logo
Trump's dealmaker claims up tension between India, US – DW – 06/23/2025

Trump's dealmaker claims up tension between India, US – DW – 06/23/2025

DW9 hours ago

There is new friction in the India-US relationship after Washington claimed that it helped broker a ceasefire between India and Pakistan by leveraging trade talks.
US President Donald Trump's claim that he personally brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan during May's conflict has caused some diplomatic friction.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi told Trump in a telephone call that the ceasefire was achieved through talks between the Indian and Pakistani militaries and not US mediation, India's foreign secretary, Vikram Misri, said in a statement following the call.
"PM Modi told President Trump clearly that during this period, there was no talk at any stage on subjects like India-US trade deal or US mediation between India and Pakistan," Misri said.
"Prime Minister Modi emphasized that India has not accepted mediation in the past and never will," Misri added.
There was no separate readout of the call from the White House.
Modi and Trump were scheduled to meet on the sidelines of the Group of Seven (G7) Summit in Canada, but didn't because of the US president's hasty departure due to the situation in the Middle East.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Although Modi and Trump enjoy a personal rapport, there is a belief that Trump's unpredictability and transactional approach to foreign policy matters may be straining the relationship.
India is currently negotiating a trade deal with the United States, but talks have encountered hurdles as the July 9 deadline approaches for the end of a 90-day pause on most tariffs threatened by the Trump administration against US trade partners.
Ajay Bisaria, a former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan, told DW that India has so far handled Trump with strategic composure.
"But, when the US president repeatedly and publicly claims an outsize role in mediating the recent India-Pakistan conflict, expect public corrections from India," Bisaria said.
"Public opinion in India now tends to see the US as an unreliable partner," he added.
Though Delhi understands that the India-US relationship is deeper than White House pronouncements, Bisaria said, Indian officials cannot ignore public diplomacy challenges.
"Each time Washington indulges Pakistan's military, like President Trump's recent lunch with its army chief, General Asim Munir, it sends the wrong signal," Bisaria said.
India has accused Pakistan of "supporting terrorism" from across the border after the April 22 attack on civilians in India-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people.
The attack was claimed by a group calling itself the Kashmir Resistance, which India says is also known as The Resistance Front and is linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a UN-designated terrorist organization.
New Delhi blamed Islamabad for backing the attack, an allegation Pakistan has denied.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The lunch meeting between Trump and General Munir, which took place at the White House last week, was a unique event as it marked the first time a sitting US president officially hosted a Pakistani army chief who was not also serving as the head of state.
Many viewed it as provocative given the recent tensions.
"India's diplomatic message to the US will remain clear: Sanction — don't embrace — Pakistan's generals," Bisaria said.
Meera Shankar, a former Indian envoy to the United States, had a different take. She told DW that it was perhaps somewhat clumsy to rebut Trump's claims of having brokered an end to the recent India-Pakistan conflict, since India did not seek a full-scale conflict.
She said it was possible that the Trump administration had helped persuade Pakistan to pull back.
"The Indian government was facing domestic criticism for allowing foreign intervention," Shankar said, "and I think the rebuttal was responding to this."
"The feting of Asim Munir in the US must be seen in the context of the US military strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities," she said. "It is likely that the US was seeking some facilities from Pakistan in this context."
Shankar said there was concern that the India-US strategic partnership could be coming under stress because of missteps from the Trump administration.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"There is a need to show sensitivity to each other's concerns and to strengthen communication," Shankar said.
The United States cannot afford to isolate India in countering China's rise in the Indo-Pacific region.
India will host the 2025 Quad Summit in September, with Trump expected to attend.
The group — made up of the United States, Japan, Australia and India — focuses on promoting stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region, particularly in response to China's assertiveness.
The last time the Indian and US leaders met was in February after Trump was sworn in for his second presidential term, with the visit underscoring the importance both men placed on their relationship.
Amitabh Mattoo, dean of the School of International Studies at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, told DW that the recent developments have introduced friction and mistrust into the relationship.
"The US has pursued short-term and deal-based diplomacy," Mattoo said, "and this transactional approach has undermined mutual trust and fostered a sense of unpredictability."
"This raises concerns about India's relations with the Trump administration … but the partnership can overcome challenges and shape a better, durable future — and also offer an opportunity for renewal," Mattoo said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO summit: Trump ambiguous on Article 5 clause – DW – 06/25/2025
NATO summit: Trump ambiguous on Article 5 clause – DW – 06/25/2025

DW

time29 minutes ago

  • DW

NATO summit: Trump ambiguous on Article 5 clause – DW – 06/25/2025

The US president was cryptic over whether the US would abide by the military alliance's mutual defense guarantees. Donald Trump is one of the leaders attending the NATO summit in The Hague. DW has the latest. Member nations of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) are holding a summit in The Hague, starting Tuesday. NATO members are expected to approve a boost in defense spending. These are the latest developments concerning the NATO summit on Tuesday, 24.06.2025. US President Donald Trump is in The Hague for the NATO summit, where defense leaders are expected to raise their defense spending to 5% of their national output. This could be a big win for the US president who has for years asked European allies to contribute to their national security. Trump has had a rocky relationship with NATO leaders, suggesting at times the US may not defend allies who do not contribute enough to defense spending. Asked whether the US remains committed to NATO's Article 5 clause, Trump told reporters on Air Force One (on his way to Europe) that: "Depends on your definition. There are numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right? But I'm committed to being their friends." Still, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte praised Trump in a personal letter the US leader shared to his Truth Social account. Another big topic will be Russia's war in Ukraine. Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy were at the Dutch royal palace for dinner together earlier this evening as well. But Trump was seated next to like-minded Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni. Their table is shared by Dutch King Willem-Alexander and Mark Rutte. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said he has no doubt about the US commitment to the alliance's Article 5 mutual defense clause. "I have no doubt that the US is totally committed to NATO, totally committed to Article 5," Rutte told reporters in The Hague. He made the remarks after President Donald Trump, on his way to a summit of NATO leaders, said there were "numerous" definitions of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, Asked later to clarify, Trump said he was "committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there." The EU's top foreign policy representative Kaja Kallas spoke to DW's Alexandra von Nahmen on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on Tuesday, where the diplomat said member states, "can help Ukraine more if they invest more in defense." Kallas said US President Donald Trump has been cajoling NATO states to spend more on defense, "for quite some time." But, she added: "Many didn't just listen, but now, we are in the security situation that we are. And most of the European countries have realized that we actually need to do this." "Times have changed," said Kallas when asked about the fact that Ukraine was not going to be at the top of the NATO agenda this week. "But for Europe, Ukraine is our top priority. And that's why we are committing to helping Ukraine. We are committed to putting more pressure on Russia so that they would also want peace." Asked why Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who will be at the summit, won't play a larger role, she simply said, "you know why." Kallas also spoke of the need to put defense production into high gear. "We are also cooperating with the Ukraine defense industry because they have actually created the defense industry from scratch," said Kallas, adding that the Ukrainians have been "very creative and very innovative" and that "there's a lot we can learn from them." Ukraine has been keen on joining NATO as well as the European Union. Its NATO aspirations look highly unlikely to feature prominently in The Hague. Still, Kallas did not close the door on Ukraine's EU bid, saying: "We also have the European [Council] summit coming up this week. We should move with the enlargement track because that is the hope for the Ukrainian people. We need to show that Europe is their family." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video As NATO leaders increase defense spending, they must also commit to upholding human rights and international humanitarian law, Amnesty International Secretary General Agnes Callamard told DW. 'What counts is the safety and the security of the people, and that cannot just be done through an increase in defense budgets. It must be done by recentering NATO, the UN, and the international community on what matters: the protection of international law,' Callamard said during an interview with DW in The Hague. Member states are expected to agree on a target of spending 5% of gross domestic product on defense, with 3.5% allocated to core military expenditures and another 1.5% directed toward areas such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. Callamard emphasized that the financial burden should not fall solely on ordinary citizens. 'The brunt of this 5% increase must be carried by the corporate actors who are going to benefit from the increase in defense spending,' she told DW correspondent Jack Parrock. Amnesty International is participating in the NATO Public Forum, which runs parallel to the summit and brings together leaders, officials, security experts, academics, journalists, and NGOs. 'So far, here at the NATO summit, I have not heard one reference to the suffering of the people. Yet Ukrainians are suffering, Palestinians are suffering, Israelis are suffering, Iranians are suffering. We're counting deaths by the thousands and thousands,' Callamard said. US President Donald Trump says he is heading to the NATO summit expecting a calmer atmosphere than recent events in the Middle East. "Heading to NATO where, at worst, it will be a much calmer period than what I just went through with Israel and Iran. I look forward to seeing all of my very good European friends, and others. Hopefully, much will be accomplished!" Trump posted on the social media platform X. Germany's 2025 budget includes funding for 10,000 new military positions and about 1,000 additional civilian posts, the Defense Ministry has said. "We will invest massively in the Bundeswehr," Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said. "After decades of neglecting the Bundeswehr, dangerous security gaps have emerged that we must continue to close." The minister called the news "today's message from Berlin" as he headed to the NATO summit in The Hague. "NATO partners' expectations of Germany are high, and quite rightly so," Pistorius added. He confirmed that major investments in air defense were planned. The defense budget is expected to more than double by 2029, rising to €152.8 billion, according to current budget planning. Chancellor Friedrich Merz has said Berlin plans to turn its Bundeswehr into Europe's strongest army. Pistorius has previously said that Germany could need up to 60,000 more troops. As the NATO summit in The Hague is expected to focus on a single issue — a massive increase in defense spending across the alliance — many of Ukraine's strongest supporters fear the gathering may prove disappointing for Kyiv. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrived on Tuesday and is holding bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the summit. "For us, it is the most important thing to see NATO and EU countries united," he said, standing alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and European Council President Antonio Costa. The four leaders met to coordinate their positions ahead of a dinner hosted by the Dutch King. US President Donald Trump will also be in attendance; however, he will not be seated next to the Ukrainian president, a source told DW. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said he was probably going to meet Zelenskyy in The Hague. However, the Ukrainian leader is not invited to participate in a closed-door leaders' session planned for Wednesday. This stands in stark contrast to the prominent role Zelenskyy played at previous NATO summits in Washington D.C., and Vilnius, and is most likely the result of Trump's antipathy toward the Ukrainian president. US President Donald Trump has sown doubt on his commitment to NATO's core mutual defense pledge as he departed for the key summit in the Netherlands. The two-day summit — opening with a dinner hosted by the Dutch King Willem-Alexander — aims to reassure the US leader on defense spending commitments. Trump's return to office has reignited fears he could undermine the transatlantic alliance. Asked en route aboard Air Force One whether he remained committed to NATO's Article Five mutual defense clause, Trump said, "Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five," adding only that he was "committed to being their friends." NATO members have scrambled to meet his demands by agreeing to spend 3.5% of GDP on core military needs by 2035, with an additional 1.5% dedicated to broader security areas such as cyber defense and infrastructure. Alliance officials insist the buildup is essential to deter Russia, warning that Moscow could recover from its war losses in Ukraine and pose a renewed threat within five years. Europe has finally awakened in response to Russia's war against Ukraine, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen says, describing a generational shift in the continent's security posture. "All of Europe is facing a changing international landscape as we've just heard, rightly so," she told reporters ahead of a two-day summit of the alliance in The Hague. "The security architecture that we relied on for decades can no longer be taken for granted. It is a once in a generation tectonic shift." Von der Leyen said recent actions by European states would have seemed "unthinkable just a year ago." "The Europe of defense has finally awakened," she added. "Tomorrow, the summit will set indeed historic new spending targets for NATO allies." The NATO military alliance's chief Mark Rutte has said it is "unthinkable" that Russia should manage to "outproduce" the Western defence alliance. "We need to do more," Rutte stressed at a defence industry forum ahead of a crunch leaders' summit in The Hague. "It is simply unthinkable that Russia, with an economy 25 times smaller than NATO's, should be able to outproduce and outgun us," the NATO chief stressed. "We must spend more to prevent war. We must win this new war of production." Rutte also said European allies should not be concerned over the United States' commitment to NATO, despite criticism of the alliance from US President Donald Trump. Speaking ahead of a two-day gathering in The Hague, Netherlands, Rutte said: "There is total commitment by the US president and the US senior leadership to NATO," Rutte told a public forum before the formal opening of the summit. The summit and its final statement will be short and focused on heeding Trump's call to spend 5% of GDP on defense — a big jump from the current 2% goal. Rutte described the spending issue as a "this huge pebble in the shoe" and a "huge irritant." "We are not spending enough as Europeans and Canadians, and they want us to equalize with what the US is spending," he said. Meanwhile, Rutte said he "cannot predict" when the three-year war in Ukraine will end. Russia has cited Ukraine's desire to join NATO as one of the reasons why it launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor in 2022. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While the escalation in the Middle East will be high on NATO summit's docket, the spotlight is on a massive increase in defense spending. This comes in response to pressure form US President Donald Trump. Read our full explainer here. NATO is the world's largest military alliance, and is more than three-quarters of a century old. It now has 32 member countries. But what exactly is NATO and what are its tasks? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video NATO allies gathered in The Hague on Tuesday to begin a two-day summit which would see countries in the transnational military alliance discuss a boost their defense spending. Leaders, defense and foreign ministers of the 32 member states, along with representatives of NATO's Indo-Pacific partners — Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand — are expected at the summit. The Netherlands summit comes amid the shadow of the escalation in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine. Both crises are likely to be addressed during the session. NATO countries are expected to vote in favor of increasing defense spending to 5% at the summit. Getting NATO members to shell out more money in defense spending has been a key demand of US President Donald Trump, who is also expected to attend. Stay with our updates as we bring you the latest news and analyses from the NATO summit.

Trump Plays Deft Hand With Iran-Israel Ceasefire But Doubts Remain
Trump Plays Deft Hand With Iran-Israel Ceasefire But Doubts Remain

Int'l Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Plays Deft Hand With Iran-Israel Ceasefire But Doubts Remain

With his surprise announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, US President Donald Trump has turned his flair for social media into diplomatic deftness, despite continued uncertainty in the Middle East. Israel, Iran and Trump himself all declared victory after 12 days of conflict that culminated Saturday in the United States bombing Iran's key nuclear sites. After facing criticism -- even within his base -- for breaking his campaign promises against military intervention abroad, Trump was able to show a quick way out, and to portray himself, despite the bombing, as a peacemaker. "I don't think the Israeli government was able to sustain a long-term war, but I think the main factor here was President Trump. He did not want to see a new war in the region break out under his watch," said Will Todman, a senior fellow at the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "That is what changed the calculation for Israel and for Iran as well." Trump startled even close aides and allies by announcing the ceasefire on social media late Monday -- the middle of the night in the Middle East -- just after Iran fired missiles at a US base in Qatar, in what appeared to be a choreographed response as the rockets were easily shot down. Trump chose not to retaliate against Iran and on Tuesday, returned to his electronic bully pulpit to urge Israel to abort new attacks on Iran. Iran needed an off-ramp as it suffered its worst assault since the 1980-88 war with Iraq. Trump also appeared to offer incentives to sanctions-bound Iran by suggesting an easing of US pressure on China to stop buying Iranian oil. Israel's military, while proving itself to be the region's strongest, has been stretched by campaigns in Gaza, Syria and Lebanon, and with Iranian strikes this month, the Israeli population endured the most prolonged, deadly air attacks seen in decades. After Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed Trump's intervention, the president's warning Tuesday likely also showed him the limits to US support, Todman said. Trump hailed his intervention as a monumental success, although critics have long warned that an attack could make Iran rush, more clandestinely, to a nuclear bomb. While Trump claimed Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated," a classified report found that the US bombing did not destroy the core parts of the three nuclear sites, according to CNN and The New York Times. Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, said it's too early to know if the ceasefire would hold, either. He said that Gulf Arab powers, led by well-connected Qatar, did the hard work of quiet diplomacy as they sought a return to calm in their region. "Trump vocally used his troll power to try to restrain the actions of Israel and Iran, but that matters less compared with the role that these countries continuously play," Katulis said of Gulf Arab states. Katulis, who worked on the Middle East for former president Bill Clinton, said the Trump administration's tactical military operations, combined with "a heavy dose of strategic communications" confused Americans and global actors alike "about what it is we're actually trying to get done." One area where Trump's diplomacy had clear -- if short-term -- benefits was at home. A prolonged US military campaign "had the potential to really fracture President Trump's own base of support," said Jonathan Panikoff, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. But now, "my guess is the majority of his MAGA and other Republican base will stay relatively unified, even if they were unthrilled in some quarters," he said. While traditional hawks of Trump's Republican Party largely cheered the Iran strikes, they were widely but not universally denounced by rival Democrats. Annelle Sheline, who resigned from the State Department to protest policies under former president Joe Biden and is now at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said it was critical for Trump to enforce the ceasefire. She noted Israel has bombed Lebanon and Gaza during truces, saying Netanyahu believed he enjoyed "America's unconditional support." "Trump demonstrated that he can rein in Israel when he chooses to do so. Now he must do the same to insist on a ceasefire in Gaza," she said. A view of the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility in central Iran after US military strikes AFP The rubble of a destroyed building in Tel Aviv after an Iranian strike that hit a residential neighborhood during the 12-day conflict AFP

Pentagon's Own Report Determined Iran's Nuclear Sites Were Just Damaged Despite Trump Insisting They Were 'Obliterated': Report
Pentagon's Own Report Determined Iran's Nuclear Sites Were Just Damaged Despite Trump Insisting They Were 'Obliterated': Report

Int'l Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Pentagon's Own Report Determined Iran's Nuclear Sites Were Just Damaged Despite Trump Insisting They Were 'Obliterated': Report

A Pentagon report revealed that the three Iranian nuclear facilities struck by the U.S. in last week's attack were damaged but not obliterated, directly contradicting assertions made by President Donald Trump regarding the strikes. The report was created by the Pentagon's intelligence agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, using an assessment of the sites attacked conducted by U.S. Central Command, reported CNN. The analysis of the damage reportedly confutes Trump's statements in which he claimed that the Iranian nuclear facilities hit were "completely and totally obliterated." "So the [DIA] assessment is that the U.S. set them back maybe a few months, tops," a source familiar with Iran's nuclear stockpile told CNN. This information was vehemently denied by the White House. "This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to CNN. "Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration," she insisted. Furthermore, the U.S. military has referred to the operation as an "overwhelming success." The three sites hit in the attacks, Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, sustained severe damage in their aboveground structures, leading Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to reiterate that Iran's nuclear facilities "have been obliterated." "Based on everything we have seen — and I've seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons. Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission," Hegseth told the outlet. Originally published on Latin Times

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store