairer elections and the threat of Reform UK

George Monbiot captures the betrayal and despair felt by millions of Labour voters who thought they were voting for change at the last general election (How we can smash Britain's two-party system for good at the next election, 27 May).Less than a year later they have found themselves with a government pursuing much the same cruel austerity policies as the Conservative one it replaced. And he's right that Keir Starmer's cynical descent into inflammatory Powellite rhetoric is a gift to Nigel Farage. Most voters want nothing to do with the politics of fear and division, but the UK's antiquated and unrepresentative electoral system fails to reflect the wishes of the progressive left and centre-left majority. A hung parliament is now a very real possibility after the next election. This would indeed be a huge opportunity to scrap the first-past-the-post system that has blighted British politics for so long. As two Green MPs who overturned massive majorities to win our seats, we know it's possible for progressives to win against all the odds – and to change the electoral system, we will have to. The Green party has long championed electoral reform. As candidates for the party's leadership, our aim is to be heading a much larger group of Green MPs in parliament, giving us the leverage and negotiating power to actually achieve such transformational Chowns MPGreen party, North HerefordshireAdrian Ramsay MPGreen party, Waveney Valley George Monbiot is right to challenge the shortcomings of our electoral system. However, all electoral systems are flawed and in a democracy no individual decides what sort of government gets elected afterwards. Across Europe, where proportional representation prevails, the traditional parties of power are being replaced – not by a rainbow coalition of progressives, but by the seemingly inexorable rise of the hard right. In Scotland, the SNP-Green coalition broke down. In the UK, when the Liberal Democrats held the balance of power, they sided with the Conservatives in inflicting ideological austerity. When we had a referendum between engagement with Europe or isolation, the majority voted for the latter. The failure of our mainstream parties is that they have lost the ability to engage with ordinary people. Politics is the difficult task of leading the agenda while responding to the hopes and fears of wider society and all the ambiguities and compromises that are needed to do so. The government's shift in language from restraint to support for those most in need might be the beginning of something better – we can but BrownIlkley, West Yorkshire George Monbiot is spot-on in his analysis of the dysfunctions of our electoral system. One glaring danger he doesn't mention, however, can be seen in the steep rise of the Reform UK vote. We used to hear as one of the justifications of the current system that it prevented extreme parties from gaining a significant representation. Never mind that this revealed an arrogantly undemocratic mindset, the evidence now is that the distortions of the system may precipitate precisely the opposite outcome. Given the fragmentation of votes, it is entirely possible that, with fewer than 30% of the ballot, Reform could achieve an absolute majority in parliament at the next general election. That undemocratic disaster, quite apart from the other democratic imperatives George identifies, should be ringing alarm bells for urgent SmithGlasgow Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store