logo
How aircraft toilets work, and why they often clog together

How aircraft toilets work, and why they often clog together

Hindustan Times14-05-2025
Clogged lavatories have disrupted two of Air India's international flights in the span of two months, drawing attention to how aircraft toilets operate. All but one of the toilets on a Boeing 777 (B777) from Chicago to Delhi became unusable in March, forcing the aircraft to return, and at least five toilets clogged on a B777 from Toronto to Delhi this month, forcing a diversion to Frankfurt.
A B777 typically has 12 toilets, but why should so many clog simultaneously? The key factor is the location of the objects causing the blockage — often polythene bags or pieces of cloth — which can affect all toilets whose waste lines pass through that area. But, regardless of whether one or multiple toilets are affected, such blockages stem from a disruption in the physics that aircraft lavatory systems rely on.
Vacuum toilets
Aircraft must, by necessity, maintain cabin pressure at a level higher than the atmospheric pressure outside — and this pressure differential also underpins the scientific principle on which aircraft toilets operate. The primary reason for maintaining relatively high cabin pressure is passenger safety and comfort. At an altitude of, say, 35,000 feet, the air pressure is around 3.45 pounds per square inch or psi (for context sea-level pressure is roughly four times higher). To ensure passengers have enough oxygen to breathe, cabin pressure is typically maintained at 11 to 12 psi.
The aircraft toilet system takes advantage of the pressure differential between the cabin and the surrounding atmosphere by creating a vacuum so that air at higher pressure rushes toward the area of lower pressure, carrying waste along with it. This does not mean the waste is expelled into the atmosphere — as might happen to characters in an action movie when an aircraft door blows open. Instead, the waste is directed into a holding tank located in a lower-pressure zone in an area where the pressure is lower, similar to the conditions outside the aircraft.
Also Read: Polythene bags, clothes clogged toilets: Air India after flight returns to US
'The waste tank is located below the floor of the aircraft cabin, in an unpressurised area. This tank, when full, can be serviced (emptied of waste material) whenever the aircraft lands at an airport,' said Ashwani Sharma, a veteran aircraft maintenance engineer who served with Air India for many years and is currently a professor of practice at Chandigarh University's aerospace engineering department and chairman of the Aeronautical Society of India's Mumbai branch.
When one flushes a toilet at home, it releases a stream of water that carries the waste into a sewer line. In contrast, when one flushes an aircraft toilet, it opens a valve at the bottom of the toilet bowl, exposing the contents to the pressure differential. Air from the cabin immediately rushes into the bowl and, often noisily, passes through the valve on its way to the waste tank.
The science behind clogging
What is flushed down the toilet is often the reason behind clogging. Another cause can be mineral buildup — something that frequently affects household toilets — but clogs in aircraft toilets are more often associated with items flushed by fliers and where these end up in the network of drain lines.
Different aircraft models have different numbers of toilets and water tanks. Narrow-body, single-aisle aircraft such as the Boeing B737 MAX and Airbus A320 NEO have one tank each, while wide-body, twin-aisle aircraft have two or more. 'A B777 has two tanks, while an Airbus A350 has four. If there are two tanks, then half the toilets would be connected to each,' Sharma said.
Also Read: Air India flight returns to Chicago over clogged loos
HT has reported earlier that the B777 diverted to Frankfurt had three sewer lines. No details were immediately available on how these three lines were divided between two tanks (if there were indeed two), but it is easy to understand why some clogs affect a larger number of toilets than others.
A clog in a vacuum-based toilet means that one or more objects are acting as a barrier between the areas of higher and lower pressure, so the air in the cabin can no longer flow out with the waste, making the principle of differential pressure unworkable, Sharma said. 'If the clog is in a portion of drain line that is near the waste tank, then all toilets connected to that particular tank will be clogged as the clog will prevent differential pressure being created. If, however, the clog is in a toilet bowl or the drain line immediately below the bowl, then only that toilet would be clogged,' he added.
Size matters because some items may be small enough to pass through the toilet bowl hole but too large to go through the drain line, whose diameter is smaller. 'This can block the drain line. Once there's a block in the line, differential pressure cannot be created and all toilets connected to that waste tank would become unserviceable,' Sharma said.
Looking for solutions
Sharma stressed that the problem of clogging is not limited to Air India or any single airline, calling it a universal issue. As such, newer ways to prevent or reduce clogging continue to be discussed.
For example, a mesh could be placed at the end of the toilet bowl. 'The mesh will not allow a plastic bottle or a diaper to go through and block the line, but waste matter will go,' Sharma said.
'But it can create other issues,' he said. The suction pressure is so high that if a weak material is used, it will not last. Then again, if the material is too strong, the toilet bowl itself can get blocked. 'The difference is that if the toilet bowl gets blocked, only one toilet will become unserviceable. That particular toilet can be labelled as such, but the others will continue working.' Sharma said.
It remains an evolving area with scope for innovation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Volcano Erupts In The Background While Man Proposes To His Girlfriend: "It's All Just Perfect"
Volcano Erupts In The Background While Man Proposes To His Girlfriend: "It's All Just Perfect"

NDTV

time6 hours ago

  • NDTV

Volcano Erupts In The Background While Man Proposes To His Girlfriend: "It's All Just Perfect"

A sweet love story of a couple was made memorable by a volcano when it erupted in the background while the man was proposing to his girlfriend in Guatemala. The once-in-a-lifetime moment will be cherished by the man, named Justin Lee, and his girlfriend, Morgan, for a very long time. When Justin got down on one knee, Volcan Fuego erupted in the background, spewing lava and smoke into the air, creating a romantic scene in the background. Watch the video here: View this post on Instagram A post shared by Morgan 🤍 (@missmorganalexa) Also Read | Air India Pilot Praised For Smooth Landing In Mumbai Despite Heavy Rain, Video Goes Viral The video was originally shared on June 6, but went viral after it was re-shared on Instagram on August 18. "For anyone who doesn't know, I got proposed to by my long-term boyfriend @jleenumbers on Volcan Acatenango in Guatemala. Volcan Fuego is what is erupting in the background. We got very lucky because the eruption you see in the video was the first visible eruption we saw that day," Morgan wrote in a caption. The video has captured hearts online, with social media users praising the couple's unforgettable moment. One user said it was "straight out of a fantasy book". Another user said, "The volcano was also excited for you guys". "The lightning, the lava, the love, the question, the answer, it's all just perfect," a third user wrote. Morgan has also mentioned that the Volcan Fuego holds spiritual significance in Guatemalan indigenous culture. "In Guatemalan indigenous culture, Volcan Fuego serves as a sacred link to the spiritual world, with eruptions seen as powerful manifestations of the supernatural and an opportunity for rituals and offerings. Taking 'I lava you' to a whole new level," she added.

Forced to buy fresh air tickets after testing Covid +ve, doctor wins refund
Forced to buy fresh air tickets after testing Covid +ve, doctor wins refund

Hindustan Times

time15 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Forced to buy fresh air tickets after testing Covid +ve, doctor wins refund

A retired assistant civil surgeon, who was forced to buy fresh air tickets after testing positive for Covid-19 during his US trip in January 2022, has won relief from the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sangrur. The complainant alleged that this was a violation of Covid-19 instructions and a serious offence under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. Terming Air India guilty of deficiency in service and unfair trade practices, the commission has directed the airline to issue a complete refund of the $1,370 spent on the San Francisco to Delhi tickets, along with ₹10,000 for causing mental agony and ₹10,000 for litigation costs. The complainant, Dr Surinder Singla, had submitted before the commission that he and his wife, Dr Neena Singla, had booked return flight tickets between Delhi and San Francisco via online portal MakeMyTrip for ₹1,54,773. They were set to return on January 3, 2022. Before their return flight, Dr Surinder said, he underwent a mandatory Covid-19 test and tested positive on January 1, 2022. The couple immediately informed MakeMyTrip and requested the flights be rescheduled as per the government's Covid-19 policy. But despite repeated correspondence, the flights were not rescheduled. The complainant alleged that this was a violation of Covid-19 instructions and a serious offence under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. After receiving no response regarding rescheduling, the couple was forced to purchase new tickets on January 10, 2022, from San Francisco to Delhi, at a cost of $1,370. After returning to India on January 13, 2022, their request for a refund for the original tickets was declined by Air India. The complaint was filed against both Air India and MakeMyTrip. However, the commission exempted the latter from any liability, accepting its argument that its role was limited to acting as a 'facilitator' for providing confirmed tickets and that its obligations were discharged once the tickets were provided. No one appeared or responded from Air India's end. Thus, it was proceeded against ex parte. Stating that the evidence produced by the complainant remained unrebutted, the commission ordered Air India to refund $1,370 paid for the fresh air tickets, along with interest at 7% per annum from filing of the complaint till realisation. Further, the airline will pay ₹10,000 on account of mental pain, agony and harassment caused to the couple, and ₹10,000 for litigation expenses within 60 days from the receipt of a copy of this order.

Air India ordered to repay retd doctor after Covid flight dispute
Air India ordered to repay retd doctor after Covid flight dispute

Time of India

time19 hours ago

  • Time of India

Air India ordered to repay retd doctor after Covid flight dispute

Sangrur: A consumer court here has directed Air India to refund more than ₹1 lakh to a retired doctor after the airline refused to reschedule or reimburse tickets when he tested positive for Covid-19 before a return flight from the US. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The district consumer disputes redressal commission in Sangrur held Air India and its managing director liable for "deficiency in service and unfair trade practices" after the airline rejected multiple requests for rescheduling in Jan 2022 and instead demanded an additional ₹15,500. Dr Surinder Singla, then 62, and his wife, Neena, had paid more than ₹1.5 lakh for round-trip tickets from Delhi to San Francisco. With Singla forced to cancel his return flight after testing positive, the couple ultimately spent an another more than ₹1 lakh on fresh tickets. In its ruling, the commission ordered Air India to refund more than ₹1 lakh with 7% annual interest from Oct 2022, and to pay ₹10,000 each in compensation for mental agony and litigation costs. The court gave the airline 60 days to comply or face penalties. The panel, led by president Jot Naranjan Singh Gill, cited a 2020 Supreme Court judgment requiring airlines to refund passengers whose flights were disrupted by the pandemic. MakeMyTrip, through which the tickets were booked, was cleared of responsibility as only a facilitator. The order was passed ex parte after Air India failed to appear during hearings. Advocate Yogesh Gupta, representing the Singlas, called the decision "a victory for passengers unfairly burdened by rigid airline policies". Air India has until Sept 26 to comply with the order.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store